Abstract It is well-known that the problem of the collision between two particles interacting according to the inverse square law is exactly soluble on the wave mechanics, and that the solution yields the same scattering laws as the classical theory. If, however, the two particles are identical, e.g., two electrons or two α-particles, this is not necessarily the case; for the wave functions used must be antisymmetrical or symmetrical in the co-ordinates of the two particles; and this may affect the scattering laws. In this paper we shall discuss the collision between two particles possessing spin, such as electrons, and also between two particles without spin, such as α-particles. Assuming an inverse square law force between the particles, and neglecting the actual spin forces, we shall deduce from the symmetry properties of the wave functions a scattering law differing considerably from the classical. We shall also mention the various methods by which the effect could be observed, and give some experimental evidence in its favour. The application of the exclusion principle to collision problems has been discussed by the author in a previous paper. Suppose we wish to describe the motion of two particles interacting in any field of force. We obtain a solution w(r1 r2) of the wave equation, where r1 refers to the position of the first particle, and r2 to that of the second. If we did not use antisymmetrical wave functions, we should argue that the probability that the first particle should be at r1 and the second at r 2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2, and therefore the probability that one particle should be at r1 and the other at r2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2 + |w(r2 r1)|
Abstract It is well-known that the problem of the collision between two particles interacting according to the inverse square law is exactly soluble on the wave mechanics, and that the solution yields the same scattering laws as the classical theory. If, however, the two particles are identical, e.g., two electrons or two α-particles, this is not necessarily the case; for the wave functions used must be antisymmetrical or symmetrical in the co-ordinates of the two particles; and this may affect the scattering laws. In this paper we shall discuss the collision between two particles possessing spin, such as electrons, and also between two particles without spin, such as α-particles. Assuming an inverse square law force between the particles, and neglecting the actual spin forces, we shall deduce from the symmetry properties of the wave functions a scattering law differing considerably from the classical. We shall also mention the various methods by which the effect could be observed, and give some experimental evidence in its favour. The application of the exclusion principle to collision problems has been discussed by the author in a previous paper. Suppose we wish to describe the motion of two particles interacting in any field of force. We obtain a solution w(r1 r2) of the wave equation, where r1 refers to the position of the first particle, and r2 to that of the second. If we did not use antisymmetrical wave functions, we should argue that the probability that the first particle should be at r1 and the second at r 2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2, and therefore the probability that one particle should be at r1 and the other at r2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2 + |w(r2 r1)|
Abstract The problem of the collision of two particles which act upon each other with forces varying as the inverse square of the distance between them has been solved exactly on the basis of the new quantum mechanics, and the solution is the same as that given by classical mechanics. In a recent paper, however, Mott has pointed out that this agreement between the predictions of classical mechanics and wave mechanics depends upon the dissimilarity of the colliding particles; if the particles are identical the scattering laws given by the wave mechanics will be very different from those of classical theory. Mott has considered the two types of collision between similar particles, (1) in which the particles possess spin, such as the collisions of electrons with electrons or protons with hydrogen nuclei, and (2) in which the particles have no spin, such as the collisions of α-particles with helium nuclei.
Abstract One of the outstanding differences between classical theory and quantum mechanics is the importance which the latter attaches to the identity of particles. Although perfectly well realised before the introduction of modern quantum theory, the fact that two electrons are experimentally indistinguishable did not introduce any novel features into the dynamics of many electron systems on Bohr’s theory. However, Heisenberg showed that these identity relations are of fundamental importance in many body problems, and was able to explain the formerly very puzzling characteristic of the spectrum of neutral helium, its division into two non-combining term systems. Owing to the identity of the particles, the wave function representing such a system must have certain symmetry properties; for the particles known in Nature this symmetry characteristic is that the function be either symmetric or anti-symmetric in the co-ordinates of the particles. For particles with a spin such as the electron and proton, only antisymmetry is allowed (Pauli’s principle), while for α-particles the wave function must be symmetrical. Since Heisenberg’s explanation of the helium spectrum the theory of anti-symmetric electron wave functions has been extended to describe the general features of the spectra of all atoms, while it appears from the work of Heitler and London that the theory is of fundamental importance in the explanation of chemical combination between atoms. Again, in furnishing a new statistics it is an essential feature of the theory of metals. As the effect of the identity relations depends on the fact that exchanging the electrons does not alter the system in any way, these effects are known as exchange phenomena.
