Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nature

Daily briefing: Why the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is seductive, but wrong

Flora Graham

Published Oct 19, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/d41586-018-07130-5

Related papers

Daily briefing: Why physicists love the many-worlds theory

Flora Graham

Nature•Sep 4, 2019•0 citations

Why the Many-Worlds Interpretation?

Lev Vaidman A

A brief (subjective) description of the state of the art of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics (MWI) is presented. It is argued that the MWI is the only interpretation which removes action at a distance and randomness from quantum theory. Limitations of the MWI regarding questions of probability which can be legitimately asked are specified. The ontological picture of the MWI as a theory of the universal wave function decomposed into a superposition of world wave functions, the important parts of which are defined in three-dimensional space, is presented from the point of view of our particular branch. Some speculations about misconceptions, which apparently prevent the MWI from being in the consensus, are mentioned.

arXiv:2208.04618•Quantum Reports•Aug 4, 2022•22 citations

The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Princeton University Press eBooks•Mar 25, 2025•12 citations

A Brief Overview of the Leading Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics

Mateusz Ratman

This article attempts to present brief outlines of the leading interpretations of quantum mechanics. Many-worlds, relational, von Neumann–Wigner, Copenhagen and hidden variable are examined. Arguments in favor of the many-worlds interpretation are put forth, stressing the importance of further research into the fundamentals of quantum mechanics during work on quantum gravity. The history and fundamental principles of each interpretation are briefly given.

•Oct 1, 2021•0 citations

In defense of a “single-world” interpretation of quantum mechanics

Jeffrey Bub

arXiv:1804.03267•Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Apr 27, 2018•41 citations

Daily briefing: What does quantum mechanics mean anyway?

Jacob Smith

A Nature survey reveals that physicists disagree on even the basics of what quantum mechanics means in reality. Plus, sugars on a cell’s surface mapped at unprecedented resolution and the world’s wildest biology conference. A Nature survey reveals that physicists disagree on even the basics of what quantum mechanics means in reality. Plus, sugars on a cell’s surface mapped at unprecedented resolution and the world’s wildest biology conference.

Nature•Jul 30, 2025•0 citations
A brief (subjective) description of the state of the art of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics (MWI) is presented. It is argued that the MWI is the only interpretation which removes action at a distance and randomness from quantum theory. Limitations of the MWI regarding questions of probability which can be legitimately asked are specified. The ontological picture of the MWI as a theory of the universal wave function decomposed into a superposition of world wave functions, the important parts of which are defined in three-dimensional space, is presented from the point of view of our particular branch. Some speculations about misconceptions, which apparently prevent the MWI from being in the consensus, are mentioned.