Quantum physics can only make statistical predictions about possible measurement outcomes, and these predictions originate from an operator algebra that is fundamentally different from the conventional definition of probability as a subjective lack of information regarding the physical reality of the system. In the present paper, I explore how the operator formalism accommodates the vast number of possible states and measurements by characterizing its essential function as a description of causality relations between initial conditions and subsequent observations. It is shown that any complete description of causality must involve non-positive statistical elements that cannot be associated with any directly observable effects. The necessity of non-positive elements is demonstrated by the uniquely defined mathematical description of ideal correlations which explains the physics of maximally entangled states, quantum teleportation and quantum cloning. The operator formalism thus modifies the concept of causality by providing a universally valid description of deterministic relations between initial states and subsequent observations that cannot be expressed in terms of directly observable measurement outcomes. Instead, the identifiable elements of causality are necessarily non-positive and hence unobservable. The validity of the operator algebra therefore indicates that a consistent explanation of the various uncertainty limited phenomena associated with physical objects is only possible if we learn to accept the fact that the elements of causality cannot be reconciled with a continuation of observable reality in the physical object.
Quantum physics can only make statistical predictions about possible measurement outcomes, and these predictions originate from an operator algebra that is fundamentally different from the conventional definition of probability as a subjective lack of information regarding the physical reality of the system. In the present paper, I explore how the operator formalism accommodates the vast number of possible states and measurements by characterizing its essential function as a description of causality relations between initial conditions and subsequent observations. It is shown that any complete description of causality must involve non-positive statistical elements that cannot be associated with any directly observable effects. The necessity of non-positive elements is demonstrated by the uniquely defined mathematical description of ideal correlations which explains the physics of maximally entangled states, quantum teleportation and quantum cloning. The operator formalism thus modifies the concept of causality by providing a universally valid description of deterministic relations between initial states and subsequent observations that cannot be expressed in terms of directly observable measurement outcomes. Instead, the identifiable elements of causality are necessarily non-positive and hence unobservable. The validity of the operator algebra therefore indicates that a consistent explanation of the various uncertainty limited phenomena associated with physical objects is only possible if we learn to accept the fact that the elements of causality cannot be reconciled with a continuation of observable reality in the physical object.
Recently, weak measurements have attracted a lot of interest as an experimental method for the investigation of non-classical correlations between observables that cannot be measured jointly. Here, I explain how the complex valued statistics observed in weak measurements relate to the operator algebra of the conventional Hilbert space formalism and show that the algebra of operators originates from more fundamental relations between the physical properties of a quantum system that can be expressed in terms of complex conditional probabilities. In particular, commutation relations can be identified with fundamental imaginary correlations that characterize the relations between physical properties in terms of their transformation dynamics. Non-commutativity thus originates from a definition of relations between physical properties that replaces the assumption of joint reality with a complex-valued probability reflecting the dynamical response of the system to external forces, e.g. in measurement interactions.
Quantum contextuality describes situations where the statistics observed in different measurement contexts cannot be explained by a measurement of the independent reality of the system. The most simple case is observed in a three-dimensional Hilbert space, with five different measurement contexts related to each other by shared measurement outcomes. The quantum formalism defines the relations between these contexts in terms of well-defined relations between operators, and these relations can be used to reconstruct an unknown quantum state from a finite set of measurement results. Here, I introduce a reconstruction method based on the relations between the five measurement contexts that can violate the bounds of non-contextual statistics. A complete description of an arbitrary quantum state requires only five of the eight elements of a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability, but only an overcomplete set of eleven elements provides an unbiased description of all five contexts. A set of five fundamental relations between the eleven elements reveals a deterministic structure that links the five contexts. As illustrated by a number of examples, these relations provide a consistent description of contextual realities for the measurement outcomes of all five contexts.
It is possible to completely explain all aspects of quantum mechanics by expressing the relations between physical properties in terms of complex conditional probabilities (Phys. Rev. A 89, 042115(2014)). These fully deterministic probabilities replace the classical notions of phase space geometries and continuous trajectories with a more accurate description that takes into account the role of dynamics in the emergence of reality. We can then understand why so many previous attempts to find a detailed explanation of quantum phenomena have failed: the assumption of a static reality breaks down when the interaction needed to obtain a real effect exceeds Planck`s constant. Beyond that limit, complex conditional probabilities are the only valid expression of the fundamental laws of physics.
Any change of state can be represented objectively and causally in the form of a transformation T : W to w=T(W)= Sigma j E j WE (sup) intersection j , where (E j ) are operators of the object system itself, and define the cause of the evolution from the initial state W to the final state w. Three axiomatically simple criteria are proposed in order to define that class of transformations M(A) which accomplish the measurement of a given property A= Sigma n A n P n . This class turns out to hold an infinity of equivalent transformations, which all perform the same measurement, but employ distinct causes (E j ). One such transformation is the projection w= Sigma n P n WP n which is traditionally held to define the measurement of A. While the authors results are therefore consistent with standard theory, the wider class considered includes transformations which accomplish the measurement by means of physical causes, such as rotations, translations, etc. A theorem is proved which shows the following. (a) For every measurement T in M(A) the cause must be compatible with A, i.e. (A, E j )=0 for all members of (E j ). This means that the operators of quantum theory define the very operations which cause the measurement of the physical properties they represent. (b) To achieve a measurement a certain design criterion must be satisfied by the cause (E j ). (c) The measured statistic (w n ) always agrees with the standard probability prediction made within quantum theory on the basis of the initial object state W. If w= Sigma n w n P n is the result of a measurement of A, and P(n)=Tr(WP n ) is the predicted probability that its value is A n , then for every T in M(A): w n =P(n) for all n. This provides the empirical foundation for the quantal probability calculus without resort to the traditional projection postulate. The authors criteria which makes this feasible rely exclusively on empirical principles based on classical logic-in an operational context. Several examples are investigated, including measurements performed by so-called operations. It is demonstrated that under certain circumstances an apparatus (not necessarily macroscopic) can both perform the measurement and record its outcome.
