Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

De Gruyter eBooks

11. Measurement devices

Arnold Neumaier

Published Oct 24, 2019• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This chapter presents the measurement problem from the point of view of the thermal interpretation of quantum physics. Everything physicists measure is measured in a thermal environment, for which statistical thermodynamics is relevant. The thermal interpretation agrees with how one interprets measurements in thermodynamics, the macroscopic part of quantum physics, derived via statistical mechanics. By its very construction, the thermal interpretation naturally matches the classical properties of our quantum world: The thermal interpretation assigns states-and a realistic interpretation for them-to individual quantum systems, in a way that large quantum systems are naturally described by classical observables. Since measurement devices are large quantum systems, this is the key to solving the measurement problem. We discuss the role played by macroscopic systems and the weak law of large numbers in getting readings with small uncertainty. Since quantum physics makes many deterministic predictions, for example regarding observed spectra, but also assertions about probabilities, we distinguish deterministic and statistical measurements. To clarify the meaning of the concept of measurement, we postulate (in Section 11.1) a measurement principle that defines what it means in the thermal interpretation to measure a quantity with a specified uncertainty. This turns the measurement problem from a philosophical riddle into a scientific problem in the domain of quantum statistical mechanics, namely how the quantum dynamics correlates macroscopic readings from an instrument with properties of the state of a measured microscopic system. The essence of scientific practice is the reproducibility of measurements, discussed in Section 11.2. Unlike in traditional interpretations, single, nonreproducible observations do not count as measurements, since this would violate the reproducibility of measurements-the essence of scientific practice. As a consequence, the measurement of a Hermitian quantity A is regarded as giving an uncertain value approximating the q-expectation {A} rather than (as tradition wanted to have it) as an exact revelation of an eigenvalue of A. This difference is most conspicuous in the interpretation of single discrete microscopic events. Except in very special circumstances, these are not reproducible. Thus, they have no scientific value in themselves and do not constitute measurement results. Scientific value is, however, in ensembles of such observations, which result in approximate measurements of q-probabilities and q-expectations. Sections 11.3 and 11.4 distinguish deterministic and statistical measurements, depending on whether a single observation is reproducible, and discuss the role played by macroscopic systems and the weak law of large numbers in getting readings with small uncertainty. How to measure the q-probabilities of events, described in terms of POVMs, is discussed in Section 11.5. Section 11.6 poses the measurement problem as a problem of the statistical mechanics of measurement devices, and discuss recent work by Allahverdyan, Balian, and Nieuwenhuizen on its resolution. Section 11.7 discusses the problem how, in the thermal interpretation, discrete events can arise, although qexpectations are by their very nature continuous. This is resolved by pointing to work by Breuer and Petruccione on piecewise deterministic processes (PDP). Section 11.8 sheds additional light on the origin of discrete events by an analysis of the role dissipative bistability plays in obtaining discreteness in classical physics.

DOI
10.1515/9783110667387-011

Related papers

Foundations of quantum physics III. Measurement

Arnold Neumaier

This paper presents the measurement problem from the point of view of the thermal interpretation of quantum physics introduced in Part II. The measurement of a Hermitian quantity $A$ is regarded as giving an uncertain value approximating the q-expectation $\langle A\rangle$ rather than (as tradition wanted to have it) as an exact revelation of an eigenvalue of $A$. Single observations of microscopic systems are (except under special circumstances) very uncertain measurements only. The thermal interpretation * treats detection events as a statistical measurement of particle beam intensity. * claims that the particle concept is only asymptotically valid, under conditions where particles are essentially free. * claims that the unmodeled environment influences the results enough to cause all randomness in quantum physics. * allows one to derive Born's rule for scattering and in the limit of ideal measurements; but in general, only part of Born's rule holds exactly: Whenever a quantity A with zero uncertainty is measured exactly, its value is an eigenvalue of A. * has no explicit collapse -- the latter emerges approximately in non-isolated subsystems. * gives a valid interpretation of systems modeled by a quantum-classical dynamics. * explains the peculiar features of the Copenhagen interpretation (lacking realism between measurements) and the minimal statistical interpretation (lacking realism for the single case) where these interpretations apply -- in the microscopic domain. The thermal interpretation is an interpretation of quantum physics that is in principle refutable by theoretical arguments leading to a negative answer to a number of open issues collected at the end of the paper, since there is plenty of experimental evidence for each of the points mentioned there.

