Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Quantum distribution theory and partially coherent radiation

Marlan O. Scully, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

Published Sep 4, 1997• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

As we have seen in the previous chapters, there are quantum fluctuations associated with the states corresponding to classically welldefined electromagnetic fields. The general description of fluctuation phenomena requires the density operator. However, it is possible to give an alternative but equivalent description in terms of distribution functions. In the present chapter, we extend our treatment of quantum statistical phenomena by developing the theory of quasi-classical distributions. This is of interest for several reasons. First of all, the extension of the quantum theory of radiation to involve nonquantum stochastic effects such as thermal fluctuations is needed. This is an important ingredient in the theory of partial coherence. Furthermore, the interface between classical and quantum physics is elucidated by the use of such distributions. The arch type example being the Wigner distribution. In this chapter, we introduce various distribution functions. These include the coherent state representation or the Glauber–Sudarshan Prepresentation. The P -representation is used to evaluate the normally ordered correlation functions of the field operators. As we shall see in the next chapter, the P -representation forms a correspondence between the quantum and the classical coherence theory. This distribution function does not have all of the properties of the classical distribution functions for certain states of the field, e.g., it can be negative. We also discuss the so-called Q -representation associated with the antinormally ordered correlation functions. Other distribution functions and their properties are also presented.

DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511813993.005

Related papers

The Representation Theory of Light

Partha Pratim Mondal

Light fluctuation is strongly associated with its state. A good example of this is coherent light, for which the associated probability distribution is Poisson. This strongly suggests that the description of light and the associated fluctuations can also be understood using a distribution function. This necessitates that light be described purely on the basis of a distribution function, popularly known as the “representation theory” of light. This theory treats light as an entity that exhibit fluctuations with rich statistical significance, which justifies the description of light in the realm of quantum statistics and the development of a quasi-classical distribution theory. This is essentially an extension of the quantum theory that incorporates radiation fields with a non-standard distribution function. An equivalent and powerful approach to understanding light makes use of the Fourier domain, which is associated with the characteristic function. In this chapter, we set out to explore radiation fields, including thermal, random, and squeezed light, based on the representation theory.

•May 25, 2022•0 citations

Functional Formulation of the Coherence Theory

Andrzej Zardecki

A functional formalism for coherence theory is developed in terms of the (quasi) probability functional of the radiation field. The formalism is closely connected to the P representation of the density operator. For the fields confined within a spatial volume of finite size, this connection is expressed as a multidimensional Fourier integral. A certain type of correspondence, illustrated by explicit examples, between the classical and the quantum mechanical description of the field statistics is established. The recent results of Titulaer and Glauber concerning the (1, 1)th-order coherent fields are analyzed from the point of view of the functional formulation.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 1970•3 citations

Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field

Roy J. Glauber

Methods are developed for discussing the photon statistics of arbitrary fields in fully quantum-mechanical terms. In order to keep the classical limit of quantum electrodynamics plainly in view, extensive use is made of the coherent states of the field. These states, which reduce the field correlation functions to factorized forms, are shown to offer a convenient basis for the description of fields of all types. Although they are not orthogonal to one another, the coherent states form a complete set. It is shown that any quantum state of the field may be expanded in terms of them in a unique way. Expansions are also developed for arbitrary operators in terms of products of the coherent state vectors. These expansions are discussed as a general method of representing the density operator for the field. A particular form is exhibited for the density operator which makes it possible to carry out many quantum-mechanical calculations by methods resembling those of classical theory. This representation permits clear insights into the essential distinction between the quantum and classical descriptions of the field. It leads, in addition, to a simple formulation of a superposition law for photon fields. Detailed discussions are given of the incoherent fields which are generated by superposing the outputs of many stationary sources. These fields are all shown to have intimately related properties, some of which have been known for the particular case of blackbody radiation.

Physical Review•Sep 15, 1963•6,794 citations

Coherent states

J. C. Garrison, R. Y. Chiao

The elementary quantum theory of quasi-classical states for mechanical harmonic oscillators is applied to the radiation oscillators describing light, and thus used to define quasi-classical states of light. These states are called “coherent”, because the expectation value of any normally ordered product of creation and annihilation operators factorizes for them. A theoretical discussion of possible sources for coherent states is followed by experimental evidence for their existence. The mathematical properties of coherent states, e.g., nonorthogonality and overcompleteness, are explained in order to use them to represent states and operators. These representations provide a suitable replacement for the classical phase space description of light, which is forbidden by the uncertainty principle. The quantum phase space approach leads to the definition of the Wigner distribution, the Q-function, the P-function, and Gaussian mixed states.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Jun 5, 2008•0 citations

