arXiv:2309.00020

Reply to the comment on "Quantum principle of relativity"

Andrzej Dragan, ARTUR K. EKERT

Published Aug 31, 2023• 0 citations

Abstract

We discuss critical remarks raised by Horodecki towards our work on the connection between superluminal extension of special relativity and fundamental aspects of quantum theory.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2309.00020

Related papers

Reply to the Comment on ‘Quantum principle of relativity’

Andrzej Dragan, ARTUR K. EKERT

Abstract We discuss critical remarks raised by Horodecki (2023 arXiv: 2301.07802 [quant-ph]) toward our work on the connection between superluminal extension of special relativity and fundamental aspects of quantum theory.

New Journal of PhysicsNov 27, 20234 citations

Reply to Galilean invariance without superluminal particles

Andrzej Dragan, ARTUR K. EKERT

In a recent comment [arXiv:2112.05658], Grudka and Wójcik object to some of our earlier claims concerning a link between fundamental postulates of quantum theory and special relativity extended to superluminal frames of reference. In this short reply we refute these criticisms.

arXiv:2203.04141Mar 8, 20220 citations

Reply to Comment on ‘Quantum principle of relativity’

Andrzej Dragan, ARTUR K. EKERT

We refute criticisms by Del Santo and Horvat towards our paper "Quantum principle of relativity": most of their counterarguments can be dismissed, and the rest provides further evidence to our claims.

New Journal of PhysicsAug 1, 20237 citations

Reply to Comment on ‘Quantum principle of relativity’

Andrzej Dragan, ARTUR K. EKERT

New Journal of PhysicsSep 1, 20228 citations

Reply to the comment on "Quantum priniple of relativity"

Andrzej Dragan, ARTUR K. EKERT

arXiv:2206.15247Jun 30, 20220 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Validity of Feynman’s prescription of disregarding the Pauli principle in intermediate states’ ”

Francisco Antônio Bezerra Coutinho, Yukihisa Nogami, Lauro Tomio

In a recent paper, we raised a question on the validity of Feynman's prescription of disregarding the Pauli principle in intermediate states of perturbation theory. In the preceding Comment, Cavalcanti correctly pointed out that Feynman's prescription is consistent with the exact solution of the model that we used. This means that the Pauli principle does not necessarily apply to intermediate states. We discuss implications of this puzzling aspect.

Physical Review AJun 8, 20004 citations