Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

European Journal of Physics

Schrödinger’s equation from Snell’s law

Nathan Willig Lima, Ricardo Karam

Published Feb 17, 2022• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract A new derivation of Schrödinger’s equation is presented, based on Schrödinger’s original discussions on refraction and the optical-mechanical analogy, but adopting a much simpler formalism: Newtonian mechanics and some basic elements of classical wave theory (such as Snell’s law). We compare how particles and waves refract and show that the ‘law of particle refraction’ and the ‘law of wave refraction’ may become consistent if one assumes that a particle can be represented by a wave group. In this case, the differential equation whose solutions represent the waves forming such wave group is the Schrödinger equation. Due to the simplicity of the adopted mathematical formalism, we argue that this derivation can be used in quantum mechanics courses at introductory level to give students an idea of Schrödinger’s original path to his wave equation.

DOI
10.1088/1361-6404/ac5635

Related papers

Deriving the time-independent Schrödinger equation

Jonathan Gorard

Abstract A discussion of the physical meaning of the Schrödinger wave equation can not only constitute an exciting introduction to some of the more abstract ideas of quantum mechanics, but serves more generally as a useful demonstration of the application of mathematics to modern physics. This frontline uses physical concepts and mathematical techniques that would be accessible to a sufficiently interested secondary school student, in order to derive the simplest, one-dimensional case of the time-independent Schrödinger equation: the derivation relies only upon aspects of Newtonian/wave mechanics, quantum theory, complex numbers and calculus that would be covered in an advanced secondary school syllabus.

Physics Education•Sep 14, 2016•3 citations

How do I introduce Schrödinger equation during the quantum mechanics course?

T. Mart

Abstract In this paper I explain how I usually introduce the Schrödinger equation during the quantum mechanics course. My preferred method is the chronological one. Since the Schrödinger equation belongs to a special case of wave equations I start the course with introducing the wave equation. The Schrödinger equation is derived with the help of the two quantum concepts introduced by Max Planck, Einstein, and de Broglie, i.e. the energy of a photon E = ћ ω and the wavelength of the de Broglie wave λ = h / p . Finally, the difference between the classical wave equation and the quantum Schrödinger one is explained in order to help the students to grasp the meaning of quantum wavefunction Ψ ( r , t ) . A comparison of the present method to the approaches given by the authors of quantum mechanics textbooks as well as that of the original Nuffield A level is presented. It is found that the present approach is different from those given by these authors, except by Weinberg or Dicke and Wittke. However, the approach is in line with the original Nuffield A level one.

arXiv:2010.15589•Physics Education•Jan 12, 2021•2 citations

On Schrödinger's equation, Hertz's mechanics and Van Vleck's determinant

Ricardo Lopes Coelho, John J. Stachel

There has been much research on Schrodinger's route to what we now call Schrodinger's equation. Various authors disagree as to the exact nature of the influence of each of the physicists he cites—and of some that he does not. This paper, intended for graduate students of and researchers in quantum theory, clarifies Schrodinger's original aims in formulating a wave equation for matter, discusses how far he fulfilled his original aspirations and in what respects he fell short of his goal. An analysis of Schrodinger's foundational paper enables us to distinguish between a formal and an epistemological part, and consider the input of the physicists cited on the basis of the part in which each reference occurs. It turns out, for instance, that Hamilton's optical-mechanical analogy belongs entirely to the epistemological part. Indeed, no element of this analogy plays any role in the formal part of Schrodinger's argument. Instead of basing his theory on this analogy, as is often done nowadays in the physics literature and even in the history of science, we maintain that the aim of Schrodinger's project was to represent wave phenomena by a ‘wave’ in configuration- or q-space, paralleling Hertz's treatment in his Mechanics (1894). The influence of this book on Schrodinger's foundational paper is demonstrated by an analysis of his unpublished paper: Hertz's Mechanics and Einstein's Theory of Gravitation. This approach enables us to dispense with the optical-mechanical analogy in tracing the route to Schrodinger's equation. We also discuss the curious role of the Van Vleck determinant as the ‘missing link’ in taking the classical limit of Schrodinger's wavefunction. A concluding section discusses the relation of some of Schrodinger's earlier and later work to the development of quantum field theory.

