Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Progress of Theoretical Physics

Analytical Representation of General Spin

Takao Yamamoto

Published Nov 1, 1953• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The spin operators and their eigenstates are usu:tlly represented by matrices.But it is also pos.sible to represent them analytically in several ways.I) An interesting example is shown as follows.The spin operators are assumed to be the following dif• ferential operators of the two real variables u and v J.,=1/2(uv--fJ2/8u8v), J y=z/2 (v.8/8u-u.8/8v) , Jz=I/4(U2_82/8u2_V2+82/8v2) ,

DOI
10.1143/ptp.10.579a

Related papers

On a representation for spin operators and its use in the theory of magnetism

V. G. Bar’yakhtar, D. A. Yablonskiĭ

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 1975•10 citations

Lorentz-Invariant Localization for Elementary Systems. II

Andrés J. Kálnay

The purpose of this paper is to find to what extent the notion of position in the relativistic quantum mechanics of free elementary systems of nonzero mass is defined (or precluded) by the requirement that the descriptions of a localized state as seen from two observers in different frames of reference should be physically consistent. Neither the existence of a time component of the position operator nor the compatibility of the space components of position is assumed. Hermiticity with respect to the quantum-relativistic scalar product in state-vector space is neither assumed nor rejected. There are three possibilities: (i) The position is represented as usual by a Hermitian operator; this is the point-type position. (ii) Non-Hermitian operators are accepted, and the $k$ component of position can represent segments of the $k$ axis with length of the order of $\frac{1}{m}$; when the operator is not only non-Hermitian, but also non-normal, this is the extended-type position. (iii) Non-Hermitian operators are accepted, but the segments are reduced to points; this is the limiting case of the extended-type position. Case (ii) is not studied in this paper. General conditions are found for any spin as regards cases (i) and (iii), and their consequences are obtained for spin 0 and spin \textonehalf{}. The results are the following: There is no position operator in case (i), but in case (iii) the position operator is unique for spin 0 and unique up to a parameter for spin \textonehalf{}. For both spins, in spite of the lack of relativistic Hermiticity, the eigenvalues of position are real, and the velocity is the expected one. The eigenstates of one component of the position are found. The components of the position are compatible with each other for spin 0, and incompatible for spin \textonehalf{}. In the former case, the simultaneous eigenstates of all components are Philip's class-I localized states. Related work is discussed.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Feb 15, 1970•27 citations

Spin calculations in arbitrary and diagonal spin bases

Sergey M. Sikach

We consider the spin calculations in arbitrary and diagonal spin bases

arXiv:hep-ph/0203139•Presented at•Mar 14, 2002•0 citations

SOV approach for integrable quantum models associated with general representations on spin-1/2 chains of the 8-vertex reflection algebra

S Faldella, Giuliano Niccoli

The analysis of the transfer matrices associated to the most general representations of the 8-vertex reflection algebra on spin-1/2 chains is here implemented by introducing a quantum separation of variables (SOV) method which generalizes to these integrable quantum models the method first introduced by Sklyanin. More in detail, for the representations reproducing in their homogeneous limits the open XYZ spin-1/2 quantum chains with the most general integrable boundary conditions, we explicitly construct representations of the 8-vertex reflection algebras for which the transfer matrix spectral problem is separated. Then, in these SOV representations we get the complete characterization of the transfer matrix spectrum (eigenvalues and eigenstates) and its non-degeneracy. Moreover, we present the first fundamental step toward the characterization of the dynamics of these models by deriving determinant formulae for the matrix elements of the identity on separated states, which apply in particular to transfer matrix eigenstates. The comparison of our analysis for the 8-vertex reflection algebra with that of [1, 2] for the 6-vertex one leads to the interesting remark that a profound similarity in both the characterization of the spectral problems and of the scalar products exists for these two different realizations of the reflection algebra once they are described by SOV method. As it will be shown in a future publication, this remarkable similarity will be at the basis of the simultaneous determination of form factors of local operators of integrable quantum models associated to general reflection algebra representations of both 8-vertex and 6-vertex type.

arXiv:1307.5531•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Feb 28, 2014•46 citations

