Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

The Luttinger liquid

C. Di Castro, Roberto Raimondi

Published Aug 27, 2015• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

For pure fermionic systems, and in the absence of symmetry breaking (e.g. magnetism, superconductivity, …), two types of metallic phases are well established: (i) the “normal” Fermi liquid phase in d = 3 presented in Chapters 12 and 19 via the response and the Green functions techniques; and (ii) the “anomalous” Luttinger liquid phase in d = 1 originally formulated with the bosonization technique by which the fermionic operators are represented in terms of “bosonic” density operators (Luther and Peschel (1974); Haldane (1981)) with the exact solution (Mattis and Lieb (1965)) of the Tomonaga–Luttinger model (Tomonaga (1950); Luttinger (1963)) discussed inmany reviews and books (see for instance the book by Giamarchi (2004)). Here, to stress similarities and differences between the Fermi liquid and the Luttinger liquid, we will follow the alternative route of response and Green functions techniques (Dzyaloshinskii and Larkin (1973), Di Castro and Metzner (1991), Metzner et al. (1998)) and add a few comments on the renormalization group approach (Metzner and Di Castro (1993)). As we have seen in Chapters 12 and 19, the Fermi liquid is described asymptotically by the free low-lying single-particle excitations, i.e., the quasiparticles with a zero-kelvin discontinuous occupation number in momentum space n k (see Eq. (18.54)) at a well defined Fermi surface (k = k F ): where here k F> and k F< indicate the limit k → k F from above and below. This discontinuity still marks the Fermi surface in the interacting system. The finite reduction of the single-particle spectral weight z kF with respect to the Fermi gas (z kF = 1) is given by the finite (i.e. non-critical) “wavefunction renormalization” (see Eq. (18.94)). The presence of the discontinuity at the Fermi surface, together with the Pauli principle, compel the inverse quasiparticle lifetime to be τ −1 ≈ max( T 2 , ϵ 2 ), where _ is the deviation of the energy of the quasiparticle from the Fermi energy. The energy uncertainty ħτ −1 due to the finite lifetime of a quasiparticle near the Fermi surface is small compared to its energy ϵ , and the quasiparticle concept is well defined. All the momentum transferring scattering processes become asymptotically ineffective, as derived phenomenologically in Chapter 12 and confirmed microscopically in Chapter 19.

DOI
10.1017/cbo9781139600286.021

Related papers

Luttinger many-fermion model

Ladislav Šamaj, Zoltán Bajnok

Low-temperature properties of 3D interacting fermion systems are well described by Landau's theory of Fermi liquids; for reviews see, e.g. [183, 184]. It involves only excitations of the system around the Fermi surface on energy scales small compared to the Fermi energy. Excitations are well described by quasi-particles which are in one-to-one correspondence with the bare particles. The bare-particle interaction does not break the qualitative picture of non-interacting system, but renormalizes the dynamical characteristics (the effective mass and the pair interaction) of quasi-particles. Within the microscopic Green function formalism, the existence of quasi-particles is equivalent to assuming that the self-energy correction Σ( k , ω) is regular (has only short-range contributions in time and space) close to the Fermi surface. The lifetime of quasi-particles τ α(ε k −ε F ) −2 is long enough to consider them as well-defined eigenstates over long time-scales. The momentum occupation number of the bare particles exhibits a sharp discontinuity when crossing the Fermi momentum. The charge and spin degrees of freedom of quasi-particle always travel together. The Landau theory breaks down in 1D systems of interacting fermions which have a very specific Fermi surface consisting of two points ± k F . In such systems, the self-energy Σ( k , ω) no longer possesses the analytic properties required for introducing quasi-particles. In contrast to Fermi liquids, the momentum occupation number of the bare particles in the ground state is continuous at the Fermi momentum. Moreover, the charge and spin excitations are separated.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 16, 2013•0 citations

Fermi liquids, and their phase transitions

Subir Sachdev A

The Fermi liquid is perhaps the most familiar quantum many-body state of solid state physics; we met it briefly in Section 16.2.2. It is the generic state of fermions at nonzero density, and is found in all metals. Its basic characteristics can already be understood in a simple free fermion picture. Noninteracting fermions occupy the lowest energy single-particle states, consistent with the exclusion principle. This leads to the fundamental concept of the Fermi surface: a surface in momentum space separating the occupied and empty single fermion states. The lowest energy excitations then consist of quasiparticle excitations which are particle-like outside the Fermi surface, and hole-like inside the Fermi surface. Landau's Fermi liquid theory is a careful justification for the stability of this simple picture in the presence of interactions between fermions. Just as we found in Chapters 5 and 7 for the quantum Ising and rotor models, interaction corrections modify the wavefunction of the quasiparticle and so introduce a quasiparticle residue A ; however, they do not destabilize the integrity of the quasiparticle, as we review in Section 18.1. The purpose of this chapter is to describe two paradigms of symmetry breaking quantum transitions in Fermi liquids. In the first class, studied in Section 18.2, the broken symmetry is related to the point-group symmetry of the crystal, while translational symmetry is preserved; consequently, the order parameter resides at zero wavevector. In the second class, studied in Section 18.3, the order parameter is at a finite wavevector, and so translational symmetry is also broken.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 7, 2011•1 citation

