Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

THE SPINNING ELECTRON

Mircea S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

Published Jan 8, 2014• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

J m mΦ = + Φ= and this, by consideration of Eq.(34.5), gives sj mmm += (34.7) Since the maximum values of m and are l and s, the maximum will be so that the condition sm jm ,sl + jm j ≤ yields ( ) slmmj s +=+= maxmax (34.8) and the corresponding eigenfunction is ( ) ( ), ,l s l s ls n llR r Y θ ϕ χ+ +Ψ = Φ = For there are two mutually orthogonal states written as ,1−+= slm j smmΦ 1,,1 , −− ΦΦ slsl and these can be combined to give two linearly independent jjmΨ states corresponding to the possible choices slj += , 11 −=−+= jslm j : , 1l s l s+ + −Ψ 1−+= slj , jslm j =−+= 1 : 1, 1l s l s+ − + −Ψ For there will be three mutually orthogonal 2−+= slm j smmΦ states denoted by slj −=min (34.9) so that the possible values of j are sljsl +≤≤− (34.10) The relation between the two representations of the total angular momentum eigenstates is usually given by linking the two sets of eigenfunctions jjmΨ and smmΦ in the form m m CΨ = Φ∑∑ (34.11) jm lsmmC are called the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.

DOI
10.1201/b16000-39

Related papers

ORBITAL ANGULAR MOMENTUM

Mircea S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

The operator is contained in the expression (31.1) of the central field Hamiltonian, and this can be shown using Eq.(31.6), where the component operators are replaced by their forms (29.16) written in Cartesian coordinates, and this gives ⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂−⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂−= z x x z z x x z y z z y y z z yL 222ˆ == ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂− x y y x x y y x2= It is a straightforward matter to show that this relation may also be written as ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂−= 2 2 yx z xz y zy xL = ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+ z z y y x x xz zx zy yz yx xy 222222 222 2= We now use the expansion ( )2 2ˆ ˆr p x y z x y zx y z x y z⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⋅ = − + + + +⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠G G = ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂−= z z y y x x xz zx zy yz yx xy z z y y x x so that the addition of the last two relations yields ( ) ( ) 2 2 222 2 2 2 2 22 2 2ˆ ˆLˆ r p x y z x y zx y zx y z⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ ⋅ = − + + + + + + +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂∂ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠G G = = ( )pripr ˆˆˆ 22 GG=G ⋅+= (31.10) It follows that the momentum can be expressed as ( ) ( ) ( ) rrr r r L r priprL r p ∂ ∂−⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ⋅−⋅+= 2 ˆ1ˆˆˆˆˆ1ˆ ==GG=GGG (31.11) where the radial part results from the substitution of Eq. (I.20), Appendix I, which gives 1 1ˆ sinr p i i e e e r r rθ ϕθ θ ϕ ⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂= − ∇ = − + +⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ G G G G= = and hence ˆ ˆr p i r r ∂⋅ = − ∂ G G = Therefore the Hamiltonian (31.1) becomes ( )rUL rrrr r rm H + ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ −∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−= 222 2 ˆ111 2 ˆ = = and reduces to the equivalent form ( )rUL rr r rrm H +⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ −⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ 2 ˆ11 2 ˆ = = (31.12) used for a particle bound by a central force field. 31.2. EIGENVALUE EQUATIONS IN A CENTRAL FIELD Spherically symmetric systems, where the potential energy ( )rU is independent of the direction of ,rG are usually treated using the spherical coordinates ( )ϕθ ,,r related to the Cartesian coordinates as referred to in Appendix I, Eq.(I.19). As the angle θ is defined by the inclination to the z-axis, it is mathematically convenient to take the direction of the component of ( zyx ,, ) L G that is compatible with (in the sense introduced in Chapter 34) to be the z-axis. Therefore we consider the eigenvalue equations of the operators and given by ˆ ˆ, zH L 2Lˆ ( ) ( )ˆ , , , ,H r rθ ϕ ε θ ϕΨ = Ψ ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ ,,,,ˆ rLrL zz Ψ=Ψ (31.13) ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ ,,,,ˆ 22 rLrL Ψ=Ψ The appropriate form of the Hamiltonian Hˆ is conveniently written using the standard expression (I.23) of the Laplace operator in spherical coordinates as 2∇ ( )rU rrr r rrm H +⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂−= 2 sin 1sin sin 11 2 ˆ ϕθθθθθ = (31.14) Using the transformation (I.19) from Cartesian to spherical coordinates and the chain rule for differentiation, we find sin sin sin cosx y z r r x y x y z x y y θ ϕ θ ϕϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂= + + = − + = −∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂x so that the operator takes the form zLˆ ϕ∂ ∂=⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂= ix y y x i Lz ==ˆ (31.15) Furthermore, from Eqs.