Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2405.20569 · Entropy

Statistical Signatures of Quantum Contextuality

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Published Aug 26, 2024• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum contextuality describes situations where the statistics observed in different measurement contexts cannot be explained by a measurement of the independent reality of the system. The most simple case is observed in a three-dimensional Hilbert space, with five different measurement contexts related to each other by shared measurement outcomes. The quantum formalism defines the relations between these contexts in terms of well-defined relations between operators, and these relations can be used to reconstruct an unknown quantum state from a finite set of measurement results. Here, I introduce a reconstruction method based on the relations between the five measurement contexts that can violate the bounds of non-contextual statistics. A complete description of an arbitrary quantum state requires only five of the eight elements of a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability, but only an overcomplete set of eleven elements provides an unbiased description of all five contexts. A set of five fundamental relations between the eleven elements reveals a deterministic structure that links the five contexts. As illustrated by a number of examples, these relations provide a consistent description of contextual realities for the measurement outcomes of all five contexts.

DOI
10.3390/e26090725

Related papers

Quantitative relations between different measurement contexts

Ming Ji, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

In quantum theory, a measurement context is defined by an orthogonal basis in a Hilbert space, where each basis vector represents a specific measurement outcome. The precise quantitative relation between two different measurement contexts can thus be characterized by the inner products of nonorthogonal states in that Hilbert space. Here, we use measurement outcomes that are shared by different contexts to derive specific quantitative relations between the inner products of the Hilbert space vectors that represent the different contexts. It is shown that the probabilities that describe the paradoxes of quantum contextuality can be derived from a very small number of inner products, revealing details of the fundamental relations between measurement contexts that go beyond a basic violation of noncontextual limits. The application of our analysis to a product space of two systems reveals that the nonlocality of quantum entanglement can be traced back to a local inner product representing the relation between measurement contexts in only one system. Our results thus indicate that the essential nonclassical features of quantum mechanics can be traced back to the fundamental difference between quantum superpositions and classical alternatives.

arXiv:2305.14873•Quantum•Feb 14, 2024•8 citations

Characterization of the nonclassical relation between measurement outcomes represented by nonorthogonal quantum states

Ming Ji, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Quantum mechanics describes seemingly paradoxical relations between the outcomes of measurements that cannot be performed jointly. In Hilbert space, the outcomes of such incompatible measurements are represented by nonorthogonal states. In this paper we investigate how the relation between outcomes represented by nonorthogonal quantum states differs from the relations suggested by a joint assignment of measurement outcomes that do not depend on the actual measurement context. The analysis is based on a well-known scenario where three statements about the impossibilities of certain outcomes would seem to make a specific fourth outcome impossible as well, yet quantum theory allows the observation of that outcome with a nonvanishing probability. We show that the Hilbert space formalism modifies the relation between the four measurement outcomes by defining a lower bound of the fourth probability that increases as the total probability of the first three outcomes drops to zero. Quantum theory thus not only makes the violation of noncontextual consistency between the measurement outcomes possible, but actually requires it as a necessary consequence of the Hilbert space inner products that describe the contextual relation between the outcomes of different measurements.

arXiv:2211.02199•Physical Review A•Feb 9, 2023•9 citations

Quantum coherence and negative quasi probabilities in a contextual three-path interferometer

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Abstract Basic quantum effects are often illustrated using single particle interferences in two-path interferometers. A wider range of non-classical phenomena can be illustrated using three-path interferometers, but the increased complexity of quantum statistics in a three-dimensional Hilbert space makes it difficult to identify a representative set of observable properties that could be used to characterize specific phenomena. Here, I propose a characterization of pure states based on a five-stage interferometer recently introduced to demonstrate the relation between different measurement contexts (Optica Quantum 1, 63 (2023)). It is shown that the orthogonality relations between the states representing the different measurement contexts can be used to classify pure states within the three-dimensional Hilbert space according to the non-classical correlations between different contexts expressed by negative Kirkwood–Dirac distributions.

arXiv:2507.22323•Journal of Physics Photonics•Jan 13, 2026•0 citations

Quantum contextuality from measurement invasiveness

Andrea Navoni, Marco G. Genoni, Andrea Smirne

Contextuality is a defining feature that separates the quantum from the classical descriptions of physical systems. Within the marginal-scenario framework, noncontextual models are characterized by the existence of a single joint probability distribution consistent with all measurable contexts, while contextual models violate this condition. Building on this approach, we introduce a general method to analyze contextuality in terms of stochastic linear maps that effectively model invasive measurements on an otherwise classical statistics. These maps transform probabilities within the noncontextuality polytope, which includes all classical probabilities, into probabilities that may lie outside the polytope, while preserving the compatibility structure of the scenario at hand. We derive general consistency conditions that such maps must satisfy to represent admissible invasive measurements, and we fully identify them for a paradigmatic example of contextuality for a single three-level quantum system. Furthermore, we introduce a quantifier of contextuality based on the minimal invasiveness required to reproduce a given probability distribution, which offers a distinct approach on how to evaluate the degree of contextuality in a general scenario.

