© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

Is A Single Particle Always Entangled?

Shengwang Du

Published Apr 5, 2023• 0 citations

Abstract

We investigate the single-particle multi-mode "entanglement" and raise the questions: Is a single particle always entangled? Is entanglement a physical reality which is invariant under an arbitrary unitary transformation or choice of mode basis? We show that, if accepting the single-particle entanglement picture, a single particle can always be entangled by choosing a proper mode basis. This "mode entanglement", expressed as a superposition of single-particle mode basis, may have important applications in quantum information processing as it has some similar mathematical features as the multi-particle entanglement.

DOI: 10.1364/opticaopen.22557619

Related papers

Is A Single Particle Always Entangled?

Shengwang Du

We investigate the single-particle multi-mode "entanglement" and raise the questions: Is a single particle always entangled? Is entanglement a physical reality which is invariant under an arbitrary unitary transformation or choice of mode basis? We show that, if accepting the single-particle entanglement picture, a single particle can always be entangled by choosing a proper mode basis. This "mode entanglement", expressed as a superposition of single-particle mode basis, may have important applications in quantum information processing as it has some similar mathematical features as the multi-particle entanglement.

•Apr 5, 2023•0 citations

From Wavefunctional Entanglement to Entangled Wavefunctional Degrees of Freedom

Bhattacharya, Aniruddha

The question of whether entanglement between photons is equivalent to entanglement between their characteristic field modes, specifically, the single-particle wavefunctions that are composed and superposed to describe particles in such modes, is a key, open problem concerning multi-partite optical degrees of freedom, and has profound implications for topics ranging from quantum foundations to quantum computation. Here, I offer a fresh, deeper, physical insight into this subtle, albeit enduring, issue by describing a situation in which the entangling interactions between optical modes, namely, the wavefunctions, can be distilled into genuine entanglement between the physical, observable properties of the photons, which are the wavefunctional degrees of freedom. This theoretical observation also highlights the salience of the measurement context, especially, of clearly disambiguating between the choice of the quantum subsystem and the decision to measure an observable along a particular axis of measurement, while quantifying and transforming quantum optical entanglement. This theoretical observation might be applied to formulate a new class of protocols for performing quantum information tasks, using entangled photons within inseparable field modes.

arXiv:2507.04650•Jul 7, 2025•0 citations

Philosophy of Polarization-Path Entanglement in Quantum Optics

Artur Czerwiński

This paper explores the formal structure and philosophical implications of polarization-path entanglement in quantum optics, where different degrees of freedom of a single photon become entangled. We examine the mathematical conditions under which coherence is preserved or lost, emphasizing the role of distinguishability and information flow. The analysis is situated within major interpretational frameworks (including Copenhagen, Many-Worlds, QBism, and Bohmian mechanics) to evaluate whether such entanglement reflects physical reality or epistemic constraints. Finally, we discuss experimental realizations, relevance to quantum information processing, and open conceptual questions regarding the ontological status of single-particle entanglement.

Optics•Aug 18, 2025•2 citations

Factorization and Entanglement in Quantum Systems

Jon Eakins, George Jaroszkiewicz

We discuss the question of entanglement versus separability of pure quantum states in direct product Hilbert spaces, and the relevance of this issue to physics. Different types of separability may be possible, depending on the particular factorization of the Hilbert space. A given orthonormal basis set for a Hilbert space is defined to be of type (p,q) if p elements of the basis are entangled and q are separable, relative to a given bi-partite factorization of that space. We conjecture that not all basis types exist for a given Hilbert space. The phenomenon of entanglement is of central importance in the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Historically, entanglement was the focus of the famous Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paper [1], which suggested that standard quantum mechanics is an incomplete theory of physical reality. The central argument of the EPR paper was that more information about incompatible variables such as momentum and position could in principle be deduced about an entangled two particle quantum state than quantum mechanics permits, effectively giving information about each particle

•Oct 6, 2002•13 citations

Multi-particle entanglement and generalized N-particle teleportation using quantum statistical correlations

Kumar, Atul, Mangala Sunder Krishnan

Construction of multi-particle entangled states and direct teleportation of N-(spin 1/2) particles are important areas of quantum information processing. A number of different schemes which have been presented already, address the problem through controlled teleportation. In this article, a criterion based on standard quantum statistical correlations employed in the many body virial expansions is used to determine maximum entanglement for a N-particle state. These states remain entangled through proper traces to states for a smaller number of particles and can be generalized for arbitrary number of particles. It is shown that they are quite useful in generalized, N-particle, direct teleportation. The corresponding quantum gates are also indicated for teleportation schemes from simple computational basis states.

