Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science

EPR Paradox and Bell Inequalitites.

Mika Hirvensalo

Published Jan 1, 2007• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

EPR paradox and Bell inequalities

Dipankar Bhattacharyya, Jyotirmoy Guha

Institute of Physics eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

The EPR Paradox Resolution. The Bell Inequalities Revisited

Jaykov Foukzon, E.R. Men’kova, A. A. Potapov

•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Bell’s theorem and the EPR paradox

Dipankar Home, F. Selleri

Rivista Del Nuovo Cimento•Sep 1, 1991•120 citations

Entangled States, EPR Paradox and Bell’s Inequality

Philippe Grangier

Springer eBooks•Dec 12, 2005•1 citation

EPR Paradox, Bell Inequalities and Peculiarities of Quantum Correlations

Apoorva Patel

arXiv:2502.06791•Journal of the Indian Institute of Science•Jan 1, 2025•1 citation

Experimental Test of the EPR Paradox and its Corresponding Steering Inequality

Tianfeng Feng, Changliang Ren, Qin Feng +4 more

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is one of the earliest paradoxes, arising from the lack of local realistic description of mechanics. The EPR paradox leads to the important concept of quantum which manifests itself by three different phenomena: entanglement, steering, and Bell's nonlocality. Two well-known paradoxes related to Bell's nonlocality, i.e. the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger paradox and the Hardy paradox, have been widely studied and also experimentally confirmed. However, an experimental test of the EPR paradox is still lacking. The EPR paradox is essentially a steering paradox, and recently it has been mathematically formulated as a contradiction equality $k=1$, thus making it amenable to an experimental verification. Moreover, based on the EPR paradox we also derive a generalized linear steering inequality. In this work, we perform the first experimental test of the EPR paradox in a two-qubit scenario, and also verify the corresponding generalized steering inequality, which has an advantage over the usual one by detecting more steerability of states. Experimental results confirm the theoretical predictions within the experimental errors, and provide a deeper understanding of foundation.

•Apr 9, 2020•0 citations
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is one of the earliest paradoxes, arising from the lack of local realistic description of mechanics. The EPR paradox leads to the important concept of quantum which manifests itself by three different phenomena: entanglement, steering, and Bell's nonlocality. Two well-known paradoxes related to Bell's nonlocality, i.e. the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger paradox and the Hardy paradox, have been widely studied and also experimentally confirmed. However, an experimental test of the EPR paradox is still lacking. The EPR paradox is essentially a steering paradox, and recently it has been mathematically formulated as a contradiction equality k=1k=1k=1, thus making it amenable to an experimental verification. Moreover, based on the EPR paradox we also derive a generalized linear steering inequality. In this work, we perform the first experimental test of the EPR paradox in a two-qubit scenario, and also verify the corresponding generalized steering inequality, which has an advantage over the usual one by detecting more steerability of states. Experimental results confirm the theoretical predictions within the experimental errors, and provide a deeper understanding of foundation.