Contextuality is a defining feature that separates the quantum from the classical descriptions of physical systems. Within the marginal-scenario framework, noncontextual models are characterized by the existence of a single joint probability distribution consistent with all measurable contexts, while contextual models violate this condition. Building on this approach, we introduce a general method to analyze contextuality in terms of stochastic linear maps that effectively model invasive measurements on an otherwise classical statistics. These maps transform probabilities within the noncontextuality polytope, which includes all classical probabilities, into probabilities that may lie outside the polytope, while preserving the compatibility structure of the scenario at hand. We derive general consistency conditions that such maps must satisfy to represent admissible invasive measurements, and we fully identify them for a paradigmatic example of contextuality for a single three-level quantum system. Furthermore, we introduce a quantifier of contextuality based on the minimal invasiveness required to reproduce a given probability distribution, which offers a distinct approach on how to evaluate the degree of contextuality in a general scenario.
Contextuality is a defining feature that separates the quantum from the classical descriptions of physical systems. Within the marginal-scenario framework, noncontextual models are characterized by the existence of a single joint probability distribution consistent with all measurable contexts, while contextual models violate this condition. Building on this approach, we introduce a general method to analyze contextuality in terms of stochastic linear maps that effectively model invasive measurements on an otherwise classical statistics. These maps transform probabilities within the noncontextuality polytope, which includes all classical probabilities, into probabilities that may lie outside the polytope, while preserving the compatibility structure of the scenario at hand. We derive general consistency conditions that such maps must satisfy to represent admissible invasive measurements, and we fully identify them for a paradigmatic example of contextuality for a single three-level quantum system. Furthermore, we introduce a quantifier of contextuality based on the minimal invasiveness required to reproduce a given probability distribution, which offers a distinct approach on how to evaluate the degree of contextuality in a general scenario.
Abstract In classical stochastic theory, the joint probability distributions of a stochastic process obey by definition the Kolmogorov consistency conditions. Interpreting such a process as a sequence of physical measurements with probabilistic outcomes, these conditions reflect that the measurements do not alter the state of the underlying physical system. Prominently, this assumption has to be abandoned in the context of quantum mechanics, yet there are also classical processes in which measurements influence the measured system. Here, conditions that characterize uniquely classical processes that are probed by a reasonable class of such invasive measurements are derived. We then analyze under what circumstances such classical processes can simulate the statistics arising from quantum processes associated with informationally‐complete measurements. It is expected that this investigation will help build a bridge between two fundamental traits of non‐classicality, namely, coherence and contextuality.
In quantum physics, the term ‘contextual’ can be used in more than one way. One usage, here called ‘Bell contextual’ since the idea goes back to Bell, is that if A , B and C are three quantum observables, with A compatible (i.e. commuting) with B and also with C , whereas B and C are incompatible, a measurement of A might yield a different result (indicating that quantum mechanics is contextual) depending upon whether A is measured along with B (the { A , B } context) or with C (the { A , C } context). An analysis of what projective quantum measurements measure shows that quantum theory is Bell non-contextual: the outcome of a particular A measurement when A is measured along with B would have been exactly the same if A had, instead, been measured along with C . A different definition, here called ‘globally (non)contextual’ refers to whether or not there is (non-contextual) or is not (contextual) a single joint probability distribution that simultaneously assigns probabilities in a consistent manner to the outcomes of measurements of a certain collection of observables, not all of which are compatible. A simple example shows that such a joint probability distribution can exist even in a situation where the measurement probabilities cannot refer to properties of a quantum system, and hence lack physical significance, even though mathematically well defined. It is noted that the quantum sample space, a projective decomposition of the identity, required for interpreting measurements of incompatible properties in different runs of an experiment using different types of apparatus, has a tensor product structure, a fact sometimes overlooked. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Contextuality and probability in quantum mechanics and beyond’.
