Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optics Communications

Parity-based estimation in an SU(1,1) interferometer with photon-subtracted squeezed vacuum states

Li-Li Hou, Jiandong Zhang, Shuai Wang

Published Mar 13, 2023• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.optcom.2023.129417

Related papers

Parity detection achieving Heisenberg limit in an SU(1,1) interferometer with coherent and squeezed vacuum input states

Li Dong

Journal of Lasers Optics & Photonics•Jan 2, 2018•0 citations

Phase estimation via delocalized photon subtraction operation inside the SU(1,1) interferometer

Zhihao Li, Qingqian Kang, Teng Zhao +3 more

arXiv:2506.07684•Physics Letters A•Apr 30, 2026•0 citations

Quantum optical interferometry via general photon-subtracted two-mode squeezed states*

Li-Li Hou, Jianzhong Xue, Yongxing Sui +1 more

We investigate the sensitivity of phase estimation in a Mach–Zehnder interferometer with photon-subtracted two-mode squeezed vacuum states. Our results show that, for given initial squeezing parameter, both symmetric and asymmetric photon subtractions can further improve the quantum Cramér–Rao bound (i.e., the ultimate phase sensitivity), especially for single-mode photon subtraction. On the other hand, the quantum Cramér–Rao bound can be reached by parity detection for symmetric photon-subtracted two-mode squeezed vacuum states at particular values of the phase shift, but it is not valid for asymmetric photon-subtracted two-mode squeezed vacuum states. In addition, compared with the two-mode squeezed vacuum state, the phase sensitivity via parity detection with asymmetric photon-subtracted two-mode squeezed vacuum states will be getting worse. Thus, parity detection may not always be the optimal detection scheme for nonclassical states of light when they are considered as the interferometer states.

Chinese Physics B•Aug 6, 2019•7 citations

Intramode-correlation-enhanced phase sensitivities in an SU(1,1) interferometer

Qian-Kun Gong, Xiu-Ling Hu, Dong Li +3 more

We theoretically derive the lower and upper bounds of quantum Fisher information (QFI) of an SU(1,1) interferometer whatever the input state chosen. According to the QFI, the crucial resource for quantum enhancement is shown to be large intramode correlations indicated by the Mandel $Q$ parameter. The subtraction of photons from the squeezed vacuum state has the effect of increasing the average photon number of the new field state, as well as the intramode correlations. For example, for a coherent state $\ensuremath{\bigotimes}$ a squeezed vacuum state with a given fixed input mean number of photons as the input, if $p$ photons are subtracted from the squeezed-vacuum state before inputting the SU(1,1) interferometer, the phase sensitivities can be improved due to the intramode-correlation increment.

arXiv:1609.03308•Physical Review A•Sep 6, 2017•49 citations

Quantum phase tracking in a truncated SU(1,1) interferometer

Prasoon Gupta, Rory W. Speirs, Paul D. Lett

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•May 30, 2019•0 citations

Phase estimation of an SU(1,1) interferometer with a coherent superposition squeezed vacuum in a realistic case

Youke Xu, Shoukang Chang, Cunjin Liu +2 more

The phase sensitivity of SU(1,1) interferometer is investigated using a coherent state and an m-coherent superposition squeezed vacuum states as inputs and the intensity detection. Photon-subtraction, photon-addition and photon superposition are three special cases. Both ideal and realistic cases are considered. It is shown that the coefficient s of coherent superposition can modulate the performance of phase sensitivity, especially in a small squeezing region. Even in the presence of photon losses, the three-kind of non-Gaussian operations can achieve the improvement of measure precision, and the photon addition presents the best robustness compared to the photon subtraction and coherent superposition. For small squeezing, the first-order non-Gaussian operation may be the most preferred in improving phase sensitivity if considering the limitations of experimental conditions. Our results may be helpful for the practical application of quantum information.

Optics Express•Sep 22, 2022•11 citations
We investigate the sensitivity of phase estimation in a Mach–Zehnder interferometer with photon-subtracted two-mode squeezed vacuum states. Our results show that, for given initial squeezing parameter, both symmetric and asymmetric photon subtractions can further improve the quantum Cramér–Rao bound (i.e., the ultimate phase sensitivity), especially for single-mode photon subtraction. On the other hand, the quantum Cramér–Rao bound can be reached by parity detection for symmetric photon-subtracted two-mode squeezed vacuum states at particular values of the phase shift, but it is not valid for asymmetric photon-subtracted two-mode squeezed vacuum states. In addition, compared with the two-mode squeezed vacuum state, the phase sensitivity via parity detection with asymmetric photon-subtracted two-mode squeezed vacuum states will be getting worse. Thus, parity detection may not always be the optimal detection scheme for nonclassical states of light when they are considered as the interferometer states.
We theoretically derive the lower and upper bounds of quantum Fisher information (QFI) of an SU(1,1) interferometer whatever the input state chosen. According to the QFI, the crucial resource for quantum enhancement is shown to be large intramode correlations indicated by the Mandel QQQ parameter. The subtraction of photons from the squeezed vacuum state has the effect of increasing the average photon number of the new field state, as well as the intramode correlations. For example, for a coherent state $\ensuremath{\bigotimes}$ a squeezed vacuum state with a given fixed input mean number of photons as the input, if ppp photons are subtracted from the squeezed-vacuum state before inputting the SU(1,1) interferometer, the phase sensitivities can be improved due to the intramode-correlation increment.
The phase sensitivity of SU(1,1) interferometer is investigated using a coherent state and an m-coherent superposition squeezed vacuum states as inputs and the intensity detection. Photon-subtraction, photon-addition and photon superposition are three special cases. Both ideal and realistic cases are considered. It is shown that the coefficient s of coherent superposition can modulate the performance of phase sensitivity, especially in a small squeezing region. Even in the presence of photon losses, the three-kind of non-Gaussian operations can achieve the improvement of measure precision, and the photon addition presents the best robustness compared to the photon subtraction and coherent superposition. For small squeezing, the first-order non-Gaussian operation may be the most preferred in improving phase sensitivity if considering the limitations of experimental conditions. Our results may be helpful for the practical application of quantum information.