arXiv:2507.16942•Physical Review A•Feb 27, 2026•0 citations

Reconstructing Physical Quantities after Quantum Mechanics: Measurement, Context, and the Limits of Classical Reality

Hajime Sugio

This paper argues that physical quantities should be reconstructed not as non-contextual intrinsic attributes with measurement-independent determinate values, but as equivalence classes of measurement procedures. Bell–CHSH violations first motivate the problem: they show that Bell-type local causality/factorizability, measurement independence, and the relevant form of outcome determinism or value-definiteness cannot be jointly maintained, without by themselves refuting realism as such. Kochen–Specker contextuality supplies the stronger premise for the sharp-observable case: no global, non-contextual, dispersion-free value assignment to projection-valued observables can preserve the functional relations among compatible observables in Hilbert spaces of dimension at least three. The positive proposal uses algebraic quantum theory to identify physical quantities with classes of measuring procedures that yield the same outcome statistics over a full or tomographically complete state domain. This reconstruction preserves the classical deterministic limit while rejecting the stronger claim that measured quantities are context-independent values possessed independently of measurement. The analysis is restricted to sharp observables and projection-valued measurements; POVMs and unsharp measurements are noted as extensions. The resulting view is realist about an observer-independent world but non-intrinsic about empirical quantities, and it situates Wheeler's "It from Bit" as an interpretive corollary rather than as a foundational premise.

•Jul 7, 2026•0 citations

On measurement, superdeterminism, free will, and contextuality

Mordecai Waegell

Superdeterminism has received recent attention as a possible path toward a locally causal explanation of the entanglement correlations that appear in experimental tests of Bell's theorem. While the term `superdeterminism' was coined by Bell to refer to restrictions on the free will of experimenters, it was not rigorously defined until recently. It has now been defined as a property of any physical theory that produces systematic violations of statistical independence. Here we focus on formalizing the requirements that being nonsuperdeterministic places on a physical theory, and setting a standard that must be met before we can conclude that a given theory is not superdeterministic. We begin by carefully examining how a physical theory determines what outcomes we observe when performing measurements in terms of ontic states and response functions, and how this differs between superdeterministic and nonsuperdeterministic theories, in terms of the behavior of the types of vetted random sampling procedures that we use in experiments. The core result is that individual samples and measurement outcomes must be representative of the observed distributions, which is explained in detail. This also has a bearing on how measurement settings are chosen by agents, whether freely or randomly, and we argue that this standard ultimately defines what freedom/independence actually mean. We then discuss contextuality, and show that in most cases, superdeterminism is contextual. Finally, we discuss how different physical theories, with different notions of ontic states and response functions, can give rise to the same empirical data, and how the same operational contextuality may appear in different forms.