Abstract Section I.—The exclusion principle of Pauli was introduced into the old quantum theory as an empirical fact that had been brought to light in the ordering of spectra. The new mechanics has provided some sort of explanation of the principle, for in a closed system with many electrons the mathematically possible stationary states can be separated into a number of groups, with the property that transitions between stationary states in different groups cannot occur. One of these group is made up of the stationary states corresponding occur. One of the these groups is made up of the stationary states corresponding to wave functions that are antisymmetrical in the co-ordinates of the electrons. Apart from accidental degeneracies, the stationary states in different groups have different energy values. The exclusion principle then states that only energy values belonging to the antisymmertical group are found in nature. The exclusion principle has had great success not only in explaining the spectra of helium and of more complicated atoms, but also, under the form of the Fermi-Dirac statistics, in accounting for metallic conduction and ferromagnetism. In all these phenomena we are dealing with systems is stationary states, possessing energy values which are discrete, although they may lie very close together. Now, as was first emphasised by Oppenheimer, we must also use antisymmetrical wave-functions to describe aperiodic phenomena, such as the collision between an electron and an atom. If we do not, we obtain probabilities for the formation of atoms whose wave-funtions are not antisymmetrical, as we shall show in section 4, where we consider the collision between an electron and a helium atom. A helium atom described by a symmetrical wave-function would show a singlet series in palce of the observed triplets and triplet series in place of the observed singlets. The wave-functions of open systems are essentially degenerate; the symmetical and antisymmetrical solution are not separated from one another by a finite energy difference; but for any arbitrary value of the energy (and of the other integrals of the motion) we can form a symmetrical and an antisymmetrical solution. This is somewhat fundamental difference between open and closed systems. For closed systems containing two electrons there exist only the symmetrical and the antisymmetical solution; but for open systems we might take any combination of the two. In fact, to describe an observable phenomenon such as a collision, the wave-function that it would first occur to us to use is a combination of the two. To fix our ideas we shall discuss the collision between two electrons. Our arguments could equally well be applied to the collision between an electron and a hydrogen atom, the problem originally discussed by Born; but the former is the simpler case, and perhaps illustrates our theory better.
Abstract 1. In a previous paper, the author has shown that the anomalous scattering of α-particles in helium can be accounted for, if one postulates the validity of the wave mechanics to describe the phenomenon, and assumes a simple spherically symmetrical form for the field between the two colliding particles. The solutions obtained were exact, no approximate methods being used, but only the scattering at large angles, 34° and 45°, was considered. The purpose of this paper is threefold. Firstly, these results are extended to the case of the scattering of α-particles by hydrogen, and good agreement with experiment is obtained. Secondly, it is shown that the scattering at small angles both in hydrogen and in helium can be explained by the same field as is used to explain the scattering at large angles. It is therefore no longer necessary to assume a “plate-like” form for the α-particle, in order to explain the scattering at small angles, as formerly according to the classical mechanics. Thirdly, a discussion is given of the extent to which the explanation here advanced for the experimental results is dependent on the particular form assumed for the potential energy of the one particle in the field of the other. It is found that, provided we assume that the potential energy, V(r), is Coulombian for distances greater than about 5 X 10-13 cm., then whatever the form of the potential for smaller distances, the ratio, R, of the scattering to that to be expected from a purely Coulombian field is given by the formula R = |e-i/ak. logcos2א + iak cos2 א (e2iK0— 1)|2, where the scattering is in hydrogen, א is angle of scattering, and ak = hv/4πє2. A similar formula is found for the scattering in helium. The formula contains only one parameter, K0, which depends on the velocity of the incident α-particles, v, and also on the field assumed, but is independent of the angle of scattering, א. Thus we may determine K0 from the observed scattering for a given value of v and of א, and deduce the scattering at other angles for the same value of the velocity. The agreement obtained with experiment is then quite independent of any special choice of a potential energy function. In order to calculate K0 and its variation with v, we should have to assume a particular form for V(r) Conversely, from the values of K0 determined by the experimental values of R, we may calculate V(r) as in the previous paper for the case of two α-particles. 2. The Scattering Formula for Hydrogen.—In the experiments on the scattering by hydrogen, it is found convenient to count the scintillations due to the hydrogen nuclei projected forward by the collision rather than those due to the deflected α-particles themselves, and therefore in this portion of the paper we shall denote by It the ratio of the number of protons found experimentally to be projected in a given direction, to the number predicted by the Rutherford law. The fact that R refers to the particles struck on from rest makes a considerable simplification in the collision relations, for if we consider the collision of two particles of mass m1 and m2, of which m1 is initially at rest, and if we denote by א the angle made by the final direction of motion of this particle with the incident direction of m2, and by θ the angle through which either particle is deflected, measured in a frame of reference moving with the velocity of the centre of gravity of the two particles, then א = ½ (π - 0), (1) independently of the ratio m1/m2. The relation between the angle θ and the angle ϕ, through which the incident particle m2 is deflected, is on the other hand dependent on the relative masses of the particles.