(31.12) and (31.14) it follows that is in fact expressed by that part of Hamiltonian which operates on the angular variables 2Lˆ ,θ ϕ only, that is, ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂−= 2 sin 1sin sin 1ˆ ϕθθθθθ=L (31.16) The energy eigenfunctions in central field, which are simultaneously eigenfunctions of and are subjected, in addition to the usual bound state requirement (30.21), to the single-valueness condition zLˆ 2ˆ ,L ( ) ( )πϕθϕθ 2,,,, +Ψ=Ψ rr since the points ϕ and πϕ 2+ are in fact the same physical point. The solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation (31.13) in central field can be found by a process of separation of variables, yielding three ordinary differential equations in the variables ,r θ and ,ϕ respectively, to which a physical significance will be assigned. It is common practice to separate the variables in two stages, first substituting the trial solution ( ) ( ) ( ), , ,r R r Yθ ϕΨ = θ ϕ (31.17) into the energy eigenvalue equation. If the Hamiltonian is expanded in spherical coordinates, as given by Eq.(31.14), Eq.(31.13) becomes ( )2 22 2 2 21 1 1 sin2 2 sin sin 21R Y Yr U r r m R r r m Y ε θθ θ θ θ ϕ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎡ ⎤+ − = − +⎢ ⎥⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ = = (31.18) One side is independent of θ and ,ϕ and the other side is independent of r, so they must be separately equal to some constant, which is conveniently chosen to be equal to In this way we obtain a radial equation, given by .2/2 mL ( ) ( ) ( )rRrR mr LrU dr dr dr d rm ε=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛− 2 2 1 2 = (31.19) where was replaced by for obvious reasons, and an angular equation, having the so-called spherical harmonics r∂∂ / drd / ( ),Y θ ϕ as solutions, which reads 2 2 ˆor sin 1sin sin 1 ==⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂− ϕθθθθθ= (31.20) The form of the spherical harmonics is obtained as a result of the second stage of the separation process, where we assume that ( ) ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ Φ= PY , so that Eq.(31.20) becomes 2 2 1sinsinsin ϕθθθθ θ ∂ Φ∂ Φ−=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ +⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ === LP P (31.21) Since one side is independent of ϕ while the other is independent of ,θ they must each be equal to a constant, which we call We thus obtain the differential equations .2zL d L dϕ Φ 2− = Φ= (31.22) where again ϕ∂∂ / has been replaced by ϕdd / , and 0 sin sin sin 1 22 ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ −+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ PLL d dP d d z θθθθθ === (31.23) where θ∂∂ / has been replaced by θdd / . Therefore the energy equation (31.13) completely separates, in central field, into a radial equation (31.19) and two angular equations (31.22) and (31.23). The radial equation, giving the energy levels ε of the system, takes the form ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rRrR mr LrUrR dr d rdr d m ε=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ +− 2 2 2 2 = (31.24) which can be simplified by making the substitution ( ) ( )rrRr =ξ (31.25) and using the identity 2 1r dd d r dr r rdr dr ξ ξ⎛ ⎞+ =⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ r Thus Eq.(31.24) reduces to ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rr mr LrU dr rd m εξξξ =⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++− 2 22 = (31.26) which is formally identical to the time-independent Schrödinger equation in one dimension (30.17), provided the central force potential ( )rU is replaced by an effective potential energy of the form ( ) ( ) 2 2 2mr LrUrUeff += The repulsive potential, associated with the angular momentum, modifies the central potential as illustrated before, see Figure 3.3, for ( ) rCrU /−= . Further progress with the solution of the radial equation depends on the particular form of the potential function . We shall consider the significant example of one-electron atoms in the next chapter.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 8, 2014•1 citation

