Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

New Journal of Physics

Comparison of a direct measure of barrier crossing times with indirect measures such as the Larmor time

Tom Rivlin, Eli Pollak, Randall S Dumont

Published May 24, 2021• 17 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract Different approaches for considering barrier crossing times are analyzed, with special emphasis on recent experiments which attempt to measure what is commonly referred to as the Larmor tunneling time. We show that that these experiments cannot reveal the Larmor time, due to the finite energy width of the incident particles. The Larmor time, which measures changes in spin polarization, is classified together with other measurements such as the Buttiker–Landauer oscillating barrier time as indirect measurements of interaction times of scattered particles. In contrast, we present a direct quantum mechanical measure of a barrier crossing time taken to be the difference between the mean flight time for a particle transmitted through a potential barrier incident on a screen and the time it would take to reach the same screen without the barrier. These metrics are asymptotic, in the sense that they infer a time from a measurement after the scattering event is over, whereas other measures like the dwell time are local. Some time measures are well-defined only for incident states which are monochromatic in energy, others are well-defined also for incident wavepackets whose incident energy width is finite. In this paper we compare the different approaches to conclude that only the flight time can be used to answer the provocative (but ultimately ill-posed) question: how much time does it take to tunnel through a barrier?

DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/ac047b

Related papers

Chapter 12. The Tunnelling Flight Time

Eli Pollak

How much time does it take for a particle to tunnel through a barrier? This question continues to baffle up to this very day, one of the reasons being the non-existence of an energy–time commutator analogous to the position–momentum commutation relation. Instead of worrying about the definition of an operator one may consider time as a parameter in the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and study the time evolution of a wavepacket appropriately scattered on a potential barrier. Using this approach, one may formally define a tunnelling flight time that may be measured in a time-of-flight experiment. The resulting tunnelling flight time either vanishes or is very small. The implications of this observation with respect to recent hydrogen and helium atom attosecond photoionization experiments are discussed. The vanishing or small flight time does not contradict the finite time measured in Larmor clock experiments, where the tunnelling particle affects an external degree of freedom whose dynamics induced by the tunnelling may be interpreted in terms of a time scale. Flight times are also relevant to quantum reflection where coherences due to resonance scattering are not well accounted for by Wigner's phase time delay.

RSC theoretical and computational chemistry series•Jan 1, 2020•1 citation

Observation of the Decrease of Larmor Tunneling Times with Lower Incident Energy

David Spierings, Aephraim M. Steinberg

How much time does a tunneling particle spend in a barrier? A Larmor clock, one proposal to answer this question, measures the interaction between the particle and the barrier region using an auxiliary degree of freedom of the particle to clock the dwell time inside the barrier. We report on precise Larmor time measurements of ultracold ^{87}Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier, which confirm longstanding predictions of tunneling times. We observe that atoms generally spend less time tunneling through higher barriers and that this time decreases for lower energy particles. For the lowest measured incident energy, at least 90% of transmitted atoms tunneled through the barrier, spending an average of 0.59±0.02 ms inside. This is 0.11±0.03 ms faster than atoms traversing the same barrier with energy close to the barrier's peak and 0.21±0.03 ms faster than when the atoms traverse a barrier with 23% less energy.

arXiv:2101.12309•Physical Review Letters•Sep 20, 2021•30 citations

Determination of the tunneling flight time as the reflected phase time

Tom Rivlin, Eli Pollak, Randall S. Dumont

Using the time parameter in the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation, we study the time of flight for a particle tunneling through a square barrier potential. Comparing the mean and variance of the energy and the flight time for transmitted and reflected particles, using both density and flux distributions, we find that, when accounting for momentum filtering, the suitably normalized transmitted and reflected distributions are identical in both the density and flux cases. In contrast to previous studies, we demonstrate that these results do not imply a vanishing tunneling time, but rather that the time it takes to tunnel through a square barrier is precisely given by the reflected phase time. For wide barriers, this becomes independent of the barrier width, as predicted independently by MacColl and Hartman. We show that these conclusions can be reached using a variety of arguments, including purely quantum mechanical ones. Analysis of the shapes of the distributions under consideration reveals that wave-packet reshaping is not an explanation for the MacColl-Hartman effect. The results presented here have direct implications for understanding recent experimental results in the study of the barrier crossing of rubidium atoms. The finite width of an incident wave packet significantly ``masks'' the tunneling time, and induces substantial asymmetry between the flight times of transmitted and reflected atoms.

