Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1907.13523

Measuring the time a tunnelling atom spends in the barrier

Ramos, Ramón, David Spierings, Isabelle Racicot, Aephraim M. Steinberg

Published Jul 31, 2019• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Tunnelling is one of the most paradigmatic and evocative phenomena of quantum physics, underlying processes such as photosynthesis and nuclear fusion, as well as devices ranging from SQUID magnetometers to superconducting qubits for quantum computers. The question of how long a particle takes to tunnel, however, has remained controversial since the first attempts to calculate it, which relied on the group delay. It is now well understood that this delay (the arrival time of the transmitted wave packet peak at the far side of the barrier) can be smaller than the barrier thickness divided by the speed of light, without violating causality. There have been a number of experiments confirming this, and even a recent one claiming that tunnelling may take no time at all. There have also been efforts to identify another timescale, which would better describe how long a given particle spends in the barrier region. Here we present a direct measurement of such a time, studying Bose-condensed $^{87}$Rb atoms tunnelling through a 1.3-$μ$m thick optical barrier. By localizing a pseudo-magnetic field inside the barrier, we use the spin precession of the atoms as a clock to measure the time it takes them to cross the classically forbidden region. We find a traversal time of 0.62(7) ms and study its dependence on incident energy. In addition to finally shedding light on the fundamental question of the tunnelling time, this experiment lays the groundwork for addressing deep foundational questions about history in quantum mechanics: for instance, what can we learn about where a particle was at earlier times by observing where it is now?

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1907.13523

Related papers

Tunneling takes less time when it's less probable

David Spierings, Aephraim M. Steinberg

How much time does a tunneling particle spend in a barrier? A Larmor clock, one proposal to answer this question, measures the interaction between the particle and the barrier region using an auxiliary degree of freedom of the particle to clock the dwell time inside the barrier. We report on precise Larmor time measurements of an ultra-cold gas of $^{87}$Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier. The data capture distinctive features that confirm longstanding predictions of tunneling times. In particular, we demonstrate that atoms spend less time tunneling through higher barriers and that this time decreases for lower energy particles. For the lowest measured incident energy, at least $90\%$ of transmitted atoms tunneled through the barrier, spending an average of $0.59(2)$ms inside. This is $0.11(3)$ms faster than atoms traversing the same barrier with energy close to the barrier's peak and $0.21(3)$ms faster than when the atoms traverse a barrier with $23\%$ less energy.

•Jan 28, 2021•4 citations

Observation of the Decrease of Larmor Tunneling Times with Lower Incident Energy

David Spierings, Aephraim M. Steinberg

How much time does a tunneling particle spend in a barrier? A Larmor clock, one proposal to answer this question, measures the interaction between the particle and the barrier region using an auxiliary degree of freedom of the particle to clock the dwell time inside the barrier. We report on precise Larmor time measurements of ultracold ^{87}Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier, which confirm longstanding predictions of tunneling times. We observe that atoms generally spend less time tunneling through higher barriers and that this time decreases for lower energy particles. For the lowest measured incident energy, at least 90% of transmitted atoms tunneled through the barrier, spending an average of 0.59±0.02 ms inside. This is 0.11±0.03 ms faster than atoms traversing the same barrier with energy close to the barrier's peak and 0.21±0.03 ms faster than when the atoms traverse a barrier with 23% less energy.

arXiv:2101.12309•Physical Review Letters•Sep 20, 2021•30 citations

Measuring the time tunneling particles spend in the barrier

David Spierings, Aephraim M. Steinberg

The question of how long a tunneling particle spends in the forbidden region of a barrier has been a perplexing puzzle in foundational quantum mechanics for many decades. The Larmor time, one definition of tunneling time, uses an auxiliary degree of freedom of the tunneling particles to clock the time spent inside the barrier. Recently, we made our first measurement of the Larmor time for Bose-condensed 87Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier.1 Here, we report on follow up measurements with improved precision in the measured times and also study the time for the reflected atomic cloud. We observe significant discrepancies between our results and a simple theory based on weak measurement. We discuss our findings, hypothesize explanations for our results, and suggest future studies.

