\n\nThe Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) is a regular yet simple instrument to test wave-particle duality. One key device in a standard MZI is the beam splitter 2 (BS2). Here we make a simple quantum mechanics analysis about the wave function evolution and find that the strong and exclusive interaction of BS2 with the incident microscopic particle beam (photons, electrons, etc.) is the fundamental reason why standard MZIs could not allow for the simultaneous observation of wave and particle properties of these particles. A weak-measurement (WM) MZI setup is then proposed, where BS2 is replaced with a deliberately designed highly transparent interference screen operating via either weak absorption or weak-scattering effect. Quantum-mechanical analysis on this WM-MZI shows that the overall power to make simultaneous observation of interference fringe (wave nature) and which-path information (particle nature) of microscopic particles can be significantly enhanced compared with the standard MZIs.\n
\n\nThe Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) is a regular yet simple instrument to test wave-particle duality. One key device in a standard MZI is the beam splitter 2 (BS2). Here we make a simple quantum mechanics analysis about the wave function evolution and find that the strong and exclusive interaction of BS2 with the incident microscopic particle beam (photons, electrons, etc.) is the fundamental reason why standard MZIs could not allow for the simultaneous observation of wave and particle properties of these particles. A weak-measurement (WM) MZI setup is then proposed, where BS2 is replaced with a deliberately designed highly transparent interference screen operating via either weak absorption or weak-scattering effect. Quantum-mechanical analysis on this WM-MZI shows that the overall power to make simultaneous observation of interference fringe (wave nature) and which-path information (particle nature) of microscopic particles can be significantly enhanced compared with the standard MZIs.\n
Many delayed-choice experiments based on Mach-Zehnder interferometers (MZI) have been thought and made to address the fundamental problem of wave-particle duality. Conventional wisdoms long hold that by inserting or removing the second beam splitter (BS2) in a controllable way, microscopic particles (photons, electrons, etc.) transporting within the MZI can lie in the quantum superposition of the wave and particle state as ψ=a_wψ_wave+a_pψ_particle. Here we present an alternative interpretation to these delayed-choice experiments. We notice that as all composite devices of MZI including BS2 are purely classical, the inserting and removing operation of BS2 imposes a time-modulated Hamiltonian H_mod(t)=a(t)H_in+b(t)H_out, instead of a quantum superposition of H_in and H_out as H=a_wH_in+b_pH_out, to act upon the incident wave function. Solution of this quantum scattering problem, rather than the long held quantum eigen-problem yields a synchronically time-modulated output wave function as ψ_mod=a(t)ψ_wave+b(t)ψ_particle. As a result, the probability of particle output from the MZI behaves as if they are in the superposition of the wave and particle state when many events over time accumulation are counted and averaged. We expect these elementary but insightful analyses will shed a new light on exploring basic physics beyond the long-held wisdom of wave-particle duality and principle of complementarity.
According to the orthodox interpretation of quantum physics, wave-particle duality (WPD) is the intrinsic property of all massive microscopic particles. All gedanken or realistic experiments based on atom interferometers (AI) have so far upheld the principle of WPD, either by the mechanism of the Heisenberg’s position-momentum uncertainty relation or by quantum entanglement. In this paper, we propose and make a systematic quantum mechanical analysis of several schemes of weak-measurement atom interferometer (WM-AI) and compare them with the historical schemes of strong-measurement atom interferometer (SM-AI), such as Einstein’s recoiling slit and Feynman’s light microscope. As the critical part of these WM-AI setups, a weak-measurement path detector (WM-PD) deliberately interacting with the atomic internal electronic quantum states is designed and used to probe the which-path information of the atom, while only inducing negligible perturbation of the atomic center-of-mass motion. Another instrument that is used to directly interact with the atomic center-of-mass while being insensitive to the internal electronic quantum states is used to monitor the atomic center-of-mass interference pattern. Two typical schemes of WM-PD are considered. The first is the micromaser-cavity path detector, which allows us to probe the spontaneously emitted microwave photon from the incoming Rydberg atom in its excited electronic state and record unanimously the which-path information of the atom. The second is the optical-lattice Bragg-grating path detector, which can split the incoming atom beam into two different directions as determined by the internal electronic state and thus encode the which-path information of the atom into the internal states of the atom. We have used standard quantum mechanics to analyze the evolution of the atomic center-of-mass and internal electronic state wave function by directly solving Schrödinger’s equation for the composite atom-electron-photon system in these WM-AIs . We have also compared our analysis with the theoretical and experimental studies that have been presented in the previous literature. The results show that the two sets of instruments can work separately, collectively, and without mutual exclusion to enable simultaneous observation of both wave and particle nature of the atoms to a much higher level than the historical SM-AIs, while avoiding degradation from Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation and quantum entanglement. We have further investigated the space–time evolution of the internal electronic quantum state, as well as the combined atom–detector system and identified the microscopic origin and role of quantum entanglement, as emphasized in numerous previous studies. Based on these physics insights and theoretical analyses, we have proposed several new WM-AI schemes that can help to elucidate the puzzling physics of the WPD of the atoms. The principle of WM-AI scheme and quantum mechanical analyses made in this work can be directly extended to examine the principle of WPD for other massive particles.