Coherent-State Representations for the Photon Density Operator

Kevin E. Cahill

The "diagonal" $P$ representation of the photon density operator in terms of the coherent states of the radiation field is studied. It is shown that the class of weight functions $P(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ required to represent all density operators by means of the $P$ representation is much larger than the class of all probability distributions and that therefore the analogy linking the use of the $P$ representation with certain classical stochastic techniques is useful only for a limited class of density operators. The class of density operators for which the $P$ representation is appropriate is shown to be limited in the sense that there are density operators that require weight functions so singular as to lie outside the class of all tempered distributions. Conditions on the weight function $P(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ under which the expectation values of the normal ordered operators ${({a}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}})}^{n}{a}^{m}$ assume a particularly simple integral form are presented. It is shown that if $P(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ is a tempered distribution, then these expectation values are given by a simple limiting process. A limited correspondence with classical optics is suggested by a formula for these expectation values. Conditions that a density operator must satisfy if its weight function is to be non-negative are presented and are shown to exclude all pure states except the coherent states themselves. The problem of representing an arbitrary operator in terms of the coherent states is studied. New measures of the completeness of the coherent states are established.

Physical Review•Jun 21, 1965•86 citations

Coherence and quantum dynamics in simple systems

P. D. Drummond, Mark S. Hillery

In this chapter we will consider some simple systems arising out of the Hamiltonians in the previous chapters. Here, we will look at these systems without considering damping or reservoirs. These systems involve only a small number of field modes – typically one, two or three. We will revisit them in later chapters to consider what happens when the fields are confined to a cavity with damping, including possible input and output coupling. Before discussing the models, however, we need to describe a number of features of fields consisting of a small number of modes. We will begin with a discussion of the quantum theory of photo-detection and optical coherence, due to Mandel and Glauber. This makes use of the microscopic model for atom–field interactions in the previous chapter, to allow us to introduce a theory of coherence and photon counting. We will also treat the representation for a single-mode field known as a P -representation. This will be the first quasi-distribution function we will encounter. It is a c-number representation of the quantum state of a field mode. As we shall see in subsequent chapters, quasi-distribution functions are very useful in describing the dynamics of interacting quantum systems coupled to reservoirs. We will then go on to use the P -representation to define the notion of a nonclassical state of the field; such states are signified by the fact that the P -representation is no longer a well-behaved, positive distribution. Nonclassical states are natural results of nonlinear optical interactions, and we will show how that comes about for some of our models. It is also possible to define P -representations for multi-mode fields. This leads to a discussion of nonclassical correlations between modes.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 27, 2014•0 citations
As we have seen in the previous chapters, there are quantum fluctuations associated with the states corresponding to classically welldefined electromagnetic fields. The general description of fluctuation phenomena requires the density operator. However, it is possible to give an alternative but equivalent description in terms of distribution functions. In the present chapter, we extend our treatment of quantum statistical phenomena by developing the theory of quasi-classical distributions. This is of interest for several reasons. First of all, the extension of the quantum theory of radiation to involve nonquantum stochastic effects such as thermal fluctuations is needed. This is an important ingredient in the theory of partial coherence. Furthermore, the interface between classical and quantum physics is elucidated by the use of such distributions. The arch type example being the Wigner distribution. In this chapter, we introduce various distribution functions. These include the coherent state representation or the Glauber–Sudarshan Prepresentation. The P -representation is used to evaluate the normally ordered correlation functions of the field operators. As we shall see in the next chapter, the P -representation forms a correspondence between the quantum and the classical coherence theory. This distribution function does not have all of the properties of the classical distribution functions for certain states of the field, e.g., it can be negative. We also discuss the so-called Q -representation associated with the antinormally ordered correlation functions. Other distribution functions and their properties are also presented.
Light fluctuation is strongly associated with its state. A good example of this is coherent light, for which the associated probability distribution is Poisson. This strongly suggests that the description of light and the associated fluctuations can also be understood using a distribution function. This necessitates that light be described purely on the basis of a distribution function, popularly known as the “representation theory” of light. This theory treats light as an entity that exhibit fluctuations with rich statistical significance, which justifies the description of light in the realm of quantum statistics and the development of a quasi-classical distribution theory. This is essentially an extension of the quantum theory that incorporates radiation fields with a non-standard distribution function. An equivalent and powerful approach to understanding light makes use of the Fourier domain, which is associated with the characteristic function. In this chapter, we set out to explore radiation fields, including thermal, random, and squeezed light, based on the representation theory.