arXiv:0710.3476•Oct 18, 2007•0 citations

Single-particle entanglement

S. J. van Enk

I give a simple argument that demonstrates that the state $\ensuremath{\mid}0⟩\ensuremath{\mid}1⟩+\ensuremath{\mid}1⟩\ensuremath{\mid}0⟩$, with $\ensuremath{\mid}0⟩$ denoting a state with 0 particles (or photons) and $\ensuremath{\mid}1⟩$ a one-particle state, is entangled in spite of recent claims to the contrary. I also discuss viewpoints on the old controversy about whether the above state can be said to display single-particle or single-photon nonlocality.

arXiv:quant-ph/0507189•Physical Review A•Dec 29, 2005•212 citations

We investigate the single-particle multi-mode "entanglement" and raise the questions: Is a single particle always entangled? Is entanglement a physical reality which is invariant under an arbitrary unitary transformation or choice of mode basis? We show that, if accepting the single-particle entanglement picture, a single particle can always be entangled by choosing a proper mode basis. This "mode entanglement", expressed as a superposition of single-particle mode basis, may have important applications in quantum information processing as it has some similar mathematical features as the multi-particle entanglement.

We investigate the single-particle multi-mode "entanglement" and raise the questions: Is a single particle always entangled? Is entanglement a physical reality which is invariant under an arbitrary unitary transformation or choice of mode basis? We show that, if accepting the single-particle entanglement picture, a single particle can always be entangled by choosing a proper mode basis. This "mode entanglement", expressed as a superposition of single-particle mode basis, may have important applications in quantum information processing as it has some similar mathematical features as the multi-particle entanglement.

The question of whether entanglement between photons is equivalent to entanglement between their characteristic field modes, specifically, the single-particle wavefunctions that are composed and superposed to describe particles in such modes, is a key, open problem concerning multi-partite optical degrees of freedom, and has profound implications for topics ranging from quantum foundations to quantum computation. Here, I offer a fresh, deeper, physical insight into this subtle, albeit enduring, issue by describing a situation in which the entangling interactions between optical modes, namely, the wavefunctions, can be distilled into genuine entanglement between the physical, observable properties of the photons, which are the wavefunctional degrees of freedom. This theoretical observation also highlights the salience of the measurement context, especially, of clearly disambiguating between the choice of the quantum subsystem and the decision to measure an observable along a particular axis of measurement, while quantifying and transforming quantum optical entanglement. This theoretical observation might be applied to formulate a new class of protocols for performing quantum information tasks, using entangled photons within inseparable field modes.

This paper explores the formal structure and philosophical implications of polarization-path entanglement in quantum optics, where different degrees of freedom of a single photon become entangled. We examine the mathematical conditions under which coherence is preserved or lost, emphasizing the role of distinguishability and information flow. The analysis is situated within major interpretational frameworks (including Copenhagen, Many-Worlds, QBism, and Bohmian mechanics) to evaluate whether such entanglement reflects physical reality or epistemic constraints. Finally, we discuss experimental realizations, relevance to quantum information processing, and open conceptual questions regarding the ontological status of single-particle entanglement.

We discuss the question of entanglement versus separability of pure quantum states in direct product Hilbert spaces, and the relevance of this issue to physics. Different types of separability may be possible, depending on the particular factorization of the Hilbert space. A given orthonormal basis set for a Hilbert space is defined to be of type (p,q) if p elements of the basis are entangled and q are separable, relative to a given bi-partite factorization of that space. We conjecture that not all basis types exist for a given Hilbert space. The phenomenon of entanglement is of central importance in the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Historically, entanglement was the focus of the famous Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paper [1], which suggested that standard quantum mechanics is an incomplete theory of physical reality. The central argument of the EPR paper was that more information about incompatible variables such as momentum and position could in principle be deduced about an entangled two particle quantum state than quantum mechanics permits, effectively giving information about each particle

Construction of multi-particle entangled states and direct teleportation of N-(spin 1/2) particles are important areas of quantum information processing. A number of different schemes which have been presented already, address the problem through controlled teleportation. In this article, a criterion based on standard quantum statistical correlations employed in the many body virial expansions is used to determine maximum entanglement for a N-particle state. These states remain entangled through proper traces to states for a smaller number of particles and can be generalized for arbitrary number of particles. It is shown that they are quite useful in generalized, N-particle, direct teleportation. The corresponding quantum gates are also indicated for teleportation schemes from simple computational basis states.

I give a simple argument that demonstrates that the state $\ensuremath{\mid}0⟩\ensuremath{\mid}1⟩+\ensuremath{\mid}1⟩\ensuremath{\mid}0⟩$, with $\ensuremath{\mid}0⟩$ denoting a state with 0 particles (or photons) and $\ensuremath{\mid}1⟩$ a one-particle state, is entangled in spite of recent claims to the contrary. I also discuss viewpoints on the old controversy about whether the above state can be said to display single-particle or single-photon nonlocality.