arXiv:1902.10782•Feb 27, 2019•0 citations

9. The thermal interpretation of quantum physics

Arnold Neumaier

In this chapter, we define a new interpretation of quantum physics, called the thermal interpretation. The thermal interpretation of quantum physics (including quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, quantum statistical mechanics, and their applications) allows a consistent and deterministic relativistic quantum description of the universe from the smallest to the largest levels of modeling, including its classical aspects, without having to introduce any change in the formal apparatus of quantum physics. The goal of the thermal interpretation is to provide foundations that match all requirements from Chapter 8. The thermal interpretation agrees with how one interprets measurements in statistical thermodynamics, the macroscopic part of quantum physics, derived via statistical mechanics. Extrapolating from the macroscopic case, the thermal interpretation considers the functions of the state (or of the parameters characterizing a state from a particular family of states) as the objective properties of what really exists. Some of these are accessible to experiment-namely the expectation values of quantities that have a small uncertainty and vary sufficiently slowly in time and space. Because of the law of large numbers, all thermodynamic variables are in this category. By its very construction, the thermal interpretation naturally matches the classical, in essence, thermodynamical properties of our quantum world.

De Gruyter eBooks•Oct 24, 2019•0 citations

Foundations of quantum physics II. The thermal interpretation

Arnold Neumaier

This paper presents the thermal interpretation of quantum physics. The insight from Part I of this series that Born's rule has its limitations -- hence cannot be the foundation of quantum physics -- opens the way for an alternative interpretation -- the thermal interpretation of quantum physics. It gives new foundations that connect quantum physics (including quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics, quantum field theory and their applications) to experiment. The thermal interpretation resolves the problems of the foundations of quantum physics revealed in the critique from Part I of this series. It improves the traditional foundations in several respects: * The thermal interpretation reflects the actual practice of quantum physics, especially regarding its macroscopic implications. * The thermal interpretation gives a fair account of the interpretational differences between quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. * The thermal interpretation gives a natural, realistic meaning to the standard formalism of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory in a single world, without introducing additional hidden variables. * The thermal interpretation is independent of the measurement problem. The latter becomes a precise problem in statistical mechanics rather than a fuzzy and problematic notion in the foundations. Details will be discussed in Part III.

arXiv:1902.10779•Feb 27, 2019•0 citations

Teaching ideal quantum measurement, from dynamics to interpretation

ARMEN E. ALLAHVERDYAN, Roger Balian, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen

We present a graduate course on ideal measurements, analyzed as dynamical processes of interaction between the tested system S and an apparatus A, described by quantum statistical mechanics. The apparatus A = M + B involves a macroscopic measuring device M and a bath B. The requirements for ideality of the measurement allow us to specify the Hamiltonian of the isolated compound system S + M + B . The resulting dynamical equations may be solved for simple models. Conservation laws are shown to entail two independent relaxation mechanisms: truncation and registration. Approximations, justified by the large size of M and of B, are needed. The final density matrix 𝒟 ^ ( t f ) of S + A has an equilibrium form. It describes globally the outcome of a large set of runs of the measurement. The measurement problem, i.e., extracting physical properties of individual runs from 𝒟 ^ ( t f ), then arises due to the ambiguity of its splitting into parts associated with subsets of runs. To deal with this ambiguity, we postulate that each run ends up with a distinct pointer value A i of the macroscopic M. This is compatible with the principles of quantum mechanics. Born’s rule then arises from the conservation law for the tested observable; it expresses the frequency of occurrence of the final indications A i of M in terms of the initial state of S. Von Neumann’s reduction amounts to updating of information due to selection of A i . We advocate the terms q -probabilities and q -correlations when analyzing measurements of non-commuting observables. These ideas may be adapted to different types of courses.