Physical Review A•Jan 27, 2021•24 citations

Tunneling takes less time when it's less probable

David Spierings, Aephraim M. Steinberg

How much time does a tunneling particle spend in a barrier? A Larmor clock, one proposal to answer this question, measures the interaction between the particle and the barrier region using an auxiliary degree of freedom of the particle to clock the dwell time inside the barrier. We report on precise Larmor time measurements of an ultra-cold gas of $^{87}$Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier. The data capture distinctive features that confirm longstanding predictions of tunneling times. In particular, we demonstrate that atoms spend less time tunneling through higher barriers and that this time decreases for lower energy particles. For the lowest measured incident energy, at least $90\%$ of transmitted atoms tunneled through the barrier, spending an average of $0.59(2)$ms inside. This is $0.11(3)$ms faster than atoms traversing the same barrier with energy close to the barrier's peak and $0.21(3)$ms faster than when the atoms traverse a barrier with $23\%$ less energy.

•Jan 28, 2021•4 citations

Larmor precession and the traversal time for tunneling

Μ. Büttiker

Baz' and Rybachenko have proposed the use of the Larmor precession as a clock to measure the time it takes a particle to traverse a barrier. An applied magnetic field is confined to the barrier. The spin of the incident particles is polarized perpendicular to this field. The extent of the Larmor precession occurring during transmission is used as a measurement of the time spent traversing the barrier. However, the particles tunneling through an opaque barrier also acquire a spin component parallel to the field since particles with spin parallel to the field have a higher transmission probability than particles with spin antiparallel to the field. Similar effects are actually used to polarize electrons and neutrons. An interpretation of this experiment compares the results with an approach which determines the traversal time by studying transmission of particles through a time-modulated barrier. This leads to three characteristic times describing the interaction of particles with a barrier. A dwell time measures the average time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier whether it is reflected or transmitted at the end of its stay, a traversal time measures the time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier if it is finally transmitted, and a reflection time measures the interaction time of a reflected particle.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•May 15, 1983•699 citations

Determination of the mean tunneling flight time in the Büttiker-Landauer oscillating-barrier model as the reflected phase time

Reuven Ianconescu, Eli Pollak

The oscillating-barrier model was used by B\"uttiker and Landauer to determine a ``traversal time for tunneling.'' The model sets a timescale but is not the physically measured flight time of a wave packet scattered on the oscillating-barrier potential. In this paper we show that the flight time in the limit of a narrow-in-momentum wave packet is given by the reflected phase time associated with the various branches of the scattered particle. This is but another example which establishes that tunneling flight times are a reflection of the Wigner phase times. As such, the oscillating-barrier model does not add any new information about tunneling flight times which has not been elucidated previously using static barrier models.

