Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices

Peters, P. N., Holdeman, L. B.

Published Jun 24, 2020• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Published document discusses devices which are based on weak-link Josephson elements that join superconductors. Links can take numerous forms, and circuitry utilizing links can perform many varied functions with unprecedented sensitivity. Theoretical review of Josephson's junctions include tunneling junctions, point contact devices, microbridges, and proximity-effect devices.

DOI
10.1142/9789811209260_0003

Related papers

Nanobridge superconducting quantum interference devices: Beyond the Josephson limit

Dibyendu Hazra

Nanoscale superconducting quantum interference devices (nano-SQUIDS) where the weak links are made from nanobridges, i.e., nanobridge SQUIDs (NBSs), are one of the most sensitive magnetometers for nanoscale magnetometry. Because of very strong nonlinearity in the nanobridge-electrode joints, the applied magnetic flux (${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{a}$)--critical current (${I}_{c}$) characteristics of NBSs differ very significantly from conventional tunnel-junction SQUIDs, especially when the nanobridges are long and/or the screening parameter is large. However, in most of the theoretical descriptions, NBSs have been treated as the conventional tunnel-junction SQUIDs, which are based on the dc Josephson effect. Here, I present a model demonstrating that for long nanobridges and/or large screening parameters the ${I}_{c}({\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{a})$ of a NBS can be explained by merely considering the fluxoid quantization in the NBS loop and the energy of the NBS; it is not necessary to take the Josephson effect into consideration. I also demonstrate that using the model, one can derive useful expressions such as the modulation depth and transfer function. I discuss the role of the kinetic inductance fraction ($\ensuremath{\kappa}$) in determining ${I}_{c}({\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{a})$. I compare the predictions of the present model with the experimental data already published by several groups.

arXiv:1809.09510•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Apr 5, 2019•11 citations

Applications of barrier tunneling phenomena

E. L. Wolf

Barrier tunnelling devices based on the Josephson effect include superconducting quantum interference detectors (SQUID) in conventional and scanning forms. The use of a scanning SQUID detector to detect a half-flux quantum in a ring of Josephson junctions identifies d-wave superconductivity. The shunted Josephson junction is the basis for the rapid single flux quantum RSFQ class of superconducting logic circuits. The use of RSFQ to form fast analogue to digital ADC converter devices is reported. Various types of radiation detectors are described including SIS detectors, Josephson-effect detectors, and optical point-contact antenna devices.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Nov 17, 2011•0 citations

Millimeter and submillimeter wave mixers based on superconducting weak links

Janusz Konopka, I. Wolff

Principles of operation of superconducting mixers based on: Superconductor-Insulator-Superconductor (SIS) tunnel junctions, Josephson junctions in high temperature superconductors and on superconducting hot-electron-microbolometers are presented. Most recent results on all types of superconducting mixers, with special attention paid to noise properties is reviewed.

International Conference on Microwaves, Radar & Wireless Communications•Nov 27, 2002•0 citations

Low-Capacitance Josephson Junctions

Andrii P. Shapovalov, Pascal Febvre, Uğur Yılmaz +3 more

The Josephson effect, as an example of a macroscopic quantum phenomenon, reveals itself in the three-layer heterostructures formed by two superconductors coupled by a weak link that usually consists of a 1-2 nm-thick insulating barrier.The traditional way of modelling such-systems' dynamics is based on an equivalent circuit that comprises three parallel elements: a pure superconducting element with a certain supercurrent-versus-Josephson phase difference dependence, a resistor R, and a capacitor C. In this short review, we analyse the practical problem of reducing the junction capacitance while maintaining or slightly impairing other characteristics.Some arguments are presented to explain why the capacitance should be suppressed and how it will affect performance of superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) and digital electronics circuits.As a solution for low-capacitance junctions, we propose a weak link made of an amorphous-silicon interlayer doped with nanoscale metallic drops between the two superconducting Mo-Re-alloy electrodes.

Progress in Physics of Metals•Mar 1, 2020•4 citations

Superconducting quantum interference devices with graphene junctions.

Michael D. Thompson, Jonathan R. Prance, R. P. Haley +7 more

We present measurements of DC superconducting quantum interference devices based on Nb/graphene/Nb Josephson junctions. The superconducting proximity effect in graphene can be used to build Josephson junctions whose critical current can be controlled by field-effect gates. These junctions combine the tunability of semiconductor Josephson junctions with the high critical currents and low contact resistances of metal SNS junctions. By using local gates, the SQUID junction critical currents can be modified individually and this allows the sensitivity and symmetry of the SQUID to be controlled in-situ. We compare the critical current of the SQUID with simulations that include a non-sinusoidal current phase relation in the junctions, as expected for ballistic graphene junctions. We also investigate the transfer function of the device in both symmetric and asymmetric configurations and find a highest transfer function of 300 μV/Φ0. Graphene Josephson junctions have the potential to add functionality to existing technologies; for example, to make SQUID magnetometers with tunable sensitivity or superconducting qubits with fast electrical control.

