Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Distributed Consensus

Louie Helm, Christine Julien

Published Jan 1, 2007• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Distributed consensus is possible for asynchronous communication networks when assisted by quantum mechanical effects. Previous results are extended to show that consensus is possible even in the presence of byzantine process failures. This result directly contradicts the FLP impossibility result which states that distributed consensus is impossible when even one faulty networked process exists in the group. PODC’08, August 18–21, 2008, p445, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ACM 978-1-59593-9890/08/08. 1. DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING IS PHYSICAL Distributed computing is concerned with what can be accomplished using systems of networked processors. As with all information processing devices, these systems are necessarily physical and ultimately bound by the laws of physics[Land88]. Therefore, when proving impossibility results and bounds on algorithmic efficiency, it only makes sense to consider the possibilities offered, not only by classical information processing, but also the effects of quantum mechanics[NC00]. Recent results have shown that shared quantum resources make problems like anonymous leader election and distributed consensus possible under conditions where no classical algorithm could perform the same tasks[DP06]. These results are extended here to show that shared quantum resources allow fault-tolerant consensus in direct contradiction of previous impossibility results[FLP85]. Although this research is largely self-contained, a basic understanding of distributed computing is assumed of the reader along with a passing understanding of linear algebra which is necessary to understand the reasoning behind the algorithm detailed in section 4. A thorough understanding of quantum mechanics is recommended, although a reference of the specific quantum mechanical notation required to follow later reasoning in section 4 is detailed in section 3. A computer scientist unfamiliar with quantum mechanics would be well served to reference chapter 2 of [NC00] in order to gain a deeper understanding of the notation covered in section 3 of this paper. Likewise, a quantum physicist would be well served to reference chapter 15 of [Garg04] to more deeply understand the fault modeling of distributed computing covered in section 2 and section 5.

Related papers

Quantum distributed consensus

Louis K. Helm

Distributed consensus can be achieved on asynchronous communication networks when assisted by quantum mechanics. This contradicts the FLP impossibility result by achieving consensus in the presence of faults.

ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC)•Aug 18, 2008•6 citations

Distributed quantum computing

Vasil S. Denchev, Gopal Pandurangan

Quantum computing and distributed systems may enter a mutually beneficial partnership in the future. On the one hand, it is much easier to build a number of small quantum computers rather than a single large one. On the other hand, the best results concerning some of the fundamental problems in distributed computing can potentially be dramatically improved upon by taking advantage of the superior resources and processing power that quantum mechanics offers. This survey has the purpose to highlight both of these benefits. We first review the current results regarding the implementation of arbitrary quantum algorithms on distributed hardware. We then discuss existing proposals for quantum solutions of leader election - a fundamental problem from distributed computing. Quantum mechanics allows leader election to be solved with no communication, provided that certain pre-shared entanglement is already in place. Further, an impossibility result from classical distributed computing is circumvented by the quantum solution of anonymous leader election - a unique leader is elected in finite time with certainty. Finally, we discuss the viability of these proposals from a practical perspective. Although, theoretically, distributed quantum computing looks promising, it is still unclear how to build quantum hardware and how to create and maintain robust large-scale entangled states. Moreover, it is not clear whether the costs of creating entangled states and working with them are smaller than the costs of existing classical solutions.

ACM SIGACT News•Sep 1, 2008•73 citations

Distributed Consensus with Byzantine Fault Tolerance via Quantum Key Distribution

Jincheng Zhang

This paper proposes a novel approach to distributed consensus that leverages quantum key distribution (QKD) for Byzantine fault tolerance. Traditional consensus algorithms struggle to guarantee agreement in the face of malicious actors introducing Byzantine faults. This work introduces a framework where a shared secret, established via QKD, serves as the foundation for a consensus protocol. The inherent cryptographic properties of QKD – specifically its ability to detect eavesdropping – are exploited to identify and neutralize malicious nodes attempting to disrupt the consensus process. We demonstrate that this combination offers a fundamentally more secure and efficient solution compared to classical approaches. The core of our system relies on the creation of a quantum-secured shared key, denoted as *K*, and the subsequent implementation of a consensus protocol designed to operate on this key. This protocol incorporates mechanisms for key verification and anomaly detection, providing robust resilience against Byzantine faults. The theoretical analysis presented highlights the advantages of this approach in terms of security and efficiency. We define the following key variables: *n* - number of nodes in the network; *f* - maximum number of faulty nodes; *m* - number of correct nodes; *si* - the state of node *i* (1 if active, 0 if faulty); *K* - the quantum key shared among the nodes; *ri,j* - the raw key shared between nodes *i* and *j*; *Ei,j* - the error rate observed between nodes *i* and *j* during QKD; *σi,j* - the quantum state used for key exchange between nodes *i* and *j*; *Ci,j* - the ciphertext generated during the QKD process; *Di,j* - the decrypted ciphertext between nodes *i* and *j*; *Hi,j* - the hash value calculated based on the decrypted ciphertext. The system's robustness is directly proportional to the level of security provided by QKD and the effectiveness of the consensus protocol in detecting and isolating faulty nodes.

