Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

An Axiomatic Approach to the Formalism of Quantum Mechanics. I.

Eduard Prugovečki

Published Jun 1, 1966• 16 citations
Publisher

Abstract

An axiomatic formulation of a quantum mechanical formalism is given. The formulation is not in terms of objects associated with the Hilbert space, but in terms of a different kind of objects for which the name ``complex probability measures'' has been chosen. It is shown that the conventional Hilbert-space formalism obeys the given axioms. A few consequences of the axioms are investigated, some of which are found useful in the second part of this work.

DOI
10.1063/1.1704999

Related papers

An Axiomatic Approach to the Formalism of Quantum Mechanics. II.

Eduard Prugovečki

Another axiom has to be introduced to make the formalism given in Part I physically equivalent to the conventional Hilbert-space formalism. Then it is shown that, given a certain fundamental set of observables, a B*-algebra A can be built into which the set 𝒪b of all bounded observables can be mapped injectively. The closure of the algebra generated by the image of 𝒪b into A is A itself. A Hilbert space ℋ exists into which the set 𝒪0 of all pure physical states can be mapped injectively. The closure of the subset of ℋ which is the image of this mapping is ℋ itself. The algebra A can be mapped in such a fashion into the C*-algebra B(ℋ) of all bounded observables that these mappings provide, essentially, just a translation of the original formalism in a Hilbert-space formalism.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1966•12 citations

Seven Principles of Quantum Mechanics

Igor Vasil'evich Volovich

The list of basic axioms of quantum mechanics as it was formulated by von Neumann includes only the mathematical formalism of the Hilbert space and its statistical interpretation. We point out that such an approach is too general to be considered as the foundation of quantum mechanics. In particular in this approach any finite-dimensional Hilbert space describes a quantum system. Though such a treatment might be a convenient approximation it can not be considered as a fundamental description of a quantum system and moreover it leads to some paradoxes like Bell's theorem. I present a list from seven basic postulates of axiomatic quantum mechanics. In particular the list includes the axiom describing spatial properties of quantum system. These axioms do not admit a nontrivial realization in the finite-dimensional Hilbert space. One suggests that the axiomatic quantum mechanics is consistent with local realism.

arXiv:quant-ph/0212126•Dec 22, 2002•15 citations

Derivation of the Rules of Quantum Mechanics from Information-Theoretic Axioms

Daniel I. Fivel

Conventional quantum mechanics with a complex Hilbert space and the Born Rule is derived from five axioms describing properties of probability distributions for the outcome of measurements. Axioms I,II,III are common to quantum mechanics and hidden variable theories. Axiom IV recognizes a phenomenon, first noted by Turing and von Neumann, in which the increase in entropy resulting from a measurement is reduced by a suitable intermediate measurement. This is shown to be impossible for local hidden variable theories. Axiom IV, together with the first three, almost suffice to deduce the conventional rules but allow some exotic, alternatives such as real or quaternionic quantum mechanics. Axiom V recognizes a property of the distribution of outcomes of random measurements on qubits which holds only in the complex Hilbert space model. It is then shown that the five axioms also imply the conventional rules for all dimensions. 1

•Jan 1, 2010•16 citations

A question in the axiomatic approach to Quantum Mechanics

Elemér Elad Rosinger

The classical Hilbert space formulation of the axioms of Quantum Mechanics appears to leave open the question whether the Hermitian operators which are associated with the observables of a finite non-relativistic quantum system are uniquely determined.

arXiv:quant-ph/0407072•Jul 9, 2004•0 citations

Quantum mechanics

Pieter E. Vermaas

I start by briefly overviewing quantum mechanics as it is standardly formulated and by discussing the question of whether this standard formulation needs to be supplemented by an interpretation. The overview is based mainly on Von Neumann (1932, 1955) and its aim is not to give the reader a crash course in quantum mechanics, but to present those parts of the standard formalism which I use in this book. For a more complete treatment, the reader may consult the standard textbooks on quantum mechanics or, for instance, Sudbery (1986) or Redhead (1987). The standard formulation The standard formulation of quantum mechanics can be introduced in four steps. The first step is that in quantum mechanics one describesthe physics of a system by means of a Hilbert space ℋ. This Hilbert space is a complex linear vector space on which an inner product is defined. Let's adopt the convention (please consult the Glossary at the end of the book for notational conventions) that α refers to a system and that is the Hilbert space that is associated with this system. Let ∣ℋ α 〉 denote a vector in ℋ α and let 〈ψ α ∣φ α 〉 be the inner product between the vectors ∣ψ α 〉 and ∣φ α 〉.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 5, 2010•0 citations

Banach space formalism of quantum mechanics

Zeqian Chen

This paper presents a generalization of quantum mechanics from conventional Hilbert space formalism to Banach space one. We construct quantum theory starting with any complex Banach space beyond a complex Hilbert space, through using a basic fact that a complex Banach space always admits a semi-inner product. Precisely, in a complex Banach space $\mathbb{X}$ with a given semi-inner product, a pure state is defined by Lumer \cite{Lumer1961} to be a bounded linear functional on the space of bounded operators determined by a normalized element of $\mathbb{X}$ under the semi-inner product, and then the state space $\mathcal{S} (\mathbb{X})$ of the system is the weakly closed convex set spanned by all pure states. Based on Lumer's notion of the state, we associate a quantum system with a complex Banach space $\mathbb{X}$ equipped with a fixed semi-inner product, and then define a physical event at a quantum state $ω\in \mathcal{S}(\mathbb{X})$ to be a projection $P$ (bounded operator such that $P^2 =P$) in $\mathbb{X}$ satisfying the positivity condition $0 \le ω(P) \le 1,$ and a physical quantity at a quantum state $ω$ to be a spectral operator of scalar type with real spectrum so that the associated spectral projections are all physical events at $ω.$ The Born formula for measurement of a physical quantity is the natural pairing of operators with linear functionals satisfying the probability conservation law. A time evolution of the system is governed by a one-parameter group of invertible spectral operators determined by a scalar type operator with the real spectrum, which satisfies the Schrödinger equation. Our formulation is just a generalization of the Dirac-von Neumann formalism of quantum mechanics to the Banach space setting. We include some examples for illustration.

