Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Phase Space Representations of the Density Operator

Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

Published Apr 19, 2016• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In Chapter 4, we introduced the concept of the photon number representation of the electromagnetic (EM) field that is based on the number states, the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian of the EM field. However, this is not the only possible representation, in fact not always the most convenient. In this chapter, we introduce the concept of phase space representations of a quantum system which is in a state described by the density operator ρˆ. The density operator of a given system encodes classical as well as non-classical (quantum) properties of the system. How to distinguish these two kinds of properties is of basic importance in quantum optics. Therefore, we shall address this issue by using representations of the density operator that are based on the parametric space of complex eigenvalues of the annihilation operator aˆ in a coherent state |α〉. We first determine what we mean by the density operator of a quantum system and discuss its basic properties. Next, we introduce different representations of the density operator in terms of coherent state projectors |α〉〈α|. The representations show that a state of the EM field or of an arbitrary quantum system may be regarded as a mixture of coherent states. Along the way, we will learn how to find the P , Q and Wigner representations of the density operator, what are their properties, how to interpret the properties and how to calculate relations between the different representations. Most importantly, certain field states exhibit non- classical features and these non-classical features can be manifested in the phase space representations. Accordingly, we will learn how the representations are very convenient tools to describe quantum states of simple systems.

DOI
10.1201/b16875-13

Related papers

Representations of the EM Field

Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

In this chapter, we will introduce different representations of the electromagnetic (EM) field. One may ask, why do we need different representations for the EMfield? The answer is that usually we do not know the state of the EM field which in quantum optics is represented by the annihilation and creation operators. However, results of measurements of the field are given in terms of real variables, for example, intensity. The representations allow us to recognize the state of the field from values of the measured quantities such as average amplitude, intensity, and correlation functions. The nature of the state is present in terms of the interpretation of the apparently classical (measured) variables. We will discuss two basic types of representations often used in quantum optics, Fock state (photon number) representation and coherent states representation, the later one introduced by Glauber.a We also discuss properties of fields with thermal and Poisson distribution of photons. The photon number states are very often used as a basis for quantum optics problems, and despite of many difficulties have recently been generated experimentally [11-13].

•Apr 19, 2016•0 citations

Phase Space Distributions

Bryan J. Dalton, John Jeffers, Stephen Mark Barnett

Abstract This chapter formally presents the representation of the quantum density operator by phase space distribution functions of phase space variables, leading to expressions for quantum correlation functions in terms of phase space integrals in which phase space variables for each mode—c-numbers for bosons, Grassmann numbers for fermions—replace mode annihilation and creation operators. The emphasis is on double-phase-space normally ordered (positive P type) normalised distribution functions, with distinct phase space variables for annihilation and creation operators; however, symmetrically ordered (Wigner type) distribution functions are also considered, along with unnormalised B distribution functions, which lead to phase space integrals for Fock state populations and coherences. Characteristic functions are first defined and then shown to be related to distribution functions via phase space integrals. The existence and symmetry properties of distribution functions—which are non-unique and non-analytic for bosons—is demonstrated using Bargmann coherent-state projectors.

•Nov 13, 2014•1 citation

Quasiprobability distributions

Ulf Leonhardt

Wigner representation In classical optics (Born and Wolf, 1999), the state of the electromagnetic oscillator is perfectly described by the statistics of the classical amplitude α . The amplitude may be completely fixed (then the field is coherent), or α may fluctuate (then the field is partially coherent or incoherent). In classical optics as well as in classical mechanics, we can characterize the statistics of the complex amplitude?or, equivalently, the statistics of the components position q and momentum p introducing a phase space distribution W ( q , p ). (As explained in Section 3.1, the real and the imaginary part of the complex amplitude α can be regarded as the position and the momentum of the electromagnetic oscillator.) The distribution W ( q , p ) quantifies the probability of finding a particular pair of q and p values in their simultaneous measurement. Knowing the phase space probability distribution, all statistical quantities of the electromagnetic oscillator can be predicted by calculation. In this sense the phase space distribution describes the state in classical physics. All this is much more subtle in quantum mechanics. First of all, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle prevents us from observing position momentum simultaneously and precisely. So it seems there is no point in thinking about quantum phase space. But wait! In quantum mechanics we cannot directly observe quantum states either. Nevertheless, we are legitimately entitled to use the concept of states as if they were existing entities (whatever they are). We use their properties to predict the statistics of observations.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 18, 2010•1 citation