Luttinger Model

Vieri Mastropietro, Daniel Charles Mattis

The Luttinger Model and Its Solution: An Exactly Soluble Model of a Many-Fermion System (J M Luttinger) Exact Solution of a Many-Fermion System and its Associated Boson Field (Daniel C Mattis and Elliott H Lieb) Lattice, Dynamical and Non Linear Effects: Luttinger Model and Luttinger Liquids (Vieri Mastropietro) The Luttinger Liquid and Integrable Models (J Sirker) Long Time Correlations of Nonlinear Luttinger Liquids Rodrigo (G Pereira) An Expanded Luttinger Model (Daniel C Mattis) Applications and Experimental Tests: Quantum Hall Edge Physics and Its One-Dimensional Luttinger Liquid Description (Orion Ciftja) A Luttinger Liquid Core Inside Helium-4 Filled Nanopores (Adrian Del Maestro) Some Experimental Tests of Tomonaga - Luttinger Liquids (T Giamarchi) Bosonization and Its Application to Transport in Quantum Wires (Feifei Li) Generalizations to Higher Dimensions: Fermions in Two Dimensions, Bosonization, and Exactly Solvable Models (Jonas De Woul and Edwin Langmann) Luttinger Liquid, Singular Interaction and Quantum Criticality in Cuprate Materials (C Di Castro and S Caprara) Luttinger Model in Dimensions d > 1 (Daniel C Mattis).

Series on directions in condensed matter physics•Jun 18, 2013•11 citations

Non-Fermi Liquids, the Luttinger Liquid, and Bosonization

Michael El-Batanouny

Treats non-Fermi liquids and quantum critical points and describes Luttinger liquid theories. Bosonization of the noninteracting and interacting Tomonaga–Luttinger models are derived. Bosonization of the single particle operators is establshed and the corresponding Green functions derived.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 6, 2020•0 citations

A brief introduction to Luttinger liquids

Johannes Voit, Theoretische Physik, Universität Bayreuth +1 more

Abstract. I give a brief introduction to Luttinger liquids. Luttinger liquids are paramagnetic one-dimensional metals without Landau quasi-particle excitations. The elementary excitations are collective charge and spin modes, leading to charge-spin separation. Correlation functions exhibit power-law behavior. All physical properties can be calculated, e.g. by bosonization, and depend on three parameters only: the renormalized coupling constant Kρ, and the charge and spin velocities. I also discuss the stability of Luttinger liquids with respect to temperature, interchain coupling, lattice effects and phonons, and list important open problems. WHAT IS A LUTTINGER LIQUID ANYWAY? Ordinary, three-dimensional metals are described by Fermi liquid theory. Fermi liquid theory is about the importance of electron-electron interactions in metals. It states that there is a 1:1-correspondence between the low-energy excitations of a free Fermi gas, and those of an interacting electron liquid which are termed “quasiparticles” [1]. Roughly speaking, the combination of the Pauli principle with low excitation energy (e.g. T ≪ EF) and the large phase space available in 3D, produces

•Jan 1, 2000•11 citations

A Luttinger's theorem revisited

Behnam Farid

For uniform systems of spinless fermions in d spatial dimensions with d > 1, interacting through the isotropic two-body potential ν(r -r′), a celebrated theorem due to Luttinger (1961) states that under the assumption of validity of the many-body perturbation theory the self-energy ∑(k;ϵ), with 0 ⩽ k ≲ 3k F (where k F stands for the Fermi wavenumber), satisfies the following universal asymptotic relation as ε approaches the Fermi energy εF: Im [∑(k; ϵ)]∼ ∓ α k (ϵ - ϵF) 2, ϵ ≶ ϵF, with α k ⩾ 0. As this is, by definition, specific to self-energies of the Landau Fermi-liquid systems, treatment of non-Fermi-liquid systems are therefore thought to lie outside the domain of applicability of the many-body perturbation theory; that, for these systems, the many-body perturbation theory? should necessarily break down. We demonstrate that Im [∑(k; ϵ)]∼ ∓ α k (ϵ - ϵF) 2, ϵ ≶ ϵF, is implicit in Luttinger's proof and that, for d > 1, in principle nothing prohibits a non-Fermi-liquid-type (and, in particular a Luttinger-liquid-type) ∑(k; ϵ) from being obtained within the framework of the many-body perturbation theory. We in addition indicate how seemingly innocuous Taylor expansions of the self-energy with respect to k. ϵ or both amount to tacitly assuming that the metallic system under consideration is a Fermi liquid, whether the self-energy is calculated perturbatively or otherwise. Proofs that a certain metallic system is in a Fermiliquid state, based on such expansions, are therefore tautologies.

