Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento

Experimental evidence of the einstein paradox

O. Costa de Beauregard

Published May 1, 1977• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02746555

Related papers

Implications of the recent experimental realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

M. D. Reid

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•May 22, 1995•0 citations

On possible experimental tests for the paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen

Asher Peres, Paul Singer

Il Nuovo Cimento•Mar 1, 1960•14 citations

Further discussion of possible experimental tests for the paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen

David Böhm, Yakir Aharonov

Il Nuovo Cimento•Sep 1, 1960•25 citations

Towards the evidence of a purely spatial Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in images: measurement scheme and first experimental results

F. Devaux, Joé Mougin-Sisini, Paul‐Antoine Moreau +1 more

The European Physical Journal D•Jul 1, 2012•18 citations

Einstein's twin paradox in action

Physics World•Nov 1, 2010•0 citations

Remark on Recent Experimental Findings supporting Smarandache’s Quantum Sorites Paradoxes, Superluminal Hypothesis, and SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron

Victor .., Robert N. Boyd

Statement of the Problem: Smarandache Hypothesis states that there is no speed limit of anything, including light and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by majority of physicists. Here we review some experiments to support superluminal physics and also findings to explain Smarandache Quantum Paradoxes and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on new experiment on magneton, supporting SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron. Aim of this paper: We discuss some experimental results which will likely open new directions of research toward evidence-based physics.Conclusion Significance: Multiexperimental findings assessment allows one to verify conjectures by Florentin Smarandache RNB, namely: Smarandache Hypothesis, Smarandache Quantum Sorites Paradoxes and SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron.

•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations
Statement of the Problem: Smarandache Hypothesis states that there is no speed limit of anything, including light and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by majority of physicists. Here we review some experiments to support superluminal physics and also findings to explain Smarandache Quantum Paradoxes and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on new experiment on magneton, supporting SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron. Aim of this paper: We discuss some experimental results which will likely open new directions of research toward evidence-based physics.Conclusion Significance: Multiexperimental findings assessment allows one to verify conjectures by Florentin Smarandache RNB, namely: Smarandache Hypothesis, Smarandache Quantum Sorites Paradoxes and SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron.