Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

Wave Mechanics

Richard Fitzpatrick

Published Jan 7, 2013• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

According to classical physics (i.e., physics prior to the 20th century), particles and waves are distinct classes of physical entity that possess markedly different properties. For instance, particles are discrete, which means that they cannot be arbitrarily divided. In other words, it makes sense to talk about one electron, or two electrons, but not about a third of an electron. Waves, on the other hand, are continuous, which means that they can be arbitrarily divided. In other words, given a wave whose amplitude has a certain value, it makes sense to talk about a similar wave whose amplitude is one third, or any other fraction whatsoever, of this value. Particles are also highly localized in space. For example, atomic nuclei have very small radii of order 10−15 m, whereas electrons act like point particles (i.e., they have no discernible spatial extent). Waves, on the other hand, are nonlocalized in space. In fact, a wave is defined as a disturbance that is periodic in space, with some finite periodicity length (i.e., wavelength). Hence, it is fairly meaningless to talk about a disturbance being a wave unless it extends over a region of space that is at least a few wavelengths in size.

DOI
10.1201/b14579-13

Related papers

Summarizing what we know about the photon

Harry Paul

How can we construct a picture of the photon from the wealth of observation material available to us? The photon appears to have a split personality: it is neither a wave nor a particle but something else which, depending on the experimental situation, exhibits a wave- or a particle-like behavior. In other words, in the photon (as in material particles such as the electron) the particle–wave dualism becomes manifest. Whereas classically the wave and the particle pictures are separate, quantum mechanics accomplishes a formal synthesis through a unified mathematical treatment. Let us look first at the wave aspect familiar from classical electrodynamics, which seems to be the most natural description. It makes all the different interference phenomena understandable, such as the “interference of the photon with itself” on the one hand and the appearance of spatial and temporal intensity correlations in a thermal radiation field on the other (which are obviously brought about by superposition of elementary waves emitted independently from different atoms). It might come as a surprise (at least for those having quantum mechanical preconceptions) that the classical theory is valid down to arbitrarily small intensities: the visibility of the interference pattern does not deteriorate even for very small intensities – the zero point fluctuations of the electromagnetic field advocated by quantum mechanics do not have a disturbing effect – and is valid not only for conventional interference experiments but also for interference between independently generated light beams (in the form of laser light).

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 20, 2004•0 citations

Wave mechanics

Vladimir Mitin, Viatcheslav A. Kochelap, Michael A. Stroscio

Introduction In this chapter we discuss the basic physical concepts and equations related to the behavior of particles in the nanoworld. We introduce the Schrödinger wave equation for particles and determine the ways to calculate observable physical quantities. We find that, in wave mechanics, the motion of a particle confined to a finite volume is always characterized by discrete values of the energy and standing-wave-like wavefunctions, i.e., such a motion is quantized. While motion in an infinite space (i.e., free motion) is not quantized and is described by propagating waves, the energy of the particle is characterized by a continuous range of values. Keeping in mind the diverse variants of nanostructures, by using wave mechanics we analyze some particular examples, which highlight important quantum properties of particles. Many of the examples analyzed can serve as the simplest models of nanostructures and will be exploited in following chapters to understand the fundamentals of processes in nanoelectronics. The Schrödinger wave equation From the previous chapter, we conclude that nanosize physical systems are quantum-mechanical systems, inasmuch as their sizes are comparable to typical de Broglie wavelengths of the particles composing these systems. In dealing with quantum-mechanical systems, one aims at determining the wavefunction of a single particle or of the whole system. As we will demonstrate in the subsequent discussion, knowledge of the wavefunction in quantum mechanics is sufficient to describe completely a particle or even a system of particles.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 6, 2007•0 citations

Toward quantum mechanics

Anthony F. J. Levi

Introduction It is believed that the basic physical building blocks forming the world we live in may be categorized into particles of matter and carriers of force between matter. All known elementary constituents of matter and transmitters of force are quantized. For example, energy, momentum, and angular momentum take on discrete quantized values. The electron is an example of an elementary particle of matter, and the photon is an example of a transmitter of force. Neutrons, protons, and atoms are composite particles made up of elementary particles of matter and transmitters of force. These composite particles are also quantized. Because classical mechanics is unable to explain quantization, we must learn quantum mechanics in order to understand the microscopic properties of atoms – which, for example, make up solids such as crystalline semiconductors. Historically, the laws of quantum mechanics have been established by experiment. The most important early experiments involved light. Long before it was realized that light waves are quantized into particles called photons, key experiments on the wave properties of light were performed. For example, it was established that the color of visible light is associated with different wavelengths of light. Table 2.1 shows the range of wavelengths corresponding to different colors. The connection between optical and electrical phenomena was established by Maxwell in 1864. This extended the concept of light to include the complete electromagnetic spectrum. A great deal of effort was, and continues to be, spent gathering information on the behavior of light.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jun 1, 2006•0 citations