arXiv:2405.20353•Comptes Rendus Physique•May 24, 2024•10 citations

Quantum thermodynamics under observation : the influence of quantum measurements

Jahnke, Thomas

The rather new field of quantum thermodynamics intends to derive thermodynamics from quantum mechanics, as well as to study thermodynamical behavior of quantum systems. It turns out that, indeed, thermalization can be obtained even for very small quantum systems due to the interaction with an appropriate environment. The consideration of an ensemble, as in statistical mechanics, is not necessary. However, the total system - consisting of system and environment - in quantum thermodynamics is usually considered to be closed. In particular, there exists no interaction with an external observer. Since quantum measurements typically influence the measured system, one may wonder which influence such an observation will have in the quantum thermodynamical setting. In this thesis, we study this influence of measurements in quantum thermodynamical systems. It turns out that various concepts known from statistical mechanics arise from such a "quantum thermodynamics under observation", although they do not have any meaning in the isolated quantum thermodynamical setting. The model discussed in the first part consists of a two-level system coupled to a large spin environment, the magnetization of which is measured periodically. This leads to quasi-classical trajectories for the system and - as in statistical mechanics - thermalization and temperature only have a meaning in terms of an ensemble average or a long-time average. Calculating these averages, we prove the ergodicity of the system. Interestingly, the entropy of the obtained attractor state depends on the time between the measurements and can be shown to be connected with the subjective lack of knowledge of the observer. In case of optimal measurements, the ensemble averaged state of the system under periodic measurements equals the state of the system in the quantum thermodynamical model without measurements. Introducing a detuning between system and environment, we find that the system can be prepared in almost arbitrary thermal states due to the periodic measurements. Even the creation of inversion becomes possible. As shown in numerical simulations, our results, which were analytically obtained for large environments, are even applicable to describe the behavior of the system coupled to small environments consisting of only a few spins. Besides measurements of the environment, we also study direct projective measurements of the system, as well as measurements with finite duration, obtaining that the dynamics of the system is almost independent of the concrete realization of the measurements. In the second part of the thesis, we discuss the meaning of temperature fluctuations in quantum thermodynamical systems. In statistical mechanics, there exist different approaches to the problem of temperature fluctuations, which lead to the well-known temperature fluctuation formula. The nature and operational accessibility of these fluctuations, however, remains rather unclear. We argue that according to quantum thermodynamics a system relaxes into a quasi-stationary thermal state and therefore the temperature does not fluctuate. However, since temperature is not an observable, it can only be determined indirectly. For modular systems, we show that the fluctuations of the temperature estimate obtained from a single energy measurement, indeed, are given by the temperature fluctuation formula derived in statistical mechanics, but only within a certain temperature range. The validity range of this formula increases with increasing size of the system. Thus, one can conclude that these "temperature fluctuations" can be interpreted as representing a fundamental limit for the instantaneous determination of temperature.

•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

General Considerations

John von Neumann

This chapter considers what would happen to a mixture with the statistical operator 𝗨 if a quantity 𝖱 with operator 𝖱 is measured in it. It then investigates the thermodynamics of quantum mechanical ensembles from two different points of view. First, the chapter assumes the validity of both of the fundamental laws of thermodynamics, and proceeds on this basis to calculation of the entropy of ensembles. In this effort the normal methods of phenomenological thermodynamics are applied, and quantum mechanics plays a role only insofar as these thermodynamic observations relate to objects whose behavior is regulated by the laws of quantum. Afterwards this chapter proves the validity of these fundamental laws in quantum mechanics. Next, the chapter introduces some reversibility and equilibrium problems. Finally, this chapter discusses the macroscopic measurement.