•Aug 29, 2026•0 citations

Distributed Consensus with Quantum Byzantine Fault Tolerance

Jincheng Zhang

This paper presents a novel approach to distributed consensus protocols leveraging quantum entanglement and Byzantine fault tolerance. The core claim is that quantum entanglement can provide secure and efficient agreement among nodes even in the presence of malicious actors. We propose a mechanism that utilizes quantum key distribution (QKD) to establish shared entanglement between participating nodes. Subsequent quantum measurements identify faulty nodes, informing a robust consensus algorithm built upon majority voting and entanglement-based error correction. The potential advantages of this combined approach – enhanced security and efficiency compared to traditional classical methods – are explored. The research addresses the critical challenge of achieving reliable consensus in distributed systems susceptible to Byzantine attacks. This work introduces a new paradigm for consensus, potentially leading to more resilient and secure distributed applications.

•Aug 29, 2026•0 citations

Distributed Consensus Algorithms with Byzantine Fault Tolerance via Quantum Entanglement

Jincheng Zhang

This paper proposes a novel distributed consensus algorithm utilizing quantum entanglement to achieve Byzantine fault tolerance. Traditional consensus algorithms struggle to guarantee correctness in the face of malicious actors (Byzantine faults) where nodes can arbitrarily deviate from the honest majority. This work introduces a protocol that leverages the unique properties of quantum entanglement to establish correlated states between nodes, enabling the detection and mitigation of these malicious behaviors without relying on trusted third parties or computationally intensive verification processes. The core claim is that quantum entanglement provides a provably secure and efficient mechanism for distributed consensus, offering superior resilience compared to classical approaches. The algorithm is formally described, and key mathematical components, including state transformations and probability calculations, are presented. The theoretical analysis demonstrates the algorithm's ability to converge to a correct consensus state even when a significant fraction of nodes are faulty. The use of entanglement fundamentally alters the Byzantine fault tolerance landscape, offering a pathway towards more robust and secure distributed systems.

•Sep 3, 2026•0 citations

Pushing Boundaries: Quantum-Enhanced Leader Election and the Limits of Consensus

Chandrashekar Radhakrishnan, Yuhang Zheng, Olivier Marin

This work addresses the complexities involved in designing distributed quantum algorithms, highlighting that quantum entanglement does not bypass the Fischer-Lynch-Paterson (FLP) impossibility theorem in asynchronous networks. Although quantum resources such as entanglement offer potential speedups, the inherent constraints of classical communication remain. We develop a leader election algorithm as a proof of concept, demonstrating how entanglement can enhance efficiency while still contending with asynchronous delays. This algorithm serves as a foundation for a broader blueprint for future distributed quantum algorithms, providing insights into both the real performance gains and the limitations that entanglement offers in a distributed setting.

