Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Oxford University Press eBooks

The Mach–Zehnder Interferometer

William J. Mullin

Published Mar 16, 2017• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The chapter discusses the Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI), which uses beam splitters in combination with mirrors to place a photon into a superposition of paths. In a final beam splitter, the two paths may be recombined to interfere, showing wave behavior. If the final beam splitter is removed, the photon is definitely in one path or the other, showing particle behavior. The polarization of light allows additional applications—one can use a polarizing beam splitter to separate and reconstitute the wave functions of a photon polarized at an angle. In a delayed-choice experiment, one decides which kind of experiment one is to do, particle or wave, after the photon has already entered the arms of the MZI. The chapter discusses a version of this that puts the MZI and a second-detector photon in an entangled state of particle and wave results.

DOI
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795131.003.0006

Related papers

The Mach-Zehnder interferometer and photon dualism

Paul A. Klevgard

The Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) is used to illustrate the long-standing wave-particle duality problem. How can the photon divide at the first beam splitter and yet terminate on either arm with its undiminished energy? Why is which-way (welcher weg) information incompatible with wave interference? How do we explain Wheeler’s delayed choice experiment? The position adopted is that the photon has two identities, one supporting particle features and the other wave features. There is photon kinetic energy that never splits (on half-silvered mirrors) or diffracts (in pinholes or slits). Then there is photon probability waves that do diffract and can reinforce or cancel. Interpretations of these two identities are suggested.

•Aug 21, 2020•4 citations

Entanglement-Enabled Delayed-Choice Experiment

Florian Kaiser, T. Coudreau, P. Milman +2 more

Wave-particle complementarity is one of the most intriguing features of quantum physics. To emphasize this measurement apparatus-dependent nature, experiments have been performed in which the output beam splitter of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer is inserted or removed after a photon has already entered the device. A recent extension suggested using a quantum beam splitter at the interferometer's output; we achieve this using pairs of polarization-entangled photons. One photon is tested in the interferometer and is detected, whereas the other allows us to determine whether wave, particle, or intermediate behaviors have been observed. Furthermore, this experiment allows us to continuously morph the tested photon's behavior from wavelike to particle-like, which illustrates the inadequacy of a naive wave or particle description of light.

arXiv:1206.4348•Science•Nov 1, 2012•200 citations

Experimental realization of Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment with dual selections

Xiaowan Yang, Xinglei Yu, Liangsheng Li +5 more

Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment demonstrates wave-particle duality of particles using different experimental configurations of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. In a quantum version of this experiment, the wave-particle behavior of photons can be observed by controlling presence or absence of the second beam splitter. Here, we implement a delayed-choice experiment with dual selections based on entangled photons, experimentally controlling both of two beam splitters in the Mach-Zehnder interferometer, where the presence and absence of the second beam splitter are simultaneously controlled through path encoding. Our experiment reveals the wave-particle behavior of single photons under different configurations of two beam splitters. We further discuss the scenario when two beam splitters are in a quantum superposition of being present and absent, photons will be in a wave-particle quantum superposition state.

quant-pharXiv:2610.01832•Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy•Oct 2, 2026•3 citations

Quantum Delayed-Choice Experiment with a Beam Splitter in a Quantum Superposition

Shi‐Biao Zheng, Youpeng Zhong, Kai Xu +7 more

A quantum system can behave as a wave or as a particle, depending on the experimental arrangement. When, for example, measuring a photon using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, the photon acts as a wave if the second beam splitter is inserted, but as a particle if this beam splitter is omitted. The decision of whether or not to insert this beam splitter can be made after the photon has entered the interferometer, as in Wheeler's famous delayed-choice thought experiment. In recent quantum versions of this experiment, this decision is controlled by a quantum ancilla, while the beam splitter is itself still a classical object. Here, we propose and realize a variant of the quantum delayed-choice experiment. We configure a superconducting quantum circuit as a Ramsey interferometer, where the element that acts as the first beam splitter can be put in a quantum superposition of its active and inactive states, as verified by the negative values of its Wigner function. We show that this enables the wave and particle aspects of the system to be observed with a single setup, without involving an ancilla that is not itself a part of the interferometer. We also study the transition of this quantum beam splitter from a quantum to a classical object due to decoherence, as observed by monitoring the interferometer output.

