Reveals limitations of noninteracting fermion formulation. The chapter also introduces Landau’s Fermi liquid parameters and the conceptual basis of quasiparticles. Some suscptibilities are derived. Microscopic justification is explained.
The Fermi liquid is perhaps the most familiar quantum many-body state of solid state physics; we met it briefly in Section 16.2.2. It is the generic state of fermions at nonzero density, and is found in all metals. Its basic characteristics can already be understood in a simple free fermion picture. Noninteracting fermions occupy the lowest energy single-particle states, consistent with the exclusion principle. This leads to the fundamental concept of the Fermi surface: a surface in momentum space separating the occupied and empty single fermion states. The lowest energy excitations then consist of quasiparticle excitations which are particle-like outside the Fermi surface, and hole-like inside the Fermi surface. Landau's Fermi liquid theory is a careful justification for the stability of this simple picture in the presence of interactions between fermions. Just as we found in Chapters 5 and 7 for the quantum Ising and rotor models, interaction corrections modify the wavefunction of the quasiparticle and so introduce a quasiparticle residue A ; however, they do not destabilize the integrity of the quasiparticle, as we review in Section 18.1. The purpose of this chapter is to describe two paradigms of symmetry breaking quantum transitions in Fermi liquids. In the first class, studied in Section 18.2, the broken symmetry is related to the point-group symmetry of the crystal, while translational symmetry is preserved; consequently, the order parameter resides at zero wavevector. In the second class, studied in Section 18.3, the order parameter is at a finite wavevector, and so translational symmetry is also broken.
Landau (1958) gave a rigorous microscopic derivation of his phenomenological Fermi -liquid theory starting from the first principles Hamiltonian of strongly interacting Fermions. The derivation is based on an asymptotic expansion in small parameters such as q/kF, bc.>/EF, kT/EF, where q and c.> represent the wave numbers and frequencies of real excitations of the system. Landau showed that the dynamics of these low-lying excitations (quasiparticles and collective modes) is governed by classical transport equations with all quantum many-body effects absorbed into effective interaction parameters. Landau's approach has been generalized to superfluid Fermi liquids and superconductors by Leggett (1965) and, going beyond linear response, by Eliashberg (1971). Their ideas merged into a recent review on the quasiclassical approach to superfluid 3 He by Serene and Rainer (1983). I will use the notation of this review throughout this paper. Landau's transport theory together with its offsprings will be called 'quasiclassical theory in the following. In this context it is important to mention that Eilenberger (1968) and Larkin and Ovchinnikov (1968) have shown that the complete theory of superconductors can be formulated as a quasiclassical transport theory. Surprisingly, this theory permits calculating microscopic properties, e.g. the quasiparticle excitation spectrum, which are predominantly governed by quantum effects.
Landau-Fermi liquid theory is conventionally believed to hold whenever the interacting single-particle density of states develops a $\ensuremath{\delta}$-like component at the Fermi surface, which is associated with quasiparticles. Here we show that a microscopic justification can be actually achieved under more general circumstances, even in the case where coherent quasiparticles are totally missing and the interacting single-particle density of states vanishes at the chemical potential as a consequence of a pole singularity in the self-energy.
Abstract This chapter analyses Landau’s Fermi liquid theory. A fundamental postulate of Landau’s Fermi liquid theory is that quasiparticle energies are a function of the momentum, p, and that the momentum, pF, corresponding to the Fermi energy continues to be given by a free particle expression. Thus, the quasiparticle states are in one-to-one correspondence with those of an ideal Fermi gas and each quasiparticle has a spin quantum number, σ ± 1/2. The remainder of the chapter deals with the quasiparticle interaction function; sum rules; and collisionless collective modes, which are defined as a collective mode as a time- (or frequency) and space- (or wave vector) dependent oscillation of the fluid involving a coordinated motion of its constituent particles. Sample problems are also provided at the end of the chapter.
The methods employed in the previous papers of this series for the ground-state energy of a normal Fermion system are extended to finite temperatures. The basic assumption is that the density matrix of the actual system in thermodynamic equilibrium can be derived by adiabatic transformation from the density matrix of system of noninteracting particles at the same temperature, volume, and chemical potential. However, the spectrum of the noninteracting system must be dependent on the intensive parameters. The self-consistency of the scheme is exhibited by demonstrating that the effective potential characterizing this system can be related to the self-energy operator of the actual system. Two equivalent versions of the theory are derived. In one of these the basic equations are precisely those of the Landau theory of Fermi liquids with the difference, however, that all quantities are given explicitly from first principles.
For pure fermionic systems, and in the absence of symmetry breaking (e.g. magnetism, superconductivity, …), two types of metallic phases are well established: (i) the “normal” Fermi liquid phase in d = 3 presented in Chapters 12 and 19 via the response and the Green functions techniques; and (ii) the “anomalous” Luttinger liquid phase in d = 1 originally formulated with the bosonization technique by which the fermionic operators are represented in terms of “bosonic” density operators (Luther and Peschel (1974); Haldane (1981)) with the exact solution (Mattis and Lieb (1965)) of the Tomonaga–Luttinger model (Tomonaga (1950); Luttinger (1963)) discussed inmany reviews and books (see for instance the book by Giamarchi (2004)). Here, to stress similarities and differences between the Fermi liquid and the Luttinger liquid, we will follow the alternative route of response and Green functions techniques (Dzyaloshinskii and Larkin (1973), Di Castro and Metzner (1991), Metzner et al. (1998)) and add a few comments on the renormalization group approach (Metzner and Di Castro (1993)). As we have seen in Chapters 12 and 19, the Fermi liquid is described asymptotically by the free low-lying single-particle excitations, i.e., the quasiparticles with a zero-kelvin discontinuous occupation number in momentum space n k (see Eq. (18.54)) at a well defined Fermi surface (k = k F ): where here k F> and k F< indicate the limit k → k F from above and below. This discontinuity still marks the Fermi surface in the interacting system. The finite reduction of the single-particle spectral weight z kF with respect to the Fermi gas (z kF = 1) is given by the finite (i.e. non-critical) “wavefunction renormalization” (see Eq. (18.94)). The presence of the discontinuity at the Fermi surface, together with the Pauli principle, compel the inverse quasiparticle lifetime to be τ −1 ≈ max( T 2 , ϵ 2 ), where _ is the deviation of the energy of the quasiparticle from the Fermi energy. The energy uncertainty ħτ −1 due to the finite lifetime of a quasiparticle near the Fermi surface is small compared to its energy ϵ , and the quasiparticle concept is well defined. All the momentum transferring scattering processes become asymptotically ineffective, as derived phenomenologically in Chapter 12 and confirmed microscopically in Chapter 19.