Optical and Quantum Sensing and Precision Metrology II•Feb 25, 2020•7 citations

Tunnelling Time of a Bose-Einstein condensate

Jesus Ramon Ramos Benitez

Tunnelling is one of the phenomena at the heart of quantum mechanics. Despite its central role in physics, the duration of the tunnelling process has been debated since the development of quantum theory without a definite answer. In this thesis, the question of how long a particle takes to tunnel is investigated experimentally using ultracold atoms. These systems provide an ideal platform to address this question due to their isolation from the external environment and the ability to create almost arbitrary potentials for the atoms. As the tunnelling time experiment requires low temperatures, the realization and characterization of wave packets below the nanokelvin regime are studied first. A 16x reduction of the effective temperature of the atoms is obtained through delta-kick cooling. However, the achieved temperatures are so low that a new method, dubbed the “knife-edge technique”, is developed to characterize the final atomic state accurately. Through this new method, a final temperature of 900 ± 200 pK is found. Finally, the tunnelling time is investigated using a Bose-Einstein condensate in a one dimensional waveguide intersected by a 1.3 μm barrier. As the atoms tunnel through the thin potential, their spins time the tunnelling event through the Larmor precession induced by a pseudo-magnetic field localized inside the barrier. The precession angle is found by performing tomography on the spin state of the tunnelling atoms. With the knowledge of the Larmor frequency and the rotation angles, we find a tunnelling time of 0.65(7) ms. This experiment achieves a long-sought tunnelling time measurement with a clear interpretation, and its results show good quantitative agreement with theory based on the weak measurement formalism.

•Nov 1, 2019•0 citations

Decoding electron tunnelling delay time by embracing wave-particle duality

Chuncheng Wang, Xiaokai Li, Xiwang Liu +7 more

Tunnelling lies at the heart of quantum mechanics and is a fundamental process in attosecond science, molecular biology, and quantum devices. Whether tunnelling takes time and how a microscopic particle transits through a barrier have been debated since the early days of quantum mechanics. The time required for an electron to tunnel through an atomic potential barrier has been measured with attosecond angular streaking (attoclock), and a recent work on the hydrogen atom claimed that electron tunnelling is instantaneous. However, the time required for Rb atoms to tunnel through an optical potential barrier has been measured to be on the order of milliseconds with a recent Larmor clock measurement. The essence of electron and atom tunnelling is identical, but the reason for the contradictory conclusions remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that the sub-barrier potential interaction is the root of the nonzero tunnelling delay time. We reveal that the wave-particle duality of a tunnelling electron must be fully taken into account when decoding the tunnelling delay time from the attoclock measurements. Based on energy-resolved attoclock measurements, we show that the tunnelling delay time of an electron ranges from 24 to 58 attoseconds, and the counterintuitive result that an electron with a lower energy may spend less time in the barrier is consistent with the velocity-dependent tunnelling time of atoms in Larmor clock measurements. Our results unify the tunnelling time of microscopic particles by highlighting the classically forbidden sub-barrier potential interactions of matter waves.

