Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC)

Quantum distributed consensus

Louis K. Helm

Published Aug 18, 2008• 6 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Distributed consensus can be achieved on asynchronous communication networks when assisted by quantum mechanics. This contradicts the FLP impossibility result by achieving consensus in the presence of faults.
DOI
10.1145/1400751.1400841

Related papers

Quantum Distributed Consensus

Louie Helm, Christine Julien

Distributed consensus is possible for asynchronous communication networks when assisted by quantum mechanical effects. Previous results are extended to show that consensus is possible even in the presence of byzantine process failures. This result directly contradicts the FLP impossibility result which states that distributed consensus is impossible when even one faulty networked process exists in the group. PODC’08, August 18–21, 2008, p445, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ACM 978-1-59593-9890/08/08. 1. DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING IS PHYSICAL Distributed computing is concerned with what can be accomplished using systems of networked processors. As with all information processing devices, these systems are necessarily physical and ultimately bound by the laws of physics[Land88]. Therefore, when proving impossibility results and bounds on algorithmic efficiency, it only makes sense to consider the possibilities offered, not only by classical information processing, but also the effects of quantum mechanics[NC00]. Recent results have shown that shared quantum resources make problems like anonymous leader election and distributed consensus possible under conditions where no classical algorithm could perform the same tasks[DP06]. These results are extended here to show that shared quantum resources allow fault-tolerant consensus in direct contradiction of previous impossibility results[FLP85]. Although this research is largely self-contained, a basic understanding of distributed computing is assumed of the reader along with a passing understanding of linear algebra which is necessary to understand the reasoning behind the algorithm detailed in section 4. A thorough understanding of quantum mechanics is recommended, although a reference of the specific quantum mechanical notation required to follow later reasoning in section 4 is detailed in section 3. A computer scientist unfamiliar with quantum mechanics would be well served to reference chapter 2 of [NC00] in order to gain a deeper understanding of the notation covered in section 3 of this paper. Likewise, a quantum physicist would be well served to reference chapter 15 of [Garg04] to more deeply understand the fault modeling of distributed computing covered in section 2 and section 5.

•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Multi-party quantum Byzantine consensus based on full quantum one-way function

Tao Shang, Yao Tang, Yuanjing Zhang +2 more

Quantum Information Processing•Dec 24, 2024•1 citation

Blockchain consensus mechanism based on quantum zero-knowledge proof

Xiaojun Wen, Yongzhi Chen, Xincan Fan +3 more

Optics & Laser Technology•Nov 22, 2021•24 citations

Pushing Boundaries: Quantum-Enhanced Leader Election and the Limits of Consensus

Chandrashekar Radhakrishnan, Yuhang Zheng, Olivier Marin

This work addresses the complexities involved in designing distributed quantum algorithms, highlighting that quantum entanglement does not bypass the Fischer-Lynch-Paterson (FLP) impossibility theorem in asynchronous networks. Although quantum resources such as entanglement offer potential speedups, the inherent constraints of classical communication remain. We develop a leader election algorithm as a proof of concept, demonstrating how entanglement can enhance efficiency while still contending with asynchronous delays. This algorithm serves as a foundation for a broader blueprint for future distributed quantum algorithms, providing insights into both the real performance gains and the limitations that entanglement offers in a distributed setting.

arXiv:2411.04629•Nov 7, 2024•0 citations

A Review on Quantum Blockchain Based Consensus Mechanism Approaches

Jeet Ramoliya, Nishant Doshi

Lecture notes in networks and systems•Jan 1, 2023•1 citation

Distributed Consensus with Quantum Byzantine Fault Tolerance

Jincheng Zhang

This paper presents a novel approach to distributed consensus protocols leveraging quantum entanglement and Byzantine fault tolerance. The core claim is that quantum entanglement can provide secure and efficient agreement among nodes even in the presence of malicious actors. We propose a mechanism that utilizes quantum key distribution (QKD) to establish shared entanglement between participating nodes. Subsequent quantum measurements identify faulty nodes, informing a robust consensus algorithm built upon majority voting and entanglement-based error correction. The potential advantages of this combined approach – enhanced security and efficiency compared to traditional classical methods – are explored. The research addresses the critical challenge of achieving reliable consensus in distributed systems susceptible to Byzantine attacks. This work introduces a new paradigm for consensus, potentially leading to more resilient and secure distributed applications.

•Aug 29, 2026•0 citations
Distributed consensus is possible for asynchronous communication networks when assisted by quantum mechanical effects. Previous results are extended to show that consensus is possible even in the presence of byzantine process failures. This result directly contradicts the FLP impossibility result which states that distributed consensus is impossible when even one faulty networked process exists in the group. PODC’08, August 18–21, 2008, p445, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ACM 978-1-59593-9890/08/08. 1. DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING IS PHYSICAL Distributed computing is concerned with what can be accomplished using systems of networked processors. As with all information processing devices, these systems are necessarily physical and ultimately bound by the laws of physics[Land88]. Therefore, when proving impossibility results and bounds on algorithmic efficiency, it only makes sense to consider the possibilities offered, not only by classical information processing, but also the effects of quantum mechanics[NC00]. Recent results have shown that shared quantum resources make problems like anonymous leader election and distributed consensus possible under conditions where no classical algorithm could perform the same tasks[DP06]. These results are extended here to show that shared quantum resources allow fault-tolerant consensus in direct contradiction of previous impossibility results[FLP85]. Although this research is largely self-contained, a basic understanding of distributed computing is assumed of the reader along with a passing understanding of linear algebra which is necessary to understand the reasoning behind the algorithm detailed in section 4. A thorough understanding of quantum mechanics is recommended, although a reference of the specific quantum mechanical notation required to follow later reasoning in section 4 is detailed in section 3. A computer scientist unfamiliar with quantum mechanics would be well served to reference chapter 2 of [NC00] in order to gain a deeper understanding of the notation covered in section 3 of this paper. Likewise, a quantum physicist would be well served to reference chapter 15 of [Garg04] to more deeply understand the fault modeling of distributed computing covered in section 2 and section 5.
This work addresses the complexities involved in designing distributed quantum algorithms, highlighting that quantum entanglement does not bypass the Fischer-Lynch-Paterson (FLP) impossibility theorem in asynchronous networks. Although quantum resources such as entanglement offer potential speedups, the inherent constraints of classical communication remain. We develop a leader election algorithm as a proof of concept, demonstrating how entanglement can enhance efficiency while still contending with asynchronous delays. This algorithm serves as a foundation for a broader blueprint for future distributed quantum algorithms, providing insights into both the real performance gains and the limitations that entanglement offers in a distributed setting.
This paper presents a novel approach to distributed consensus protocols leveraging quantum entanglement and Byzantine fault tolerance. The core claim is that quantum entanglement can provide secure and efficient agreement among nodes even in the presence of malicious actors. We propose a mechanism that utilizes quantum key distribution (QKD) to establish shared entanglement between participating nodes. Subsequent quantum measurements identify faulty nodes, informing a robust consensus algorithm built upon majority voting and entanglement-based error correction. The potential advantages of this combined approach – enhanced security and efficiency compared to traditional classical methods – are explored. The research addresses the critical challenge of achieving reliable consensus in distributed systems susceptible to Byzantine attacks. This work introduces a new paradigm for consensus, potentially leading to more resilient and secure distributed applications.