Coupling of Angular Momenta. 3j-Symbols

Igal Talmi

In Section 3 we saw how to combine the intrinsic spin s and the orbital angular momentum L to form eigenstates of J 2 where J = L + s . The coefficients in ( 3.30 ) and ( 3.31 ) are special cases of a general class of transformation coefficients. The states on the r.h.s. of ( 3.30 ) and ( 3.31 ) are eigenstates of s 2 , s z , L 2 , L z . On the left hand side there are eigenstates of s 2 , L 2 , J 2 and J z . In general, we may start with any two sets ψ j 1 m 1 , ψ j 2 m 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780203739716/ff034a11-a369-4bc6-a470-f8cf1794dcb5/content/eq354.tif"/> of two different systems. The spins j 1 and j 2 may be either orbital angular momenta or total spins of two particles, two intrinsic spins or one orbital angular momentum and one intrinsic spin. The latter case was considered in Section 3. In other cases j 1 may be the rank of an irreducible tensor operator and j 2 the angular momentum of a wave function or both j 1 and j 2 may be the ranks of two irreducible tensor operators. To simplify the notation we will use, for the transformation of the sets ψ j 1 m 1 , ψ j 2 m 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780203739716/ff034a11-a369-4bc6-a470-f8cf1794dcb5/content/eq355.tif"/> under infinitesimal rotations, the expressions ( 6.20 ). This will not detract from the applicability of the following results to other tensorial sets. As pointed out several times above, the following mathematical derivations have general validity and are independent of the physical nature of ψ j 1 m 1 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780203739716/ff034a11-a369-4bc6-a470-f8cf1794dcb5/content/eq356.tif"/> and ψ j 2 m 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780203739716/ff034a11-a369-4bc6-a470-f8cf1794dcb5/content/eq357.tif"/> . They are due only to the transformation properties of the two sets under rotations.

Routledge eBooks•Oct 6, 2017•0 citations

On the Nonorthogonality of Generalized Momentum Eigenfunctions in Quantum Mechanics

Peter D. Robinson

The orthogonality requirement usually specified for the eigenfunctions φ of a quantum-mechanical operator P which has a continuous spectrum of eigenvalues λ, is ∫φ*(λ)φ(λ′) dλ=δ(λ−λ′). The derivation of this result is examined; it is seen to be merely a sufficient, but not a necessary condition for the consistent expansion of a bound-state wavefunction ψ in the form ∫ a(λ)φ(λ) dλ. The situation when P is a generalized momentum operator is investigated in detail. Such operators were discussed in the preceding paper. It is shown that any two of the corresponding momentum eigenfunctions are not usually orthogonal. Nevertheless, with the help of Fourier analysis, a consistent expansion ψ=∫ a(λ)φ(λ) dλ is established. The theory is illustrated with the familiar examples of a ``particle in a box'' and a ground-state hydrogen atom. When a space coordinate has a finite range, a quantum condition can be imposed on the generalized momentum eigenvalues so that the momentum eigenfunctions form a complete discrete orthogonal set. We attempt to justify the belief that such quantization is not essential unless it is necessary to ensure single-valued eigenfunctions.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 1963•3 citations

Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients

Victor Anisimov, James J. P. Stewart

The addition theorem of angular momentum states that the angular momentum operator of a coupled state is the vector sum of the angular momentum operators of the uncoupled states. Given that, the eigenfunction of the angular momentum of a system in the coupled state can be represented as a linear combination of eigenfunctions of the system in its uncoupled state and, in turn, the eigenfunctions of the uncoupled state are a direct product of eigenfunctions of the individual particles. Clebsch-Gordan coefficients emerge as an overlap integral in the series expansion of the coupled state in the basis of uncoupled states. This chapter provides a detailed derivation of the addition theorem of angular momentum, including obtaining the lower and upper boundaries of the quantum numbers, deriving the orthonormality conditions for Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, and using shift operators to generate the members of a multiplet. It also derives a general expression for the evaluation of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, provides a detailed analysis of the addition of angular momenta and electron spin to build the resulting Clebsch-Gordan matrix, and shows that a rotation transformation of the direct product of eigenfunctions of the angular momentum and spin leads to the recurrence relations for the Wigner matrix.