arXiv:2104.06144•Apr 13, 2021•2 citations

Tunneling times

Partha Ghose

Introduction In classical physics it is meaningful to ask the question, ‘How much time does a particle take to pass through a given region?’ The interesting question in quantum mechanics is: does a particle take a definite time to tunnel through a classically forbidden region? The question has been debated ever since the idea that there was such a time in quantum theory was first put forward by MacColl way back in 1932 [253]. A plethora of times has since then been proposed, and the answer seems to depend on the interpretation of quantum mechanics one uses. A reliable answer is clearly of great importance for the design of high-frequency quantum devices, tunnelling phenomena (as, for example, in scanning tunneling microscopy), nuclear and chemical reactions and, of course, for purely conceptual reasons. Most of the controversies centre around simple and intuitive notions in idealized one-dimensional models in a scattering configuration in which a particle (usually represented by a wave packet) is incident on a potential barrier localized in the interval [ a, b ]. Three kinds of time have been defined in this context. One, called the transmission time τ T ( a, b ), is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually transmitted. Similarly, the reflection time τ R ( a, b ) is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually reflected.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 29, 1999•0 citations
Tunnelling is one of the most paradigmatic and evocative phenomena of quantum physics, underlying processes such as photosynthesis and nuclear fusion, as well as devices ranging from SQUID magnetometers to superconducting qubits for quantum computers. The question of how long a particle takes to tunnel, however, has remained controversial since the first attempts to calculate it, which relied on the group delay. It is now well understood that this delay (the arrival time of the transmitted wave packet peak at the far side of the barrier) can be smaller than the barrier thickness divided by the speed of light, without violating causality. There have been a number of experiments confirming this, and even a recent one claiming that tunnelling may take no time at all. There have also been efforts to identify another timescale, which would better describe how long a given particle spends in the barrier region. Here we present a direct measurement of such a time, studying Bose-condensed 87^{87}87Rb atoms tunnelling through a 1.3-μμμm thick optical barrier. By localizing a pseudo-magnetic field inside the barrier, we use the spin precession of the atoms as a clock to measure the time it takes them to cross the classically forbidden region. We find a traversal time of 0.62(7) ms and study its dependence on incident energy. In addition to finally shedding light on the fundamental question of the tunnelling time, this experiment lays the groundwork for addressing deep foundational questions about history in quantum mechanics: for instance, what can we learn about where a particle was at earlier times by observing where it is now?
How much time does a tunneling particle spend in a barrier? A Larmor clock, one proposal to answer this question, measures the interaction between the particle and the barrier region using an auxiliary degree of freedom of the particle to clock the dwell time inside the barrier. We report on precise Larmor time measurements of an ultra-cold gas of 87^{87}87Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier. The data capture distinctive features that confirm longstanding predictions of tunneling times. In particular, we demonstrate that atoms spend less time tunneling through higher barriers and that this time decreases for lower energy particles. For the lowest measured incident energy, at least 90%90\%90% of transmitted atoms tunneled through the barrier, spending an average of 0.59(2)0.59(2)0.59(2)ms inside. This is 0.11(3)0.11(3)0.11(3)ms faster than atoms traversing the same barrier with energy close to the barrier's peak and 0.21(3)0.21(3)0.21(3)ms faster than when the atoms traverse a barrier with 23%23\%23% less energy.
How much time does a tunneling particle spend in a barrier? A Larmor clock, one proposal to answer this question, measures the interaction between the particle and the barrier region using an auxiliary degree of freedom of the particle to clock the dwell time inside the barrier. We report on precise Larmor time measurements of ultracold ^{87}Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier, which confirm longstanding predictions of tunneling times. We observe that atoms generally spend less time tunneling through higher barriers and that this time decreases for lower energy particles. For the lowest measured incident energy, at least 90% of transmitted atoms tunneled through the barrier, spending an average of 0.59±0.02 ms inside. This is 0.11±0.03 ms faster than atoms traversing the same barrier with energy close to the barrier's peak and 0.21±0.03 ms faster than when the atoms traverse a barrier with 23% less energy.
