This chapter introduces a new physical property called spin. The distinguishing factor between a fermion and a boson is the respective spin of the particles. Being a charged particle, the electron’s spin gives it a tiny magnetic field, which interacts with the SG field, causing the electrons to be deflected. However, this classical picture has significant limitations, as we will come to appreciate. Fundamentally, spin is a quantum mechanical physical property with no exact classical equivalent. Angular momentum plays a very similar role in the classical mechanics of rotating objects. It is also a conserved quantity, and its rate of change per second is a measure of the turning force applied. If the angular momentum has direction, then it must have components as with any other directed quantity.
This chapter introduces a new physical property called spin. The distinguishing factor between a fermion and a boson is the respective spin of the particles. Being a charged particle, the electron’s spin gives it a tiny magnetic field, which interacts with the SG field, causing the electrons to be deflected. However, this classical picture has significant limitations, as we will come to appreciate. Fundamentally, spin is a quantum mechanical physical property with no exact classical equivalent. Angular momentum plays a very similar role in the classical mechanics of rotating objects. It is also a conserved quantity, and its rate of change per second is a measure of the turning force applied. If the angular momentum has direction, then it must have components as with any other directed quantity.
Most students of science and engineering know that every elementary particle, such as electrons, neutrons, photons, neutrinos, etc., has a quantum mechanical property called “spin” which can be measured (perhaps not easily, but at least in principle) and has a quantized value, including zero. The vast majority of these students mentally visualize spin as the angular momentum associated with the elementary particle spinning or rotating about its own axis (like a top or a planetary object). This mental picture, although convenient and comforting, is actually somewhat crude and certainly incomplete. Landau and Lifshitz, in their classic textbook on quantum mechanics [1], wrote “[the spin] property of elementary particles is peculiar to quantum theory. [It] has no classical interpretation... It would be wholly meaningless to imagine the ‘intrinsic’ angular momentum of an elementary particle as being the result of its rotation about its own axis.” The simplistic notion of self-rotation about an axis, shown in Fig. 1.1, can- not explain many features of spin, such as why its magnitude cannot assume continuous values and why it is quantized to certain specific values. It also causes serious problems if taken too literally. As we will see later (Problem 1.2), if we think of an electron as a solid sphere of radius equal to the Lorentz radius e2/(4πǫ0m0c 2) (where e is the electron’s charge, m0 is the mass, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and ǫ0 is the dielectric constant of vacuum), then the velocity on the surface of a rotating electron would have to be many times the velocity of light in vacuum if such a rotation were to generate an angular momentum equal to the electron’s spin. Obviously that would not be permitted by the theory of relativity. Indeed, a deep understanding of quantum mechanics is required to understand how the spin property comes about. Its origin is in relativistic quantum mechanics and really was first appreciated by Paul Andrew Maurice Dirac when he derived the Dirac equation which is the cornerstone of relativistic quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman, noted for his distaste for mysticism in physics, wrote about the notion of “spin”: “It appears to be one of the few places in physics where there is a rule which can be stated very simply, but for which no one has found a simple and easy explanation. The explanation is down deep in relativistic quantum mechanics.
Spin is an intrinsic form of angular momentum carried by elementary particles, composite particles, and atomic nuclei. It is wildly believed that spin is a purely quantum mechanical concept and has no classical analogue. In fact, elementary particles are conceived as point objects which have no axis to “spin” around. Therefore, there is no explaining how spin arises at the fundamental level, why particles have the values they do, and what underpins the Pauli Exclusion principle and Bose-Einstein behavior. However, spin is like a vector quantity; it has a definite magnitude, and it has a “direction”, in order to spin should be composite. In this paper we propose a physical explanation for spin of the electron at the sub-particle level, relying on the vortex model of the electron. The electron is described as a superfluid frictionless vortex which has a mass, angular momentum and spin to provide a complete explanation of all properties of the electron: it composite, spinning around its own axis, produces a tiny magnetic fields independent of those from its orbital motions. The classical hydrodynamic laws are used to describe the quantum properties of the electron, such as spin, angular momentum, magnetic momentum and a magnetic dipole. The circulation in the vortex is constant, and the angular momentum of the vortex is conserved and has the same value of Planck constant. The direction of the angular momentum of a spinning electron vortex is along the axis of rotation and determined by the direction of spin. The spin quantum number 1/2 has a fixed value which represents the gap between the circulation rate of the core of the vortex and the boundaries of the vortex. The changeable values +1/2 “spin-up” or -1/2 “spin-down” indicate the direction of the magnetic dipole of the vortex. The relation between spin and Planck constant is discussed and the origin h/4pi angular momentum units are revealed.