CRC Press eBooks•Dec 6, 2019•0 citations

Analytical Representation of General Spin

Takao Yamamoto

The spin operators and their eigenstates are usu:tlly represented by matrices.But it is also pos.sible to represent them analytically in several ways.I) An interesting example is shown as follows.The spin operators are assumed to be the following dif• ferential operators of the two real variables u and v J.,=1/2(uv--fJ2/8u8v), J y=z/2 (v.8/8u-u.8/8v) , Jz=I/4(U2_82/8u2_V2+82/8v2) ,

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Nov 1, 1953•0 citations

Intrinsic Angular Momentum and Magnetic Moment of the Electron. Spin

D. I. Blokhint︠s︡ev

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1964•0 citations
J m mΦ = + Φ= and this, by consideration of Eq.(34.5), gives sj mmm += (34.7) Since the maximum values of m and are l and s, the maximum will be so that the condition sm jm ,sl + jm j ≤ yields ( ) slmmj s +=+= maxmax (34.8) and the corresponding eigenfunction is ( ) ( ), ,l s l s ls n llR r Y θ ϕ χ+ +Ψ = Φ = For there are two mutually orthogonal states written as ,1−+= slm j smmΦ 1,,1 , −− ΦΦ slsl and these can be combined to give two linearly independent jjmΨ states corresponding to the possible choices slj += , 11 −=−+= jslm j : , 1l s l s+ + −Ψ 1−+= slj , jslm j =−+= 1 : 1, 1l s l s+ − + −Ψ For there will be three mutually orthogonal 2−+= slm j smmΦ states denoted by slj −=min (34.9) so that the possible values of j are sljsl +≤≤− (34.10) The relation between the two representations of the total angular momentum eigenstates is usually given by linking the two sets of eigenfunctions jjmΨ and smmΦ in the form m m CΨ = Φ∑∑ (34.11) jm lsmmC are called the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.
The operator is contained in the expression (31.1) of the central field Hamiltonian, and this can be shown using Eq.(31.6), where the component operators are replaced by their forms (29.16) written in Cartesian coordinates, and this gives ⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂−⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂−= z x x z z x x z y z z y y z z yL 222ˆ == ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂− x y y x x y y x2= It is a straightforward matter to show that this relation may also be written as ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂−= 2 2 yx z xz y zy xL = ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+ z z y y x x xz zx zy yz yx xy 222222 222 2= We now use the expansion ( )2 2ˆ ˆr p x y z x y zx y z x y z⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⋅ = − + + + +⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠G G = ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂−= z z y y x x xz zx zy yz yx xy z z y y x x so that the addition of the last two relations yields ( ) ( ) 2 2 222 2 2 2 2 22 2 2ˆ ˆLˆ r p x y z x y zx y zx y z⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ ⋅ = − + + + + + + +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂∂ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠G G = = ( )pripr ˆˆˆ 22 GG=G ⋅+= (31.10) It follows that the momentum can be expressed as ( ) ( ) ( ) rrr r r L r priprL r p ∂ ∂−⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ⋅−⋅+= 2 ˆ1ˆˆˆˆˆ1ˆ ==GG=GGG (31.11) where the radial part results from the substitution of Eq. (I.20), Appendix I, which gives 1 1ˆ sinr p i i e e e r r rθ ϕθ θ ϕ ⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂= − ∇ = − + +⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ G G G G= = and hence ˆ ˆr p i r r ∂⋅ = − ∂ G G = Therefore the Hamiltonian (31.1) becomes ( )rUL rrrr r rm H + ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ −∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−= 222 2 ˆ111 2 ˆ = = and reduces to the equivalent form ( )rUL rr r rrm H +⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ −⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ 2 ˆ11 2 ˆ = = (31.12) used for a particle bound by a central force field. 31.2. EIGENVALUE EQUATIONS IN A CENTRAL FIELD Spherically symmetric systems, where the potential energy ( )rU is independent of the direction of ,rG are usually treated using the spherical coordinates ( )ϕθ ,,r related to the Cartesian coordinates as referred to in Appendix I, Eq.