© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Interferometers

George Jaroszkiewicz

Published Jul 13, 2023• 0 citations

Abstract

Interferometers IntroductionThe discussion of modules and computerization in previous chapters gives us the means to consider empirically useful quantized detector networks (QDN).In this chapter we shall focus on a particular class of network known as interferometers.Interferometers play a crucial role in quantum mechanics (QM) because they demonstrate the "paradox" of wave-particle duality in a direct way.On the one hand, discrete signals are detected by the observer and those signals are usually interpreted as particles or quanta.On the other hand, the observed frequencies built up over many runs show effects interpreted as due to the interference of waves.In the previous chapter, we used computer algebra (CA) to discuss the Wollaston interferometer (WI), a relatively simple interferometer.We shall use the same approach in the following discussion of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), apparatus that allows the observer to investigate optical transmission through various materials. The Mach-Zehnder InterferometerThe basic structure of an MZI is given in Figure 13.1.A source S of light sends a monochromatic, unpolarized beam 1 0 into one input channel of beam splitter B 1 .Output channel 1 1 is deflected by mirror M 1 onto a module labeled φ that contains some medium under investigation, such as a crystal or liquid.The net effect is to create a phase change in that deflected beam by an amount φ, and then that modified beam, 1 2 , is passed into beam splitter B 2 .The second output channel, 2 1 , from B 1 , meanwhile, is deflected by mirror M 2 into beam splitter B 2 .The two deflected beams, 1 2 and 2 2 , that pass into B 2 interfere and are finally monitored by detectors 1 3 and 2 3 .Our analysis of the MZI follows the CA approach used for the WI in the previous chapter.

DOI: 10.1017/9781009401432.014

Related papers

The Mach–Zehnder Interferometer

William J. Mullin

The chapter discusses the Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI), which uses beam splitters in combination with mirrors to place a photon into a superposition of paths. In a final beam splitter, the two paths may be recombined to interfere, showing wave behavior. If the final beam splitter is removed, the photon is definitely in one path or the other, showing particle behavior. The polarization of light allows additional applications—one can use a polarizing beam splitter to separate and reconstitute the wave functions of a photon polarized at an angle. In a delayed-choice experiment, one decides which kind of experiment one is to do, particle or wave, after the photon has already entered the arms of the MZI. The chapter discusses a version of this that puts the MZI and a second-detector photon in an entangled state of particle and wave results.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Mar 16, 2017•3 citations

The Double-Slit & the Mach-Zehnder Interferometer: Re-visiting through Asymmetry

Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri

It is generally believed that the “mystery” behind understanding Quantum Mechanics (QM) and the global drives to construct quantum computers using “Entanglement”, can be understood from how the two-beam superposition effect (SE) emerges out of a 2-slit, and a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI). This chapter rehabilitates the classical analyses of these two superposition effects, while exploiting functional asymmetries, either deliberately introduced or intrinsic in the two-beam apparatuses. We are using mathematical formalism already well-established in classical optics since 1800’s, but with the extra emphasis that any final data generation requires some real physical interaction between the detector and the two light signals simultaneously stimulating the detecting molecules. This critical step of physical interaction process is not explicitly underscored by either the classical or the quantum physics. However, the asymmetry, either in the propagation or in the interaction process, is utilized to bring out the contradictions with the QM interpretations. For the 2-slit system, we deliberately introduce asymmetry on one of the slits. For MZI, the asymmetry is already built into the classical reflection property of a typical beams splitter.

Book Publisher International (a part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International)•Apr 20, 2023•3 citations

Quantum entanglement—introduction

Vlatko Vedral

Abstract The Mach–Zehnder interferometer experiment described earlier shows why and how quantum mechanics is different from classical mechanics. A photon sent through a beam splitter behaves like a particle when it is observed by only one of the two detectors. When two beam splitters are used, the photon “interferes with itself” and behaves like a wave. This is the so-called wave-particle duality of quantum mechanics which leads to quantum entanglement. This chapter discusses quantum superpositions when two or more particles are present. Understanding and analysing entanglement is one of the most interesting directions in the field of quantum information. First, a historical background of quantum entanglement is given, followed by a discussion on Bell's inequalities, separable states that do not violate Bell's inequalities, pure states that violate Bell's inequalities, mixed states that do not violate Bell's inequalities, and entanglement in second quantisation.

