Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Quantum Indeterminacy

Belal Ehsan Baaquie

Published Dec 15, 2012• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4614-6224-8_7

Related papers

Explicating Quantum Indeterminacy

Peter J. Lewis

Synthese Library/Synthese library•Jan 1, 2022•6 citations

Unexpected quantum indeterminacy

Andréa Oldofredi

arXiv:2403.06584•European Journal for Philosophy of Science•Mar 1, 2024•4 citations

Vague identity and quantum indeterminacy

K. Krause

•Jan 1, 1995•2 citations

Quantum metaphysical indeterminacy

Claudio Calosi, Jessica Wilson

Philosophical Studies•Jul 28, 2018•101 citations

Quantum Waves and Indeterminacy

Lars‐Göran Johansson

Synthese Library/Synthese library•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Fact from Fiction

Samuel Lebens, İrem Kurtsal Steen

Abstract One standard interpretation of quantum physics describes our world as manifesting ontological indeterminacy. In this paper, we argue that theists are well placed to account for this indeterminacy should that account of quantum physics win out over competing alternatives. We criticize the three most promising theories of ontic indeterminacy in how they account for quantum indeterminacy. We present another form of indeterminacy: the indeterminacy of fiction. We propose an often-underappreciated corollary of standard theism, namely, Theistic Dependence (TD). We contend that the theist, equipped with TD, can render quantum indeterminacy as comprehensible as the very tame indeterminacy in fiction. This, we argue, provides the theist with an advantage over the atheist.

•Apr 1, 2025•0 citations
Abstract One standard interpretation of quantum physics describes our world as manifesting ontological indeterminacy. In this paper, we argue that theists are well placed to account for this indeterminacy should that account of quantum physics win out over competing alternatives. We criticize the three most promising theories of ontic indeterminacy in how they account for quantum indeterminacy. We present another form of indeterminacy: the indeterminacy of fiction. We propose an often-underappreciated corollary of standard theism, namely, Theistic Dependence (TD). We contend that the theist, equipped with TD, can render quantum indeterminacy as comprehensible as the very tame indeterminacy in fiction. This, we argue, provides the theist with an advantage over the atheist.