(I.19). As the angle θ is defined by the inclination to the z-axis, it is mathematically convenient to take the direction of the component of ( zyx ,, ) L G that is compatible with (in the sense introduced in Chapter 34) to be the z-axis. Therefore we consider the eigenvalue equations of the operators and given by ˆ ˆ, zH L 2Lˆ ( ) ( )ˆ , , , ,H r rθ ϕ ε θ ϕΨ = Ψ ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ ,,,,ˆ rLrL zz Ψ=Ψ (31.13) ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ ,,,,ˆ 22 rLrL Ψ=Ψ The appropriate form of the Hamiltonian Hˆ is conveniently written using the standard expression (I.23) of the Laplace operator in spherical coordinates as 2∇ ( )rU rrr r rrm H +⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂−= 2 sin 1sin sin 11 2 ˆ ϕθθθθθ = (31.14) Using the transformation (I.19) from Cartesian to spherical coordinates and the chain rule for differentiation, we find sin sin sin cosx y z r r x y x y z x y y θ ϕ θ ϕϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂= + + = − + = −∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂x so that the operator takes the form zLˆ ϕ∂ ∂=⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂= ix y y x i Lz ==ˆ (31.15) Furthermore, from Eqs.(31.12) and (31.14) it follows that is in fact expressed by that part of Hamiltonian which operates on the angular variables 2Lˆ ,θ ϕ only, that is, ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂−= 2 sin 1sin sin 1ˆ ϕθθθθθ=L (31.16) The energy eigenfunctions in central field, which are simultaneously eigenfunctions of and are subjected, in addition to the usual bound state requirement (30.21), to the single-valueness condition zLˆ 2ˆ ,L ( ) ( )πϕθϕθ 2,,,, +Ψ=Ψ rr since the points ϕ and πϕ 2+ are in fact the same physical point. The solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation (31.13) in central field can be found by a process of separation of variables, yielding three ordinary differential equations in the variables ,r θ and ,ϕ respectively, to which a physical significance will be assigned. It is common practice to separate the variables in two stages, first substituting the trial solution ( ) ( ) ( ), , ,r R r Yθ ϕΨ = θ ϕ (31.17) into the energy eigenvalue equation. If the Hamiltonian is expanded in spherical coordinates, as given by Eq.(31.14), Eq.(31.13) becomes ( )2 22 2 2 21 1 1 sin2 2 sin sin 21R Y Yr U r r m R r r m Y ε θθ θ θ θ ϕ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎡ ⎤+ − = − +⎢ ⎥⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ = = (31.18) One side is independent of θ and ,ϕ and the other side is independent of r, so they must be separately equal to some constant, which is conveniently chosen to be equal to In this way we obtain a radial equation, given by .2/2 mL ( ) ( ) ( )rRrR mr LrU dr dr dr d rm ε=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛− 2 2 1 2 = (31.19) where was replaced by for obvious reasons, and an angular equation, having the so-called spherical harmonics r∂∂ / drd / ( ),Y θ ϕ as solutions, which reads 2 2 ˆor sin 1sin sin 1 ==⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂− ϕθθθθθ= (31.20) The form of the spherical harmonics is obtained as a result of the second stage of the separation process, where we assume that ( ) ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ Φ= PY , so that Eq.(31.20) becomes 2 2 1sinsinsin ϕθθθθ θ ∂ Φ∂ Φ−=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ +⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ === LP P (31.21) Since one side is independent of ϕ while the other is independent of ,θ they must each be equal to a constant, which we call We thus obtain the differential equations .2zL d L dϕ Φ 2− = Φ= (31.22) where again ϕ∂∂ / has been replaced by ϕdd / , and 0 sin sin sin 1 22 ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ −+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ PLL d dP d d z θθθθθ === (31.23) where θ∂∂ / has been replaced by θdd / . Therefore the energy equation (31.13) completely separates, in central field, into a radial equation (31.19) and two angular equations (31.22) and (31.23). The radial equation, giving the energy levels ε of the system, takes the form ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rRrR mr LrUrR dr d rdr d m ε=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ +− 2 2 2 2 = (31.24) which can be simplified by making the substitution ( ) ( )rrRr =ξ (31.25) and using the identity 2 1r dd d r dr r rdr dr ξ ξ⎛ ⎞+ =⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ r Thus Eq.(31.24) reduces to ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rr mr LrU dr rd m εξξξ =⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++− 2 22 = (31.26) which is formally identical to the time-independent Schrödinger equation in one dimension (30.17), provided the central force potential ( )rU is replaced by an effective potential energy of the form ( ) ( ) 2 2 2mr LrUrUeff += The repulsive potential, associated with the angular momentum, modifies the central potential as illustrated before, see Figure 3.3, for ( ) rCrU /−= . Further progress with the solution of the radial equation depends on the particular form of the potential function . We shall consider the significant example of one-electron atoms in the next chapter.