arXiv:2411.04629•Nov 7, 2024•0 citations
Distributed consensus is possible for asynchronous communication networks when assisted by quantum mechanical effects. Previous results are extended to show that consensus is possible even in the presence of byzantine process failures. This result directly contradicts the FLP impossibility result which states that distributed consensus is impossible when even one faulty networked process exists in the group. PODC’08, August 18–21, 2008, p445, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ACM 978-1-59593-9890/08/08. 1. DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING IS PHYSICAL Distributed computing is concerned with what can be accomplished using systems of networked processors. As with all information processing devices, these systems are necessarily physical and ultimately bound by the laws of physics[Land88]. Therefore, when proving impossibility results and bounds on algorithmic efficiency, it only makes sense to consider the possibilities offered, not only by classical information processing, but also the effects of quantum mechanics[NC00]. Recent results have shown that shared quantum resources make problems like anonymous leader election and distributed consensus possible under conditions where no classical algorithm could perform the same tasks[DP06]. These results are extended here to show that shared quantum resources allow fault-tolerant consensus in direct contradiction of previous impossibility results[FLP85]. Although this research is largely self-contained, a basic understanding of distributed computing is assumed of the reader along with a passing understanding of linear algebra which is necessary to understand the reasoning behind the algorithm detailed in section 4. A thorough understanding of quantum mechanics is recommended, although a reference of the specific quantum mechanical notation required to follow later reasoning in section 4 is detailed in section 3. A computer scientist unfamiliar with quantum mechanics would be well served to reference chapter 2 of [NC00] in order to gain a deeper understanding of the notation covered in section 3 of this paper. Likewise, a quantum physicist would be well served to reference chapter 15 of [Garg04] to more deeply understand the fault modeling of distributed computing covered in section 2 and section 5.
Quantum computing and distributed systems may enter a mutually beneficial partnership in the future. On the one hand, it is much easier to build a number of small quantum computers rather than a single large one. On the other hand, the best results concerning some of the fundamental problems in distributed computing can potentially be dramatically improved upon by taking advantage of the superior resources and processing power that quantum mechanics offers. This survey has the purpose to highlight both of these benefits. We first review the current results regarding the implementation of arbitrary quantum algorithms on distributed hardware. We then discuss existing proposals for quantum solutions of leader election - a fundamental problem from distributed computing. Quantum mechanics allows leader election to be solved with no communication, provided that certain pre-shared entanglement is already in place. Further, an impossibility result from classical distributed computing is circumvented by the quantum solution of anonymous leader election - a unique leader is elected in finite time with certainty. Finally, we discuss the viability of these proposals from a practical perspective. Although, theoretically, distributed quantum computing looks promising, it is still unclear how to build quantum hardware and how to create and maintain robust large-scale entangled states. Moreover, it is not clear whether the costs of creating entangled states and working with them are smaller than the costs of existing classical solutions.
This paper proposes a novel approach to distributed consensus that leverages quantum key distribution (QKD) for Byzantine fault tolerance. Traditional consensus algorithms struggle to guarantee agreement in the face of malicious actors introducing Byzantine faults. This work introduces a framework where a shared secret, established via QKD, serves as the foundation for a consensus protocol. The inherent cryptographic properties of QKD – specifically its ability to detect eavesdropping – are exploited to identify and neutralize malicious nodes attempting to disrupt the consensus process. We demonstrate that this combination offers a fundamentally more secure and efficient solution compared to classical approaches. The core of our system relies on the creation of a quantum-secured shared key, denoted as *K*, and the subsequent implementation of a consensus protocol designed to operate on this key. This protocol incorporates mechanisms for key verification and anomaly detection, providing robust resilience against Byzantine faults. The theoretical analysis presented highlights the advantages of this approach in terms of security and efficiency. We define the following key variables: *n* - number of nodes in the network; *f* - maximum number of faulty nodes; *m* - number of correct nodes; *si* - the state of node *i* (1 if active, 0 if faulty); *K* - the quantum key shared among the nodes; *ri,j* - the raw key shared between nodes *i* and *j*; *Ei,j* - the error rate observed between nodes *i* and *j* during QKD; *σi,j* - the quantum state used for key exchange between nodes *i* and *j*; *Ci,j* - the ciphertext generated during the QKD process; *Di,j* - the decrypted ciphertext between nodes *i* and *j*; *Hi,j* - the hash value calculated based on the decrypted ciphertext. The system's robustness is directly proportional to the level of security provided by QKD and the effectiveness of the consensus protocol in detecting and isolating faulty nodes.
This paper presents a novel approach to distributed consensus protocols leveraging quantum entanglement and Byzantine fault tolerance. The core claim is that quantum entanglement can provide secure and efficient agreement among nodes even in the presence of malicious actors. We propose a mechanism that utilizes quantum key distribution (QKD) to establish shared entanglement between participating nodes. Subsequent quantum measurements identify faulty nodes, informing a robust consensus algorithm built upon majority voting and entanglement-based error correction. The potential advantages of this combined approach – enhanced security and efficiency compared to traditional classical methods – are explored. The research addresses the critical challenge of achieving reliable consensus in distributed systems susceptible to Byzantine attacks. This work introduces a new paradigm for consensus, potentially leading to more resilient and secure distributed applications.
This paper proposes a novel distributed consensus algorithm utilizing quantum entanglement to achieve Byzantine fault tolerance. Traditional consensus algorithms struggle to guarantee correctness in the face of malicious actors (Byzantine faults) where nodes can arbitrarily deviate from the honest majority. This work introduces a protocol that leverages the unique properties of quantum entanglement to establish correlated states between nodes, enabling the detection and mitigation of these malicious behaviors without relying on trusted third parties or computationally intensive verification processes. The core claim is that quantum entanglement provides a provably secure and efficient mechanism for distributed consensus, offering superior resilience compared to classical approaches. The algorithm is formally described, and key mathematical components, including state transformations and probability calculations, are presented. The theoretical analysis demonstrates the algorithm's ability to converge to a correct consensus state even when a significant fraction of nodes are faulty. The use of entanglement fundamentally alters the Byzantine fault tolerance landscape, offering a pathway towards more robust and secure distributed systems.
This work addresses the complexities involved in designing distributed quantum algorithms, highlighting that quantum entanglement does not bypass the Fischer-Lynch-Paterson (FLP) impossibility theorem in asynchronous networks. Although quantum resources such as entanglement offer potential speedups, the inherent constraints of classical communication remain. We develop a leader election algorithm as a proof of concept, demonstrating how entanglement can enhance efficiency while still contending with asynchronous delays. This algorithm serves as a foundation for a broader blueprint for future distributed quantum algorithms, providing insights into both the real performance gains and the limitations that entanglement offers in a distributed setting.