Wave Functions and The First Postulate

M.S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

A consistent description of the motion of a particle by wave propagation implies not only a geometrical equivalence between a trajectory and a ray but also a kinematical equivalence between the time rates at which the particle or wave is traversing its path. This may be tentatively achieved by using a wave configuration, known as a wave packet, represented as a continuous superposition of monochromatic waves. If the wave packet can be regarded as a point, having zero amplitude everywhere except in a very small region, its motion along a trajectory might be interpreted as the motion of a single particle. The representation of a particle in space and time by means of a highly localized wave packet is a basic assumption of wave mechanics. The behavior of the wave packet as a whole will account for experiments where particle-like properties are observed, whereas individual wavelength components of packet will appear in experiments which depend upon interference and diffraction effects.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2020•1 citation

The makeshift of wave mechanics

Erwin Schrödinger, Roger Penrose

Now I shall try to give you an idea of the way in which physicists at present endeavour to overcome this failure. One might term it an ‘emergency exit’, though it was not intended as such, but as a new theory. I mean, of course, wave mechanics. (Edding-ton called it ‘not a physical theory but a dodge— and a very good dodge too’.) The situation is about as follows. The observed facts (about particles and light and all sorts of radiation and their mutual interaction) appear to be repugnant to the classical ideal of a continuous description in space and time. (Let me explain myself to the physicist by hinting at one example: Bohr's famous theory of spectral lines in 1913 had to assume that the atom makes a sudden transition from one state into another state, and that in doing so it emits a train of light waves several feet long, containing hundreds of thousands of waves and requiring for its formation a considerable time. No information about the atom during this transition can be offered.) So the facts of observation are irreconcilable with a continuous description in space and time; it just seems impossible, at least in many cases. On the other hand, from an incomplete description—from a picture with gaps in space and time—one cannot draw clear and unambiguous conclusions; it leads to hazy, arbitrary, unclear thinking—and that is the thing we must avoid at all costs! What is to be done?

