Present study focuses on some foundational problems of quantum theory specifically deals with the concept of probability density and relating introductory problems. In this sense, the work initially investigates the origins of the general probability theory and re-examines the concepts of spatial and temporal probability densities based on genuine epistemological and ontological arguments. In order to tackle the foundational problems, standard theory is primarily memorised and criticized scientifically and philosophically in terms of foundationally disappearing term of time dependent potential energy within the time and space dependent Schrödinger wave equation. Based on those arguments, the problematic inconsistency between the spatial and temporal probability density functions is underlined. Given the problem, an original approach previously suggested, is concisely described and extended to resolve the existing problem. The novel approach, based on a novel time dependent Schrödinger wave equation, resolves the discrepancy with the classical wave equation and also leads to time dependent temporal probability densities even for the time free potential energies. Novel temporal probability density function is also normalized and has a fluctuation period of around 10-16 s which is very short compared to the atomic time scales.
Present study focuses on some foundational problems of quantum theory specifically deals with the concept of probability density and relating introductory problems. In this sense, the work initially investigates the origins of the general probability theory and re-examines the concepts of spatial and temporal probability densities based on genuine epistemological and ontological arguments. In order to tackle the foundational problems, standard theory is primarily memorised and criticized scientifically and philosophically in terms of foundationally disappearing term of time dependent potential energy within the time and space dependent Schrödinger wave equation. Based on those arguments, the problematic inconsistency between the spatial and temporal probability density functions is underlined. Given the problem, an original approach previously suggested, is concisely described and extended to resolve the existing problem. The novel approach, based on a novel time dependent Schrödinger wave equation, resolves the discrepancy with the classical wave equation and also leads to time dependent temporal probability densities even for the time free potential energies. Novel temporal probability density function is also normalized and has a fluctuation period of around 10-16 s which is very short compared to the atomic time scales.
This study focuses on the temporal evolution of quantum systems based on epistemological and ontological arguments and reconsiders some fundamental concepts of quantum theory. Initially, the time dependent Schrödinger wave equation (TDSWE) is criticized for the lack of a potential energy term and thereafter, a novel time dependent momentum operator is defined which eventually leads to an alternative TDSWE, including a potential energy term that remains in harmony with current theory. The wave nature is then generally examined by comparing time evolutions of classical and Schrödinger waves, dissimilarities then carefully inspected and ultimately a novel second order TDSWE is suggested. Finally, time evolution of the probability density is discussed in light of this new approach, and additionally some further insights and conclusions are briefly outlined that conform with the standard theory.
In spite of outstanding achievement of the quantum theory, the theory is under never-ending judgment due to probabilistic character and certain unresolved paradoxes arising from the very fundamentals. Additionally, it is debated that a more sophisticated theory beyond the quantum theory emerges as a need for a better understanding of the atomic and sub atomic worlds. This paper, for that reason, focuses on the very fundamental structure of the quantum theory such as the physical and philosophical meanings of the wave functions, the probability and the Schrödinger Wave Equation (SWE). Specifically deals with the time evolution of the free quantum particles. The work just arises from the difference of the classical and quantum waves, specifically the comparison of the time and space dependence of classical waves and Schrödinger waves, for the free space, indicates that time dependence shows a clear dissimilarity. In order to tackle the problem, a time dependent momentum operator, for the first time, is defined and consequently an alternative TDSWE is straightforwardly derived and its philosophical implications have been discussed. Additionally, time and position dependence of the probability functions, relating free particles, have been physically and philosophically discussed and some alternative approaches and comments are forwarded. Finally, the approaches, comments and mathematical equations are in good agreement with the standard quantum theory and interestingly go further possibly tracing some signs of new pathways to resolve the mysterious quantum world. Keywords: Schrödinger wave equation, fundamentals of quantum mechanics, momentum operator, quantum probabilities, time evolution of quantum systems.