Princeton University Press eBooks•Feb 27, 2018•0 citations
This chapter presents the measurement problem from the point of view of the thermal interpretation of quantum physics. Everything physicists measure is measured in a thermal environment, for which statistical thermodynamics is relevant. The thermal interpretation agrees with how one interprets measurements in thermodynamics, the macroscopic part of quantum physics, derived via statistical mechanics. By its very construction, the thermal interpretation naturally matches the classical properties of our quantum world: The thermal interpretation assigns states-and a realistic interpretation for them-to individual quantum systems, in a way that large quantum systems are naturally described by classical observables. Since measurement devices are large quantum systems, this is the key to solving the measurement problem. We discuss the role played by macroscopic systems and the weak law of large numbers in getting readings with small uncertainty. Since quantum physics makes many deterministic predictions, for example regarding observed spectra, but also assertions about probabilities, we distinguish deterministic and statistical measurements. To clarify the meaning of the concept of measurement, we postulate (in Section 11.1) a measurement principle that defines what it means in the thermal interpretation to measure a quantity with a specified uncertainty. This turns the measurement problem from a philosophical riddle into a scientific problem in the domain of quantum statistical mechanics, namely how the quantum dynamics correlates macroscopic readings from an instrument with properties of the state of a measured microscopic system. The essence of scientific practice is the reproducibility of measurements, discussed in Section 11.2. Unlike in traditional interpretations, single, nonreproducible observations do not count as measurements, since this would violate the reproducibility of measurements-the essence of scientific practice. As a consequence, the measurement of a Hermitian quantity A is regarded as giving an uncertain value approximating the q-expectation {A} rather than (as tradition wanted to have it) as an exact revelation of an eigenvalue of A. This difference is most conspicuous in the interpretation of single discrete microscopic events. Except in very special circumstances, these are not reproducible. Thus, they have no scientific value in themselves and do not constitute measurement results. Scientific value is, however, in ensembles of such observations, which result in approximate measurements of q-probabilities and q-expectations. Sections 11.3 and 11.4 distinguish deterministic and statistical measurements, depending on whether a single observation is reproducible, and discuss the role played by macroscopic systems and the weak law of large numbers in getting readings with small uncertainty. How to measure the q-probabilities of events, described in terms of POVMs, is discussed in Section 11.5. Section 11.6 poses the measurement problem as a problem of the statistical mechanics of measurement devices, and discuss recent work by Allahverdyan, Balian, and Nieuwenhuizen on its resolution. Section 11.7 discusses the problem how, in the thermal interpretation, discrete events can arise, although qexpectations are by their very nature continuous. This is resolved by pointing to work by Breuer and Petruccione on piecewise deterministic processes (PDP). Section 11.8 sheds additional light on the origin of discrete events by an analysis of the role dissipative bistability plays in obtaining discreteness in classical physics.
This paper presents the measurement problem from the point of view of the thermal interpretation of quantum physics introduced in Part II. The measurement of a Hermitian quantity AAA is regarded as giving an uncertain value approximating the q-expectation ⟨A⟩\langle A\rangle⟨A⟩ rather than (as tradition wanted to have it) as an exact revelation of an eigenvalue of AAA. Single observations of microscopic systems are (except under special circumstances) very uncertain measurements only. The thermal interpretation * treats detection events as a statistical measurement of particle beam intensity. * claims that the particle concept is only asymptotically valid, under conditions where particles are essentially free. * claims that the unmodeled environment influences the results enough to cause all randomness in quantum physics. * allows one to derive Born's rule for scattering and in the limit of ideal measurements; but in general, only part of Born's rule holds exactly: Whenever a quantity A with zero uncertainty is measured exactly, its value is an eigenvalue of A. * has no explicit collapse -- the latter emerges approximately in non-isolated subsystems. * gives a valid interpretation of systems modeled by a quantum-classical dynamics. * explains the peculiar features of the Copenhagen interpretation (lacking realism between measurements) and the minimal statistical interpretation (lacking realism for the single case) where these interpretations apply -- in the microscopic domain. The thermal interpretation is an interpretation of quantum physics that is in principle refutable by theoretical arguments leading to a negative answer to a number of open issues collected at the end of the paper, since there is plenty of experimental evidence for each of the points mentioned there.
In this chapter, we define a new interpretation of quantum physics, called the thermal interpretation. The thermal interpretation of quantum physics (including quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, quantum statistical mechanics, and their applications) allows a consistent and deterministic relativistic quantum description of the universe from the smallest to the largest levels of modeling, including its classical aspects, without having to introduce any change in the formal apparatus of quantum physics. The goal of the thermal interpretation is to provide foundations that match all requirements from Chapter 8. The thermal interpretation agrees with how one interprets measurements in statistical thermodynamics, the macroscopic part of quantum physics, derived via statistical mechanics. Extrapolating from the macroscopic case, the thermal interpretation considers the functions of the state (or of the parameters characterizing a state from a particular family of states) as the objective properties of what really exists. Some of these are accessible to experiment-namely the expectation values of quantities that have a small uncertainty and vary sufficiently slowly in time and space. Because of the law of large numbers, all thermodynamic variables are in this category. By its very construction, the thermal interpretation naturally matches the classical, in essence, thermodynamical properties of our quantum world.
