Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Representations of the EM Field

Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

Published Apr 19, 2016• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this chapter, we will introduce different representations of the electromagnetic (EM) field. One may ask, why do we need different representations for the EMfield? The answer is that usually we do not know the state of the EM field which in quantum optics is represented by the annihilation and creation operators. However, results of measurements of the field are given in terms of real variables, for example, intensity. The representations allow us to recognize the state of the field from values of the measured quantities such as average amplitude, intensity, and correlation functions. The nature of the state is present in terms of the interpretation of the apparently classical (measured) variables. We will discuss two basic types of representations often used in quantum optics, Fock state (photon number) representation and coherent states representation, the later one introduced by Glauber.a We also discuss properties of fields with thermal and Poisson distribution of photons. The photon number states are very often used as a basis for quantum optics problems, and despite of many difficulties have recently been generated experimentally [11-13].

DOI
10.1201/b16875-8

Related papers

General Description and Quantization of EM Fields

Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

We will begin our journey through the background of quantum optics with an elementary, but quantitative, classical theory of radiative fields.Wewill first briefly outline the electromagnetic (EM) theory of radiation, and describe how the EM radiation may be understood as a wavewhich can be represented by a set of harmonic oscillators. We shall describe how the free or non-interacting EM field may be understood as a collection of harmonic oscillators which is quantized in the standard manner, and whose energy cannot be zero as a consequence of the basic non-commutability of the canonical field variables. This chapter discusses the properties of plane EM waves and normalization of the EM field in one dimension. This is followed by a description of the Hamiltonian and the amplitudes of the EM field in terms of the annihilation and creation operators. Based on this chapter, it is possible to considerably simplify the formulation of the physical basis for the mathematical description of the major problems of quantum optics.

•Apr 19, 2016•0 citations

Phase Space Representations of the Density Operator

Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

In Chapter 4, we introduced the concept of the photon number representation of the electromagnetic (EM) field that is based on the number states, the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian of the EM field. However, this is not the only possible representation, in fact not always the most convenient. In this chapter, we introduce the concept of phase space representations of a quantum system which is in a state described by the density operator ρˆ. The density operator of a given system encodes classical as well as non-classical (quantum) properties of the system. How to distinguish these two kinds of properties is of basic importance in quantum optics. Therefore, we shall address this issue by using representations of the density operator that are based on the parametric space of complex eigenvalues of the annihilation operator aˆ in a coherent state |α〉. We first determine what we mean by the density operator of a quantum system and discuss its basic properties. Next, we introduce different representations of the density operator in terms of coherent state projectors |α〉〈α|. The representations show that a state of the EM field or of an arbitrary quantum system may be regarded as a mixture of coherent states. Along the way, we will learn how to find the P , Q and Wigner representations of the density operator, what are their properties, how to interpret the properties and how to calculate relations between the different representations. Most importantly, certain field states exhibit non- classical features and these non-classical features can be manifested in the phase space representations. Accordingly, we will learn how the representations are very convenient tools to describe quantum states of simple systems.

•Apr 19, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Optics

Warit Asavanant, Akira Furusawa

Basic concepts of quantum optics are introduced in this chapter. In the beginning, we give a review of the basic quantum mechanics. Then, we perform quantization of an electromagnetic field, which naturally introduces the concept of mode and quadrature. After that, we introduce basic quantum states of light and their phase space representation. Quantum operations in the continuous-variable system and their universality are also explained. To obtain the values of the physical quantities, we have to measure our quantum systems. In the optical continuous-variable system, homodyne measurement and photon number measurement are among the most common measurements that are also discussed here. Finally, we introduce the concept of quantum entanglement, which is one of the central concepts in quantum computation.