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 17, 2017•0 citations

Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices

J. C. Gallop

In Chapter 2 we made use of a hypothetical arrangement of a strongly coupled superconducting ring, interrupted by a region of weak superconductivity, to derive the essential features of the Josephson effects. In practice this same arrangement is actually employed as the basis of one of the most useful superconducting devices developed so far, the single-junction, or rf, squid . (As mentioned in the Introduction, squid is an acronym for Superconducting QUantum Interference Device.) Here the essential physics behind the operation of these important devices will be described, and in the following section the practical realisation of an rf squid with its associated readout electronics will be explained. Chapter 4 will treat in a similar way dc squid s, which are related devices possessing two weak links in a single ring, whose mode of operation is rather different.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 19, 2017•5 citations
Published document discusses devices which are based on weak-link Josephson elements that join superconductors. Links can take numerous forms, and circuitry utilizing links can perform many varied functions with unprecedented sensitivity. Theoretical review of Josephson's junctions include tunneling junctions, point contact devices, microbridges, and proximity-effect devices.
Nanoscale superconducting quantum interference devices (nano-SQUIDS) where the weak links are made from nanobridges, i.e., nanobridge SQUIDs (NBSs), are one of the most sensitive magnetometers for nanoscale magnetometry. Because of very strong nonlinearity in the nanobridge-electrode joints, the applied magnetic flux (${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{a}$)--critical current (Ic{I}_{c}Ic​) characteristics of NBSs differ very significantly from conventional tunnel-junction SQUIDs, especially when the nanobridges are long and/or the screening parameter is large. However, in most of the theoretical descriptions, NBSs have been treated as the conventional tunnel-junction SQUIDs, which are based on the dc Josephson effect. Here, I present a model demonstrating that for long nanobridges and/or large screening parameters the ${I}_{c}({\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{a})$ of a NBS can be explained by merely considering the fluxoid quantization in the NBS loop and the energy of the NBS; it is not necessary to take the Josephson effect into consideration. I also demonstrate that using the model, one can derive useful expressions such as the modulation depth and transfer function. I discuss the role of the kinetic inductance fraction ($\ensuremath{\kappa}$) in determining ${I}_{c}({\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{a})$. I compare the predictions of the present model with the experimental data already published by several groups.
Barrier tunnelling devices based on the Josephson effect include superconducting quantum interference detectors (SQUID) in conventional and scanning forms. The use of a scanning SQUID detector to detect a half-flux quantum in a ring of Josephson junctions identifies d-wave superconductivity. The shunted Josephson junction is the basis for the rapid single flux quantum RSFQ class of superconducting logic circuits. The use of RSFQ to form fast analogue to digital ADC converter devices is reported. Various types of radiation detectors are described including SIS detectors, Josephson-effect detectors, and optical point-contact antenna devices.
The Josephson effect, as an example of a macroscopic quantum phenomenon, reveals itself in the three-layer heterostructures formed by two superconductors coupled by a weak link that usually consists of a 1-2 nm-thick insulating barrier.The traditional way of modelling such-systems' dynamics is based on an equivalent circuit that comprises three parallel elements: a pure superconducting element with a certain supercurrent-versus-Josephson phase difference dependence, a resistor R, and a capacitor C. In this short review, we analyse the practical problem of reducing the junction capacitance while maintaining or slightly impairing other characteristics.Some arguments are presented to explain why the capacitance should be suppressed and how it will affect performance of superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) and digital electronics circuits.As a solution for low-capacitance junctions, we propose a weak link made of an amorphous-silicon interlayer doped with nanoscale metallic drops between the two superconducting Mo-Re-alloy electrodes.
We present measurements of DC superconducting quantum interference devices based on Nb/graphene/Nb Josephson junctions. The superconducting proximity effect in graphene can be used to build Josephson junctions whose critical current can be controlled by field-effect gates. These junctions combine the tunability of semiconductor Josephson junctions with the high critical currents and low contact resistances of metal SNS junctions. By using local gates, the SQUID junction critical currents can be modified individually and this allows the sensitivity and symmetry of the SQUID to be controlled in-situ. We compare the critical current of the SQUID with simulations that include a non-sinusoidal current phase relation in the junctions, as expected for ballistic graphene junctions. We also investigate the transfer function of the device in both symmetric and asymmetric configurations and find a highest transfer function of 300 μV/Φ0. Graphene Josephson junctions have the potential to add functionality to existing technologies; for example, to make SQUID magnetometers with tunable sensitivity or superconducting qubits with fast electrical control.
In Chapter 2 we made use of a hypothetical arrangement of a strongly coupled superconducting ring, interrupted by a region of weak superconductivity, to derive the essential features of the Josephson effects. In practice this same arrangement is actually employed as the basis of one of the most useful superconducting devices developed so far, the single-junction, or rf, squid . (As mentioned in the Introduction, squid is an acronym for Superconducting QUantum Interference Device.) Here the essential physics behind the operation of these important devices will be described, and in the following section the practical realisation of an rf squid with its associated readout electronics will be explained. Chapter 4 will treat in a similar way dc squid s, which are related devices possessing two weak links in a single ring, whose mode of operation is rather different.