arXiv:1403.0203•Physical Review Letters•Dec 28, 2015•36 citations

Interferometers

George Jaroszkiewicz

Interferometers IntroductionThe discussion of modules and computerization in previous chapters gives us the means to consider empirically useful quantized detector networks (QDN).In this chapter we shall focus on a particular class of network known as interferometers.Interferometers play a crucial role in quantum mechanics (QM) because they demonstrate the "paradox" of wave-particle duality in a direct way.On the one hand, discrete signals are detected by the observer and those signals are usually interpreted as particles or quanta.On the other hand, the observed frequencies built up over many runs show effects interpreted as due to the interference of waves.In the previous chapter, we used computer algebra (CA) to discuss the Wollaston interferometer (WI), a relatively simple interferometer.We shall use the same approach in the following discussion of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), apparatus that allows the observer to investigate optical transmission through various materials. The Mach-Zehnder InterferometerThe basic structure of an MZI is given in Figure 13.1.A source S of light sends a monochromatic, unpolarized beam 1 0 into one input channel of beam splitter B 1 .Output channel 1 1 is deflected by mirror M 1 onto a module labeled φ that contains some medium under investigation, such as a crystal or liquid.The net effect is to create a phase change in that deflected beam by an amount φ, and then that modified beam, 1 2 , is passed into beam splitter B 2 .The second output channel, 2 1 , from B 1 , meanwhile, is deflected by mirror M 2 into beam splitter B 2 .The two deflected beams, 1 2 and 2 2 , that pass into B 2 interfere and are finally monitored by detectors 1 3 and 2 3 .Our analysis of the MZI follows the CA approach used for the WI in the previous chapter.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jul 13, 2023•0 citations

Time-modulated Hamiltonian for interpreting Mach-Zehnder interferometer delayed-choice experiments

Zhiyuan Li

Many delayed-choice experiments based on Mach-Zehnder interferometers (MZI) have been thought and made to address the fundamental problem of wave-particle duality. Conventional wisdoms long hold that by inserting or removing the second beam splitter (BS2) in a controllable way, microscopic particles (photons, electrons, etc.) transporting within the MZI can lie in the quantum superposition of the wave and particle state as ψ=a_wψ_wave+a_pψ_particle. Here we present an alternative interpretation to these delayed-choice experiments. We notice that as all composite devices of MZI including BS2 are purely classical, the inserting and removing operation of BS2 imposes a time-modulated Hamiltonian H_mod(t)=a(t)H_in+b(t)H_out, instead of a quantum superposition of H_in and H_out as H=a_wH_in+b_pH_out, to act upon the incident wave function. Solution of this quantum scattering problem, rather than the long held quantum eigen-problem yields a synchronically time-modulated output wave function as ψ_mod=a(t)ψ_wave+b(t)ψ_particle. As a result, the probability of particle output from the MZI behaves as if they are in the superposition of the wave and particle state when many events over time accumulation are counted and averaged. We expect these elementary but insightful analyses will shed a new light on exploring basic physics beyond the long-held wisdom of wave-particle duality and principle of complementarity.