Philosophical Magazine B•Aug 1, 1999•11 citations
For pure fermionic systems, and in the absence of symmetry breaking (e.g. magnetism, superconductivity, …), two types of metallic phases are well established: (i) the “normal” Fermi liquid phase in d = 3 presented in Chapters 12 and 19 via the response and the Green functions techniques; and (ii) the “anomalous” Luttinger liquid phase in d = 1 originally formulated with the bosonization technique by which the fermionic operators are represented in terms of “bosonic” density operators (Luther and Peschel (1974); Haldane (1981)) with the exact solution (Mattis and Lieb (1965)) of the Tomonaga–Luttinger model (Tomonaga (1950); Luttinger (1963)) discussed inmany reviews and books (see for instance the book by Giamarchi (2004)). Here, to stress similarities and differences between the Fermi liquid and the Luttinger liquid, we will follow the alternative route of response and Green functions techniques (Dzyaloshinskii and Larkin (1973), Di Castro and Metzner (1991), Metzner et al. (1998)) and add a few comments on the renormalization group approach (Metzner and Di Castro (1993)). As we have seen in Chapters 12 and 19, the Fermi liquid is described asymptotically by the free low-lying single-particle excitations, i.e., the quasiparticles with a zero-kelvin discontinuous occupation number in momentum space n k (see Eq. (18.54)) at a well defined Fermi surface (k = k F ): where here k F> and k F< indicate the limit k → k F from above and below. This discontinuity still marks the Fermi surface in the interacting system. The finite reduction of the single-particle spectral weight z kF with respect to the Fermi gas (z kF = 1) is given by the finite (i.e. non-critical) “wavefunction renormalization” (see Eq. (18.94)). The presence of the discontinuity at the Fermi surface, together with the Pauli principle, compel the inverse quasiparticle lifetime to be τ −1 ≈ max( T 2 , ϵ 2 ), where _ is the deviation of the energy of the quasiparticle from the Fermi energy. The energy uncertainty ħτ −1 due to the finite lifetime of a quasiparticle near the Fermi surface is small compared to its energy ϵ , and the quasiparticle concept is well defined. All the momentum transferring scattering processes become asymptotically ineffective, as derived phenomenologically in Chapter 12 and confirmed microscopically in Chapter 19.
Low-temperature properties of 3D interacting fermion systems are well described by Landau's theory of Fermi liquids; for reviews see, e.g. [183, 184]. It involves only excitations of the system around the Fermi surface on energy scales small compared to the Fermi energy. Excitations are well described by quasi-particles which are in one-to-one correspondence with the bare particles. The bare-particle interaction does not break the qualitative picture of non-interacting system, but renormalizes the dynamical characteristics (the effective mass and the pair interaction) of quasi-particles. Within the microscopic Green function formalism, the existence of quasi-particles is equivalent to assuming that the self-energy correction Σ( k , ω) is regular (has only short-range contributions in time and space) close to the Fermi surface. The lifetime of quasi-particles τ α(ε k −ε F ) −2 is long enough to consider them as well-defined eigenstates over long time-scales. The momentum occupation number of the bare particles exhibits a sharp discontinuity when crossing the Fermi momentum. The charge and spin degrees of freedom of quasi-particle always travel together. The Landau theory breaks down in 1D systems of interacting fermions which have a very specific Fermi surface consisting of two points ± k F . In such systems, the self-energy Σ( k , ω) no longer possesses the analytic properties required for introducing quasi-particles. In contrast to Fermi liquids, the momentum occupation number of the bare particles in the ground state is continuous at the Fermi momentum. Moreover, the charge and spin excitations are separated.
The Fermi liquid is perhaps the most familiar quantum many-body state of solid state physics; we met it briefly in Section 16.2.2. It is the generic state of fermions at nonzero density, and is found in all metals. Its basic characteristics can already be understood in a simple free fermion picture. Noninteracting fermions occupy the lowest energy single-particle states, consistent with the exclusion principle. This leads to the fundamental concept of the Fermi surface: a surface in momentum space separating the occupied and empty single fermion states. The lowest energy excitations then consist of quasiparticle excitations which are particle-like outside the Fermi surface, and hole-like inside the Fermi surface. Landau's