•Jan 25, 2022•0 citations

Squeezed States of Light

Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

In Chapter 4 we defined different representations of the elec- tromagnetic (EM) field: the Fock, thermal and coherent state representations, and discussed in details properties of the EM field in these representations. We have seen that in the coherent state the fluctuations in the two quadratures of the EM field amplitudes are equal and minimize the uncertainty product given by the Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation. In other words, the quantum fluctuations of the field in a coherent state are equal to the zero- point fluctuations and are randomly distributed in phase. These zero-point fluctuations represent the standard quantum limit to the reduction of noise in a signal. Even an ideal laser operating in a pure coherent state would still possess quantum noise due to zero-point fluctuations.

•Apr 19, 2016•0 citations

Coherent states

Yuli V. Nazarov, Jeroen Danon

This chapter is devoted to coherent states. Generally speaking, a wave function of a system of identical particles does not have to have a certain number of particles. It can be a superposition of states with different numbers of particles. We have already encountered this in Chapters 5 and 6 when we studied superconductivity and superfluidity. Another important example of states with no well-defined number of particles is given by coherent states . In a way, these states are those which most resemble classical ones: the uncertainty in conjugated variables (such as position and momentum) is minimal for both variables, and their time-evolution is as close to classical trajectories as one can get. Coherent states of radiation are relatively easy to achieve. They arise if we excite the electromagnetic field with classical currents. We look in detail at the coherent state of a single-mode oscillator and all its properties. The coherent state turns out to be an eigenfunction of the annihilation operator, the distribution of photon numbers is Poissonian, and it provides an optimal wave function describing a classical electromagnetic wave. We come back to our simple model of the laser and critically revise it with our knowledge of coherent states, and estimate the time at which the laser retains its optical coherence. We then derive Maxwell–Bloch equations that combine the master equation approach to the lasing (as outlined in Chapter 9) with the concept of coherence.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 3, 2013•0 citations