This paper presents the thermal interpretation of quantum physics. The insight from Part I of this series that Born's rule has its limitations -- hence cannot be the foundation of quantum physics -- opens the way for an alternative interpretation -- the thermal interpretation of quantum physics. It gives new foundations that connect quantum physics (including quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics, quantum field theory and their applications) to experiment. The thermal interpretation resolves the problems of the foundations of quantum physics revealed in the critique from Part I of this series. It improves the traditional foundations in several respects: * The thermal interpretation reflects the actual practice of quantum physics, especially regarding its macroscopic implications. * The thermal interpretation gives a fair account of the interpretational differences between quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. * The thermal interpretation gives a natural, realistic meaning to the standard formalism of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory in a single world, without introducing additional hidden variables. * The thermal interpretation is independent of the measurement problem. The latter becomes a precise problem in statistical mechanics rather than a fuzzy and problematic notion in the foundations. Details will be discussed in Part III.
We present a graduate course on ideal measurements, analyzed as dynamical processes of interaction between the tested system S and an apparatus A, described by quantum statistical mechanics. The apparatus A = M + B involves a macroscopic measuring device M and a bath B. The requirements for ideality of the measurement allow us to specify the Hamiltonian of the isolated compound system S + M + B . The resulting dynamical equations may be solved for simple models. Conservation laws are shown to entail two independent relaxation mechanisms: truncation and registration. Approximations, justified by the large size of M and of B, are needed. The final density matrix 𝒟 ^ ( t f ) of S + A has an equilibrium form. It describes globally the outcome of a large set of runs of the measurement. The measurement problem, i.e., extracting physical properties of individual runs from 𝒟 ^ ( t f ), then arises due to the ambiguity of its splitting into parts associated with subsets of runs. To deal with this ambiguity, we postulate that each run ends up with a distinct pointer value A i of the macroscopic M. This is compatible with the principles of quantum mechanics. Born’s rule then arises from the conservation law for the tested observable; it expresses the frequency of occurrence of the final indications A i of M in terms of the initial state of S. Von Neumann’s reduction amounts to updating of information due to selection of A i . We advocate the terms q -probabilities and q -correlations when analyzing measurements of non-commuting observables. These ideas may be adapted to different types of courses.
The rather new field of quantum thermodynamics intends to derive thermodynamics from quantum mechanics, as well as to study thermodynamical behavior of quantum systems. It turns out that, indeed, thermalization can be obtained even for very small quantum systems due to the interaction with an appropriate environment. The consideration of an ensemble, as in statistical mechanics, is not necessary. However, the total system - consisting of system and environment - in quantum thermodynamics is usually considered to be closed. In particular, there exists no interaction with an external observer. Since quantum measurements typically influence the measured system, one may wonder which influence such an observation will have in the quantum thermodynamical setting. In this thesis, we study this influence of measurements in quantum thermodynamical systems. It turns out that various concepts known from statistical mechanics arise from such a "quantum thermodynamics under observation", although they do not have any meaning in the isolated quantum thermodynamical setting. The model discussed in the first part consists of a two-level system coupled to a large spin environment, the magnetization of which is measured periodically. This leads to quasi-classical trajectories for the system and - as in statistical mechanics - thermalization and temperature only have a meaning in terms of an ensemble average or a long-time average. Calculating these averages, we prove the ergodicity of the system. Interestingly, the entropy of the obtained attractor state depends on the time between the measurements and can be shown to be connected with the subjective lack of knowledge of the observer. In case of optimal measurements, the ensemble averaged state of the system under periodic measurements equals the state of the system in the quantum thermodynamical model without measurements. Introducing a detuning between system and environment, we find that the system can be prepared in almost arbitrary thermal states due to the periodic measurements. Even the creation of inversion becomes possible. As shown in numerical simulations, our results, which were analytically obtained for large environments, are even applicable to describe the behavior of the system coupled to small environments consisting of only a few spins. Besides measurements of the environment, we also study direct projective measurements of the system, as well as measurements with finite duration, obtaining that the dynamics of the system is almost independent of the concrete realization of the measurements. In the second part of the thesis, we discuss the meaning of temperature fluctuations in quantum thermodynamical systems. In statistical mechanics, there exist different approaches to the problem of temperature fluctuations, which lead to the well-known temperature fluctuation formula. The nature and operational accessibility of these fluctuations, however, remains rather unclear. We argue that according to quantum thermodynamics a system relaxes into a quasi-stationary thermal state and therefore the temperature does not fluctuate. However, since temperature is not an observable, it can only be determined indirectly. For modular systems, we show that the fluctuations of the temperature estimate obtained from a single energy measurement, indeed, are given by the temperature fluctuation formula derived in statistical mechanics, but only within a certain temperature range. The validity range of this formula increases with increasing size of the system. Thus, one can conclude that these "temperature fluctuations" can be interpreted as representing a fundamental limit for the instantaneous determination of temperature.
This chapter considers what would happen to a mixture with the statistical operator 𝗨 if a quantity 𝖱 with operator 𝖱 is measured in it. It then investigates the thermodynamics of quantum mechanical ensembles from two different points of view. First, the chapter assumes the validity of both of the fundamental laws of thermodynamics, and proceeds on this basis to calculation of the entropy of ensembles. In this effort the normal methods of phenomenological thermodynamics are applied, and quantum mechanics plays a role only insofar as these thermodynamic observations relate to objects whose behavior is regulated by the laws of quantum. Afterwards this chapter proves the validity of these fundamental laws in quantum mechanics. Next, the chapter introduces some reversibility and equilibrium problems. Finally, this chapter discusses the macroscopic measurement.