Interpretational paradoxes of quantum mechanics may be associated with the application of the structure of classical probability theory to systems whose probabilistic organization is fundamentally contextual. In this work, we propose an outline of an alternative probability theory in which the primary object is not an elementary outcome but a contextual whole—a class of alternatives defined by a common structural property. In this approach, probability is organized on two levels. The first level describes the probabilities of contextual wholes, while the second level describes the conditional probabilities of alternatives within those wholes. Individual alternatives do not possess autonomous probabilities outside their context. Their probabilities arise only as contextual projections of a more fundamental probabilistic structure. Within this model, quantum mechanics appears as a special case of a more general theory in which contextual wholes are described by superpositions of probability amplitudes. Classical probability theory emerges as a limiting case in which all contexts are mutually compatible and can be combined into a single global description. The proposed framework provides a possible conceptual foundation for understanding quantum probability, contextuality, interference, and hybrid probability distributions within a unified structure.
Generalized contextuality refers to our inability of explaining measurement statistics using a contextindependent probabilistic and ontological model.On the other hand, measurement statistics can also be modeled using the framework of general probabilistic theories (GPTs).Here, starting from a construction of GPTs based on a Gleason-type theorem, we fully characterize these structures with respect to their permission and rejection of generalized (non)contextual ontological models.It follows that in any GPT construction the three insistence of (i) the no-restriction hypothesis, (ii) the ontological noncontextuality, and (iii) multiple nonrefinable measurements for any fixed number of outcomes are incompatible.Hence, any GPT satisfying the no-restriction hypothesis is ontologically noncontextual if and only if it is simplicial.We give a detailed discussion of GPTs for which the no-restriction hypothesis is violated, and show that they can always be considered as subtheories (subGPTs) of GPTs satisfying the hypothesis.It is shown that subGPTs are ontologically noncontextual if and only if they are subtheories of simplicial GPTs of the same dimensionality.Finally, we establish as a corollary the necessary and sufficient condition for a single resourceful measurement or state to promote an ontologically noncontextual (i.e., classical) general probabilistic theory to an ontologically contextual (i.e., nonclassical) one under the no-restriction hypothesis.
Kochen--Specker contextuality is a fundamental feature of quantum mechanics and a crucial resource for quantum computational advantage and reduction of communication complexity. Its presence is witnessed in empirical data by the violation of noncontextuality inequalities. However, all known noncontextuality inequalities corresponding to facets of noncontextual polytopes are either Bell inequalities or refer to cyclic or state-independent contextuality scenarios. We introduce a general method for lifting noncontextuality inequalities, deriving facets of noncontextual polytopes for more complex scenarios from known facets of simpler subscenarios. Concretely, starting from an arbitrary scenario, the addition of a new measurement or a new outcome preserves the facet-defining nature of any noncontextuality inequality. This extends the results of Pironio [J. Math. Phys. 46, 062112 (2005)] from Bell nonlocality scenarios to contextuality scenarios, unifying liftings of Bell and noncontextuality inequalities. Our method produces facet-defining noncontextuality inequalities in all scenarios with contextual correlations, and we present examples of facet-defining noncontextuality inequalities for scenarios where no examples were known. Our results shed light on the structure of noncontextuality polytopes and the relationship between such polytopes across different scenarios.
The predictions of quantum theory resist generalised noncontextual explanations. In addition to the foundational relevance of this fact, the particular extent to which quantum theory violates noncontextuality limits available quantum advantage in communication and information processing. In the first part of this work, we formally define contextuality scenarios via prepare-and-measure experiments, along with the polytope of general contextual behaviours containing the set of quantum contextual behaviours. This framework allows us to recover several properties of set of quantum behaviours in these scenarios, including contextuality scenarios and associated noncontextuality inequalities that require for their violation the individual quantum preparation and measurement procedures to be mixed states and unsharp measurements. With the framework in place, we formulate novel semidefinite programming relaxations for bounding these sets of quantum contextual behaviours. Most significantly, to circumvent the inadequacy of pure states and projective measurements in contextuality scenarios, we present a novel unitary operator based semidefinite relaxation technique. We demonstrate the efficacy of these relaxations by obtaining tight upper bounds on the quantum violation of several noncontextuality inequalities and identifying novel maximally contextual quantum strategies. To further illustrate the versatility of these relaxations, we demonstrate monogamy of preparation contextuality in a tripartite setting, and present a secure semi-device independent quantum key distribution scheme powered by quantum advantage in parity oblivious random access codes.