quant-pharXiv:2604.00311•Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations•Apr 2, 2026•0 citations
Quantum contextuality describes situations where the statistics observed in different measurement contexts cannot be explained by a measurement of the independent reality of the system. The most simple case is observed in a three-dimensional Hilbert space, with five different measurement contexts related to each other by shared measurement outcomes. The quantum formalism defines the relations between these contexts in terms of well-defined relations between operators, and these relations can be used to reconstruct an unknown quantum state from a finite set of measurement results. Here, I introduce a reconstruction method based on the relations between the five measurement contexts that can violate the bounds of non-contextual statistics. A complete description of an arbitrary quantum state requires only five of the eight elements of a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability, but only an overcomplete set of eleven elements provides an unbiased description of all five contexts. A set of five fundamental relations between the eleven elements reveals a deterministic structure that links the five contexts. As illustrated by a number of examples, these relations provide a consistent description of contextual realities for the measurement outcomes of all five contexts.
In quantum theory, a measurement context is defined by an orthogonal basis in a Hilbert space, where each basis vector represents a specific measurement outcome. The precise quantitative relation between two different measurement contexts can thus be characterized by the inner products of nonorthogonal states in that Hilbert space. Here, we use measurement outcomes that are shared by different contexts to derive specific quantitative relations between the inner products of the Hilbert space vectors that represent the different contexts. It is shown that the probabilities that describe the paradoxes of quantum contextuality can be derived from a very small number of inner products, revealing details of the fundamental relations between measurement contexts that go beyond a basic violation of noncontextual limits. The application of our analysis to a product space of two systems reveals that the nonlocality of quantum entanglement can be traced back to a local inner product representing the relation between measurement contexts in only one system. Our results thus indicate that the essential nonclassical features of quantum mechanics can be traced back to the fundamental difference between quantum superpositions and classical alternatives.
Quantum mechanics describes seemingly paradoxical relations between the outcomes of measurements that cannot be performed jointly. In Hilbert space, the outcomes of such incompatible measurements are represented by nonorthogonal states. In this paper we investigate how the relation between outcomes represented by nonorthogonal quantum states differs from the relations suggested by a joint assignment of measurement outcomes that do not depend on the actual measurement context. The analysis is based on a well-known scenario where three statements about the impossibilities of certain outcomes would seem to make a specific fourth outcome impossible as well, yet quantum theory allows the observation of that outcome with a nonvanishing probability. We show that the Hilbert space formalism modifies the relation between the four measurement outcomes by defining a lower bound of the fourth probability that increases as the total probability of the first three outcomes drops to zero. Quantum theory thus not only makes the violation of noncontextual consistency between the measurement outcomes possible, but actually requires it as a necessary consequence of the Hilbert space inner products that describe the contextual relation between the outcomes of different measurements.
Abstract Basic quantum effects are often illustrated using single particle interferences in two-path interferometers. A wider range of non-classical phenomena can be illustrated using three-path interferometers, but the increased complexity of quantum statistics in a three-dimensional Hilbert space makes it difficult to identify a representative set of observable properties that could be used to characterize specific phenomena. Here, I propose a characterization of pure states based on a five-stage interferometer recently introduced to demonstrate the relation between different measurement contexts (Optica Quantum 1, 63 (2023)). It is shown that the orthogonality relations between the states representing the different measurement contexts can be used to classify pure states within the three-dimensional Hilbert space according to the non-classical correlations between different contexts expressed by negative Kirkwood–Dirac distributions.
Contextuality is a defining feature that separates the quantum from the classical descriptions of physical systems. Within the marginal-scenario framework, noncontextual models are characterized by the existence of a single joint probability distribution consistent with all measurable contexts, while contextual models violate this condition. Building on this approach, we introduce a general method to analyze contextuality in terms of stochastic linear maps that effectively model invasive measurements on an otherwise classical statistics. These maps transform probabilities within the noncontextuality polytope, which includes all classical probabilities, into probabilities that may lie outside the polytope, while preserving the compatibility structure of the scenario at hand. We derive general consistency conditions that such maps must satisfy to represent admissible invasive measurements, and we fully identify them for a paradigmatic example of contextuality for a single three-level quantum system. Furthermore, we introduce a quantifier of contextuality based on the minimal invasiveness required to reproduce a given probability distribution, which offers a distinct approach on how to evaluate the degree of contextuality in a general scenario.
This paper argues that physical quantities should be reconstructed not as non-contextual intrinsic attributes with measurement-independent determinate values, but as equivalence classes of measurement procedures. Bell–CHSH violations first motivate the problem: they show that Bell-type local causality/factorizability, measurement independence, and the relevant form of outcome determinism or value-definiteness cannot be jointly maintained, without by themselves refuting realism as such. Kochen–Specker contextuality supplies the stronger premise for the sharp-observable case: no global, non-contextual, dispersion-free value assignment to projection-valued observables can preserve the functional relations among compatible observables in Hilbert spaces of dimension at least three. The positive proposal uses algebraic quantum theory to identify physical quantities with classes of measuring procedures that yield the same outcome statistics over a full or tomographically complete state domain. This reconstruction preserves the classical deterministic limit while rejecting the stronger claim that measured quantities are context-independent values possessed independently of measurement. The analysis is restricted to sharp observables and projection-valued measurements; POVMs and unsharp measurements are noted as extensions. The resulting view is realist about an observer-independent world but non-intrinsic about empirical quantities, and it situates Wheeler's "It from Bit" as an interpretive corollary rather than as a foundational premise.
Superdeterminism has received recent attention as a possible path toward a locally causal explanation of the entanglement correlations that appear in experimental tests of Bell's theorem. While the term `superdeterminism' was coined by Bell to refer to restrictions on the free will of experimenters, it was not rigorously defined until recently. It has now been defined as a property of any physical theory that produces systematic violations of statistical independence. Here we focus on formalizing the requirements that being nonsuperdeterministic places on a physical theory, and setting a standard that must be met before we can conclude that a given theory is not superdeterministic. We begin by carefully examining how a physical theory determines what outcomes we observe when performing measurements in terms of ontic states and response functions, and how this differs between superdeterministic and nonsuperdeterministic theories, in terms of the behavior of the types of vetted random sampling procedures that we use in experiments. The core result is that individual samples and measurement outcomes must be representative of the observed distributions, which is explained in detail. This also has a bearing on how measurement settings are chosen by agents, whether freely or randomly, and we argue that this standard ultimately defines what freedom/independence actually mean. We then discuss contextuality, and show that in most cases, superdeterminism is contextual. Finally, we discuss how different physical theories, with different notions of ontic states and response functions, can give rise to the same empirical data, and how the same operational contextuality may appear in different forms.