•Sep 28, 2006•0 citations

Double-Slit Experiments

George Jaroszkiewicz

Introduction In this chapter we show how the quantized detector network (QDN) formalism describes the double-slit (DS) experiment. This is arguably the simplest experiment that demonstrates quantum affects such as wave–particle duality and quantum interference. It continues to be the focus of much debate and experiment (Mardari, 2005), because theoretical modeling of what is going on reflects current understanding of quantum physics and hence physical reality.We will apply QDN to two variants: the original DS experiment and the monitored DS experiment, where an attempt is made to determine the imagined path of the particle. The DS experiment is widely acknowledged by physicists to be of importance to the understanding of quantum mechanics (QM). So much so that in 2002, the single electron version, first performed by Merli, Missiroli, and Pozzi (Merli et al., 1976), was voted by readers of Physics World to be “the most beautiful experiment in physics” (Rosa, 2012). The DS experiment can be discussed in terms of three stages, shown in Figure 10.1. By the end of the preparation stage, Σ 0 , a monochromatic beam of light or particles has been prepared by a source P , such as a laser. The beam emerges from point O and then passes through an information void V 1 to the first stage, Σ 1 , which consists of a wall or barrier W . This wall has two openings denoted A and B that allow parts of the beam to pass through into another information void V 2 and onto the second and final stage Σ 2 , which consists of a detecting screen S . The screen S is in general some material that can absorb and record particle impacts. In reality, any screen will consist of a finite number of signal detectors, such as photosensitive molecules, but the typical QM modeling is done as if there were a continuum of sites on the screen, such as C , that could register particles.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 28, 2017•0 citations

Weak-measurement Mach-Zehnder interferometer for testing wave-particle duality

Zhi‐Yuan Li

\n\nThe Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) is a regular yet simple instrument to test wave-particle duality. One key device in a standard MZI is the beam splitter 2 (BS2). Here we make a simple quantum mechanics analysis about the wave function evolution and find that the strong and exclusive interaction of BS2 with the incident microscopic particle beam (photons, electrons, etc.) is the fundamental reason why standard MZIs could not allow for the simultaneous observation of wave and particle properties of these particles. A weak-measurement (WM) MZI setup is then proposed, where BS2 is replaced with a deliberately designed highly transparent interference screen operating via either weak absorption or weak-scattering effect. Quantum-mechanical analysis on this WM-MZI shows that the overall power to make simultaneous observation of interference fringe (wave nature) and which-path information (particle nature) of microscopic particles can be significantly enhanced compared with the standard MZIs.\n

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Mar 1, 2017•7 citations

The Controlled Phase Shifts of Photons in the Mach-Zehnder Interferometer

Jiří Stávek

The Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) is a two-path phase-to-intensity transducer that becomes "mysterious" mainly when one conflates operational facts, minimal predictive calculus, and ontological storytelling.Controlled phase shifts are the central "knob" of the MZI: a tunable relative phase Φ converts directly into complementary output intensities at the two ports.In this model, photons enter the MZI with classical instructions: the "white" photons with E 2 = 1 (where E is the electric field of the sinusoidal electromagnetic wave at the given moment) are reflected on the beamsplitters, the "grey" photons with E 2 = 0.5 can be both reflected and transmitted through the beamsplitters (with 50:50 ratio), and the "black" photons with E 2 = 0 transmit through the beamsplitters.The movable mirrors and the second beamsplitter modify the "color" of photons.The 50:50 mixture of "white" and "black" photons at the input is separated by the first beamsplitter.The phase shifts are modified by movable mirrors so that the second beamsplitter organizes the resulting structure of photons at the two detectors.The interference patterns have been formed from two sub-ensembles of photons with their relative phase shift ΔΦ = π at the given port.We assume that this classical behavior of photons in the MZI can clarify the "riddle-like" discussions (e.g., delayed choice switching, the meaning of a dark port, and the role of which-way information).

