Experimental Hamiltonian Identification for Qubits subject to Multiple Independent Control Mechanisms

Sonia G. Schirmer, Avinash Kolli, Daniel K. L. Oi, Jared H. Cole

Published Jan 1, 2004• 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. We consider a qubit subject to various independent control mechanisms and present a general strategy to identify both the internal Hamiltonian and the interaction Hamiltonian for each control mechanism, relying only on a single, fixed readout process such as ˆσz measurements. 1.

Related papers

Experimental Hamiltonian Identification for Qubits subject to Multiple Independent Control Mechanisms

Sonia G. Schirmer

We consider a qubit subject to various independent control mechanisms and present a general strategy to identify both the internal Hamiltonian and the interaction Hamiltonian for each control mechanism, relying only on a single, fixed readout process such as σ̂z measurements.

arXiv:quant-ph/0409107AIP conference proceedingsJan 1, 20042 citations

Experimental Hamiltonian identification for controlled two-level systems

S. G. Schirmer, Avinash Kolli, Daniel K. L. Oi

We present a strategy to empirically determine the internal and control Hamiltonians for an unknown two-level system (black box) subject to various (piecewise constant) control fields when direct readout by measurement is limited to a single, fixed observable.

arXiv:quant-ph/0311187Physical Review AMay 19, 200464 citations

Experimentally Determining Bloch Parameters of Hamiltonian for Single-Qubit Systems

Ming Zhang, Zhou Wei-Wei, Hong‐Yi Dai +3 more

By considering the identification problem of unknown but fixed Hamiltonian H = S 0 σ 0 + Σ i = x, y, z S i σ i where σ i (i = x, y, z) are pauli matrices and σ 0 = I, we explore the feasibility and limitation of empirically determining the Hamiltonian parameters for quantum systems under experimental conditions imposed by projective measurements and initialization procedures. It may be unsurprising to physicists that one can not obtain the knowledge of So no matter what kind of projective measurements and initialization are permitted, but the observation draws our attention to the importance of the parameter identifiability under different experimental condition. It has also been revealed that one can obtain the knowledge of |S z | and S x 2 + S y 2 at most when only the projective measurement {|0⟩⟨0|, |1⟩⟨1|} is permitted to perform on and initialize the qubit. Further more, we demonstrated that it is feasible to distinguish |S x |, |S y |, and |S Z | even without any a priori information about Hamiltonian if at least two kinds of projective measurement or initialization procedures are permitted. It should be emphasized that both projective measurements and initialization procedures play an important role in quantum system identification.

Communications in Theoretical PhysicsJun 1, 20104 citations

Physics-based mathematical models for quantum devices via experimental system identification

S. G. Schirmer, Daniel K. L. Oi, Simon J. Devitt

We consider the task of intrinsic control system identification for quantum devices. The problem of experimental determination of subspace confinement is considered, and simple general strategies for full Hamiltonian identification and decoherence characterization of a controlled two-level system are presented.

arXiv:0805.2725Journal of Physics Conference SeriesMar 1, 200812 citations

Quantum System Identification

Daniel Klaus Burgarth, Kazuya Yuasa

The aim of quantum system identification is to estimate the ingredients inside a black box, in which some quantum-mechanical unitary process takes place, by just looking at its input-output behavior. Here we establish a basic and general framework for quantum system identification, that allows us to classify how much knowledge about the quantum system is attainable, in principle, from a given experimental setup. We show that controllable closed quantum systems can be estimated up to unitary conjugation. Prior knowledge on some elements of the black box helps the system identification. We present an example in which a Bell measurement is more efficient to identify the system. When the topology of the system is known, the framework enables us to establish a general criterion for the estimability of the coupling constants in its Hamiltonian.

arXiv:1104.0583Physical Review LettersFeb 23, 201283 citations

Quantum system identification: Hamiltonian estimation using spectral and Bayesian analysis

S. G. Schirmer, Frank C. Langbein

Abstract—Identifying the Hamiltonian of a quantum system from experimental data is considered. General limits on the identifiability of model parameters with limited experimental resources are investigated, and a specific Bayesian estimation procedure is proposed and evaluated for a model system where a-priori information about the Hamiltonian’s structure is available. I.

Jan 1, 20106 citations