Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Objective causality

U Larsen

Published Dec 21, 1988• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Any change of state can be represented objectively and causally in the form of a transformation T : W to w=T(W)= Sigma j E j WE (sup) intersection j , where (E j ) are operators of the object system itself, and define the cause of the evolution from the initial state W to the final state w. Three axiomatically simple criteria are proposed in order to define that class of transformations M(A) which accomplish the measurement of a given property A= Sigma n A n P n . This class turns out to hold an infinity of equivalent transformations, which all perform the same measurement, but employ distinct causes (E j ). One such transformation is the projection w= Sigma n P n WP n which is traditionally held to define the measurement of A. While the authors results are therefore consistent with standard theory, the wider class considered includes transformations which accomplish the measurement by means of physical causes, such as rotations, translations, etc. A theorem is proved which shows the following. (a) For every measurement T in M(A) the cause must be compatible with A, i.e. (A, E j )=0 for all members of (E j ). This means that the operators of quantum theory define the very operations which cause the measurement of the physical properties they represent. (b) To achieve a measurement a certain design criterion must be satisfied by the cause (E j ). (c) The measured statistic (w n ) always agrees with the standard probability prediction made within quantum theory on the basis of the initial object state W. If w= Sigma n w n P n is the result of a measurement of A, and P(n)=Tr(WP n ) is the predicted probability that its value is A n , then for every T in M(A): w n =P(n) for all n. This provides the empirical foundation for the quantal probability calculus without resort to the traditional projection postulate. The authors criteria which makes this feasible rely exclusively on empirical principles based on classical logic-in an operational context. Several examples are investigated, including measurements performed by so-called operations. It is demonstrated that under certain circumstances an apparatus (not necessarily macroscopic) can both perform the measurement and record its outcome.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/21/24/008

Related papers

What Does the Operator Algebra of Quantum Statistics Tell Us about the Objective Causes of Observable Effects?

Holger F. Hofmann

Quantum physics can only make statistical predictions about possible measurement outcomes, and these predictions originate from an operator algebra that is fundamentally different from the conventional definition of probability as a subjective lack of information regarding the physical reality of the system. In the present paper, I explore how the operator formalism accommodates the vast number of possible states and measurements by characterizing its essential function as a description of causality relations between initial conditions and subsequent observations. It is shown that any complete description of causality must involve non-positive statistical elements that cannot be associated with any directly observable effects. The necessity of non-positive elements is demonstrated by the uniquely defined mathematical description of ideal correlations which explains the physics of maximally entangled states, quantum teleportation and quantum cloning. The operator formalism thus modifies the concept of causality by providing a universally valid description of deterministic relations between initial states and subsequent observations that cannot be expressed in terms of directly observable measurement outcomes. Instead, the identifiable elements of causality are necessarily non-positive and hence unobservable. The validity of the operator algebra therefore indicates that a consistent explanation of the various uncertainty limited phenomena associated with physical objects is only possible if we learn to accept the fact that the elements of causality cannot be reconciled with a continuation of observable reality in the physical object.

arXiv:2005.03822•Entropy•Jun 9, 2020•3 citations

Logic and Complementarity

T. Bergstein

From the preceding exposition it follows that the quantum statistical representation of an individual atomic system does not imply any renunciation regarding further knowledge about the system. On the contrary the statistical character of quantum physics directly reflects the fundamental non-causal appearance of quantal recordings, and through the discovery of the complementarity of quantal phenomena a complete but necessarily statistical description of the atom has been accomplished. Furthermore quantum physics has afforded a statistical description of macroscopic bodies through their representation as assemblies of huge numbers of identical atomic systems, and, apart from accounting in a more fundamental way for the properties already described in classical physics(the correspondence principle, p. 36), quantum statistics explains several macroscopic phenomena which cannot be understood within the conceptual frame of classical physics only. It must be maintained, however, that when observing the properties of individual atomic objects the macroscopic observational apparatus cannot be represented in terms of atomic constituents because this would destroy the unambiguity of the description. The observational apparatus fulfils its basic function of being the spacetime frame of reference for the quantal recordings precisely through its description in classical physics alone. However, when refraining from the analysis of individual quantal processes it is possible to apply quantum statistics to macroscopic phenomena, that is, the causality of classical physical phenomena can be interpreted in the quantum formalism as the statistical result of the interplay of enormous numbers of atomic processes. It is possible, then, to talk of statistical causality as a fundamental aspect of physical reality.

