Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Institute of Physics eBooks

EPR paradox and Bell inequalities

Dipankar Bhattacharyya, Jyotirmoy Guha

Published Jan 1, 2022• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1088/978-0-7503-2715-2ch11

Related papers

The EPR Paradox Resolution. The Bell Inequalities Revisited

Jaykov Foukzon, E.R. Men’kova, A. A. Potapov

•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

EPR Paradox, Bell Inequalities and Peculiarities of Quantum Correlations

Apoorva Patel

arXiv:2502.06791•Journal of the Indian Institute of Science•Jan 1, 2025•1 citation

On EPR paradox, and violation of the Bell inequality in local quantum mechanics

V. K. Ignatovich

•Jan 25, 2011•0 citations

Resolving the EPR Paradox and Bell's Theorem

Robert H. McEachern

The EPR Paradox and the quantum correlations described by Bell's Inequality theorem, are explained as arising from the behavior of entities that manifest only a single bit of information, such as noisy, band-limited, polarized coins.

•Apr 1, 2018•0 citations

The EPR Argument and Bell’s Inequalities

Philip L. Bowers

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 27, 2020•0 citations

Closer Look at EPR Paradox and Bell’s Inequality

Vladimir K. Ignatovich

The EPR paradox is shown to be a result of the wrong definitions in quantum mechanics of such physical quantities as momentum and position. The corrected definitions show that momentum and position of particles can be precisely defined simultaneously and uncertainty relations do not prevent it. Therefore, with correct definition of physical quantities in quantum mechanics, the paradox disappears. The Bohm Aharonov version of the EPR paradox is illustrated by the example of measuring the polarization of photon pairs. The common view of the two photon state radiated by a source is presented. The common Bell’s inequality is discussed and the simplest version of it for a specific hidden variable is derived. A possibility of an experimental study of whether a photon and its polarization are preexistent before measurements is considered.

American Journal of Modern Physics•Apr 17, 2015•1 citation
The EPR paradox is shown to be a result of the wrong definitions in quantum mechanics of such physical quantities as momentum and position. The corrected definitions show that momentum and position of particles can be precisely defined simultaneously and uncertainty relations do not prevent it. Therefore, with correct definition of physical quantities in quantum mechanics, the paradox disappears. The Bohm Aharonov version of the EPR paradox is illustrated by the example of measuring the polarization of photon pairs. The common view of the two photon state radiated by a source is presented. The common Bell’s inequality is discussed and the simplest version of it for a specific hidden variable is derived. A possibility of an experimental study of whether a photon and its polarization are preexistent before measurements is considered.