European Journal of Physics•May 7, 2013•2 citations

Derivation of Schrodinger's equation from the Hamilton-Jacobi and the Eikonal equations

Lachezar S. Simeonov

Most authors of textbooks on quantum mechanics either postulate or sketch a short `ad hoc` derivation of Schrodinger's equation. In this work we give a detailed derivation of Schrodinger's equation from the Hamilton-Jacobi equation and the Eikonal equation in geometrical optics. We start from the historical debates on the nature of light -- whether it is a beam of particles, or waves in the aether. We derive the Eikonal equation and show the conditions when a wave can behave as a beam of particles. Then we discuss several experiments with an electron gun, that show clearly diffraction and interference of a single electron. Next, in order to explain these experiments, we derive Schrodinger's equation by comparing Hamilton-Jacobi equation in classical mechanics with the Eikonal equation in geometrical optics. To do that, we first show how to derive the wave equation from the Eikonal equation (not the other way around!). Second, we use this method to derive Schrodinger's equation from the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Next, we derive Born's statistical rule using the early understanding of de Broglie that both particles and waves exist. Afterwards, we show that historically people preferred to remove the particles (as well as their trajectories) altogether from de Broglie's ideas but retained Born's rule (the so called Copenhagen interpretation). These derivations of the foundations of quantum mechanics do not follow precisely the history of the subject. Rather we select some early ideas and experiments in a judicious manner to present Schrodinger's equation in a logical and ordered way. We use the electron gun experiments instead of black body radiation and photoelectric effect. Our derivation may bring more light and satisfaction for the undergraduate students about the confusing and rather mysterious subject of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2410.03689•Sep 21, 2024•0 citations

Wave optics versus wave mechanics I

Sergey V. Gaponenko

Let us return from optics to mechanics and explore the analogy to its fullest extent. In optics the old system of mechanics corresponds to intellectually operating with isolated mutually independent light rays. The new undulatory mechanics corresponds to the wave theory of light . Erwin Schrödinger, Nobel lecture , 1933 In this chapter we shall see that electromagnetic waves and electrons feature a number of common properties under conditions of spatial confinement. Simple and familiar problems from introductory quantum mechanics and textbook wave optics are recalled in this chapter to emphasize the basic features of waves in spatially inhomogeneous media. Herewith we make a first step towards understanding the properties of electrons and electromagnetic waves in nanostructures and notice that these properties in many instances are counterparts. Different formulas and statements of this chapter can be found in handbooks on quantum mechanics and wave optics. A few textbooks on quantum mechanics do consider analogies of propagation and reflection phenomena in wave optics with those in wave mechanics. Isomorphism of the Schrödinger and Helmholtz equations In Chapter 2 we discussed that an electron in quantum mechanics is described by the wave function, the square of its absolute value giving the probability of finding an electron at a specific point in space. This function satisfies the Schrödinger equation (2.56) which is the second-order differential equation with respect to space and the first-order differential equation with respect to time.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 8, 2010•1 citation

