How much time does a tunneling particle spend in a barrier? A Larmor clock, one proposal to answer this question, measures the interaction between the particle and the barrier region using an auxiliary degree of freedom of the particle to clock the dwell time inside the barrier. We report on precise Larmor time measurements of an ultra-cold gas of $^{87}$ Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier. The data capture distinctive features that confirm longstanding predictions of tunneling times. In particular, we demonstrate that atoms spend less time tunneling through higher barriers and that this time decreases for lower energy particles. For the lowest measured incident energy, at least $90\%$ of transmitted atoms tunneled through the barrier, spending an average of $0.59(2)$ ms inside. This is $0.11(3)$ ms faster than atoms traversing the same barrier with energy close to the barrier's peak and $0.21(3)$ ms faster than when the atoms traverse a barrier with $23\%$ less energy.How much time does a tunneling particle spend in a barrier? A Larmor clock, one proposal to answer this question, measures the interaction between the particle and the barrier region using an auxiliary degree of freedom of the particle to clock the dwell time inside the barrier. We report on precise Larmor time measurements of an ultra-cold gas of $^{87}$Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier. The data capture distinctive features that confirm longstanding predictions of tunneling times. In particular, we demonstrate that atoms spend less time tunneling through higher barriers and that this time decreases for lower energy particles. For the lowest measured incident energy, at least $90\%$ of transmitted atoms tunneled through the barrier, spending an average of $0.59(2)$ms inside. This is $0.11(3)$ms faster than atoms traversing the same barrier with energy close to the barrier's peak and $0.21(3)$ms faster than when the atoms traverse a barrier with $23\%$ less energy.

Jan 28, 20214 citations

Measuring the time tunneling particles spend in the barrier

David Spierings, Aephraim M. Steinberg

The question of how long a tunneling particle spends in the forbidden region of a barrier has been a perplexing puzzle in foundational quantum mechanics for many decades. The Larmor time, one definition of tunneling time, uses an auxiliary degree of freedom of the tunneling particles to clock the time spent inside the barrier. Recently, we made our first measurement of the Larmor time for Bose-condensed 87Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier.1 Here, we report on follow up measurements with improved precision in the measured times and also study the time for the reflected atomic cloud. We observe significant discrepancies between our results and a simple theory based on weak measurement. We discuss our findings, hypothesize explanations for our results, and suggest future studies.The question of how long a tunneling particle spends in the forbidden region of a barrier has been a perplexing puzzle in foundational quantum mechanics for many decades. The Larmor time, one definition of tunneling time, uses an auxiliary degree of freedom of the tunneling particles to clock the time spent inside the barrier. Recently, we made our first measurement of the Larmor time for Bose-condensed 87Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier.1 Here, we report on follow up measurements with improved precision in the measured times and also study the time for the reflected atomic cloud. We observe significant discrepancies between our results and a simple theory based on weak measurement. We discuss our findings, hypothesize explanations for our results, and suggest future studies.

Optical and Quantum Sensing and Precision Metrology IIFeb 25, 20207 citations

Measuring the time a tunnelling atom spends in the barrier

Ramos, Ramón, David Spierings, Isabelle Racicot +1 more

Tunnelling is one of the most paradigmatic and evocative phenomena of quantum physics, underlying processes such as photosynthesis and nuclear fusion, as well as devices ranging from SQUID magnetometers to superconducting qubits for quantum computers. The question of how long a particle takes to tunnel, however, has remained controversial since the first attempts to calculate it, which relied on the group delay. It is now well understood that this delay (the arrival time of the transmitted wave packet peak at the far side of the barrier) can be smaller than the barrier thickness divided by the speed of light, without violating causality. There have been a number of experiments confirming this, and even a recent one claiming that tunnelling may take no time at all. There have also been efforts to identify another timescale, which would better describe how long a given particle spends in the barrier region. Here we present a direct measurement of such a time, studying Bose-condensed $^{87}$ Rb atoms tunnelling through a 1.3- $μ$ m thick optical barrier. By localizing a pseudo-magnetic field inside the barrier, we use the spin precession of the atoms as a clock to measure the time it takes them to cross the classically forbidden region. We find a traversal time of 0.62(7) ms and study its dependence on incident energy. In addition to finally shedding light on the fundamental question of the tunnelling time, this experiment lays the groundwork for addressing deep foundational questions about history in quantum mechanics: for instance, what can we learn about where a particle was at earlier times by observing where it is now?Tunnelling is one of the most paradigmatic and evocative phenomena of quantum physics, underlying processes such as photosynthesis and nuclear fusion, as well as devices ranging from SQUID magnetometers to superconducting qubits for quantum computers. The question of how long a particle takes to tunnel, however, has remained controversial since the first attempts to calculate it, which relied on the group delay. It is now well understood that this delay (the arrival time of the transmitted wave packet peak at the far side of the barrier) can be smaller than the barrier thickness divided by the speed of light, without violating causality. There have been a number of experiments confirming this, and even a recent one claiming that tunnelling may take no time at all. There have also been efforts to identify another timescale, which would better describe how long a given particle spends in the barrier region. Here we present a direct measurement of such a time, studying Bose-condensed $^{87}$Rb atoms tunnelling through a 1.3-$μ$m thick optical barrier. By localizing a pseudo-magnetic field inside the barrier, we use the spin precession of the atoms as a clock to measure the time it takes them to cross the classically forbidden region. We find a traversal time of 0.62(7) ms and study its dependence on incident energy. In addition to finally shedding light on the fundamental question of the tunnelling time, this experiment lays the groundwork for addressing deep foundational questions about history in quantum mechanics: for instance, what can we learn about where a particle was at earlier times by observing where it is now?