arXiv:1601.00378•Jan 4, 2016•0 citations
The chapter discusses the Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI), which uses beam splitters in combination with mirrors to place a photon into a superposition of paths. In a final beam splitter, the two paths may be recombined to interfere, showing wave behavior. If the final beam splitter is removed, the photon is definitely in one path or the other, showing particle behavior. The polarization of light allows additional applications—one can use a polarizing beam splitter to separate and reconstitute the wave functions of a photon polarized at an angle. In a delayed-choice experiment, one decides which kind of experiment one is to do, particle or wave, after the photon has already entered the arms of the MZI. The chapter discusses a version of this that puts the MZI and a second-detector photon in an entangled state of particle and wave results.
The Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) is used to illustrate the long-standing wave-particle duality problem. How can the photon divide at the first beam splitter and yet terminate on either arm with its undiminished energy? Why is which-way (welcher weg) information incompatible with wave interference? How do we explain Wheeler’s delayed choice experiment? The position adopted is that the photon has two identities, one supporting particle features and the other wave features. There is photon kinetic energy that never splits (on half-silvered mirrors) or diffracts (in pinholes or slits). Then there is photon probability waves that do diffract and can reinforce or cancel. Interpretations of these two identities are suggested.
Wave-particle complementarity is one of the most intriguing features of quantum physics. To emphasize this measurement apparatus-dependent nature, experiments have been performed in which the output beam splitter of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer is inserted or removed after a photon has already entered the device. A recent extension suggested using a quantum beam splitter at the interferometer's output; we achieve this using pairs of polarization-entangled photons. One photon is tested in the interferometer and is detected, whereas the other allows us to determine whether wave, particle, or intermediate behaviors have been observed. Furthermore, this experiment allows us to continuously morph the tested photon's behavior from wavelike to particle-like, which illustrates the inadequacy of a naive wave or particle description of light.
Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment demonstrates wave-particle duality of particles using different experimental configurations of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. In a quantum version of this experiment, the wave-particle behavior of photons can be observed by controlling presence or absence of the second beam splitter. Here, we implement a delayed-choice experiment with dual selections based on entangled photons, experimentally controlling both of two beam splitters in the Mach-Zehnder interferometer, where the presence and absence of the second beam splitter are simultaneously controlled through path encoding. Our experiment reveals the wave-particle behavior of single photons under different configurations of two beam splitters. We further discuss the scenario when two beam splitters are in a quantum superposition of being present and absent, photons will be in a wave-particle quantum superposition state.
A quantum system can behave as a wave or as a particle, depending on the experimental arrangement. When, for example, measuring a photon using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, the photon acts as a wave if the second beam splitter is inserted, but as a particle if this beam splitter is omitted. The decision of whether or not to insert this beam splitter can be made after the photon has entered the interferometer, as in Wheeler's famous delayed-choice thought experiment. In recent quantum versions of this experiment, this decision is controlled by a quantum ancilla, while the beam splitter is itself still a classical object. Here, we propose and realize a variant of the quantum delayed-choice experiment. We configure a superconducting quantum circuit as a Ramsey interferometer, where the element that acts as the first beam splitter can be put in a quantum superposition of its active and inactive states, as verified by the negative values of its Wigner function. We show that this enables the wave and particle aspects of the system to be observed with a single setup, without involving an ancilla that is not itself a part of the interferometer. We also study the transition of this quantum beam splitter from a quantum to a classical object due to decoherence, as observed by monitoring the interferometer output.
Interferometers IntroductionThe discussion of modules and computerization in previous chapters gives us the means to consider empirically useful quantized detector networks (QDN).In this chapter we shall focus on a particular class of network known as interferometers.Interferometers play a crucial role in quantum mechanics (QM) because they demonstrate the "paradox" of wave-particle duality in a direct way.On the one hand, discrete signals are detected by the observer and those signals are usually interpreted as particles or quanta.On the other hand, the observed frequencies built up over many runs show effects interpreted as due to the interference of waves.In the previous chapter, we used computer algebra (CA) to discuss the Wollaston interferometer (WI), a relatively simple interferometer.We shall use the same approach in the following discussion of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), apparatus that allows the observer to investigate optical transmission through various materials. The Mach-Zehnder InterferometerThe basic structure of an MZI is given in Figure 13.1.A source S of light sends a monochromatic, unpolarized beam 1 0 into one input channel of beam splitter B 1 .Output channel 1 1 is deflected by mirror M 1 onto a module labeled φ that contains some medium under investigation, such as a crystal or liquid.The net effect is to create a phase change in that deflected beam by an amount φ, and then that modified beam, 1 2 , is passed into beam splitter B 2 .The second output channel, 2 1 , from B 1 , meanwhile, is deflected by mirror M 2 into beam splitter B 2 .The two deflected beams, 1 2 and 2 2 , that pass into B 2 interfere and are finally monitored by detectors 1 3 and 2 3 .Our analysis of the MZI follows the CA approach used for the WI in the previous chapter.
Many delayed-choice experiments based on Mach-Zehnder interferometers (MZI) have been thought and made to address the fundamental problem of wave-particle duality. Conventional wisdoms long hold that by inserting or removing the second beam splitter (BS2) in a controllable way, microscopic particles (photons, electrons, etc.) transporting within the MZI can lie in the quantum superposition of the wave and particle state as ψ=a_wψ_wave+a_pψ_particle. Here we present an alternative interpretation to these delayed-choice experiments. We notice that as all composite devices of MZI including BS2 are purely classical, the inserting and removing operation of BS2 imposes a time-modulated Hamiltonian H_mod(t)=a(t)H_in+b(t)H_out, instead of a quantum superposition of H_in and H_out as H=a_wH_in+b_pH_out, to act upon the incident wave function. Solution of this quantum scattering problem, rather than the long held quantum eigen-problem yields a synchronically time-modulated output wave function as ψ_mod=a(t)ψ_wave+b(t)ψ_particle. As a result, the probability of particle output from the MZI behaves as if they are in the superposition of the wave and particle state when many events over time accumulation are counted and averaged. We expect these elementary but insightful analyses will shed a new light on exploring basic physics beyond the long-held wisdom of wave-particle duality and principle of complementarity.