QUANTUM DESCRIPTION OF LIGHT

Alexey Vitalievich Kavokin, Jeremy J. Baumberg

This chapter presents the basic principles of quantum optics. It starts from recalling the main elements of quantum mechanics in Heisenberg and Schroedinger interpretations, then the creation and annihilation operators are introduced, and bosonic and fermionic commutation rules are discussed. The secondary quantization theory is used to show differences between coherent, thermal, and Fock states of light; introduce squeezing and antisqueezing; and discuss the statistics of photons. Finally, the polarization and second-order coherence of light are discussed from the point of view of the quantum optics.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Dec 20, 2007•0 citations
In this chapter, we will introduce different representations of the electromagnetic (EM) field. One may ask, why do we need different representations for the EMfield? The answer is that usually we do not know the state of the EM field which in quantum optics is represented by the annihilation and creation operators. However, results of measurements of the field are given in terms of real variables, for example, intensity. The representations allow us to recognize the state of the field from values of the measured quantities such as average amplitude, intensity, and correlation functions. The nature of the state is present in terms of the interpretation of the apparently classical (measured) variables. We will discuss two basic types of representations often used in quantum optics, Fock state (photon number) representation and coherent states representation, the later one introduced by Glauber.a We also discuss properties of fields with thermal and Poisson distribution of photons. The photon number states are very often used as a basis for quantum optics problems, and despite of many difficulties have recently been generated experimentally [11-13].
We will begin our journey through the background of quantum optics with an elementary, but quantitative, classical theory of radiative fields.Wewill first briefly outline the electromagnetic (EM) theory of radiation, and describe how the EM radiation may be understood as a wavewhich can be represented by a set of harmonic oscillators. We shall describe how the free or non-interacting EM field may be understood as a collection of harmonic oscillators which is quantized in the standard manner, and whose energy cannot be zero as a consequence of the basic non-commutability of the canonical field variables. This chapter discusses the properties of plane EM waves and normalization of the EM field in one dimension. This is followed by a description of the Hamiltonian and the amplitudes of the EM field in terms of the annihilation and creation operators. Based on this chapter, it is possible to considerably simplify the formulation of the physical basis for the mathematical description of the major problems of quantum optics.
In Chapter 4, we introduced the concept of the photon number representation of the electromagnetic (EM) field that is based on the number states, the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian of the EM field. However, this is not the only possible representation, in fact not always the most convenient. In this chapter, we introduce the concept of phase space representations of a quantum system which is in a state described by the density operator ρˆ. The density operator of a given system encodes classical as well as non-classical (quantum) properties of the system. How to distinguish these two kinds of properties is of basic importance in quantum optics. Therefore, we shall address this issue by using representations of the density operator that are based on the parametric space of complex eigenvalues of the annihilation operator aˆ in a coherent state |α〉. We first determine what we mean by the density operator of a quantum system and discuss its basic properties. Next, we introduce different representations of the density operator in terms of coherent state projectors |α〉〈α|. The representations show that a state of the EM field or of an arbitrary quantum system may be regarded as a mixture of coherent states. Along the way, we will learn how to find the P , Q and Wigner representations of the density operator, what are their properties, how to interpret the properties and how to calculate relations between the different representations. Most importantly, certain field states exhibit non- classical features and these non-classical features can be manifested in the phase space representations. Accordingly, we will learn how the representations are very convenient tools to describe quantum states of simple systems.
Basic concepts of quantum optics are introduced in this chapter. In the beginning, we give a review of the basic quantum mechanics. Then, we perform quantization of an electromagnetic field, which naturally introduces the concept of mode and quadrature. After that, we introduce basic quantum states of light and their phase space representation. Quantum operations in the continuous-variable system and their universality are also explained. To obtain the values of the physical quantities, we have to measure our quantum systems. In the optical continuous-variable system, homodyne measurement and photon number measurement are among the most common measurements that are also discussed here. Finally, we introduce the concept of quantum entanglement, which is one of the central concepts in quantum computation.
In Chapter 4 we defined different representations of the elec- tromagnetic (EM) field: the Fock, thermal and coherent state representations, and discussed in details properties of the EM field in these representations. We have seen that in the coherent state the fluctuations in the two quadratures of the EM field amplitudes are equal and minimize the uncertainty product given by the Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation. In other words, the quantum fluctuations of the field in a coherent state are equal to the zero- point fluctuations and are randomly distributed in phase. These zero-point fluctuations represent the standard quantum limit to the reduction of noise in a signal. Even an ideal laser operating in a pure coherent state would still possess quantum noise due to zero-point fluctuations.
This chapter is devoted to coherent states. Generally speaking, a wave function of a system of identical particles does not have to have a certain number of particles. It can be a superposition of states with different numbers of particles. We have already encountered this in Chapters 5 and 6 when we studied superconductivity and superfluidity. Another important example of states with no well-defined number of particles is given by coherent states . In a way, these states are those which most resemble classical ones: the uncertainty in conjugated variables (such as position and momentum) is minimal for both variables, and their time-evolution is as close to classical trajectories as one can get. Coherent states of radiation are relatively easy to achieve. They arise if we excite the electromagnetic field with classical currents. We look in detail at the coherent state of a single-mode oscillator and all its properties. The coherent state turns out to be an eigenfunction of the annihilation operator, the distribution of photon numbers is Poissonian, and it provides an optimal wave function describing a classical electromagnetic wave. We come back to our simple model of the laser and critically revise it with our knowledge of coherent states, and estimate the time at which the laser retains its optical coherence. We then derive Maxwell–Bloch equations that combine the master equation approach to the lasing (as outlined in Chapter 9) with the concept of coherence.
This chapter presents the basic principles of quantum optics. It starts from recalling the main elements of quantum mechanics in Heisenberg and Schroedinger interpretations, then the creation and annihilation operators are introduced, and bosonic and fermionic commutation rules are discussed. The secondary quantization theory is used to show differences between coherent, thermal, and Fock states of light; introduce squeezing and antisqueezing; and discuss the statistics of photons. Finally, the polarization and second-order coherence of light are discussed from the point of view of the quantum optics.