Open Access Journal of Physics•Mar 10, 2026•0 citations

Interferometers IntroductionThe discussion of modules and computerization in previous chapters gives us the means to consider empirically useful quantized detector networks (QDN).In this chapter we shall focus on a particular class of network known as interferometers.Interferometers play a crucial role in quantum mechanics (QM) because they demonstrate the "paradox" of wave-particle duality in a direct way.On the one hand, discrete signals are detected by the observer and those signals are usually interpreted as particles or quanta.On the other hand, the observed frequencies built up over many runs show effects interpreted as due to the interference of waves.In the previous chapter, we used computer algebra (CA) to discuss the Wollaston interferometer (WI), a relatively simple interferometer.We shall use the same approach in the following discussion of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), apparatus that allows the observer to investigate optical transmission through various materials. The Mach-Zehnder InterferometerThe basic structure of an MZI is given in Figure 13.1.A source S of light sends a monochromatic, unpolarized beam 1 0 into one input channel of beam splitter B 1 .Output channel 1 1 is deflected by mirror M 1 onto a module labeled φ that contains some medium under investigation, such as a crystal or liquid.The net effect is to create a phase change in that deflected beam by an amount φ, and then that modified beam, 1 2 , is passed into beam splitter B 2 .The second output channel, 2 1 , from B 1 , meanwhile, is deflected by mirror M 2 into beam splitter B 2 .The two deflected beams, 1 2 and 2 2 , that pass into B 2 interfere and are finally monitored by detectors 1 3 and 2 3 .Our analysis of the MZI follows the CA approach used for the WI in the previous chapter.

The chapter discusses the Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI), which uses beam splitters in combination with mirrors to place a photon into a superposition of paths. In a final beam splitter, the two paths may be recombined to interfere, showing wave behavior. If the final beam splitter is removed, the photon is definitely in one path or the other, showing particle behavior. The polarization of light allows additional applications—one can use a polarizing beam splitter to separate and reconstitute the wave functions of a photon polarized at an angle. In a delayed-choice experiment, one decides which kind of experiment one is to do, particle or wave, after the photon has already entered the arms of the MZI. The chapter discusses a version of this that puts the MZI and a second-detector photon in an entangled state of particle and wave results.

It is generally believed that the “mystery” behind understanding Quantum Mechanics (QM) and the global drives to construct quantum computers using “Entanglement”, can be understood from how the two-beam superposition effect (SE) emerges out of a 2-slit, and a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI). This chapter rehabilitates the classical analyses of these two superposition effects, while exploiting functional asymmetries, either deliberately introduced or intrinsic in the two-beam apparatuses. We are using mathematical formalism already well-established in classical optics since 1800’s, but with the extra emphasis that any final data generation requires some real physical interaction between the detector and the two light signals simultaneously stimulating the detecting molecules. This critical step of physical interaction process is not explicitly underscored by either the classical or the quantum physics. However, the asymmetry, either in the propagation or in the interaction process, is utilized to bring out the contradictions with the QM interpretations. For the 2-slit system, we deliberately introduce asymmetry on one of the slits. For MZI, the asymmetry is already built into the classical reflection property of a typical beams splitter.

