In this chapter, the authors address the key goal of finding a representation of the natural numbers as a spectrum of eigenvalues of an operator. A possible representation of an operator that would be sure to have non-negative real eigenvalues would be one that has the form of a modulus. The representation based on H-form operators requires only a trivial modification to the notation. It is particularly relevant to a situation where the number n is specifically being used to count particles and is used in many-body quantum physics. The phasor operator representation leads to second way of representing the states of the number operator, that relies on functional analysis. There is a complementary representation to that of the u-dependent representation of the number operator and the number amplitude operators.
In this chapter, the authors address the key goal of finding a representation of the natural numbers as a spectrum of eigenvalues of an operator. A possible representation of an operator that would be sure to have non-negative real eigenvalues would be one that has the form of a modulus. The representation based on H-form operators requires only a trivial modification to the notation. It is particularly relevant to a situation where the number n is specifically being used to count particles and is used in many-body quantum physics. The phasor operator representation leads to second way of representing the states of the number operator, that relies on functional analysis. There is a complementary representation to that of the u-dependent representation of the number operator and the number amplitude operators.
Abstract A novel approach is presented in which some key basic equations of physics are reconstructed from a generalized atomicity viewpoint i.e., one in which a system is characterised simply by the number of items it contains and hence by the natural numbers alone. The natural numbers may then be associated with the eigenvalue spectrum of an operator. The non-negative nature of the natural numbers leads to the properties of creation and annihilation operators. By examining the parastatistical properties of the number operator, it is also shown that there is only one linear representation that allows a primitive system to be created. An interpretation of the nonlinear factorization of the number operator is also given in terms of the Hamiltonian for bound states of the Schrödinger equation for the case of general one-dimensional potentials. Introducing multiple categories of items yields the standard equations of many-body systems with interaction and scattering, and the existence of bosons and fermions.
Quantum mechanics can be formulated either in terms of matrix mechanics or in terms of wave mechanics. This chapter centers on a discussion of the historical origins, mathematical structure, and extension to non-Hermitian quantum theory of matrix mechanics. The development of atomic discrete spectra and the old quantum theory showed that classical mechanics could not account for the discreteness of atomic energy levels and spectral lines, which motivated Heisenberg, Born, Jordan, and others to establish matrix mechanics centered on noncommuting physical quantities. Combining the Bohr atomic model, angular momentum quantization, and radiative transitions, one can see how matrix mechanics describes the energy level structure and quantum transitions of atomic systems, and how the Heisenberg equation of motion gives the fundamental form of quantum dynamics. The example of the harmonic oscillator further shows that the discreteness of the energy spectrum can be obtained directly from the matrix method, thereby establishing a clear connection among transition frequencies, matrix elements, and radiation-induced transitions. The matrix representation corresponds to the operator theory in Hilbert space, where state vectors, inner products, complete bases, and spectral decomposition constitute the fundamental mathematical framework of quantum mechanics. For closed quantum systems, physical observables are generally required to be represented by Hermitian or self-adjoint operators, so as to ensure that their eigenvalues possess the physically acceptable property of being real numbers. The Hermiticity of an operator is also closely related to its domain and boundary conditions, which provides a mathematical possibility for the emergence of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Based on these discussions, this chapter further explains how non-Hermitian dynamics is connected with open systems, dissipative processes, and special boundary conditions, thereby demonstrating the natural connection between traditional matrix mechanics and modern non-Hermitian quantum theory.
