American Journal of Physics

Reply to ’’Comment on ’Spin and uncertainty in the interpretation of quantum mechanics’ ’’

David Hestenes

Published May 1, 1981• 0 citations

Publisher

Abstract

See also commentary Comment on ’’Spin and uncertainty in the interpretation of quantum mechanics’’

DOI: 10.1119/1.12491

Related papers

Comment on ’’Spin and uncertainty in the interpretation of quantum mechanics’’

Robert T. Deck

American Journal of PhysicsMay 1, 19811 citation

Reply to Comment on ‘Computations in quantum mechanics made easy’

H. J. Korsch, Kevin Rapedius

European Journal of PhysicsOct 14, 20200 citations

Reply to "Comment on ‘Association between quantum paradoxes based on weak values and a realistic interpretation of quantum measurements’"

Anonymous

Physical Review AMay 12, 20250 citations

The stochastic interpretation of quantum mechanics: A reply to Ghirardiet al.

E. Onofri

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimentoFeb 1, 19796 citations

Further Comment on “Alternative to the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Theory”

Mendel Sachs

American Journal of PhysicsFeb 1, 19693 citations

Comment on “On the classical analysis of spin-orbit coupling in hydrogenlike atoms,” by A. L. Kholmetskii, O. V. Missevitch, and T. Yarman [Am. J. Phys. 78 (4), 428–432 (2010)]

David C. Lush

See also commentary Reply to “Comment on ‘On the classical analysis of spin-orbit coupling in hydrogenlike atoms,’ ” by D. C. Lush [Am. J. Phys. 78 (12), 1422 (2010)] related On the classical analysis of spin-orbit coupling in hydrogenlike atoms

American Journal of PhysicsNov 18, 20107 citations