The physical origin of Schrödinger equation

Xiao-Bo Yan

Abstract Quantum mechanics is one of the basic theories of modern physics. Here, the famous Schrödinger equation and the differential operators representing mechanical quantities in quantum mechanics are derived, just based on the principle that the translation invariance (symmetry) of a system in Hamiltonian mechanics should be preserved in quantum mechanics. Moreover, according to the form of the differential operators, the commutation relation in quantum mechanics between the generalized coordinate and the generalized momentum can be directly obtained. We believe that the results in this paper are very useful for understanding the physical origin of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2106.01312•European Journal of Physics•Apr 9, 2021•2 citations
Abstract A new derivation of Schrödinger’s equation is presented, based on Schrödinger’s original discussions on refraction and the optical-mechanical analogy, but adopting a much simpler formalism: Newtonian mechanics and some basic elements of classical wave theory (such as Snell’s law). We compare how particles and waves refract and show that the ‘law of particle refraction’ and the ‘law of wave refraction’ may become consistent if one assumes that a particle can be represented by a wave group. In this case, the differential equation whose solutions represent the waves forming such wave group is the Schrödinger equation. Due to the simplicity of the adopted mathematical formalism, we argue that this derivation can be used in quantum mechanics courses at introductory level to give students an idea of Schrödinger’s original path to his wave equation.
Abstract A discussion of the physical meaning of the Schrödinger wave equation can not only constitute an exciting introduction to some of the more abstract ideas of quantum mechanics, but serves more generally as a useful demonstration of the application of mathematics to modern physics. This frontline uses physical concepts and mathematical techniques that would be accessible to a sufficiently interested secondary school student, in order to derive the simplest, one-dimensional case of the time-independent Schrödinger equation: the derivation relies only upon aspects of Newtonian/wave mechanics, quantum theory, complex numbers and calculus that would be covered in an advanced secondary school syllabus.
Abstract In this paper I explain how I usually introduce the Schrödinger equation during the quantum mechanics course. My preferred method is the chronological one. Since the Schrödinger equation belongs to a special case of wave equations I start the course with introducing the wave equation. The Schrödinger equation is derived with the help of the two quantum concepts introduced by Max Planck, Einstein, and de Broglie, i.e. the energy of a photon E = ћ ω and the wavelength of the de Broglie wave λ = h / p . Finally, the difference between the classical wave equation and the quantum Schrödinger one is explained in order to help the students to grasp the meaning of quantum wavefunction Ψ ( r , t ) . A comparison of the present method to the approaches given by the authors of quantum mechanics textbooks as well as that of the original Nuffield A level is presented. It is found that the present approach is different from those given by these authors, except by Weinberg or Dicke and Wittke. However, the approach is in line with the original Nuffield A level one.
There has been much research on Schrodinger's route to what we now call Schrodinger's equation. Various authors disagree as to the exact nature of the influence of each of the physicists he cites—and of some that he does not. This paper, intended for graduate students of and researchers in quantum theory, clarifies Schrodinger's original aims in formulating a wave equation for matter, discusses how far he fulfilled his original aspirations and in what respects he fell short of his goal. An analysis of Schrodinger's foundational paper enables us to distinguish between a formal and an epistemological part, and consider the input of the physicists cited on the basis of the part in which each reference occurs. It turns out, for instance, that Hamilton's optical-mechanical analogy belongs entirely to the epistemological part. Indeed, no element of this analogy plays any role in the formal part of Schrodinger's argument. Instead of basing his theory on this analogy, as is often done nowadays in the physics literature and even in the history of science, we maintain that the aim of Schrodinger's project was to represent wave phenomena by a ‘wave’ in configuration- or q-space, paralleling Hertz's treatment in his Mechanics (1894). The influence of this book on Schrodinger's foundational paper is demonstrated by an analysis of his unpublished paper: Hertz's Mechanics and Einstein's Theory of Gravitation. This approach enables us to dispense with the optical-mechanical analogy in tracing the route to Schrodinger's equation. We also discuss the curious role of the Van Vleck determinant as the ‘missing link’ in taking the classical limit of Schrodinger's wavefunction. A concluding section discusses the relation of some of Schrodinger's earlier and later work to the development of quantum field theory.
Most authors of textbooks on quantum mechanics either postulate or sketch a short `ad hoc` derivation of Schrodinger's equation. In this work we give a detailed derivation of Schrodinger's equation from the Hamilton-Jacobi equation and the Eikonal equation in geometrical optics. We start from the historical debates on the nature of light -- whether it is a beam of particles, or waves in the aether. We derive the Eikonal equation and show the conditions when a wave can behave as a beam of particles. Then we discuss several experiments with an electron gun, that show clearly diffraction and interference of a single electron. Next, in order to explain these experiments, we derive Schrodinger's equation by comparing Hamilton-Jacobi equation in classical mechanics with the Eikonal equation in geometrical optics. To do that, we first show how to derive the wave equation from the Eikonal equation (not the other way around!). Second, we use this method to derive Schrodinger's equation from the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Next, we derive Born's statistical rule using the early understanding of de Broglie that both particles and waves exist. Afterwards, we show that historically people preferred to remove the particles (as well as their trajectories) altogether from de Broglie's ideas but retained Born's rule (the so called Copenhagen interpretation). These derivations of the foundations of quantum mechanics do not follow precisely the history of the subject. Rather we select some early ideas and experiments in a judicious manner to present Schrodinger's equation in a logical and ordered way. We use the electron gun experiments instead of black body radiation and photoelectric effect. Our derivation may bring more light and satisfaction for the undergraduate students about the confusing and rather mysterious subject of quantum mechanics.
Let us return from optics to mechanics and explore the analogy to its fullest extent. In optics the old system of mechanics corresponds to intellectually operating with isolated mutually independent light rays. The new undulatory mechanics corresponds to the wave theory of light . Erwin Schrödinger, Nobel lecture , 1933 In this chapter we shall see that electromagnetic waves and electrons feature a number of common properties under conditions of spatial confinement. Simple and familiar problems from introductory quantum mechanics and textbook wave optics are recalled in this chapter to emphasize the basic features of waves in spatially inhomogeneous media. Herewith we make a first step towards understanding the properties of electrons and electromagnetic waves in nanostructures and notice that these properties in many instances are counterparts. Different formulas and statements of this chapter can be found in handbooks on quantum mechanics and wave optics. A few textbooks on quantum mechanics do consider analogies of propagation and reflection phenomena in wave optics with those in wave mechanics. Isomorphism of the Schrödinger and Helmholtz equations In Chapter 2 we discussed that an electron in quantum mechanics is described by the wave function, the square of its absolute value giving the probability of finding an electron at a specific point in space. This function satisfies the Schrödinger equation (2.56) which is the second-order differential equation with respect to space and the first-order differential equation with respect to time.
Abstract Quantum mechanics is one of the basic theories of modern physics. Here, the famous Schrödinger equation and the differential operators representing mechanical quantities in quantum mechanics are derived, just based on the principle that the translation invariance (symmetry) of a system in Hamiltonian mechanics should be preserved in quantum mechanics. Moreover, according to the form of the differential operators, the commutation relation in quantum mechanics between the generalized coordinate and the generalized momentum can be directly obtained. We believe that the results in this paper are very useful for understanding the physical origin of quantum mechanics.