Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

History of physics

Spin and Its Interpretation

Carl S. Helrich

Published Jan 1, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-79268-8_9

Related papers

Spin and uncertainty in the interpretation of quantum mechanics

David Hestenes

A rigorous derivation of the Schrödinger theory from the Pauli (or Dirac) theory implies that the Schrödinger equation describes an electron in an eigenstate of spin. Furthermore, the ground-state kinetic energy is completely determined by the electron spin density. This can be explained by interpreting the spin as an orbital angular momentum, which is necessarily accompanied by a kinetic energy. Thus, the spin is a zero-point angular momentum associated with the zero-point energy of the electron. Since the dispersion in electron momentum is determined by the zero-point energy, the Heisenberg uncertainty relations for an electron can be interpreted as a property of the electronspin motion. The kinetic interpretation of spin and the statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics can be jointly sustained by regarding the electron as a point particle. It follows that stationary electron states are sources of fluctuating electric fields. There is reason to believe that these fluctuating fields are responsible for the Van der Waals force and can be identified with electromagnetic vacuum field fluctuations. The kinetic interpretation of spin then implies that the Van der Waals forces are spin dependent. These ideas are not only consistent with the conventional mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics, they provide a more complete and coherent interpretation of many details in the formalism than does the alternative Copenhagen interpretation. They present some difficulties, however, which, if the kinetic interpretation of spin is correct, probably require some modification of quantum electrodynamics to be resolved.

American Journal of Physics•May 1, 1979•97 citations

A Possible Explanation of Spin

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•May 1, 1998•0 citations

Reply to ’’Comment on ’Spin and uncertainty in the interpretation of quantum mechanics’ ’’

David Hestenes

See also commentary Comment on ’’Spin and uncertainty in the interpretation of quantum mechanics’’

American Journal of Physics•May 1, 1981•0 citations

Introduction to spin

Giampiero V. M. Esposito, Giuseppe Marmo, George Sudarshan

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 11, 2004•0 citations

The interpretation of quantum mechanics on the basis of independence from the background

Kuyukov

In this paper we consider the interpretation of quantum mechanics on the basis of independence from the background. Spin and tensor networks provide a clear geometric interpretation of quantum entanglement. Also the energy of the particles treated as elements of the spin volume.

•Mar 29, 2020•0 citations

Spin physics in perspective

David F. Measday

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 1984•0 citations
A rigorous derivation of the Schrödinger theory from the Pauli (or Dirac) theory implies that the Schrödinger equation describes an electron in an eigenstate of spin. Furthermore, the ground-state kinetic energy is completely determined by the electron spin density. This can be explained by interpreting the spin as an orbital angular momentum, which is necessarily accompanied by a kinetic energy. Thus, the spin is a zero-point angular momentum associated with the zero-point energy of the electron. Since the dispersion in electron momentum is determined by the zero-point energy, the Heisenberg uncertainty relations for an electron can be interpreted as a property of the electronspin motion. The kinetic interpretation of spin and the statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics can be jointly sustained by regarding the electron as a point particle. It follows that stationary electron states are sources of fluctuating electric fields. There is reason to believe that these fluctuating fields are responsible for the Van der Waals force and can be identified with electromagnetic vacuum field fluctuations. The kinetic interpretation of spin then implies that the Van der Waals forces are spin dependent. These ideas are not only consistent with the conventional mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics, they provide a more complete and coherent interpretation of many details in the formalism than does the alternative Copenhagen interpretation. They present some difficulties, however, which, if the kinetic interpretation of spin is correct, probably require some modification of quantum electrodynamics to be resolved.