Quantum mechanics has achieved unparalleled success as an operational theory, describing a wide range of experiments to remarkable accuracy. However, the physical foundations on which it rests remain as puzzling as they were a century ago, and a concise statement of the physical principles that underlie quantum mechanics is still outstanding. One promising approach holds that these principles should be formulated in terms of information, since many of the counter-intuitive effects in quantum theory concern questions such as what one can know about a quantum system and how the information encoded therein can be processed and distributed between parties. Another challenging feature of quantum theory is its incompatibility with the other cornerstone of modern physics, general relativity. In order to reconcile the two, one must identify and retain only the essential concepts and principles of each theory, and in the case of general relativity, causality has been identified as such a concept. This raises the question of how our classical understanding of causality must change when quantum theory is taken into account. In order to address these questions about information, knowledge and causality, I turn to the framework of causal models. In classical statistics, causal models explain the relations among a set of variables in terms of causal influences, which makes them a powerful tool for structuring our knowledge about complex systems and developing strategies for interacting with them. More importantly, the framework provides the conceptual underpinnings and mathematical methods for addressing questions about causation, information and knowledge in a rigorous manner. In this thesis, I develop a version of the classical causal models framework that is compatible with quantum theory and explore its physical implications. \n \n \nA first step is to define quantum versions of fundamental elements such as variables, conditionals and belief propagation rules. This allows one to consider the question of what one can come to know about a quantum variable from the point of view of causal modelling. The conditionals relating quantum variables are found to have a richer structure than their classical counterparts, which can be exploited for the task of discerning causal relations given limited data -- a central problem in classical causal modelling. The mathematical properties of quantum conditionals also establish a correspondence between various classes of two-party correlations, such as bound and distillable entanglement, and the types of causal structures that can give rise to them, which may become a useful tool for entanglement theory and quantum information processing. In the context of open quantum systems dynamics, quantum causal models provide a clear physical explanation of not completely positive maps and, more broadly, of non-Markovian quantum dynamics. Finally, I consider the possibility of non-classical effects in the way that different causal mechanisms are combined -- that is, non-classical causal structures. For the simple case of two causally ordered variables, I propose indicators that witness different classes of combinations of causal mechanisms, including a non-classical mixture, and describe an experiment realizing examples of the different classes. \n \n \nAs these results illustrate, the framework of quantum causal models provides both greater conceptual clarity and a comprehensive mathematical formalism for studying a diverse set of problems, ranging from foundational questions to applications in open systems dynamics and the exploration of non-classical causal structures, which are likely to feature in a future theory of quantum gravity. The material presented in this thesis is intended as a foundation and inspiration for further applications of quantum causal models.
This dissertation investigates statistical constraints on measurement outcomes in quantum mechanics, addressing two fundamental features that distinguish quantum theory from classical physics: non-reality and uncertainty.We examine these features through two perspectives: observable-dependent statistical constraints on quantum correlations and estimationbased measurement uncertainty in infinite-dimensional quantum systems.In the first part, we study realizability problems in both local realism and quantum theory, focusing on observable-dependent constraints.While previous studies have mainly characterized quantum correlations independently of observables, we derive a necessary and sufficient condition for quantum realizability of correlations in the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) scenario when observables are fixed in advance.Our main result provides an explicit inequality that imposes stronger constraints than previously known observable-independent bounds.We demonstrate that the maximum CHSH inequality violation depends on observable choice and apply our results to Bell's original scenario, revealing that whether Bell's original inequality is violated depends sensitively on observable selection.These findings demonstrate that non-reality does not manifest equally in all measurement configurations.In the second part, we extend the estimation-based formulation of measurement uncertainty by Watanabe, Sagawa, and Ueda to infinite-dimensional quantum systems.The original formulation provided clear physical interpretation but excluded fundamental observables such as position and momentum.Using pseudo-inverse forms of positive-semidefinite sesquilinear forms, we develop classical and quantum estimation theory for statistical models whose parameter space is the set of full-rank quantum states on infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.We derive classical and quantum Cramér-Rao inequalities and define estimationbased measurement errors for both bounded and unbounded operators.For each error type, we establish error-error uncertainty relation inequalities stronger than the original Watanabe-Sagawa-Ueda bound due to an improved derivation utilizing the full Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.Our work provides a universal definition of measurement errors with a clear physical interpretation while maintaining mathematical rigor.Our results contribute to quantum foundations by deepening the understanding of how measurement outcome constraints arise from quantum structure and observable properties.The methodological tools introduced-including characteristic functions, quasi-joint probability distributions, symmetry-based reduction techniques, and pseudo-inverse forms-may prove useful for future investigations in quantum foundations and quantum information theory.