Physical Review A•Apr 20, 2021•8 citations
Abstract Different approaches for considering barrier crossing times are analyzed, with special emphasis on recent experiments which attempt to measure what is commonly referred to as the Larmor tunneling time. We show that that these experiments cannot reveal the Larmor time, due to the finite energy width of the incident particles. The Larmor time, which measures changes in spin polarization, is classified together with other measurements such as the Buttiker–Landauer oscillating barrier time as indirect measurements of interaction times of scattered particles. In contrast, we present a direct quantum mechanical measure of a barrier crossing time taken to be the difference between the mean flight time for a particle transmitted through a potential barrier incident on a screen and the time it would take to reach the same screen without the barrier. These metrics are asymptotic, in the sense that they infer a time from a measurement after the scattering event is over, whereas other measures like the dwell time are local. Some time measures are well-defined only for incident states which are monochromatic in energy, others are well-defined also for incident wavepackets whose incident energy width is finite. In this paper we compare the different approaches to conclude that only the flight time can be used to answer the provocative (but ultimately ill-posed) question: how much time does it take to tunnel through a barrier?
How much time does it take for a particle to tunnel through a barrier? This question continues to baffle up to this very day, one of the reasons being the non-existence of an energy–time commutator analogous to the position–momentum commutation relation. Instead of worrying about the definition of an operator one may consider time as a parameter in the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and study the time evolution of a wavepacket appropriately scattered on a potential barrier. Using this approach, one may formally define a tunnelling flight time that may be measured in a time-of-flight experiment. The resulting tunnelling flight time either vanishes or is very small. The implications of this observation with respect to recent hydrogen and helium atom attosecond photoionization experiments are discussed. The vanishing or small flight time does not contradict the finite time measured in Larmor clock experiments, where the tunnelling particle affects an external degree of freedom whose dynamics induced by the tunnelling may be interpreted in terms of a time scale. Flight times are also relevant to quantum reflection where coherences due to resonance scattering are not well accounted for by Wigner's phase time delay.
How much time does a tunneling particle spend in a barrier? A Larmor clock, one proposal to answer this question, measures the interaction between the particle and the barrier region using an auxiliary degree of freedom of the particle to clock the dwell time inside the barrier. We report on precise Larmor time measurements of ultracold ^{87}Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier, which confirm longstanding predictions of tunneling times. We observe that atoms generally spend less time tunneling through higher barriers and that this time decreases for lower energy particles. For the lowest measured incident energy, at least 90% of transmitted atoms tunneled through the barrier, spending an average of 0.59±0.02 ms inside. This is 0.11±0.03 ms faster than atoms traversing the same barrier with energy close to the barrier's peak and 0.21±0.03 ms faster than when the atoms traverse a barrier with 23% less energy.
Using the time parameter in the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation, we study the time of flight for a particle tunneling through a square barrier potential. Comparing the mean and variance of the energy and the flight time for transmitted and reflected particles, using both density and flux distributions, we find that, when accounting for momentum filtering, the suitably normalized transmitted and reflected distributions are identical in both the density and flux cases. In contrast to previous studies, we demonstrate that these results do not imply a vanishing tunneling time, but rather that the time it takes to tunnel through a square barrier is precisely given by the reflected phase time. For wide barriers, this becomes independent of the barrier width, as predicted independently by MacColl and Hartman. We show that these conclusions can be reached using a variety of arguments, including purely quantum mechanical ones. Analysis of the shapes of the distributions under consideration reveals that wave-packet reshaping is not an explanation for the MacColl-Hartman effect. The results presented here have direct implications for understanding recent experimental results in the study of the barrier crossing of rubidium atoms. The finite width of an incident wave packet significantly ``masks'' the tunneling time, and induces substantial asymmetry between the flight times of transmitted and reflected atoms.
How much time does a tunneling particle spend in a barrier? A Larmor clock, one proposal to answer this question, measures the interaction between the particle and the barrier region using an auxiliary degree of freedom of the particle to clock the dwell time inside the barrier. We report on precise Larmor time measurements of an ultra-cold gas of 87^{87}87Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier. The data capture distinctive features that confirm longstanding predictions of tunneling times. In particular, we demonstrate that atoms spend less time tunneling through higher barriers and that this time decreases for lower energy particles. For the lowest measured incident energy, at least 90%90\%90% of transmitted atoms tunneled through the barrier, spending an average of 0.59(2)0.59(2)0.59(2)ms inside. This is 0.11(3)0.11(3)0.11(3)ms faster than atoms traversing the same barrier with energy close to the barrier's peak and 0.21(3)0.21(3)0.21(3)ms faster than when the atoms traverse a barrier with 23%23\%23% less energy.
Baz' and Rybachenko have proposed the use of the Larmor precession as a clock to measure the time it takes a particle to traverse a barrier. An applied magnetic field is confined to the barrier. The spin of the incident particles is polarized perpendicular to this field. The extent of the Larmor precession occurring during transmission is used as a measurement of the time spent traversing the barrier. However, the particles tunneling through an opaque barrier also acquire a spin component parallel to the field since particles with spin parallel to the field have a higher transmission probability than particles with spin antiparallel to the field. Similar effects are actually used to polarize electrons and neutrons. An interpretation of this experiment compares the results with an approach which determines the traversal time by studying transmission of particles through a time-modulated barrier. This leads to three characteristic times describing the interaction of particles with a barrier. A dwell time measures the average time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier whether it is reflected or transmitted at the end of its stay, a traversal time measures the time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier if it is finally transmitted, and a reflection time measures the interaction time of a reflected particle.
The oscillating-barrier model was used by B\"uttiker and Landauer to determine a ``traversal time for tunneling.'' The model sets a timescale but is not the physically measured flight time of a wave packet scattered on the oscillating-barrier potential. In this paper we show that the flight time in the limit of a narrow-in-momentum wave packet is given by the reflected phase time associated with the various branches of the scattered particle. This is but another example which establishes that tunneling flight times are a reflection of the Wigner phase times. As such, the oscillating-barrier model does not add any new information about tunneling flight times which has not been elucidated previously using static barrier models.