General Description and Quantization of EM Fields

Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

We will begin our journey through the background of quantum optics with an elementary, but quantitative, classical theory of radiative fields.Wewill first briefly outline the electromagnetic (EM) theory of radiation, and describe how the EM radiation may be understood as a wavewhich can be represented by a set of harmonic oscillators. We shall describe how the free or non-interacting EM field may be understood as a collection of harmonic oscillators which is quantized in the standard manner, and whose energy cannot be zero as a consequence of the basic non-commutability of the canonical field variables. This chapter discusses the properties of plane EM waves and normalization of the EM field in one dimension. This is followed by a description of the Hamiltonian and the amplitudes of the EM field in terms of the annihilation and creation operators. Based on this chapter, it is possible to considerably simplify the formulation of the physical basis for the mathematical description of the major problems of quantum optics.

•Apr 19, 2016•0 citations

Coherent States

Bryan J. Dalton, John Jeffers, Stephen Mark Barnett

Abstract This chapter defines and determines the properties of the important (though non-physical) boson and fermion coherent states, which are specified in terms of c-number (bosons) or Grassmann (fermions) variables and their complex conjugates, and defined via unitary displacement operators acting on the vacuum state. Important non-orthogonality, overcompleteness and coherence properties of coherent states are obtained. Coherent states are shown to be eigenstates of mode annihilation operators, with eigenvalues given by the c-number or Grassmann variable specifying the state. Related (unnormalised) Bargmann states are defined, depending only on the variable and not its complex conjugate, and are used to obtain useful representations of physical states and canonical forms for operators in terms of Bargmann state projectors, as well as obtaining important results such as for traces of operator products in terms of phase space integrals. Mode creation operators acting on Bargmann states are shown as equivalent to differentiation.

•Nov 13, 2014•0 citations

Quantum Theory of Light: The State of Quantized Field and Photon

Yanhua H. Shih

Photon number state representation, especially the single-photon state representation, and the coherent state representation are widely used to specify the state of a radiation field. The concept of density operator or density matrix is introduced in the process of calculating the expectation value of a quantum observable. People then introduce and distinguish the pure state and mixed state. The quantum states of composite system, especially the state of two-photon field, are studied by introducing an 2-D Hilbert space constructed as the direct or tensor product of the Hilbert spaces of two subsystems. A simple model for the creation of single-photon state and multi-photon state is given with details. The concepts of product state, entangled state, and mixed state are introduced and distinguished. Coherent states form a complete set of vector space. Similar to number states, coherent states can be used as a vector basis for characterizing radiation field, except coherent states are nonorthogonal vectors in general.