arXiv:1907.13523Jul 31, 20194 citations

Larmor precession and the traversal time for tunneling

Μ. Büttiker

Baz' and Rybachenko have proposed the use of the Larmor precession as a clock to measure the time it takes a particle to traverse a barrier. An applied magnetic field is confined to the barrier. The spin of the incident particles is polarized perpendicular to this field. The extent of the Larmor precession occurring during transmission is used as a measurement of the time spent traversing the barrier. However, the particles tunneling through an opaque barrier also acquire a spin component parallel to the field since particles with spin parallel to the field have a higher transmission probability than particles with spin antiparallel to the field. Similar effects are actually used to polarize electrons and neutrons. An interpretation of this experiment compares the results with an approach which determines the traversal time by studying transmission of particles through a time-modulated barrier. This leads to three characteristic times describing the interaction of particles with a barrier. A dwell time measures the average time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier whether it is reflected or transmitted at the end of its stay, a traversal time measures the time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier if it is finally transmitted, and a reflection time measures the interaction time of a reflected particle.Baz' and Rybachenko have proposed the use of the Larmor precession as a clock to measure the time it takes a particle to traverse a barrier. An applied magnetic field is confined to the barrier. The spin of the incident particles is polarized perpendicular to this field. The extent of the Larmor precession occurring during transmission is used as a measurement of the time spent traversing the barrier. However, the particles tunneling through an opaque barrier also acquire a spin component parallel to the field since particles with spin parallel to the field have a higher transmission probability than particles with spin antiparallel to the field. Similar effects are actually used to polarize electrons and neutrons. An interpretation of this experiment compares the results with an approach which determines the traversal time by studying transmission of particles through a time-modulated barrier. This leads to three characteristic times describing the interaction of particles with a barrier. A dwell time measures the average time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier whether it is reflected or transmitted at the end of its stay, a traversal time measures the time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier if it is finally transmitted, and a reflection time measures the interaction time of a reflected particle.

Physical review. B, Condensed matterMay 15, 1983699 citations

Comparison of a direct measure of barrier crossing times with indirect measures such as the Larmor time

Tom Rivlin, Eli Pollak, Randall S Dumont

Abstract Different approaches for considering barrier crossing times are analyzed, with special emphasis on recent experiments which attempt to measure what is commonly referred to as the Larmor tunneling time. We show that that these experiments cannot reveal the Larmor time, due to the finite energy width of the incident particles. The Larmor time, which measures changes in spin polarization, is classified together with other measurements such as the Buttiker–Landauer oscillating barrier time as indirect measurements of interaction times of scattered particles. In contrast, we present a direct quantum mechanical measure of a barrier crossing time taken to be the difference between the mean flight time for a particle transmitted through a potential barrier incident on a screen and the time it would take to reach the same screen without the barrier. These metrics are asymptotic, in the sense that they infer a time from a measurement after the scattering event is over, whereas other measures like the dwell time are local. Some time measures are well-defined only for incident states which are monochromatic in energy, others are well-defined also for incident wavepackets whose incident energy width is finite. In this paper we compare the different approaches to conclude that only the flight time can be used to answer the provocative (but ultimately ill-posed) question: how much time does it take to tunnel through a barrier?Abstract Different approaches for considering barrier crossing times are analyzed, with special emphasis on recent experiments which attempt to measure what is commonly referred to as the Larmor tunneling time. We show that that these experiments cannot reveal the Larmor time, due to the finite energy width of the incident particles. The Larmor time, which measures changes in spin polarization, is classified together with other measurements such as the Buttiker–Landauer oscillating barrier time as indirect measurements of interaction times of scattered particles. In contrast, we present a direct quantum mechanical measure of a barrier crossing time taken to be the difference between the mean flight time for a particle transmitted through a potential barrier incident on a screen and the time it would take to reach the same screen without the barrier. These metrics are asymptotic, in the sense that they infer a time from a measurement after the scattering event is over, whereas other measures like the dwell time are local. Some time measures are well-defined only for incident states which are monochromatic in energy, others are well-defined also for incident wavepackets whose incident energy width is finite. In this paper we compare the different approaches to conclude that only the flight time can be used to answer the provocative (but ultimately ill-posed) question: how much time does it take to tunnel through a barrier?