Wave-particle duality of photons with losses in the Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) is investigated experimentally and theoretically. The experiment is done with the standard MZI with the beam splitter or the beam merger being continuously varied. The losses are deliberately introduced either inside the MZI (the two arms between the beam splitter and beam mergers) or outside the MZI (after the beam merger). It is proved that the unbalanced losses have great influence on the predictability P (particle nature) and visibility V (wave nature). For the former case the duality inequality holds while for the later the duality inequality is ``violated''. We get P2+V2>1. This ``violation'' could be eliminated in principle by switching the two paths and detectors and then averaging the results. The observed results can be exactly explained theoretically. The experiment is done with coherent beam, instead of single photons, and we have proved that they are exactly equivalent in duality experiment with MZI.
Many delayed-choice experiments based on Mach–Zehnder interferometers (MZI) have been considered and made to address the fundamental problem of wave-particle duality. Conventional wisdom long holds that by inserting or removing the second beam splitter (BS2) in a controllable way, microscopic particles (photons, electrons, etc.) transporting within the MZI can lie in the quantum superposition of the wave and particle state as ψ = a w ψ wave + a p ψ particle . Here we present an alternative interpretation to these delayed-choice experiments. We notice that as the BS2 is purely classical, the inserting and removing operation of the BS2 imposes a time-modulated Hamiltonian H mod (t) = a(t)H in + b(t)H out , instead of a quantum superposition of H in and H out as H = a w H in + a p H out , to act upon the incident wave function. Solution of this quantum scattering problem, rather than the long held quantum eigen-problem yields a synchronically time-modulated output wave function as ψ mod (t) = a(t)ψ wave + b(t)ψ particle , instead of the stationary quantum superposition state ψ = a w ψ wave + a p ψ particle . As a result, the probability of particle output from the MZI behaves as if they are in the superposition of the wave and particle state when many events over time accumulation are counted and averaged. We expect that these elementary but insightful analyses will shed a new light on exploring basic physics beyond the long-held wisdom of wave-particle duality and the principle of complementarity.
The chapter discusses the Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI), which uses beam splitters in combination with mirrors to place a photon into a superposition of paths. In a final beam splitter, the two paths may be recombined to interfere, showing wave behavior. If the final beam splitter is removed, the photon is definitely in one path or the other, showing particle behavior. The polarization of light allows additional applications—one can use a polarizing beam splitter to separate and reconstitute the wave functions of a photon polarized at an angle. In a delayed-choice experiment, one decides which kind of experiment one is to do, particle or wave, after the photon has already entered the arms of the MZI. The chapter discusses a version of this that puts the MZI and a second-detector photon in an entangled state of particle and wave results.
The Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) is used to illustrate the long-standing wave-particle duality problem. How can the photon divide at the first beam splitter and yet terminate on either arm with its undiminished energy? Why is which-way (welcher weg) information incompatible with wave interference? How do we explain Wheeler’s delayed choice experiment? The position adopted is that the photon has two identities, one supporting particle features and the other wave features. There is photon kinetic energy that never splits (on half-silvered mirrors) or diffracts (in pinholes or slits). Then there is photon probability waves that do diffract and can reinforce or cancel. Interpretations of these two identities are suggested.