The predictions of quantum theory resist generalised noncontextual explanations. In addition to the foundational relevance of this fact, the particular extent to which quantum theory violates noncontextuality limits available quantum advantage in communication and information processing. In the first part of this work, we formally define contextuality scenarios via prepare-and-measure experiments, along with the polytope of general contextual behaviours containing the set of quantum contextual behaviours. This framework allows us to recover several properties of set of quantum behaviours in these scenarios, including contextuality scenarios and associated noncontextuality inequalities that require for their violation the individual quantum preparation and measurement procedures to be mixed states and unsharp measurements. With the framework in place, we formulate novel semidefinite programming relaxations for bounding these sets of quantum contextual behaviours. Most significantly, to circumvent the inadequacy of pure states and projective measurements in contextuality scenarios, we present a novel unitary operator based semidefinite relaxation technique. We demonstrate the efficacy of these relaxations by obtaining tight upper bounds on the quantum violation of several noncontextuality inequalities and identifying novel maximally contextual quantum strategies. To further illustrate the versatility of these relaxations, we demonstrate monogamy of preparation contextuality in a tripartite setting, and present a secure semi-device independent quantum key distribution scheme powered by quantum advantage in parity oblivious random access codes.
We introduce a hierarchy of semidefinite relaxations of the set of quantum correlations in generalized contextuality scenarios.This constitutes a simple and versatile tool for bounding the magnitude of quantum contextuality.To illustrate its utility, we use it to determine the maximal quantum violation of several noncontextuality inequalities whose maximum violations were previously unknown.We then go further and use it to prove that certain preparation-contextual correlations cannot be explained with pure states, thereby showing that mixed states are an indispensable resource for contextuality.In the second part of the paper, we turn our attention to the simulation of preparation-contextual correlations in general operational theories.We introduce the information cost of simulating preparation contextuality, which quantifies the additional, otherwise forbidden, information required to simulate contextual correlations in either classical or quantum models.In both cases, we show that the simulation cost can be efficiently bounded using a variant of our hierarchy of semidefinite relaxations, and we calculate it exactly in the simplest contextuality scenario of parity-oblivious multiplexing.
The quantum ontological feature of contextuality apart from being central to foundations of quantum theory forms the basis of quantum advantage in a multitude of information processing tasks. In particular, the contextuality of preparation procedures was shown to power a particular two-party information processing task “parity oblivious multiplexing” (Spekkens et al. Phys Rev Lett 102:010401 (2009). Specifically, it was shown that there exists a limit to how well any preparation noncontextual theory can perform in this task. This limit constitutes a noncontextuality inequality. Moreover, the authors demonstrated quantum violation of this inequality along with preparation contextuality associated with the ontic description underlying two-level completely mixed quantum state. In this work, we extend these arguments to apply to arbitrary dimensions by introducing a class of two-party information processing tasks, namely d-level parity oblivious random access codes. We analytically obtain classical (or equivalently preparation noncontextual) bounds on the success probability for these tasks for arbitrary d. For each value of d, this bound constitutes a unique noncontextuality inequality. Remarkably, these bounds are independent of the amount of communication. Furthermore, we find a classical protocol utilizing a
dc=d -dimensional classical message which saturates this bound. In order to establish nontriviality of these inequalities, we provide evidence of significant quantum violations. Specifically, by numerical techniques, we show that for
d=3,…,10 , the noncontextuality bound is violated by quantum theory. (1) We provide explicit quantum protocols which violate the associated noncontextuality inequality for
d=3,4,5 employing
dq=d -leveled quantum systems. (2) Using see-saw semi-definite programming (SDP) technique, we find evidence (lower bounds) of significant quantum violation of these inequalities for
d=3,…,10 . (3) With the help of state-of-the-art (NPA-hierarchy like) SDP technique, we provide upper bounds (independent of the dimension of the involved quantum systems) on quantum violation for
d=3,…,10 . The introduced class of information tasks, thus, provides for operational depiction of preparation contextuality of the ontic description underlying mixed higher dimensional quantum systems.
In a noncontextual hidden variable model of quantum theory, hidden variables determine the outcomes of every measurement in a manner that is independent of how the measurement is implemented. Using a generalization of this notion to arbitrary operational theories and to preparation procedures, we demonstrate that a particular two-party information-processing task, "parity-oblivious multiplexing," is powered by contextuality in the sense that there is a limit to how well any theory described by a noncontextual hidden variable model can perform. This bound constitutes a "noncontextuality inequality" that is violated by quantum theory. We report an experimental violation of this inequality in good agreement with the quantum predictions. The experimental results also provide the first demonstration of 2-to-1 and 3-to-1 quantum random access codes.
Communication games are collaborative information processing tasks involving a number of players with limited communication. Such games are useful tools for studying physical theories. A physical theory exhibits preparation contextuality whenever observed behaviour cannot be explained by a preparation noncontextual model. Here we show that there is a fundamental connection between the performance in communication games and the degree of preparation (non)contextuality. For this purpose, we present a general framework that allows us to construct communication games such that the game performance corresponds to a measure of preparation (non)contextuality. We illustrate the power of this framework by, 1) deriving many examples of tests of preparation contextuality, 2) showing that quantum violations of Bell inequalities can be derived from quantum violations of preparation noncontextuality, 3) qualitatively and quantitatively explaining related previous results on preparation contextuality in quantum communication games, and 4) solving the open problem of revealing the preparation contextuality of the maximally mixed quantum state in any dimension.
An ontological model of an operational theory is considered to be universally noncontextual if both preparation and measurement noncontextuality assumptions are satisfied in that model. In this report, we first generalize the logical proofs of quantum preparation and measurement contextuality for qubit system for any odd number of preparations and measurements. Based on the logical proof, we derive testable universally non-contextual inequalities violated by quantum theory. We then propose a class of two-party communication games and show that the average success probability of winning such games is solely linked to suitable Bell expression whose local bound is greater than universal non-contextual bound. Thus, for a given state, even if quantum theory does not exhibit non-locality, it may still reveal non-classicality by violating the universal non-contextual bound. Further, we consider a different communication game to demonstrate that for a given choices of observables in quantum theory, even if there is no logical proof of preparation and measurement contextuality exist, the universal quantum contextuality can be revealed through that communication game. Such a game thus test a weaker form of universal non-contextuality with minimal assumption.
Replacing the task of retrieval with exclusion changes how preparation contextuality manifests operationally under parity-oblivious constraints, with exclusion showing a quantum advantage where retrieval does not. We introduce the parity-oblivious random exclusion code (POREC) and show that for prime symbol size
m, classical and preparation-noncontextual encodings provide a tight noncontextual bound. For the first nontrivial case (two digits, three symbols), our derived exact qubit optimum violates this bound, in contrast to parity-oblivious retrieval, which displays no quantum advantage. This characteristic difference is absent without parity constraints. For general prime
m, qubit strategies achieve a quantum-to-noncontextual gap that grows linearly relative to the random exclusion code (REC) gap, exceeding both parity-oblivious retrieval and standard REC. The exact qubit bound yields a sharp semi-device-independent certification of dimension
d≥3. Our analysis of noise robustness demonstrates POREC to be amenable for experimental implementation on existing prepare-and-measure platforms, establishing parity-oblivious exclusion as a distinct operational probe of preparation contextuality, as well as a practical information processing protocol with wide applications.