Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Science News-Letter

Einstein Finds past Events Not Knowable with Certainty

Published Mar 28, 1931• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.2307/3907257

Related papers

Retrocausal Information Flow: What are the Consequences of Knowing the Future?

York H. Dobyns

This paper discusses experimental findings from the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research project supporting the existence of retrocausal information flow. Possible alternative explanations to retrocausation are examined for each experiment. In each case it can be shown that retrocausal information flow is either a parsimonious explanation, or the only currently available explanation, for the observational data. Gedankenexperiments are then examined to demonstrate that regardless of observational effect size, empirical phenomena of the type seen in these experiments cannot produce time paradoxes.The theoretical discussion pursuant to the experimental data covers some of the basic problems in the physical representation of time. Human perception of time incorporates a dichotomy: the past is known but cannot be changed, the future is presumed to be indeterminate and hence controllable but unknowable in advance. Physical formalisms have difficulty in representing this dichotomy, arriving in the most extreme case at the completely deterministic Einsteinian block universe view of spacetime. Strict physical determinism, however, currently seems implausible due to apparently essential indeterminism at the quantum scale.Retrocausal phenomena attack the dichotomy on empirical rather than theoretical grounds, since if past events can be causally influenced by future events either the past is malleable or the future is knowable. This approach allows a resolution of the past/future dichotomy by additional approaches other than strict determinism: the past may be indeterminate, or both past and future can contain a mixture of deterministic and indeterminate events.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2006•3 citations

Einstein's twin paradox in action

Physics World•Nov 1, 2010•0 citations

Knowledge of Past and Future in Quantum Mechanics

Guido Bacciagaluppi, Elise Crull

This is a reprinting of Einstein, Podolsky and Tolman’s 1931 letter to the editor of Physical Review . In this letter, the authors demonstrate that the principles of quantum mechanics give rise to an uncertainty in the description of past events which is analogous to the uncertainty quantum mechanics assigns to the prediction of future events.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 14, 2024•0 citations

Experimental evidence of the einstein paradox

O. Costa de Beauregard

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•May 1, 1977•3 citations

Einstein, Physics and Reality

Jagdish Mehra

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Dec 1, 1999•4 citations

Interference Between Past and Future Events in F ?? K anti K Decays

Srivastava Y. N., Widom A.

The Einstein-Tolman-Podolsky (ETP) effect showing the quantum interference of amplitudes for past future (time-like separated) events is discussed for a proposed experiment on the \\Phi\\rightarrow K\\overline{K} decay processes. Within the proposed resolution of the experiment, and the known magnitudes of CP violating amplitudes, the ETC effect may be susceptible to laboratory tests.

•Feb 12, 1993•0 citations
This paper discusses experimental findings from the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research project supporting the existence of retrocausal information flow. Possible alternative explanations to retrocausation are examined for each experiment. In each case it can be shown that retrocausal information flow is either a parsimonious explanation, or the only currently available explanation, for the observational data. Gedankenexperiments are then examined to demonstrate that regardless of observational effect size, empirical phenomena of the type seen in these experiments cannot produce time paradoxes.The theoretical discussion pursuant to the experimental data covers some of the basic problems in the physical representation of time. Human perception of time incorporates a dichotomy: the past is known but cannot be changed, the future is presumed to be indeterminate and hence controllable but unknowable in advance. Physical formalisms have difficulty in representing this dichotomy, arriving in the most extreme case at the completely deterministic Einsteinian block universe view of spacetime. Strict physical determinism, however, currently seems implausible due to apparently essential indeterminism at the quantum scale.Retrocausal phenomena attack the dichotomy on empirical rather than theoretical grounds, since if past events can be causally influenced by future events either the past is malleable or the future is knowable. This approach allows a resolution of the past/future dichotomy by additional approaches other than strict determinism: the past may be indeterminate, or both past and future can contain a mixture of deterministic and indeterminate events.