2 Spin calculations in arbitrary and diagonal spin bases∗

Sergey M. Sikach

•Aug 17, 2016•0 citations

Representations of spacetime alternatives and their classical limits

August W. Bosse, James B. Hartle

Different quantum mechanical operators can correspond to the same classical quantity. Hermitian operators differing only by operator ordering of the canonical coordinates and momenta at one moment of time are the most familiar example. Classical spacetime alternatives that extend over time can also be represented by different quantum operators. For example, operators representing a particular value of the time average of a dynamical variable can be constructed in two ways: first, as a projection onto the value of the time-averaged Heisenberg picture operator for the dynamical variable and, second, as the class operator defined by a sum over those histories of the dynamical variable that have the specified time-averaged value. We show by both explicit example and general argument that the predictions of these different representations agree in the classical limit and that sets of histories represented by them decohere in that limit.

arXiv:quant-ph/0503182•Physical Review A•Aug 12, 2005•9 citations
The spin operators and their eigenstates are usu:tlly represented by matrices.But it is also pos.sible to represent them analytically in several ways.I) An interesting example is shown as follows.The spin operators are assumed to be the following dif• ferential operators of the two real variables u and v J.,=1/2(uv--fJ2/8u8v), J y=z/2 (v.8/8u-u.8/8v) , Jz=I/4(U2_82/8u2_V2+82/8v2) ,
The purpose of this paper is to find to what extent the notion of position in the relativistic quantum mechanics of free elementary systems of nonzero mass is defined (or precluded) by the requirement that the descriptions of a localized state as seen from two observers in different frames of reference should be physically consistent. Neither the existence of a time component of the position operator nor the compatibility of the space components of position is assumed. Hermiticity with respect to the quantum-relativistic scalar product in state-vector space is neither assumed nor rejected. There are three possibilities: (i) The position is represented as usual by a Hermitian operator; this is the point-type position. (ii) Non-Hermitian operators are accepted, and the kkk component of position can represent segments of the kkk axis with length of the order of 1m\frac{1}{m}m1​; when the operator is not only non-Hermitian, but also non-normal, this is the extended-type position. (iii) Non-Hermitian operators are accepted, but the segments are reduced to points; this is the limiting case of the extended-type position. Case (ii) is not studied in this paper. General conditions are found for any spin as regards cases (i) and (iii), and their consequences are obtained for spin 0 and spin \textonehalf{}. The results are the following: There is no position operator in case (i), but in case (iii) the position operator is unique for spin 0 and unique up to a parameter for spin \textonehalf{}. For both spins, in spite of the lack of relativistic Hermiticity, the eigenvalues of position are real, and the velocity is the expected one. The eigenstates of one component of the position are found. The components of the position are compatible with each other for spin 0, and incompatible for spin \textonehalf{}. In the former case, the simultaneous eigenstates of all components are Philip's class-I localized states. Related work is discussed.
The analysis of the transfer matrices associated to the most general representations of the 8-vertex reflection algebra on spin-1/2 chains is here implemented by introducing a quantum separation of variables (SOV) method which generalizes to these integrable quantum models the method first introduced by Sklyanin. More in detail, for the representations reproducing in their homogeneous limits the open XYZ spin-1/2 quantum chains with the most general integrable boundary conditions, we explicitly construct representations of the 8-vertex reflection algebras for which the transfer matrix spectral problem is separated. Then, in these SOV representations we get the complete characterization of the transfer matrix spectrum (eigenvalues and eigenstates) and its non-degeneracy. Moreover, we present the first fundamental step toward the characterization of the dynamics of these models by deriving determinant formulae for the matrix elements of the identity on separated states, which apply in particular to transfer matrix eigenstates. The comparison of our analysis for the 8-vertex reflection algebra with that of [1, 2] for the 6-vertex one leads to the interesting remark that a profound similarity in both the characterization of the spectral problems and of the scalar products exists for these two different realizations of the reflection algebra once they are described by SOV method. As it will be shown in a future publication, this remarkable similarity will be at the basis of the simultaneous determination of form factors of local operators of integrable quantum models associated to general reflection algebra representations of both 8-vertex and 6-vertex type.
Different quantum mechanical operators can correspond to the same classical quantity. Hermitian operators differing only by operator ordering of the canonical coordinates and momenta at one moment of time are the most familiar example. Classical spacetime alternatives that extend over time can also be represented by different quantum operators. For example, operators representing a particular value of the time average of a dynamical variable can be constructed in two ways: first, as a projection onto the value of the time-averaged Heisenberg picture operator for the dynamical variable and, second, as the class operator defined by a sum over those histories of the dynamical variable that have the specified time-averaged value. We show by both explicit example and general argument that the predictions of these different representations agree in the classical limit and that sets of histories represented by them decohere in that limit.