Fermi liquid theory is a careful justification for the stability of this simple picture in the presence of interactions between fermions. Just as we found in Chapters 5 and 7 for the quantum Ising and rotor models, interaction corrections modify the wavefunction of the quasiparticle and so introduce a quasiparticle residue A ; however, they do not destabilize the integrity of the quasiparticle, as we review in Section 18.1. The purpose of this chapter is to describe two paradigms of symmetry breaking quantum transitions in Fermi liquids. In the first class, studied in Section 18.2, the broken symmetry is related to the point-group symmetry of the crystal, while translational symmetry is preserved; consequently, the order parameter resides at zero wavevector. In the second class, studied in Section 18.3, the order parameter is at a finite wavevector, and so translational symmetry is also broken.
The Luttinger Model and Its Solution: An Exactly Soluble Model of a Many-Fermion System (J M Luttinger) Exact Solution of a Many-Fermion System and its Associated Boson Field (Daniel C Mattis and Elliott H Lieb) Lattice, Dynamical and Non Linear Effects: Luttinger Model and Luttinger Liquids (Vieri Mastropietro) The Luttinger Liquid and Integrable Models (J Sirker) Long Time Correlations of Nonlinear Luttinger Liquids Rodrigo (G Pereira) An Expanded Luttinger Model (Daniel C Mattis) Applications and Experimental Tests: Quantum Hall Edge Physics and Its One-Dimensional Luttinger Liquid Description (Orion Ciftja) A Luttinger Liquid Core Inside Helium-4 Filled Nanopores (Adrian Del Maestro) Some Experimental Tests of Tomonaga - Luttinger Liquids (T Giamarchi) Bosonization and Its Application to Transport in Quantum Wires (Feifei Li) Generalizations to Higher Dimensions: Fermions in Two Dimensions, Bosonization, and Exactly Solvable Models (Jonas De Woul and Edwin Langmann) Luttinger Liquid, Singular Interaction and Quantum Criticality in Cuprate Materials (C Di Castro and S Caprara) Luttinger Model in Dimensions d > 1 (Daniel C Mattis).
Abstract. I give a brief introduction to Luttinger liquids. Luttinger liquids are paramagnetic one-dimensional metals without Landau quasi-particle excitations. The elementary excitations are collective charge and spin modes, leading to charge-spin separation. Correlation functions exhibit power-law behavior. All physical properties can be calculated, e.g. by bosonization, and depend on three parameters only: the renormalized coupling constant Kρ, and the charge and spin velocities. I also discuss the stability of Luttinger liquids with respect to temperature, interchain coupling, lattice effects and phonons, and list important open problems. WHAT IS A LUTTINGER LIQUID ANYWAY? Ordinary, three-dimensional metals are described by Fermi liquid theory. Fermi liquid theory is about the importance of electron-electron interactions in metals. It states that there is a 1:1-correspondence between the low-energy excitations of a free Fermi gas, and those of an interacting electron liquid which are termed “quasiparticles” [1]. Roughly speaking, the combination of the Pauli principle with low excitation energy (e.g. T ≪ EF) and the large phase space available in 3D, produces
For uniform systems of spinless fermions in d spatial dimensions with d > 1, interacting through the isotropic two-body potential ν(r -r′), a celebrated theorem due to Luttinger (1961) states that under the assumption of validity of the many-body perturbation theory the self-energy ∑(k;ϵ), with 0 ⩽ k ≲ 3k F (where k F stands for the Fermi wavenumber), satisfies the following universal asymptotic relation as ε approaches the Fermi energy εF: Im [∑(k; ϵ)]∼ ∓ α k (ϵ - ϵF) 2, ϵ ≶ ϵF, with α k ⩾ 0. As this is, by definition, specific to self-energies of the Landau Fermi-liquid systems, treatment of non-Fermi-liquid systems are therefore thought to lie outside the domain of applicability of the many-body perturbation theory; that, for these systems, the many-body perturbation theory? should necessarily break down. We demonstrate that Im [∑(k; ϵ)]∼ ∓ α k (ϵ - ϵF) 2, ϵ ≶ ϵF, is implicit in Luttinger's proof and that, for d > 1, in principle nothing prohibits a non-Fermi-liquid-type (and, in particular a Luttinger-liquid-type) ∑(k; ϵ) from being obtained within the framework of the many-body perturbation theory. We in addition indicate how seemingly innocuous Taylor expansions of the self-energy with respect to k. ϵ or both amount to tacitly assuming that the metallic system under consideration is a Fermi liquid, whether the self-energy is calculated perturbatively or otherwise. Proofs that a certain metallic system is in a Fermiliquid state, based on such expansions, are therefore tautologies.