Abstract The Mach–Zehnder interferometer experiment described earlier shows why and how quantum mechanics is different from classical mechanics. A photon sent through a beam splitter behaves like a particle when it is observed by only one of the two detectors. When two beam splitters are used, the photon “interferes with itself” and behaves like a wave. This is the so-called wave-particle duality of quantum mechanics which leads to quantum entanglement. This chapter discusses quantum superpositions when two or more particles are present. Understanding and analysing entanglement is one of the most interesting directions in the field of quantum information. First, a historical background of quantum entanglement is given, followed by a discussion on Bell's inequalities, separable states that do not violate Bell's inequalities, pure states that violate Bell's inequalities, mixed states that do not violate Bell's inequalities, and entanglement in second quantisation.

Introduction In this chapter we show how the quantized detector network (QDN) formalism describes the double-slit (DS) experiment. This is arguably the simplest experiment that demonstrates quantum affects such as wave–particle duality and quantum interference. It continues to be the focus of much debate and experiment (Mardari, 2005), because theoretical modeling of what is going on reflects current understanding of quantum physics and hence physical reality.We will apply QDN to two variants: the original DS experiment and the monitored DS experiment, where an attempt is made to determine the imagined path of the particle. The DS experiment is widely acknowledged by physicists to be of importance to the understanding of quantum mechanics (QM). So much so that in 2002, the single electron version, first performed by Merli, Missiroli, and Pozzi (Merli et al., 1976), was voted by readers of Physics World to be “the most beautiful experiment in physics” (Rosa, 2012). The DS experiment can be discussed in terms of three stages, shown in Figure 10.1. By the end of the preparation stage, Σ 0 , a monochromatic beam of light or particles has been prepared by a source P , such as a laser. The beam emerges from point O and then passes through an information void V 1 to the first stage, Σ 1 , which consists of a wall or barrier W . This wall has two openings denoted A and B that allow parts of the beam to pass through into another information void V 2 and onto the second and final stage Σ 2 , which consists of a detecting screen S . The screen S is in general some material that can absorb and record particle impacts. In reality, any screen will consist of a finite number of signal detectors, such as photosensitive molecules, but the typical QM modeling is done as if there were a continuum of sites on the screen, such as C , that could register particles.

\n\nThe Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) is a regular yet simple instrument to test wave-particle duality. One key device in a standard MZI is the beam splitter 2 (BS2). Here we make a simple quantum mechanics analysis about the wave function evolution and find that the strong and exclusive interaction of BS2 with the incident microscopic particle beam (photons, electrons, etc.) is the fundamental reason why standard MZIs could not allow for the simultaneous observation of wave and particle properties of these particles. A weak-measurement (WM) MZI setup is then proposed, where BS2 is replaced with a deliberately designed highly transparent interference screen operating via either weak absorption or weak-scattering effect. Quantum-mechanical analysis on this WM-MZI shows that the overall power to make simultaneous observation of interference fringe (wave nature) and which-path information (particle nature) of microscopic particles can be significantly enhanced compared with the standard MZIs.\n

The Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) is a two-path phase-to-intensity transducer that becomes "mysterious" mainly when one conflates operational facts, minimal predictive calculus, and ontological storytelling.Controlled phase shifts are the central "knob" of the MZI: a tunable relative phase Φ converts directly into complementary output intensities at the two ports.In this model, photons enter the MZI with classical instructions: the "white" photons with E 2 = 1 (where E is the electric field of the sinusoidal electromagnetic wave at the given moment) are reflected on the beamsplitters, the "grey" photons with E 2 = 0.5 can be both reflected and transmitted through the beamsplitters (with 50:50 ratio), and the "black" photons with E 2 = 0 transmit through the beamsplitters.The movable mirrors and the second beamsplitter modify the "color" of photons.The 50:50 mixture of "white" and "black" photons at the input is separated by the first beamsplitter.The phase shifts are modified by movable mirrors so that the second beamsplitter organizes the resulting structure of photons at the two detectors.The interference patterns have been formed from two sub-ensembles of photons with their relative phase shift ΔΦ = π at the given port.We assume that this classical behavior of photons in the MZI can clarify the "riddle-like" discussions (e.g., delayed choice switching, the meaning of a dark port, and the role of which-way information).