New Journal of Physics

Reply to Comment on ‘Quantum principle of relativity’

Andrzej Dragan, ARTUR K. EKERT

Published Sep 1, 2022• 8 citations

Abstract

We refute criticisms by Del Santo and Horvat towards our paper "Quantum principle of relativity": most of their counterarguments can be dismissed, and the rest provides further evidence to our claims.

DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac90e3

Related papers

Reply to Comment on ‘Quantum principle of relativity’

Andrzej Dragan, ARTUR K. EKERT

New Journal of PhysicsAug 1, 20237 citations

Reply to the comment on "Quantum priniple of relativity"

Andrzej Dragan, ARTUR K. EKERT

arXiv:2206.15247Jun 30, 20220 citations

Reply to the comment on "Quantum principle of relativity"

Andrzej Dragan, ARTUR K. EKERT

We discuss critical remarks raised by Horodecki towards our work on the connection between superluminal extension of special relativity and fundamental aspects of quantum theory.

arXiv:2309.00020Aug 31, 20230 citations

Reply to the Comment on ‘Quantum principle of relativity’

Andrzej Dragan, ARTUR K. EKERT

Abstract We discuss critical remarks raised by Horodecki (2023 arXiv: 2301.07802 [quant-ph]) toward our work on the connection between superluminal extension of special relativity and fundamental aspects of quantum theory.

New Journal of PhysicsNov 27, 20234 citations

Reply to Galilean invariance without superluminal particles

Andrzej Dragan, ARTUR K. EKERT

In a recent comment [arXiv:2112.05658], Grudka and Wójcik object to some of our earlier claims concerning a link between fundamental postulates of quantum theory and special relativity extended to superluminal frames of reference. In this short reply we refute these criticisms.

arXiv:2203.04141Mar 8, 20220 citations

Further Comment on “Alternative to the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Theory”

Mendel Sachs

American Journal of PhysicsFeb 1, 19693 citations