•Jan 1, 1972•0 citations

Approximate measurement in quantum mechanics

Mary H. Fehrs

This is the first of two papers showing that the quantum problem of measurement remains unsolved even when the initial state of the apparatus is described by a statistical operator and when the results of measurement have a small probability of being erroneous. A realistic treatment of the measurement of observables of microscopic objects (e.g., the position or the spin of an electron) by means of observables of macroscopic apparatus (e.g., the position of a spot on a photographic plate) requires the consideration of errors. The first paper considers measurement procedures of the following type: An initial eigenstate of the object observable leads to a final statistical operator of the object plus apparatus which describes a mixture of “approximate” eigenstates of the apparatus observable. It is proved that each of a large class of initial states leads to a final statistical operator which does not describe any mixture containing even one “approximate” eigenstate of the apparatus observable. INTRODUCTION Several writers have tried to solve the quantum-mechanical problem of measurement through one or both of the following proposals: (a) describthe initial state of the measuring apparatus by a projection onto a subspace of the associated Hilbert space or by a statistical operator, thus taking into account the practical impossibility of knowing the exact quantum state of a macroscopic object; (b) recognizing that there may be some physical inaccuracy, such as a small error in the position of a pointer needle, in the final registration of the outcome of the measurement by the apparatus.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 26, 1993•1 citation

Persistence of Information in the Quantum Measurement Problem.

Shantena Augusto Sabbadini

The quantum measurement problem has to do with the compatibility of two different prescriptions for the end state of a quantum measurement process: (1) a superposition representing an entangled state of object system and apparatus; (2) a mixture of correlated states of object system and apparatus. The first prescription is a consequence of the linearity of time evolution in quantum mechanics; the second one (corresponding to what is usually called the 'collapse of the wave function') is a basic feature of the axiomatic structure of the theory. This paper proves that the two prescriptions are exactly equivalent whenever information about the results of the measurement persists, i.e. whenever there is some kind of record or trace of the results (all the measurements we are ordinarily concerned with fulfill this requirement). Experimental evidence is cited suggesting that indeed we should expect the equivalence of prescriptions (1) and (2) to hold when and only when information about measurement results persists. Finally the notion of 'element of reality' introduced by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen is discussed in the context of this description of the measurement process, and a brief remark is offered about the 'classical' nature of the world we experience.

Physics Essays•Mar 1, 2006•2 citations

Emergence of outcomes in quantum mechanics

Bradley A. Foreman

A persistent focus on the concept of emergence as a core element of the scientific method allows a clean separation, insofar as this is possible, of the physical and philosophical aspects of the problem of outcomes in quantum mechanics. The philosophical part of the problem is to explain why a closed system has definite experimental outcomes. The physical part is to show mathematically that there exists a limit in which the contradiction between unitary Schroedinger dynamics and a reduction process leading to distinct outcomes becomes negligible according to an explicitly stated criterion, and to make this criterion as objective as possible. The physical problem is solved here by redefining the notion of a quantum state and finding a suitable measure for the change of state upon reduction. The appropriate definition of the quantum state is not as a ray or density operator in Hilbert space, but rather as an equivalence class consisting of all density operators in a given subspace, the members of which all describe the same experimental outcome. For systems containing only subsystems that are integrated with their environments, these equivalence classes can be represented mathematically by projection operators, and the resulting formalism is closely related to that used by von Neumann to study the increase of entropy predicted by the second law of thermodynamics. However, nearly isolated subsystems are reduced only indirectly, as a consequence of their interaction with integrated subsystems. The reduced states of isolated subsystems are the same conditional states used in the definition of quantum discord. The key concepts of decoherence theory can all be adapted to fit this definition of a quantum state, resulting in a unified theory capable of resolving, in principle, all aspects of the quantum measurement problem. The theory thus obtained is weakly objective but not strongly objective.

arXiv:1907.03456•Jul 8, 2019•1 citation

The Measurement Problem and the Reduction Postulate of Quantum Mechanics

Rodolfo Gambini

It is well known, that the causal Schrödinger evolution of a quantum state is not compatible with the reduction postulate, even when decoherence is taken into account. The violation of the causal evolution, introduced by the standard reduction postulate distinguishes certain systems (as the measurement devices), whose states are very close to statistical mixtures (as the ones resulting from the process of decoherence). In these systems, this violation has not any observable effect. In arbitrary quantum systems, the transition from the initial density matrix to a diagonal matrix predicted by the standard reduction postulate, would lead to a complete breakdown of the Schrödinger evolution, and consequently would destroy all the predictive power of quantum mechanics. What we show here, is that there is a modified version of the postulate that allows to treat all the quantum mechanical systems on equal footing. The standard reduction postulate may be considered as a good approximation, useful for practical purposes, of this modified version which is consistent with the Schrödinger evolution and via decoherence with the experimental results. Within this approach, the physical role played by the reduction postulate is as a tool for the computation of relative probabilities and consequently for the determination of the probabilities of consistent histories.