Most students of science and engineering know that every elementary particle, such as electrons, neutrons, photons, neutrinos, etc., has a quantum mechanical property called “spin” which can be measured (perhaps not easily, but at least in principle) and has a quantized value, including zero. The vast majority of these students mentally visualize spin as the angular momentum associated with the elementary particle spinning or rotating about its own axis (like a top or a planetary object). This mental picture, although convenient and comforting, is actually somewhat crude and certainly incomplete. Landau and Lifshitz, in their classic textbook on quantum mechanics [1], wrote “[the spin] property of elementary particles is peculiar to quantum theory.. [It] has no classical interpretation... It would be wholly meaningless to imagine the ‘intrinsic’ angular momentum of an elementary particle as being the result of its rotation about its own axis”.
One of the most important applications of the quantum mechanical formalism developed in the previous chapter is to angular momentum. This is because many microsystems are spherically symmetric, or approximately so, and angular momentum is therefore conserved. This chapter discusses that a careful study of quantized angular momentum leads to a completely new physical phenomenon – intrinsic spin. The fact that the angular momentum vector of a quantum particle must point in certain restricted directions is a bizarre quantum property. In some respects the abstract idea of an internal angular momentum is reminiscent of the classical concept of a spinning body. In classical mechanics angular momentum is added vectorially but in the quantum case the issue is more subtle. The procedure will be illustrated by the example of the addition of two spins. As in classical mechanics a charged quantum system with angular momentum possesses a magnetic moment μ.
Spin is well known to be an intrinsically relativistic property of particles. Nonetheless its effects are seen in many physical situations which are not obviously relativistic, perhaps the most obvious examples being magnets and the quantum mechanically permitted electronic configurations of the elements in the periodic table. The view of spin adopted in these and other problems is that the electron has a quantized spin ( s = 1/2) and that is a fundamental tenet of the theory, rather than something that has to be explained. In this chapter we are going to discuss the behaviour of spin-1/2 particles (electrons, protons and neutrons for example) without much direct reference to relativistic quantum theory and the origins of spin. This chapter should be instructive in its own right and as a guide to understanding spin when we come to discuss it in a fully relativistic context at various stages throughout this book. Unless otherwise specified, we will refer to electrons, but it should be borne in mind that the theory is equally applicable to any spin-1/2 particle. Students of quantum theory cannot delve very deeply into the subject without coming across the quantization of angular momentum. The orbital angular momentum usually surfaces in the theory leading up to the quantum description of the hydrogen atom.
Spin-s systems Angular momentum is one of the fundamental quantities of Newtonian physics, and in quantum physics its importance is at least as great. In quantum mechanics we often distinguish between two types of angular momentum: orbital angular momentum , which a system of particles possesses due to particle motion through space; and spin angular momentum , which is an intrinsic property of a particle. The distinction will be important later, but for now we will ignore it. We will here refer to angular momentum of any sort as “spin” and develop general-purpose mathematical tools for its description. We have already dealt with spin systems, particularly the example of a spin-½ particle. Our approach began with the empirical observation that a measurement of any spin component of a spin-½ particle could yield only the results +ħ/2 or −ħ/2. We introduced the basis states | z ±〉 for the two-dimensional Hilbert space ℋ. We also gave other basis states such as {| x ±〉} and {| y ±〉} in terms of the | z ±〉 states. From basis states and measurement values we constructed operators for the spin components S x , S y , and S z . With the operators in hand, we could then examine the algebraic relations between them (such as the commutation relation in Exercise 3.56). Our job here is to generalize our analysis to systems of arbitrary spin. To do this, we will reverse our chain of logic.