A functional formalism for coherence theory is developed in terms of the (quasi) probability functional of the radiation field. The formalism is closely connected to the P representation of the density operator. For the fields confined within a spatial volume of finite size, this connection is expressed as a multidimensional Fourier integral. A certain type of correspondence, illustrated by explicit examples, between the classical and the quantum mechanical description of the field statistics is established. The recent results of Titulaer and Glauber concerning the (1, 1)th-order coherent fields are analyzed from the point of view of the functional formulation.
Methods are developed for discussing the photon statistics of arbitrary fields in fully quantum-mechanical terms. In order to keep the classical limit of quantum electrodynamics plainly in view, extensive use is made of the coherent states of the field. These states, which reduce the field correlation functions to factorized forms, are shown to offer a convenient basis for the description of fields of all types. Although they are not orthogonal to one another, the coherent states form a complete set. It is shown that any quantum state of the field may be expanded in terms of them in a unique way. Expansions are also developed for arbitrary operators in terms of products of the coherent state vectors. These expansions are discussed as a general method of representing the density operator for the field. A particular form is exhibited for the density operator which makes it possible to carry out many quantum-mechanical calculations by methods resembling those of classical theory. This representation permits clear insights into the essential distinction between the quantum and classical descriptions of the field. It leads, in addition, to a simple formulation of a superposition law for photon fields. Detailed discussions are given of the incoherent fields which are generated by superposing the outputs of many stationary sources. These fields are all shown to have intimately related properties, some of which have been known for the particular case of blackbody radiation.
The elementary quantum theory of quasi-classical states for mechanical harmonic oscillators is applied to the radiation oscillators describing light, and thus used to define quasi-classical states of light. These states are called “coherent”, because the expectation value of any normally ordered product of creation and annihilation operators factorizes for them. A theoretical discussion of possible sources for coherent states is followed by experimental evidence for their existence. The mathematical properties of coherent states, e.g., nonorthogonality and overcompleteness, are explained in order to use them to represent states and operators. These representations provide a suitable replacement for the classical phase space description of light, which is forbidden by the uncertainty principle. The quantum phase space approach leads to the definition of the Wigner distribution, the Q-function, the P-function, and Gaussian mixed states.
The "diagonal" PPP representation of the photon density operator in terms of the coherent states of the radiation field is studied. It is shown that the class of weight functions $P(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ required to represent all density operators by means of the PPP representation is much larger than the class of all probability distributions and that therefore the analogy linking the use of the PPP representation with certain classical stochastic techniques is useful only for a limited class of density operators. The class of density operators for which the PPP representation is appropriate is shown to be limited in the sense that there are density operators that require weight functions so singular as to lie outside the class of all tempered distributions. Conditions on the weight function $P(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ under which the expectation values of the normal ordered operators ${({a}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}})}^{n}{a}^{m}$ assume a particularly simple integral form are presented. It is shown that if $P(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ is a tempered distribution, then these expectation values are given by a simple limiting process. A limited correspondence with classical optics is suggested by a formula for these expectation values. Conditions that a density operator must satisfy if its weight function is to be non-negative are presented and are shown to exclude all pure states except the coherent states themselves. The problem of representing an arbitrary operator in terms of the coherent states is studied. New measures of the completeness of the coherent states are established.
In this chapter we will consider some simple systems arising out of the Hamiltonians in the previous chapters. Here, we will look at these systems without considering damping or reservoirs. These systems involve only a small number of field modes – typically one, two or three. We will revisit them in later chapters to consider what happens when the fields are confined to a cavity with damping, including possible input and output coupling. Before discussing the models, however, we need to describe a number of features of fields consisting of a small number of modes. We will begin with a discussion of the quantum theory of photo-detection and optical coherence, due to Mandel and Glauber. This makes use of the microscopic model for atom–field interactions in the previous chapter, to allow us to introduce a theory of coherence and photon counting. We will also treat the representation for a single-mode field known as a P -representation. This will be the first quasi-distribution function we will encounter. It is a c-number representation of the quantum state of a field mode. As we shall see in subsequent chapters, quasi-distribution functions are very useful in describing the dynamics of interacting quantum systems coupled to reservoirs. We will then go on to use the P -representation to define the notion of a nonclassical state of the field; such states are signified by the fact that the P -representation is no longer a well-behaved, positive distribution. Nonclassical states are natural results of nonlinear optical interactions, and we will show how that comes about for some of our models. It is also possible to define P -representations for multi-mode fields. This leads to a discussion of nonclassical correlations between modes.