Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2403.06584 · European Journal for Philosophy of Science

Unexpected quantum indeterminacy

Andréa Oldofredi

Published Mar 1, 2024• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s13194-024-00574-9

Related papers

Quantum Indeterminacy

Belal Ehsan Baaquie

Springer eBooks•Dec 15, 2012•0 citations

Explicating Quantum Indeterminacy

Peter J. Lewis

Synthese Library/Synthese library•Jan 1, 2022•6 citations

Vague identity and quantum indeterminacy

K. Krause

•Jan 1, 1995•2 citations

Quantum metaphysical indeterminacy

Claudio Calosi, Jessica Wilson

Philosophical Studies•Jul 28, 2018•101 citations

Geometric Derivation of Born's Rule and Schrödinger's Equation (From Gradient Indeterminacy Over Extended Regions)

Daniel Avilés Hurtado

We demonstrate that two foundational postulates of quantum mechanics—Born’s rule and Schrödinger’s equation—emerge as geometric theorems when gradient indeterminacy is applied to extended quantum states (superelectrons) over finite regions. Born’s rule (P ∝ |ψ|2 ) follows from the requirement that empirical event distributions must respect the same gradient constraints as the underlying mass-wave density. Schrödinger’s equation emerges as the dynamical condition for maintaining gradient saturation over time. This work extends recent results showing that Heisenberg uncertainty, spin-1/2, and orbital stability all derive from geometric principles. We explicitly identify weak points requiring future development (the geometric factor F (Ω, κ) and the discrete-continuous transition), propose specific paths for strengthening the framework, and explore unexpected connections including the cosmological constant discrepancy, quantum entanglement as shared geometry, and the Hubble tension as evidence of geometry-dependent cosmological parameters.

•Jan 5, 2026•0 citations

Unpredictability as Foundation: Why the Universe Cannot Be Otherwise

Daniel Avilés Hurtado

The debate between determinism and indeterminism has shaped physics and philosophy for centuries. Laplace’s demon represented the deterministic ideal; Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle challenged it with irreducible unpredictability. This paper proposes a third position that dissolves the false dichotomy: the range of possible outcomes is determined by pre-existing geometric constraints, but the specific manifestation within that range is ontologically unpredictable. This distinction emerges naturally from the Gradient Indeterminacy framework, where stable quantum states require double saturation of conjugate gradients, forcing coherent oscillation between discrete configurations (e.g., 12 ↔ 13 charge events per cycle). We extend this principle beyond quantum physics via the Underlying Properties Hypothesis (UPH), showing how the same pattern manifests in biological mutation and neural variability. A case study documents an instance where a cybernetic intelligence generated images with text in an unexpected language—not as a bug, but as empirical signature of indeterminacy operating at the informational level. The framework invites a ontological shift: unpredictability is not epistemic limitation but condition of existence across scales.

•Mar 22, 2026•0 citations
We demonstrate that two foundational postulates of quantum mechanics—Born’s rule and Schrödinger’s equation—emerge as geometric theorems when gradient indeterminacy is applied to extended quantum states (superelectrons) over finite regions. Born’s rule (P ∝ |ψ|2 ) follows from the requirement that empirical event distributions must respect the same gradient constraints as the underlying mass-wave density. Schrödinger’s equation emerges as the dynamical condition for maintaining gradient saturation over time. This work extends recent results showing that Heisenberg uncertainty, spin-1/2, and orbital stability all derive from geometric principles. We explicitly identify weak points requiring future development (the geometric factor F (Ω, κ) and the discrete-continuous transition), propose specific paths for strengthening the framework, and explore unexpected connections including the cosmological constant discrepancy, quantum entanglement as shared geometry, and the Hubble tension as evidence of geometry-dependent cosmological parameters.
The debate between determinism and indeterminism has shaped physics and philosophy for centuries. Laplace’s demon represented the deterministic ideal; Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle challenged it with irreducible unpredictability. This paper proposes a third position that dissolves the false dichotomy: the range of possible outcomes is determined by pre-existing geometric constraints, but the specific manifestation within that range is ontologically unpredictable. This distinction emerges naturally from the Gradient Indeterminacy framework, where stable quantum states require double saturation of conjugate gradients, forcing coherent oscillation between discrete configurations (e.g., 12 ↔ 13 charge events per cycle). We extend this principle beyond quantum physics via the Underlying Properties Hypothesis (UPH), showing how the same pattern manifests in biological mutation and neural variability. A case study documents an instance where a cybernetic intelligence generated images with text in an unexpected language—not as a bug, but as empirical signature of indeterminacy operating at the informational level. The framework invites a ontological shift: unpredictability is not epistemic limitation but condition of existence across scales.