In Chapter 4, we introduced the concept of the photon number representation of the electromagnetic (EM) field that is based on the number states, the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian of the EM field. However, this is not the only possible representation, in fact not always the most convenient. In this chapter, we introduce the concept of phase space representations of a quantum system which is in a state described by the density operator ρˆ. The density operator of a given system encodes classical as well as non-classical (quantum) properties of the system. How to distinguish these two kinds of properties is of basic importance in quantum optics. Therefore, we shall address this issue by using representations of the density operator that are based on the parametric space of complex eigenvalues of the annihilation operator aˆ in a coherent state |α〉. We first determine what we mean by the density operator of a quantum system and discuss its basic properties. Next, we introduce different representations of the density operator in terms of coherent state projectors |α〉〈α|. The representations show that a state of the EM field or of an arbitrary quantum system may be regarded as a mixture of coherent states. Along the way, we will learn how to find the P , Q and Wigner representations of the density operator, what are their properties, how to interpret the properties and how to calculate relations between the different representations. Most importantly, certain field states exhibit non- classical features and these non-classical features can be manifested in the phase space representations. Accordingly, we will learn how the representations are very convenient tools to describe quantum states of simple systems.
In this chapter, we will introduce different representations of the electromagnetic (EM) field. One may ask, why do we need different representations for the EMfield? The answer is that usually we do not know the state of the EM field which in quantum optics is represented by the annihilation and creation operators. However, results of measurements of the field are given in terms of real variables, for example, intensity. The representations allow us to recognize the state of the field from values of the measured quantities such as average amplitude, intensity, and correlation functions. The nature of the state is present in terms of the interpretation of the apparently classical (measured) variables. We will discuss two basic types of representations often used in quantum optics, Fock state (photon number) representation and coherent states representation, the later one introduced by Glauber.a We also discuss properties of fields with thermal and Poisson distribution of photons. The photon number states are very often used as a basis for quantum optics problems, and despite of many difficulties have recently been generated experimentally [11-13].
We demonstrated in the previous chapter (Chapter 1) that the evaluation of matrix elements between states represented by the Slater determinant can be evaluated unambiguously using Slater’s rule [1, 28, 40]. While the determinantal representation and the evaluation matrix elements between the states are quite straightforward, this procedure can eventually be ineffective and cumbersome with increasing size of the system. The occupation number formalism or second quantization technique introduced by Dirac in quantum field theory, in this context has been found to be quite formidable and elegant. This formalism not only allows us to represent the states and the operators in a compact and convenient form but also enables us to deal with systems containing variable numbers of particles without explicitly specifying the number of particles. It implicitly assumes the existence of an unspecified number of functions in a single-particle basis. These one-particle functions, which constitute the Hilbert space for N particles, are generally chosen to be spinorbital because of their orthogonality. In the case of fermions, the many-particle basis is the anti-symmetric product of N one-particle basis functions (Slater determinant). The vector space consisting of all possible anti-symmetric Hilbert spaces is referred to as the Fock space, in which the operators and functions are represented without specifying the number of particles.
A basic quantity in quantum mechanics is the wave function ψ. Given a quantum mechanical system we write the Schrödinger equation for it. Its solution is the wave function. When introducing the wave function we stated that the maximum information about the state of a system can be obtained only from ψ. How do we extract observable properties of the system from the wave function? In quantum mechanics for every classical dynamical variable there exists an operator. For example, the operator of momentum p is −i~∇ while the operator of energy variable H = p2/(2m)+V (X) is −(~2/2m)∇2+V (X). Operation of an operator on ψ gives another function. If the new function is λψ, then λ is the eigenvalue of the operator. For example, the energy of a particle in a particular state represented by ψ can be obtained by operating H on ψ. That is, we have Hψ = Eψ where E is the energy eigenvalue. The expectation value of A(X,p) can be obtained from the formula 〈A〉 = ∫ ∞ −∞ ψ∗Aψ dτ , (3.1) where ψ is the solution of the equation Hψ = Eψ. Operators in quantum mechanics which represent observables are of a spe- cial type: They are linear and Hermitian. Such operators not only form computation tools, but also form the most effective language in terms of which the theory can be formulated. The fascinating point is that using linear operators we can understand the quantum mechanics. Therefore, it is important to study the basic theory of linear operators. In this chapter, we present important properties of linear operators and their eigenfunctions. We discuss the features of various operators which are necessary for studying quantum and ematical structure of quantum mechanics is.