arXiv:quant-ph/9803025•Mar 11, 1998•0 citations
Any change of state can be represented objectively and causally in the form of a transformation T : W to w=T(W)= Sigma j E j WE (sup) intersection j , where (E j ) are operators of the object system itself, and define the cause of the evolution from the initial state W to the final state w. Three axiomatically simple criteria are proposed in order to define that class of transformations M(A) which accomplish the measurement of a given property A= Sigma n A n P n . This class turns out to hold an infinity of equivalent transformations, which all perform the same measurement, but employ distinct causes (E j ). One such transformation is the projection w= Sigma n P n WP n which is traditionally held to define the measurement of A. While the authors results are therefore consistent with standard theory, the wider class considered includes transformations which accomplish the measurement by means of physical causes, such as rotations, translations, etc. A theorem is proved which shows the following. (a) For every measurement T in M(A) the cause must be compatible with A, i.e. (A, E j )=0 for all members of (E j ). This means that the operators of quantum theory define the very operations which cause the measurement of the physical properties they represent. (b) To achieve a measurement a certain design criterion must be satisfied by the cause (E j ). (c) The measured statistic (w n ) always agrees with the standard probability prediction made within quantum theory on the basis of the initial object state W. If w= Sigma n w n P n is the result of a measurement of A, and P(n)=Tr(WP n ) is the predicted probability that its value is A n , then for every T in M(A): w n =P(n) for all n. This provides the empirical foundation for the quantal probability calculus without resort to the traditional projection postulate. The authors criteria which makes this feasible rely exclusively on empirical principles based on classical logic-in an operational context. Several examples are investigated, including measurements performed by so-called operations. It is demonstrated that under certain circumstances an apparatus (not necessarily macroscopic) can both perform the measurement and record its outcome.
Quantum physics can only make statistical predictions about possible measurement outcomes, and these predictions originate from an operator algebra that is fundamentally different from the conventional definition of probability as a subjective lack of information regarding the physical reality of the system. In the present paper, I explore how the operator formalism accommodates the vast number of possible states and measurements by characterizing its essential function as a description of causality relations between initial conditions and subsequent observations. It is shown that any complete description of causality must involve non-positive statistical elements that cannot be associated with any directly observable effects. The necessity of non-positive elements is demonstrated by the uniquely defined mathematical description of ideal correlations which explains the physics of maximally entangled states, quantum teleportation and quantum cloning. The operator formalism thus modifies the concept of causality by providing a universally valid description of deterministic relations between initial states and subsequent observations that cannot be expressed in terms of directly observable measurement outcomes. Instead, the identifiable elements of causality are necessarily non-positive and hence unobservable. The validity of the operator algebra therefore indicates that a consistent explanation of the various uncertainty limited phenomena associated with physical objects is only possible if we learn to accept the fact that the elements of causality cannot be reconciled with a continuation of observable reality in the physical object.
From the preceding exposition it follows that the quantum statistical representation of an individual atomic system does not imply any renunciation regarding further knowledge about the system. On the contrary the statistical character of quantum physics directly reflects the fundamental non-causal appearance of quantal recordings, and through the discovery of the complementarity of quantal phenomena a complete but necessarily statistical description of the atom has been accomplished. Furthermore quantum physics has afforded a statistical description of macroscopic bodies through their representation as assemblies of huge numbers of identical atomic systems, and, apart from accounting in a more fundamental way for the properties already described in classical physics(the correspondence principle, p. 36), quantum statistics explains several macroscopic phenomena which cannot be understood within the conceptual frame of classical physics only. It must be maintained, however, that when observing the properties of individual atomic objects the macroscopic observational apparatus cannot be represented in terms of atomic constituents because this would destroy the unambiguity of the description. The observational apparatus fulfils its basic function of being the spacetime frame of reference for the quantal recordings precisely through its description in classical physics alone. However, when refraining from the analysis of individual quantal processes it is possible to apply quantum statistics to macroscopic phenomena, that is, the causality of classical physical phenomena can be interpreted in the quantum formalism as the statistical result of the interplay of enormous numbers of atomic processes. It is possible, then, to talk of statistical causality as a fundamental aspect of physical reality.
