Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Further Comment on “Alternative to the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Theory”

Mendel Sachs

Published Feb 1, 1969• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1119/1.1975476

Related papers

Comment on: “Alternative to the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Theory”

Ingram Bloch

American Journal of Physics•May 1, 1968•1 citation

Comment on: “Alternative to the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Theory”

Mendel Sachs

American Journal of Physics•May 1, 1968•0 citations

Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Henry Pierce Stapp

Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•1 citation

Reply to a Criticism of a Causal Re-Interpretation of the Quantum Theory

David Böhm

Physical Review•Jul 15, 1952•29 citations

Alternative to the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Theory

Philip Pearle

An alternative calculational procedure for quantum theory is presented, employing three features which differ from the corresponding features of orthodox quantum theory. These are: (1) the state vector is never to be “reduced”; (2) quantum theory only makes predictions about ensembles of identical experiments (not about individual experiments); and (3) the measuring apparatus must always be included in the state vector. What is new about this alternative theory is the demonstration that Features 2 and 3 (which have hitherto been discussed separately) can be consistently combined to yield an interpretation of quantum theory which has the additional advantage of Feature 1. It is shown that alternative and orthodox theories yield identical predictions for any practical experiment. However, two classes of experiments (which are impractical) for which the orthodox and alternative theories yield different predictions are described. Therefore, it is, in principle, possible to decide which theory Nature has chosen to obey. It is concluded that there is no reason, based upon experimental evidence, for preferring one theory over the other.

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1967•98 citations

A remark on the interpretation of quantum mechanics

F. Ghaboussi

Physics Letters A•Oct 1, 1985•1 citation
An alternative calculational procedure for quantum theory is presented, employing three features which differ from the corresponding features of orthodox quantum theory. These are: (1) the state vector is never to be “reduced”; (2) quantum theory only makes predictions about ensembles of identical experiments (not about individual experiments); and (3) the measuring apparatus must always be included in the state vector. What is new about this alternative theory is the demonstration that Features 2 and 3 (which have hitherto been discussed separately) can be consistently combined to yield an interpretation of quantum theory which has the additional advantage of Feature 1. It is shown that alternative and orthodox theories yield identical predictions for any practical experiment. However, two classes of experiments (which are impractical) for which the orthodox and alternative theories yield different predictions are described. Therefore, it is, in principle, possible to decide which theory Nature has chosen to obey. It is concluded that there is no reason, based upon experimental evidence, for preferring one theory over the other.