CRC Press eBooks•Dec 16, 2020•0 citations
In Chapter 4, we introduced the concept of the photon number representation of the electromagnetic (EM) field that is based on the number states, the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian of the EM field. However, this is not the only possible representation, in fact not always the most convenient. In this chapter, we introduce the concept of phase space representations of a quantum system which is in a state described by the density operator ρˆ. The density operator of a given system encodes classical as well as non-classical (quantum) properties of the system. How to distinguish these two kinds of properties is of basic importance in quantum optics. Therefore, we shall address this issue by using representations of the density operator that are based on the parametric space of complex eigenvalues of the annihilation operator aˆ in a coherent state |α〉. We first determine what we mean by the density operator of a quantum system and discuss its basic properties. Next, we introduce different representations of the density operator in terms of coherent state projectors |α〉〈α|. The representations show that a state of the EM field or of an arbitrary quantum system may be regarded as a mixture of coherent states. Along the way, we will learn how to find the P , Q and Wigner representations of the density operator, what are their properties, how to interpret the properties and how to calculate relations between the different representations. Most importantly, certain field states exhibit non- classical features and these non-classical features can be manifested in the phase space representations. Accordingly, we will learn how the representations are very convenient tools to describe quantum states of simple systems.
In this chapter, we will introduce different representations of the electromagnetic (EM) field. One may ask, why do we need different representations for the EMfield? The answer is that usually we do not know the state of the EM field which in quantum optics is represented by the annihilation and creation operators. However, results of measurements of the field are given in terms of real variables, for example, intensity. The representations allow us to recognize the state of the field from values of the measured quantities such as average amplitude, intensity, and correlation functions. The nature of the state is present in terms of the interpretation of the apparently classical (measured) variables. We will discuss two basic types of representations often used in quantum optics, Fock state (photon number) representation and coherent states representation, the later one introduced by Glauber.a We also discuss properties of fields with thermal and Poisson distribution of photons. The photon number states are very often used as a basis for quantum optics problems, and despite of many difficulties have recently been generated experimentally [11-13].
Abstract This chapter formally presents the representation of the quantum density operator by phase space distribution functions of phase space variables, leading to expressions for quantum correlation functions in terms of phase space integrals in which phase space variables for each mode—c-numbers for bosons, Grassmann numbers for fermions—replace mode annihilation and creation operators. The emphasis is on double-phase-space normally ordered (positive P type) normalised distribution functions, with distinct phase space variables for annihilation and creation operators; however, symmetrically ordered (Wigner type) distribution functions are also considered, along with unnormalised B distribution functions, which lead to phase space integrals for Fock state populations and coherences. Characteristic functions are first defined and then shown to be related to distribution functions via phase space integrals. The existence and symmetry properties of distribution functions—which are non-unique and non-analytic for bosons—is demonstrated using Bargmann coherent-state projectors.
Wigner representation In classical optics (Born and Wolf, 1999), the state of the electromagnetic oscillator is perfectly described by the statistics of the classical amplitude α . The amplitude may be completely fixed (then the field is coherent), or α may fluctuate (then the field is partially coherent or incoherent). In classical optics as well as in classical mechanics, we can characterize the statistics of the complex amplitude?or, equivalently, the statistics of the components position q and momentum p introducing a phase space distribution W ( q , p ). (As explained in Section 3.1, the real and the imaginary part of the complex amplitude α can be regarded as the position and the momentum of the electromagnetic oscillator.) The distribution W ( q , p ) quantifies the probability of finding a particular pair of q and p values in their simultaneous measurement. Knowing the phase space probability distribution, all statistical quantities of the electromagnetic oscillator can be predicted by calculation. In this sense the phase space distribution describes the state in classical physics. All this is much more subtle in quantum mechanics. First of all, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle prevents us from observing position momentum simultaneously and precisely. So it seems there is no point in thinking about quantum phase space. But wait! In quantum mechanics we cannot directly observe quantum states either. Nevertheless, we are legitimately entitled to use the concept of states as if they were existing entities (whatever they are). We use their properties to predict the statistics of observations.
We will begin our journey through the background of quantum optics with an elementary, but quantitative, classical theory of radiative fields.Wewill first briefly outline the electromagnetic (EM) theory of radiation, and describe how the EM radiation may be understood as a wavewhich can be represented by a set of harmonic oscillators. We shall describe how the free or non-interacting EM field may be understood as a collection of harmonic oscillators which is quantized in the standard manner, and whose energy cannot be zero as a consequence of the basic non-commutability of the canonical field variables. This chapter discusses the properties of plane EM waves and normalization of the EM field in one dimension. This is followed by a description of the Hamiltonian and the amplitudes of the EM field in terms of the annihilation and creation operators. Based on this chapter, it is possible to considerably simplify the formulation of the physical basis for the mathematical description of the major problems of quantum optics.
Abstract This chapter defines and determines the properties of the important (though non-physical) boson and fermion coherent states, which are specified in terms of c-number (bosons) or Grassmann (fermions) variables and their complex conjugates, and defined via unitary displacement operators acting on the vacuum state. Important non-orthogonality, overcompleteness and coherence properties of coherent states are obtained. Coherent states are shown to be eigenstates of mode annihilation operators, with eigenvalues given by the c-number or Grassmann variable specifying the state. Related (unnormalised) Bargmann states are defined, depending only on the variable and not its complex conjugate, and are used to obtain useful representations of physical states and canonical forms for operators in terms of Bargmann state projectors, as well as obtaining important results such as for traces of operator products in terms of phase space integrals. Mode creation operators acting on Bargmann states are shown as equivalent to differentiation.
Photon number state representation, especially the single-photon state representation, and the coherent state representation are widely used to specify the state of a radiation field. The concept of density operator or density matrix is introduced in the process of calculating the expectation value of a quantum observable. People then introduce and distinguish the pure state and mixed state. The quantum states of composite system, especially the state of two-photon field, are studied by introducing an 2-D Hilbert space constructed as the direct or tensor product of the Hilbert spaces of two subsystems. A simple model for the creation of single-photon state and multi-photon state is given with details. The concepts of product state, entangled state, and mixed state are introduced and distinguished. Coherent states form a complete set of vector space. Similar to number states, coherent states can be used as a vector basis for characterizing radiation field, except coherent states are nonorthogonal vectors in general.