Abstract In the present work the wave mechanics are applied to the discussion of a collision problem of a more complicated type than has, I think, hitherto been done. Though there is nothing very new in the process it is rather interesting to see how a wave function behaves which involves two bodies, and is therefore outside our ordinary space intuitions. But the work had a much more general aim, as an attempt to see whether a sharper line of demarcation could be drawn between the particle-like and the wave-like properties of matter. Put briefly, I take a problem which would be regarded at first sight as irreconcilable with a pure wave theory, but thoroughly typical of the behaviour of particles, and show how in fact the correct result arises naturally from the consideration of wave alone. I have been led in this way to certain not very original speculation on the basis of the quantum theory and these are given at the end of the paper. These are not in the least intended to be a general formulation of the theory, but rather as an examination of a particular type of attempted formulation. I fear that the views expressed will be found partly obvious and perhaps partly inconsistent or even erroneous. My excuse for giving them is that the quantum theory seem already sufficiently developed for us to attempt something more than a mathematical formulation of it, and that a generally accepted physical understanding will be more quickly reached by agreement or disagreement with expressed opinions, than by waiting for the arrival of a full-grown theory. It has been an extraordinarily difficult task to express the ideas I intended, and I wish to thank Prof. D. R. Hartree for many valuable criticisms of my first attempts to do so, though he must be exonerated from all blame if the final result is unintelligible or erroneous. 1. The quantum mechanics have been expressed in a variety of ways, which place the emphasis differently, but it has been shown that they are all exactly equivalent, so what may choose which we will. I shall use the following description, limiting myself to the simpler cases which do not involve considerations of relativity. We take a partial differential equation of the wave type, set down according to certain rules depending on the particular system considered. We solve this subject to certain boundary conditions, expressive of all the limitations imposed by silts, mirrors, diffraction, gratings, moving shutters, etc., that may occur in the proposed system, and obtain as result the wave function Ψ, a function of all the co-ordinates of the system and of the time. From this we from a set of functions, of which the simplest is |Ψ|2; this process may be called taking the intensities. We next have to prepare for the particle aspect, by applying certain rules so as to normalise the intensities, a process entirely foreign to the idea of waves. Finally, we make the interpretation, in which we say that the normalised intensities measure the probability of the particles having such and such positions, momenta, energies, etc., and these are the results verified by observation.
Abstract 1. Gordon has proved that the scattering of particles by an inverse square field is the same on the wave mechanics as on the classical theory. Mott has however shown, from consideration of the symmetry of the wave functions, that the scattering is quite different from the classical when the scattering and scattered particles are identical. The scattering of alpha particles by helium is typical of the case of the collision of identical particles that have no pin and obey the Einstein-Bose statistics. For this case, the expression given by Mott for the number of alpha particles scattered between angles θ, and θ +dθ, in going a distance dr in a gas containing n atoms per unit volume, is N dθ dr = 4πnN0e4/m2v4 {cosec4 θ + sec4 θ + 2 cosec2 θ sec2 θ cos u} dθ dr, (1) where u = 8/137 c/v log cot θ, (2) and N0 is the total number of incident particles, v, m and e, their initial velocity, mass and charge and c the velocity of light.