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 13, 1996•0 citations

Waves

WJ Mullin

Quantum mechanics is introduced here as a fundamental theory that must treat particles equally often as waves. Here, classical waves are introduced in some detail, with discussions of the important concepts of waves: medium, amplitude, frequency, wavelength, period, harmonics, interference, standing waves, etc. Waves can be oscillatory waves with a repeating pattern, or pulse waves, which are localized in space. All of the elements of waves are important in understanding how the Schrödinger equation describes particles. Classical standing waves must have wave lengths that fit between boundaries giving them discrete allowed frequencies, a harbinger of quantized energies in quantum mechanics. Complicated waves can be analyzed in terms of their component frequencies, the fundamental idea of Fourier analysis. This discussion shows that a classical wave has a limit in how accurately one can specify simultaneously the wave’s position and frequency, in analogy with Heisenberg uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Mar 16, 2017•1 citation
According to classical physics (i.e., physics prior to the 20th century), particles and waves are distinct classes of physical entity that possess markedly different properties. For instance, particles are discrete, which means that they cannot be arbitrarily divided. In other words, it makes sense to talk about one electron, or two electrons, but not about a third of an electron. Waves, on the other hand, are continuous, which means that they can be arbitrarily divided. In other words, given a wave whose amplitude has a certain value, it makes sense to talk about a similar wave whose amplitude is one third, or any other fraction whatsoever, of this value. Particles are also highly localized in space. For example, atomic nuclei have very small radii of order 10−15 m, whereas electrons act like point particles (i.e., they have no discernible spatial extent). Waves, on the other hand, are nonlocalized in space. In fact, a wave is defined as a disturbance that is periodic in space, with some finite periodicity length (i.e., wavelength). Hence, it is fairly meaningless to talk about a disturbance being a wave unless it extends over a region of space that is at least a few wavelengths in size.
How can we construct a picture of the photon from the wealth of observation material available to us? The photon appears to have a split personality: it is neither a wave nor a particle but something else which, depending on the experimental situation, exhibits a wave- or a particle-like behavior. In other words, in the photon (as in material particles such as the electron) the particle–wave dualism becomes manifest. Whereas classically the wave and the particle pictures are separate, quantum mechanics accomplishes a formal synthesis through a unified mathematical treatment. Let us look first at the wave aspect familiar from classical electrodynamics, which seems to be the most natural description. It makes all the different interference phenomena understandable, such as the “interference of the photon with itself” on the one hand and the appearance of spatial and temporal intensity correlations in a thermal radiation field on the other (which are obviously brought about by superposition of elementary waves emitted independently from different atoms). It might come as a surprise (at least for those having quantum mechanical preconceptions) that the classical theory is valid down to arbitrarily small intensities: the visibility of the interference pattern does not deteriorate even for very small intensities – the zero point fluctuations of the electromagnetic field advocated by quantum mechanics do not have a disturbing effect – and is valid not only for conventional interference experiments but also for interference between independently generated light beams (in the form of laser light).
Introduction In this chapter we discuss the basic physical concepts and equations related to the behavior of particles in the nanoworld. We introduce the Schrödinger wave equation for particles and determine the ways to calculate observable physical quantities. We find that, in wave mechanics, the motion of a particle confined to a finite volume is always characterized by discrete values of the energy and standing-wave-like wavefunctions, i.e., such a motion is quantized. While motion in an infinite space (i.e., free motion) is not quantized and is described by propagating waves, the energy of the particle is characterized by a continuous range of values. Keeping in mind the diverse variants of nanostructures, by using wave mechanics we analyze some particular examples, which highlight important quantum properties of particles. Many of the examples analyzed can serve as the simplest models of nanostructures and will be exploited in following chapters to understand the fundamentals of processes in nanoelectronics. The Schrödinger wave equation From the previous chapter, we conclude that nanosize physical systems are quantum-mechanical systems, inasmuch as their sizes are comparable to typical de Broglie wavelengths of the particles composing these systems. In dealing with quantum-mechanical systems, one aims at determining the wavefunction of a single particle or of the whole system. As we will demonstrate in the subsequent discussion, knowledge of the wavefunction in quantum mechanics is sufficient to describe completely a particle or even a system of particles.
Introduction It is believed that the basic physical building blocks forming the world we live in may be categorized into particles of matter and carriers of force between matter. All known elementary constituents of matter and transmitters of force are quantized. For example, energy, momentum, and angular momentum take on discrete quantized values. The electron is an example of an elementary particle of matter, and the photon is an example of a transmitter of force. Neutrons, protons, and atoms are composite particles made up of elementary particles of matter and transmitters of force. These composite particles are also quantized. Because classical mechanics is unable to explain quantization, we must learn quantum mechanics in order to understand the microscopic properties of atoms – which, for example, make up solids such as crystalline semiconductors. Historically, the laws of quantum mechanics have been established by experiment. The most important early experiments involved light. Long before it was realized that light waves are quantized into particles called photons, key experiments on the wave properties of light were performed. For example, it was established that the color of visible light is associated with different wavelengths of light. Table 2.1 shows the range of wavelengths corresponding to different colors. The connection between optical and electrical phenomena was established by Maxwell in 1864. This extended the concept of light to include the complete electromagnetic spectrum. A great deal of effort was, and continues to be, spent gathering information on the behavior of light.
A consistent description of the motion of a particle by wave propagation implies not only a geometrical equivalence between a trajectory and a ray but also a kinematical equivalence between the time rates at which the particle or wave is traversing its path. This may be tentatively achieved by using a wave configuration, known as a wave packet, represented as a continuous superposition of monochromatic waves. If the wave packet can be regarded as a point, having zero amplitude everywhere except in a very small region, its motion along a trajectory might be interpreted as the motion of a single particle. The representation of a particle in space and time by means of a highly localized wave packet is a basic assumption of wave mechanics. The behavior of the wave packet as a whole will account for experiments where particle-like properties are observed, whereas individual wavelength components of packet will appear in experiments which depend upon interference and diffraction effects.
Now I shall try to give you an idea of the way in which physicists at present endeavour to overcome this failure. One might term it an ‘emergency exit’, though it was not intended as such, but as a new theory. I mean, of course, wave mechanics. (Edding-ton called it ‘not a physical theory but a dodge— and a very good dodge too’.) The situation is about as follows. The observed facts (about particles and light and all sorts of radiation and their mutual interaction) appear to be repugnant to the classical ideal of a continuous description in space and time. (Let me explain myself to the physicist by hinting at one example: Bohr's famous theory of spectral lines in 1913 had to assume that the atom makes a sudden transition from one state into another state, and that in doing so it emits a train of light waves several feet long, containing hundreds of thousands of waves and requiring for its formation a considerable time. No information about the atom during this transition can be offered.) So the facts of observation are irreconcilable with a continuous description in space and time; it just seems impossible, at least in many cases. On the other hand, from an incomplete description—from a picture with gaps in space and time—one cannot draw clear and unambiguous conclusions; it leads to hazy, arbitrary, unclear thinking—and that is the thing we must avoid at all costs! What is to be done?
Quantum mechanics is introduced here as a fundamental theory that must treat particles equally often as waves. Here, classical waves are introduced in some detail, with discussions of the important concepts of waves: medium, amplitude, frequency, wavelength, period, harmonics, interference, standing waves, etc. Waves can be oscillatory waves with a repeating pattern, or pulse waves, which are localized in space. All of the elements of waves are important in understanding how the Schrödinger equation describes particles. Classical standing waves must have wave lengths that fit between boundaries giving them discrete allowed frequencies, a harbinger of quantized energies in quantum mechanics. Complicated waves can be analyzed in terms of their component frequencies, the fundamental idea of Fourier analysis. This discussion shows that a classical wave has a limit in how accurately one can specify simultaneously the wave’s position and frequency, in analogy with Heisenberg uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics.