Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Institute of Physics eBooks

The quantum processor circuit

Hafiz Md. Hasan Babu

Published Jun 1, 2023• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1088/978-0-7503-5683-1ch17

Related papers

Combining quantum processors with real-time classical communication

Almudena Carrera Vazquez, Caroline Tornow, Diego Ristè +3 more

Quantum computers process information with the laws of quantum mechanics. Current quantum hardware is noisy, can only store information for a short time and is limited to a few quantum bits, that is, qubits, typically arranged in a planar connectivity1. However, many applications of quantum computing require more connectivity than the planar lattice offered by the hardware on more qubits than is available on a single quantum processing unit (QPU). The community hopes to tackle these limitations by connecting QPUs using classical communication, which has not yet been proven experimentally. Here we experimentally realize error-mitigated dynamic circuits and circuit cutting to create quantum states requiring periodic connectivity using up to 142 qubits spanning two QPUs with 127 qubits each connected in real time with a classical link. In a dynamic circuit, quantum gates can be classically controlled by the outcomes of mid-circuit measurements within run-time, that is, within a fraction of the coherence time of the qubits. Our real-time classical link enables us to apply a quantum gate on one QPU conditioned on the outcome of a measurement on another QPU. Furthermore, the error-mitigated control flow enhances qubit connectivity and the instruction set of the hardware thus increasing the versatility of our quantum computers. Our work demonstrates that we can use several quantum processors as one with error-mitigated dynamic circuits enabled by a real-time classical link. A 142-qubit processor can be realized by connecting two smaller quantum processors using classical communications and circuit cutting.

arXiv:2402.17833•Nature•Nov 20, 2024•55 citations

Constant-Per-Layer-Depth MPS-Pretrained Ansatz for Noisy Distributed Quantum Processors

Seongpyo Hong, Woodo Lee, Yong-Su Kim +2 more

Distributed quantum processors could scale variational algorithms beyond single devices, but circuit depth, communication overhead, and noise limit their performance. We compare ladder, mixed-canonical, and brick-wall realizations of matrix-product-state (MPS) pretraining with matched per-layer two-qubit-block resources. Despite comparable ideal variational quantum eigensolver performance and gradient scales, the shallower brick-wall architecture reduces circuit duration, idle-time decoherence, and zero-noise-extrapolation (ZNE) overhead, yielding superior noisy and ZNE-assisted performance. We then extend MPS-pretrained circuits to modular processors with one communication qubit per quantum processing unit (QPU); a nearest-neighbor QPU-path schedule keeps the per-layer depth constant as QPUs are added. Distributed circuits whose inter-QPU links realize long-range interactions of the target Hamiltonian match or outperform the single-processor brick-wall under noise when communication idle time is short compared with the coherence time. These results establish hardware-aware co-design of tensor-network pretraining, circuit scheduling, and communication topology as a principle for variational quantum computation on noisy modular hardware.

quant-pharXiv:2610.01099•Oct 2, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Circuits

Colin P. Williams

Texts in computer science•Dec 6, 2010•0 citations

Quantum adder circuits

Hafiz Md. Hasan Babu

Institute of Physics eBooks•May 1, 2020•0 citations

(Ann. Phys. 4/2024)

Quantum Computing This cover image, related to article number 2300457 by Selçuk Çakmak and co-workers, illustrates the layers of a soft-core processor to execute RISC (reduced instruction set computer)-V instruction set architecture (RISC-V assembly code) on a quantum processing unit (QPU) based on superconducting qubits. The soft-core processor circuit layer represents a quantum circuit that realizes the example code on the QPU. As a result, the quantum computer (QC) writes the message on the QC terminal screen.

Annalen der Physik•Apr 1, 2024•0 citations

Quantum circuits

Dipankar Bhattacharyya, Jyotirmoy Guha

Institute of Physics eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations
Quantum computers process information with the laws of quantum mechanics. Current quantum hardware is noisy, can only store information for a short time and is limited to a few quantum bits, that is, qubits, typically arranged in a planar connectivity1. However, many applications of quantum computing require more connectivity than the planar lattice offered by the hardware on more qubits than is available on a single quantum processing unit (QPU). The community hopes to tackle these limitations by connecting QPUs using classical communication, which has not yet been proven experimentally. Here we experimentally realize error-mitigated dynamic circuits and circuit cutting to create quantum states requiring periodic connectivity using up to 142 qubits spanning two QPUs with 127 qubits each connected in real time with a classical link. In a dynamic circuit, quantum gates can be classically controlled by the outcomes of mid-circuit measurements within run-time, that is, within a fraction of the coherence time of the qubits. Our real-time classical link enables us to apply a quantum gate on one QPU conditioned on the outcome of a measurement on another QPU. Furthermore, the error-mitigated control flow enhances qubit connectivity and the instruction set of the hardware thus increasing the versatility of our quantum computers. Our work demonstrates that we can use several quantum processors as one with error-mitigated dynamic circuits enabled by a real-time classical link. A 142-qubit processor can be realized by connecting two smaller quantum processors using classical communications and circuit cutting.
Distributed quantum processors could scale variational algorithms beyond single devices, but circuit depth, communication overhead, and noise limit their performance. We compare ladder, mixed-canonical, and brick-wall realizations of matrix-product-state (MPS) pretraining with matched per-layer two-qubit-block resources. Despite comparable ideal variational quantum eigensolver performance and gradient scales, the shallower brick-wall architecture reduces circuit duration, idle-time decoherence, and zero-noise-extrapolation (ZNE) overhead, yielding superior noisy and ZNE-assisted performance. We then extend MPS-pretrained circuits to modular processors with one communication qubit per quantum processing unit (QPU); a nearest-neighbor QPU-path schedule keeps the per-layer depth constant as QPUs are added. Distributed circuits whose inter-QPU links realize long-range interactions of the target Hamiltonian match or outperform the single-processor brick-wall under noise when communication idle time is short compared with the coherence time. These results establish hardware-aware co-design of tensor-network pretraining, circuit scheduling, and communication topology as a principle for variational quantum computation on noisy modular hardware.
Quantum Computing This cover image, related to article number 2300457 by Selçuk Çakmak and co-workers, illustrates the layers of a soft-core processor to execute RISC (reduced instruction set computer)-V instruction set architecture (RISC-V assembly code) on a quantum processing unit (QPU) based on superconducting qubits. The soft-core processor circuit layer represents a quantum circuit that realizes the example code on the QPU. As a result, the quantum computer (QC) writes the message on the QC terminal screen.