In the literature, stochastic approaches employed to derive the Schrodinger equation seem to focus on the idea of a classical spatial density which depends on time and space ie. density(x,t). As a result, d/dt (partial) density appears in various equations such as the continuity and Focker Planck equations. At one point in the derivation the quantum wavefunction is introduced “mathematically” as W(x,t)=sqrt(density(x,t)) exp(i S(x,t)) where S is related to a velocity field through u(x,t)=velocity= d/dx S. From quantum mechanics, -Et becomes a term of S the velocity field. The stochastic/hydrodynamical approaches employ the term du/dt partial = d/dt (partial) d/dx S and then “pull out”” d/dx leaving d/dt (partial) S which yields -E average energy from the -Et term. In this note we argue that for a bound quantum state density(x) so d/dt (partial) density = 0, yet the statistical ideas of quantum mechanics should be present in such a case. Furthermore for the free particle wavefunction exp(ipx-iEt), density=1. In fact, the Schrodinger equation should follow for a free particle even the case of density=1. Stochastic processes seem to be based on equations which consider a change in classical spatial density at a point x in time due to flow in or out or stochastic changes. Quantum processes seem to deal with periodic probability changes from one dimension to another exp(ipx) (2 dimensions) which are somehow related to a physical process of momentum flow. Ultimately one links this process to an energy conservation which does not seem to be the same as a classical stochastic/hydrodynamical approach. In this note we argue that a free particle with a constant momentum p has periodic stochastic processes associated with it through its complex probability change in the region of its wavelength, but that these are linked to creating the momentum p. Furthermore momentum is linked to energy so we argue that the Schrodinger equation is a stochastic equation linking energy and momentum and that time and space are separated i.e. there is no situation of following a change in spatial density in time for a free particle with momentum p. For a bound state, one has a distribution of free particles, but again time is removed from the problem in the sense that it only appears in exp(-iEt) in the wavefunction to again establish a relationship between energy and average momentum and potential. There is again no nonzero d/dt (partial) density term which seems to be key in stochastic equations. Only if one takes a linear combination of energy eigenstates Sum over En an(En) exp(-iEnt) Wn(x) does one obtain the form density(x,t), but we argue that quantum features should already appear in exp(ipx) and the bound state scenario with a zero d/dt (partial) density(x,t). We argue, however, that the Schrodinger equation and fundamental stochastic ideas of quantum mechanics should already be present at the level of exp(ipx).
In classical mechanics, the spatial density d(x) of a particle moving under a conservation of energy law .5mv(x)v(x) + V(x) = E is proportional to 1/v(x). This is obtained from d(x)= dt/T, i.e. the probability to be at x equals the time spent at x divided by the cycle time T. Given that dx=vdt to first order, density is proportional to 1/v(x). Now, d(x) is supposed to match the time independent quantum mechanical density W(x)W(x), where W(x) is the wavefunction, for high energy levels. Thus, one would expect the time a p wave (plane wave) spends at a point should be part of time independent quantum mechanics, but it does not seem to be overtly present. Furthermore, there is the question of T for the quantum mechanical problem. It is known that even for a time-independent solution W(x) has a factor exp(iEt). Thus, it seems time is present, even if it disappears in the density W*(x)W(x). It is argued that W*(x)W(x) = P(x) where P is probability, but W(x) is related to conditional probabilities such as P(x/p) or P(p/x). Thus, these conditional probabilities should be related to time. In an earlier note, we tried to show the time-independent Schrodinger equation implies all p plane waves are cycling with the same frequency E. In this note, we try to find a quantum mechanical representation for P(x,p)=dt/T where dt(x,p) is the time spent at x by a plane wave p and also try to evaluate T.
We attempt to contribute some novel points of view to the "foundations of quantum mechanics", using mathematical tools from "quantum probability theory" (such as the theory of operator algebras). We first introduce an abstract algebraic framework for the formulation of mathematical models of physical systems that is general enough to encompass classical and quantum mechanical models. After a short discussion on the properties of classical systems (realism and determinism), we move on to the study of a general class of quantum-mechanical models of physical systems and explain what some of the key problems in a quantum theory of observations and measurements are. In the last part of our essay, we attempt to elucidate the roles played by entanglement between a system and its environment and of information loss in understanding "decoherence" and "dephasing", which are key mechanisms in a quantum theory of measurements and experiments. We also discuss the problem of "time in quantum mechanics" and sketch an answer to the question when an experiment can be considered to have been completed successfully.
This chapter demonstrates the deduction of quantum physics and, in particular, presents its new applications to eigenvalue problems. Specifically, it derives three of the five axiom presumptions of quantum mechanics (QM), for example, deducing the Schrödinger equation in two general ways. It transforms these three axiom presumptions into three theorems of QM, not only resolving the difficulty in understanding them but also yielding new theories and discoveries. For instance, this paper addresses the puzzle of the origin of wave-particle duality, derives operators, eigenvalues, and eigenstates, deduces commutation relations for coordinate and momentum as well as for time and energy, and reveals that QM is essentially a generalized (mechanics) theory of the complex square root of the (real density function of) classical statistical mechanics. The realization that QM is a generalized theory of the complex square root of classical statistical mechanics represents both a groundbreaking discovery and a revolutionary advancement in physics. This insight profoundly influences philosophical perspectives on the development of modern physics, resolves numerous puzzles in QM and quantum information, and provides QM with a scientifically solid foundation. This foundation eliminates the need for basic axiom presumptions and dispels the so-called “strange incomprehensible properties” of QM, as both classical statistical mechanics and its complex square root that have been scientifically validated. Additionally, this chapter uncovers the reason for not taking the time derivative of spatial coordinates in the Schrödinger equation. Consequently, it offers a solution to the puzzle of the origin of first quantization and primarily deduces quantum physics without the strange and incomprehensible properties currently associated with it.