Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Il Nuovo Cimento

On possible experimental tests for the paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen

Asher Peres, Paul Singer

Published Mar 1, 1960• 14 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02860195

Related papers

Further discussion of possible experimental tests for the paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen

David Böhm, Yakir Aharonov

Il Nuovo Cimento•Sep 1, 1960•25 citations

Implications of the recent experimental realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

M. D. Reid

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•May 22, 1995•0 citations

Experimental Test of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox and its Generated Steering Inequality

Tianfeng Feng, Changliang Ren, Qin Feng +4 more

•Apr 9, 2020•1 citation

On a possible role of the vector potential in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

S. Caser

Physics Letters A•Oct 1, 1982•11 citations

Experimental Test of the EPR Paradox and its Corresponding Steering Inequality

Tianfeng Feng, Changliang Ren, Qin Feng +4 more

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is one of the earliest paradoxes, arising from the lack of local realistic description of mechanics. The EPR paradox leads to the important concept of quantum which manifests itself by three different phenomena: entanglement, steering, and Bell's nonlocality. Two well-known paradoxes related to Bell's nonlocality, i.e. the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger paradox and the Hardy paradox, have been widely studied and also experimentally confirmed. However, an experimental test of the EPR paradox is still lacking. The EPR paradox is essentially a steering paradox, and recently it has been mathematically formulated as a contradiction equality $k=1$, thus making it amenable to an experimental verification. Moreover, based on the EPR paradox we also derive a generalized linear steering inequality. In this work, we perform the first experimental test of the EPR paradox in a two-qubit scenario, and also verify the corresponding generalized steering inequality, which has an advantage over the usual one by detecting more steerability of states. Experimental results confirm the theoretical predictions within the experimental errors, and provide a deeper understanding of foundation.

•Apr 9, 2020•0 citations

On the So-Called Paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen

Ernst Breitenberger

Il Nuovo Cimento•Jul 1, 1965•6 citations
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is one of the earliest paradoxes, arising from the lack of local realistic description of mechanics. The EPR paradox leads to the important concept of quantum which manifests itself by three different phenomena: entanglement, steering, and Bell's nonlocality. Two well-known paradoxes related to Bell's nonlocality, i.e. the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger paradox and the Hardy paradox, have been widely studied and also experimentally confirmed. However, an experimental test of the EPR paradox is still lacking. The EPR paradox is essentially a steering paradox, and recently it has been mathematically formulated as a contradiction equality k=1k=1k=1, thus making it amenable to an experimental verification. Moreover, based on the EPR paradox we also derive a generalized linear steering inequality. In this work, we perform the first experimental test of the EPR paradox in a two-qubit scenario, and also verify the corresponding generalized steering inequality, which has an advantage over the usual one by detecting more steerability of states. Experimental results confirm the theoretical predictions within the experimental errors, and provide a deeper understanding of foundation.