In Section 3 we saw how to combine the intrinsic spin s and the orbital angular momentum L to form eigenstates of J 2 where J = L + s . The coefficients in ( 3.30 ) and ( 3.31 ) are special cases of a general class of transformation coefficients. The states on the r.h.s. of ( 3.30 ) and ( 3.31 ) are eigenstates of s 2 , s z , L 2 , L z . On the left hand side there are eigenstates of s 2 , L 2 , J 2 and J z . In general, we may start with any two sets ψ j 1 m 1 , ψ j 2 m 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780203739716/ff034a11-a369-4bc6-a470-f8cf1794dcb5/content/eq354.tif"/> of two different systems. The spins j 1 and j 2 may be either orbital angular momenta or total spins of two particles, two intrinsic spins or one orbital angular momentum and one intrinsic spin. The latter case was considered in Section 3. In other cases j 1 may be the rank of an irreducible tensor operator and j 2 the angular momentum of a wave function or both j 1 and j 2 may be the ranks of two irreducible tensor operators. To simplify the notation we will use, for the transformation of the sets ψ j 1 m 1 , ψ j 2 m 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780203739716/ff034a11-a369-4bc6-a470-f8cf1794dcb5/content/eq355.tif"/> under infinitesimal rotations, the expressions ( 6.20 ). This will not detract from the applicability of the following results to other tensorial sets. As pointed out several times above, the following mathematical derivations have general validity and are independent of the physical nature of ψ j 1 m 1 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780203739716/ff034a11-a369-4bc6-a470-f8cf1794dcb5/content/eq356.tif"/> and ψ j 2 m 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780203739716/ff034a11-a369-4bc6-a470-f8cf1794dcb5/content/eq357.tif"/> . They are due only to the transformation properties of the two sets under rotations.
The orthogonality requirement usually specified for the eigenfunctions φ of a quantum-mechanical operator P which has a continuous spectrum of eigenvalues λ, is ∫φ*(λ)φ(λ′) dλ=δ(λ−λ′). The derivation of this result is examined; it is seen to be merely a sufficient, but not a necessary condition for the consistent expansion of a bound-state wavefunction ψ in the form ∫ a(λ)φ(λ) dλ. The situation when P is a generalized momentum operator is investigated in detail. Such operators were discussed in the preceding paper. It is shown that any two of the corresponding momentum eigenfunctions are not usually orthogonal. Nevertheless, with the help of Fourier analysis, a consistent expansion ψ=∫ a(λ)φ(λ) dλ is established. The theory is illustrated with the familiar examples of a ``particle in a box'' and a ground-state hydrogen atom. When a space coordinate has a finite range, a quantum condition can be imposed on the generalized momentum eigenvalues so that the momentum eigenfunctions form a complete discrete orthogonal set. We attempt to justify the belief that such quantization is not essential unless it is necessary to ensure single-valued eigenfunctions.
The addition theorem of angular momentum states that the angular momentum operator of a coupled state is the vector sum of the angular momentum operators of the uncoupled states. Given that, the eigenfunction of the angular momentum of a system in the coupled state can be represented as a linear combination of eigenfunctions of the system in its uncoupled state and, in turn, the eigenfunctions of the uncoupled state are a direct product of eigenfunctions of the individual particles. Clebsch-Gordan coefficients emerge as an overlap integral in the series expansion of the coupled state in the basis of uncoupled states. This chapter provides a detailed derivation of the addition theorem of angular momentum, including obtaining the lower and upper boundaries of the quantum numbers, deriving the orthonormality conditions for Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, and using shift operators to generate the members of a multiplet. It also derives a general expression for the evaluation of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, provides a detailed analysis of the addition of angular momenta and electron spin to build the resulting Clebsch-Gordan matrix, and shows that a rotation transformation of the direct product of eigenfunctions of the angular momentum and spin leads to the recurrence relations for the Wigner matrix.