The question of how long a tunneling particle spends in the forbidden region of a barrier has been a perplexing puzzle in foundational quantum mechanics for many decades. The Larmor time, one definition of tunneling time, uses an auxiliary degree of freedom of the tunneling particles to clock the time spent inside the barrier. Recently, we made our first measurement of the Larmor time for Bose-condensed 87Rb atoms tunneling through an optical barrier.1 Here, we report on follow up measurements with improved precision in the measured times and also study the time for the reflected atomic cloud. We observe significant discrepancies between our results and a simple theory based on weak measurement. We discuss our findings, hypothesize explanations for our results, and suggest future studies.
Tunnelling is one of the phenomena at the heart of quantum mechanics. Despite its central role in physics, the duration of the tunnelling process has been debated since the development of quantum theory without a definite answer. In this thesis, the question of how long a particle takes to tunnel is investigated experimentally using ultracold atoms. These systems provide an ideal platform to address this question due to their isolation from the external environment and the ability to create almost arbitrary potentials for the atoms. As the tunnelling time experiment requires low temperatures, the realization and characterization of wave packets below the nanokelvin regime are studied first. A 16x reduction of the effective temperature of the atoms is obtained through delta-kick cooling. However, the achieved temperatures are so low that a new method, dubbed the “knife-edge technique”, is developed to characterize the final atomic state accurately. Through this new method, a final temperature of 900 ± 200 pK is found. Finally, the tunnelling time is investigated using a Bose-Einstein condensate in a one dimensional waveguide intersected by a 1.3 μm barrier. As the atoms tunnel through the thin potential, their spins time the tunnelling event through the Larmor precession induced by a pseudo-magnetic field localized inside the barrier. The precession angle is found by performing tomography on the spin state of the tunnelling atoms. With the knowledge of the Larmor frequency and the rotation angles, we find a tunnelling time of 0.65(7) ms. This experiment achieves a long-sought tunnelling time measurement with a clear interpretation, and its results show good quantitative agreement with theory based on the weak measurement formalism.
Tunnelling lies at the heart of quantum mechanics and is a fundamental process in attosecond science, molecular biology, and quantum devices. Whether tunnelling takes time and how a microscopic particle transits through a barrier have been debated since the early days of quantum mechanics. The time required for an electron to tunnel through an atomic potential barrier has been measured with attosecond angular streaking (attoclock), and a recent work on the hydrogen atom claimed that electron tunnelling is instantaneous. However, the time required for Rb atoms to tunnel through an optical potential barrier has been measured to be on the order of milliseconds with a recent Larmor clock measurement. The essence of electron and atom tunnelling is identical, but the reason for the contradictory conclusions remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that the sub-barrier potential interaction is the root of the nonzero tunnelling delay time. We reveal that the wave-particle duality of a tunnelling electron must be fully taken into account when decoding the tunnelling delay time from the attoclock measurements. Based on energy-resolved attoclock measurements, we show that the tunnelling delay time of an electron ranges from 24 to 58 attoseconds, and the counterintuitive result that an electron with a lower energy may spend less time in the barrier is consistent with the velocity-dependent tunnelling time of atoms in Larmor clock measurements. Our results unify the tunnelling time of microscopic particles by highlighting the classically forbidden sub-barrier potential interactions of matter waves.
Introduction In classical physics it is meaningful to ask the question, ‘How much time does a particle take to pass through a given region?’ The interesting question in quantum mechanics is: does a particle take a definite time to tunnel through a classically forbidden region? The question has been debated ever since the idea that there was such a time in quantum theory was first put forward by MacColl way back in 1932 [253]. A plethora of times has since then been proposed, and the answer seems to depend on the interpretation of quantum mechanics one uses. A reliable answer is clearly of great importance for the design of high-frequency quantum devices, tunnelling phenomena (as, for example, in scanning tunneling microscopy), nuclear and chemical reactions and, of course, for purely conceptual reasons. Most of the controversies centre around simple and intuitive notions in idealized one-dimensional models in a scattering configuration in which a particle (usually represented by a wave packet) is incident on a potential barrier localized in the interval [ a, b ]. Three kinds of time have been defined in this context. One, called the transmission time τ T ( a, b ), is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually transmitted. Similarly, the reflection time τ R ( a, b ) is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually reflected.