New Journal of PhysicsMay 24, 202117 citations

Decoding electron tunnelling delay time by embracing wave-particle duality

Chuncheng Wang, Xiaokai Li, Xiwang Liu +7 more

Tunnelling lies at the heart of quantum mechanics and is a fundamental process in attosecond science, molecular biology, and quantum devices. Whether tunnelling takes time and how a microscopic particle transits through a barrier have been debated since the early days of quantum mechanics. The time required for an electron to tunnel through an atomic potential barrier has been measured with attosecond angular streaking (attoclock), and a recent work on the hydrogen atom claimed that electron tunnelling is instantaneous. However, the time required for Rb atoms to tunnel through an optical potential barrier has been measured to be on the order of milliseconds with a recent Larmor clock measurement. The essence of electron and atom tunnelling is identical, but the reason for the contradictory conclusions remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that the sub-barrier potential interaction is the root of the nonzero tunnelling delay time. We reveal that the wave-particle duality of a tunnelling electron must be fully taken into account when decoding the tunnelling delay time from the attoclock measurements. Based on energy-resolved attoclock measurements, we show that the tunnelling delay time of an electron ranges from 24 to 58 attoseconds, and the counterintuitive result that an electron with a lower energy may spend less time in the barrier is consistent with the velocity-dependent tunnelling time of atoms in Larmor clock measurements. Our results unify the tunnelling time of microscopic particles by highlighting the classically forbidden sub-barrier potential interactions of matter waves.Tunnelling lies at the heart of quantum mechanics and is a fundamental process in attosecond science, molecular biology, and quantum devices. Whether tunnelling takes time and how a microscopic particle transits through a barrier have been debated since the early days of quantum mechanics. The time required for an electron to tunnel through an atomic potential barrier has been measured with attosecond angular streaking (attoclock), and a recent work on the hydrogen atom claimed that electron tunnelling is instantaneous. However, the time required for Rb atoms to tunnel through an optical potential barrier has been measured to be on the order of milliseconds with a recent Larmor clock measurement. The essence of electron and atom tunnelling is identical, but the reason for the contradictory conclusions remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that the sub-barrier potential interaction is the root of the nonzero tunnelling delay time. We reveal that the wave-particle duality of a tunnelling electron must be fully taken into account when decoding the tunnelling delay time from the attoclock measurements. Based on energy-resolved attoclock measurements, we show that the tunnelling delay time of an electron ranges from 24 to 58 attoseconds, and the counterintuitive result that an electron with a lower energy may spend less time in the barrier is consistent with the velocity-dependent tunnelling time of atoms in Larmor clock measurements. Our results unify the tunnelling time of microscopic particles by highlighting the classically forbidden sub-barrier potential interactions of matter waves.

arXiv:2104.06144Apr 13, 20212 citations

^{87}

Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier. The data capture distinctive features that confirm longstanding predictions of tunneling times. In particular, we demonstrate that atoms spend less time tunneling through higher barriers and that this time decreases for lower energy particles. For the lowest measured incident energy, at least

90\%

of transmitted atoms tunneled through the barrier, spending an average of

0.59(2)

ms inside. This is

0.11(3)

ms faster than atoms traversing the same barrier with energy close to the barrier's peak and

0.21(3)

ms faster than when the atoms traverse a barrier with

23\%

less energy.

^{87}

Rb atoms tunnelling through a 1.3-

μ

m thick optical barrier. By localizing a pseudo-magnetic field inside the barrier, we use the spin precession of the atoms as a clock to measure the time it takes them to cross the classically forbidden region. We find a traversal time of 0.62(7) ms and study its dependence on incident energy. In addition to finally shedding light on the fundamental question of the tunnelling time, this experiment lays the groundwork for addressing deep foundational questions about history in quantum mechanics: for instance, what can we learn about where a particle was at earlier times by observing where it is now?