We will begin our journey through the background of quantum optics with an elementary, but quantitative, classical theory of radiative fields.Wewill first briefly outline the electromagnetic (EM) theory of radiation, and describe how the EM radiation may be understood as a wavewhich can be represented by a set of harmonic oscillators. We shall describe how the free or non-interacting EM field may be understood as a collection of harmonic oscillators which is quantized in the standard manner, and whose energy cannot be zero as a consequence of the basic non-commutability of the canonical field variables. This chapter discusses the properties of plane EM waves and normalization of the EM field in one dimension. This is followed by a description of the Hamiltonian and the amplitudes of the EM field in terms of the annihilation and creation operators. Based on this chapter, it is possible to considerably simplify the formulation of the physical basis for the mathematical description of the major problems of quantum optics.
We will begin our journey through the background of quantum optics with an elementary, but quantitative, classical theory of radiative fields.Wewill first briefly outline the electromagnetic (EM) theory of radiation, and describe how the EM radiation may be understood as a wavewhich can be represented by a set of harmonic oscillators. We shall describe how the free or non-interacting EM field may be understood as a collection of harmonic oscillators which is quantized in the standard manner, and whose energy cannot be zero as a consequence of the basic non-commutability of the canonical field variables. This chapter discusses the properties of plane EM waves and normalization of the EM field in one dimension. This is followed by a description of the Hamiltonian and the amplitudes of the EM field in terms of the annihilation and creation operators. Based on this chapter, it is possible to considerably simplify the formulation of the physical basis for the mathematical description of the major problems of quantum optics.
In this chapter, we will introduce different representations of the electromagnetic (EM) field. One may ask, why do we need different representations for the EMfield? The answer is that usually we do not know the state of the EM field which in quantum optics is represented by the annihilation and creation operators. However, results of measurements of the field are given in terms of real variables, for example, intensity. The representations allow us to recognize the state of the field from values of the measured quantities such as average amplitude, intensity, and correlation functions. The nature of the state is present in terms of the interpretation of the apparently classical (measured) variables. We will discuss two basic types of representations often used in quantum optics, Fock state (photon number) representation and coherent states representation, the later one introduced by Glauber.a We also discuss properties of fields with thermal and Poisson distribution of photons. The photon number states are very often used as a basis for quantum optics problems, and despite of many difficulties have recently been generated experimentally [11-13].
In this chapter, the authors prove that the free electromagnetic field is equivalent to an infinite set of uncoupled one-dimensional harmonic oscillators, one oscillator being associated with each value of the propagation vector k and polarization mode α. In order to quantize the electromagnetic field the authors shall have to express the field equations in Hamiltonian form and impose the canonical commutation rules on the canonically conjugate variables. Because the electromagnetic field possesses an infinite number of degrees of freedom it is also possible to formulate the theory in terms of a very different set of dynamical variables, the field operators themselves. To be more precise, the field operators only have off-diagonal matrix elements in the representation in which the photon occupation numbers are diagonal. In a state with a definite number of photons the expectation value of any field strength vanishes, and it is only meaningful to discuss fluctuations in the field strengths.
At the conceptual level, the quantization procedure replaces the pure particle description of classical mechanics by a particle-wave treatment satisfying the requirements of the fundamental wave–particle dualism. Technically, one can always start from a generalized wave equation and use it as a basis to discuss wave-front propagation in the form of rays following classical particle trajectories, see Sections 2.2.1 and 3.1. Consequently, any wave theory inherently contains that aspect of the wave–particle dualism. Especially, Maxwell's equations of electrodynamic theory include both wave and particle aspects of electromagnetic fields. Hence, it could be that there are no additional “quantum,” i.e., wave–particle dualistic aspects. However, as we discuss in this chapter, Maxwell's equations can be expressed in the framework of Hamilton's formulation of particle mechanics. This then suggests that in addition to the approximate ray-like behavior, electromagnetic fields do have a supplementary level of particle-like properties. Due to the fundamental axiom of wave–particle dualism, the additional particle-like aspects of electromagnetic fields must then also have a wave counterpart that can be axiomatically introduced via the canonical quantization scheme described in Section 3.2.3. Since the spatial dependency in Maxwell's equation contains wave–particle dualism already at the classical level, it is clear that the new level of quantization cannot be a simple real-space feature but has to involve some other space describing the structure of the electromagnetic fields. In fact, this quantization yields several very concrete implications such as quantization of the light energy, elementary fluctuations in the light-field amplitude and intensity, and more.
: Our goal is to quantize Maxwell's equations, leading to a natural interpretation of light as being composed of photons. The key is that the quantization of harmonic oscillators (or, more prosaically, the mathematics of springs) is critical to understanding light. In particular, we show that the possible energies of light form a discrete set, linked to the classical frequency, giving us an interpretation for the photoelectric effect. Our Approach From Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect, light seems to be made up of photons, which in turn are somewhat particle-like. Can we start with the classical description of light as an electromagnetic wave solution to Maxwell's equations when there are no charges or currents, quantize, and then get something that can be identified with photons? That is the goal of this chapter. (As in the previous chapter, while all of this is standard, we will be following the outline given in chapter 2 of [41].) Maxwell's equations are linear. We will concentrate on the ‘monochromatic’ solutions, those with fixed frequency and direction. We will see that the Hamiltonians of these monochromatic solutions will have the same mathematical structure as a Hamiltonian for a harmonic oscillator. We know from the last chapter how to quantize the harmonic oscillator. More importantly, we saw that there are discrete eigenvalues and eigenvectors for the corresponding Hamiltonian operator. When we quantize the Hamiltonians for the monochromatic waves in an analogous fashion, we will again have discrete eigenvalues and eigenvectors. It is these eigenvectors that we can interpret as photons.
In Chapter 1, we treated the electromagnetic field as classical. Henceforth, we will want to treat it as a quantum field. In order to do so, we will first present some of the formalism of quantum field theory. This formalism is very useful in describing many-particle systems and processes in which the number of particles changes. Why this is important to a quantum description of nonlinear optics can be seen by considering a parametric amplifier of the type discussed in the last chapter. A pump field, consisting of many photons, amplifies idler and signal fields by means of a process in which a pump photon splits into two lower-energy photons, one at the idler frequency and one at the signal frequency. Therefore, what we would like to do in this chapter is to provide a discussion of some of the basics of quantum field theory that will be useful in the treatment of the quantization of the electromagnetic field. In particular, we will begin with a summary of quantum theory notation, and a discussion of many-particle Hilbert spaces. These provide the arena in which all of the action takes place. We will then move on to a treatment of the canonical quantization procedure for fields. This will allow us to develop a scattering theory for fields, which is ideally what we need. This relates the properties of a field entering a medium to those of the field leaving it, and this corresponds to what is done in an experiment.
Abstract In this chapter we collect a number of key elements of quantum optics relevant for quantum information theory. We begin by discussing the quantization of the electromagnetic field in terms of harmonic oscillators with ladder operators and the corresponding Fock space. Based on this description we introduce Glauber’s coherent states and examine their properties as proper quantum analogues of the classical harmonic oscillator. We then study the description of states of light in a quantum-mechanical phase space by employing quasi-probability distributions such as the Wigner function. With these tools at hand we then focus on the family of Gaussian states and their compact description in terms of covariance matrices and vectors of first moments. We review the formalism of Gaussian operations, symplectic operations, the Williamson normal form, and the Bloch-Messiah decomposition. Finally, we take a look at entanglement of Gaussian states.