arXiv:2306.05630•Jun 9, 2023•1 citation
An axiomatic formulation of a quantum mechanical formalism is given. The formulation is not in terms of objects associated with the Hilbert space, but in terms of a different kind of objects for which the name ``complex probability measures'' has been chosen. It is shown that the conventional Hilbert-space formalism obeys the given axioms. A few consequences of the axioms are investigated, some of which are found useful in the second part of this work.
Another axiom has to be introduced to make the formalism given in Part I physically equivalent to the conventional Hilbert-space formalism. Then it is shown that, given a certain fundamental set of observables, a B*-algebra A can be built into which the set 𝒪b of all bounded observables can be mapped injectively. The closure of the algebra generated by the image of 𝒪b into A is A itself. A Hilbert space ℋ exists into which the set 𝒪0 of all pure physical states can be mapped injectively. The closure of the subset of ℋ which is the image of this mapping is ℋ itself. The algebra A can be mapped in such a fashion into the C*-algebra B(ℋ) of all bounded observables that these mappings provide, essentially, just a translation of the original formalism in a Hilbert-space formalism.
The list of basic axioms of quantum mechanics as it was formulated by von Neumann includes only the mathematical formalism of the Hilbert space and its statistical interpretation. We point out that such an approach is too general to be considered as the foundation of quantum mechanics. In particular in this approach any finite-dimensional Hilbert space describes a quantum system. Though such a treatment might be a convenient approximation it can not be considered as a fundamental description of a quantum system and moreover it leads to some paradoxes like Bell's theorem. I present a list from seven basic postulates of axiomatic quantum mechanics. In particular the list includes the axiom describing spatial properties of quantum system. These axioms do not admit a nontrivial realization in the finite-dimensional Hilbert space. One suggests that the axiomatic quantum mechanics is consistent with local realism.
Conventional quantum mechanics with a complex Hilbert space and the Born Rule is derived from five axioms describing properties of probability distributions for the outcome of measurements. Axioms I,II,III are common to quantum mechanics and hidden variable theories. Axiom IV recognizes a phenomenon, first noted by Turing and von Neumann, in which the increase in entropy resulting from a measurement is reduced by a suitable intermediate measurement. This is shown to be impossible for local hidden variable theories. Axiom IV, together with the first three, almost suffice to deduce the conventional rules but allow some exotic, alternatives such as real or quaternionic quantum mechanics. Axiom V recognizes a property of the distribution of outcomes of random measurements on qubits which holds only in the complex Hilbert space model. It is then shown that the five axioms also imply the conventional rules for all dimensions. 1
I start by briefly overviewing quantum mechanics as it is standardly formulated and by discussing the question of whether this standard formulation needs to be supplemented by an interpretation. The overview is based mainly on Von Neumann (1932, 1955) and its aim is not to give the reader a crash course in quantum mechanics, but to present those parts of the standard formalism which I use in this book. For a more complete treatment, the reader may consult the standard textbooks on quantum mechanics or, for instance, Sudbery (1986) or Redhead (1987). The standard formulation The standard formulation of quantum mechanics can be introduced in four steps. The first step is that in quantum mechanics one describesthe physics of a system by means of a Hilbert space ℋ. This Hilbert space is a complex linear vector space on which an inner product is defined. Let's adopt the convention (please consult the Glossary at the end of the book for notational conventions) that α refers to a system and that is the Hilbert space that is associated with this system. Let ∣ℋ α 〉 denote a vector in ℋ α and let 〈ψ α ∣φ α 〉 be the inner product between the vectors ∣ψ α 〉 and ∣φ α 〉.
This paper presents a generalization of quantum mechanics from conventional Hilbert space formalism to Banach space one. We construct quantum theory starting with any complex Banach space beyond a complex Hilbert space, through using a basic fact that a complex Banach space always admits a semi-inner product. Precisely, in a complex Banach space X\mathbb{X}X with a given semi-inner product, a pure state is defined by Lumer \cite{Lumer1961} to be a bounded linear functional on the space of bounded operators determined by a normalized element of X\mathbb{X}X under the semi-inner product, and then the state space S(X)\mathcal{S} (\mathbb{X})S(X) of the system is the weakly closed convex set spanned by all pure states. Based on Lumer's notion of the state, we associate a quantum system with a complex Banach space X\mathbb{X}X equipped with a fixed semi-inner product, and then define a physical event at a quantum state ω∈S(X)ω\in \mathcal{S}(\mathbb{X})ω∈S(X) to be a projection PPP (bounded operator such that P2=PP^2 =PP2=P) in X\mathbb{X}X satisfying the positivity condition 0≤ω(P)≤1,0 \le ω(P) \le 1,0≤ω(P)≤1, and a physical quantity at a quantum state ωωω to be a spectral operator of scalar type with real spectrum so that the associated spectral projections are all physical events at ω.ω.ω. The Born formula for measurement of a physical quantity is the natural pairing of operators with linear functionals satisfying the probability conservation law. A time evolution of the system is governed by a one-parameter group of invertible spectral operators determined by a scalar type operator with the real spectrum, which satisfies the Schrödinger equation. Our formulation is just a generalization of the Dirac-von Neumann formalism of quantum mechanics to the Banach space setting. We include some examples for illustration.