This is the first of two papers showing that the quantum problem of measurement remains unsolved even when the initial state of the apparatus is described by a statistical operator and when the results of measurement have a small probability of being erroneous. A realistic treatment of the measurement of observables of microscopic objects (e.g., the position or the spin of an electron) by means of observables of macroscopic apparatus (e.g., the position of a spot on a photographic plate) requires the consideration of errors. The first paper considers measurement procedures of the following type: An initial eigenstate of the object observable leads to a final statistical operator of the object plus apparatus which describes a mixture of “approximate” eigenstates of the apparatus observable. It is proved that each of a large class of initial states leads to a final statistical operator which does not describe any mixture containing even one “approximate” eigenstate of the apparatus observable. INTRODUCTION Several writers have tried to solve the quantum-mechanical problem of measurement through one or both of the following proposals: (a) describthe initial state of the measuring apparatus by a projection onto a subspace of the associated Hilbert space or by a statistical operator, thus taking into account the practical impossibility of knowing the exact quantum state of a macroscopic object; (b) recognizing that there may be some physical inaccuracy, such as a small error in the position of a pointer needle, in the final registration of the outcome of the measurement by the apparatus.
The quantum measurement problem has to do with the compatibility of two different prescriptions for the end state of a quantum measurement process: (1) a superposition representing an entangled state of object system and apparatus; (2) a mixture of correlated states of object system and apparatus. The first prescription is a consequence of the linearity of time evolution in quantum mechanics; the second one (corresponding to what is usually called the 'collapse of the wave function') is a basic feature of the axiomatic structure of the theory. This paper proves that the two prescriptions are exactly equivalent whenever information about the results of the measurement persists, i.e. whenever there is some kind of record or trace of the results (all the measurements we are ordinarily concerned with fulfill this requirement). Experimental evidence is cited suggesting that indeed we should expect the equivalence of prescriptions (1) and (2) to hold when and only when information about measurement results persists. Finally the notion of 'element of reality' introduced by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen is discussed in the context of this description of the measurement process, and a brief remark is offered about the 'classical' nature of the world we experience.
A persistent focus on the concept of emergence as a core element of the scientific method allows a clean separation, insofar as this is possible, of the physical and philosophical aspects of the problem of outcomes in quantum mechanics. The philosophical part of the problem is to explain why a closed system has definite experimental outcomes. The physical part is to show mathematically that there exists a limit in which the contradiction between unitary Schroedinger dynamics and a reduction process leading to distinct outcomes becomes negligible according to an explicitly stated criterion, and to make this criterion as objective as possible. The physical problem is solved here by redefining the notion of a quantum state and finding a suitable measure for the change of state upon reduction. The appropriate definition of the quantum state is not as a ray or density operator in Hilbert space, but rather as an equivalence class consisting of all density operators in a given subspace, the members of which all describe the same experimental outcome. For systems containing only subsystems that are integrated with their environments, these equivalence classes can be represented mathematically by projection operators, and the resulting formalism is closely related to that used by von Neumann to study the increase of entropy predicted by the second law of thermodynamics. However, nearly isolated subsystems are reduced only indirectly, as a consequence of their interaction with integrated subsystems. The reduced states of isolated subsystems are the same conditional states used in the definition of quantum discord. The key concepts of decoherence theory can all be adapted to fit this definition of a quantum state, resulting in a unified theory capable of resolving, in principle, all aspects of the quantum measurement problem. The theory thus obtained is weakly objective but not strongly objective.
It is well known, that the causal Schrödinger evolution of a quantum state is not compatible with the reduction postulate, even when decoherence is taken into account. The violation of the causal evolution, introduced by the standard reduction postulate distinguishes certain systems (as the measurement devices), whose states are very close to statistical mixtures (as the ones resulting from the process of decoherence). In these systems, this violation has not any observable effect. In arbitrary quantum systems, the transition from the initial density matrix to a diagonal matrix predicted by the standard reduction postulate, would lead to a complete breakdown of the Schrödinger evolution, and consequently would destroy all the predictive power of quantum mechanics. What we show here, is that there is a modified version of the postulate that allows to treat all the quantum mechanical systems on equal footing. The standard reduction postulate may be considered as a good approximation, useful for practical purposes, of this modified version which is consistent with the Schrödinger evolution and via decoherence with the experimental results. Within this approach, the physical role played by the reduction postulate is as a tool for the computation of relative probabilities and consequently for the determination of the probabilities of consistent histories.