Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Communications in Theoretical Physics

Experimentally Determining Bloch Parameters of Hamiltonian for Single-Qubit Systems

Ming Zhang, Zhou Wei-Wei, Hong‐Yi Dai, Lin Min, Sun Zhi-Qiang, Gong Er-Ling

Published Jun 1, 2010• 4 citations
Publisher

Abstract

By considering the identification problem of unknown but fixed Hamiltonian H = S 0 σ 0 + Σ i = x, y, z S i σ i where σ i (i = x, y, z) are pauli matrices and σ 0 = I, we explore the feasibility and limitation of empirically determining the Hamiltonian parameters for quantum systems under experimental conditions imposed by projective measurements and initialization procedures. It may be unsurprising to physicists that one can not obtain the knowledge of So no matter what kind of projective measurements and initialization are permitted, but the observation draws our attention to the importance of the parameter identifiability under different experimental condition. It has also been revealed that one can obtain the knowledge of |S z | and S x 2 + S y 2 at most when only the projective measurement {|0⟩⟨0|, |1⟩⟨1|} is permitted to perform on and initialize the qubit. Further more, we demonstrated that it is feasible to distinguish |S x |, |S y |, and |S Z | even without any a priori information about Hamiltonian if at least two kinds of projective measurement or initialization procedures are permitted. It should be emphasized that both projective measurements and initialization procedures play an important role in quantum system identification.

DOI
10.1088/0253-6102/53/6/17

Related papers

Quantum system identification: Hamiltonian estimation using spectral and Bayesian analysis

S. G. Schirmer, Frank C. Langbein

Abstract—Identifying the Hamiltonian of a quantum system from experimental data is considered. General limits on the identifiability of model parameters with limited experimental resources are investigated, and a specific Bayesian estimation procedure is proposed and evaluated for a model system where a-priori information about the Hamiltonian’s structure is available. I.

•Jan 1, 2010•6 citations

Quantum system identification: Hamiltonian estimation using spectral and Bayesian analysis

Sophie G Schirmer, Frank C Langbein

Identifying the Hamiltonian of a quantum system from experimental data is considered. General limits on the identifiability of model parameters with limited experimental resources are investigated, and a specific Bayesian estimation procedure is proposed and evaluated for a model system where a-priori information about the Hamiltonian's structure is available.

arXiv:0911.5429•International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing•Mar 1, 2010•6 citations

Experimental design and identifiability of model parameters for quantum systems

Ming Zhang, S. G. Schirmer, Hong‐Yi Dai +2 more

This paper explores the experimental design and identifiability problems for both closed and open quantum systems. In general, the identifiability of quantum systems depends on both the choice of model sets and experimental design. The limits of identifiability in certain experimental settings and ways to improve the identifiability of model parameters by changing experimental conditions are investigated. Furthermore, it is exemplified that the experiment design in the domain of quantum system identification at least include the three following aspects: (1) initialization procedures, (2) measurement methods, and (3) the choice of coherent control.

IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)•Dec 1, 2009•5 citations

Model type identification of four-level quantum systems by projective measurement

Weiwei Zhou, Zhiqiang Sun, S. G. Schirmer +3 more

Hamiltonian of finite-dimensional quantum closed systems can be classified by its degeneracy and corresponding parameter models for the systems can be given respectively. Based on this kind of classification, we explore the model type identification problem for four-level quantum closed systems when projective measurement is available. We show that to a certain context the model type identification problem can be reduced to a problem of spectrum analysis. However when only one kind of projective measurement is available, the model type of a four-level quantum closed system can not be completely discriminated just by spectrum analysis for most cases. Furthermore, we give an experimental design to the complete model type identification of a four-level quantum closed system with a special kind of Hamiltonian by spectrum analysis, when more than one kind of projective measurement is available.

Chinese Control Conference (CCC)•Jul 29, 2010•0 citations

Experimental Hamiltonian Identification for Qubits subject to Multiple Independent Control Mechanisms

Sonia G. Schirmer

We consider a qubit subject to various independent control mechanisms and present a general strategy to identify both the internal Hamiltonian and the interaction Hamiltonian for each control mechanism, relying only on a single, fixed readout process such as σ̂z measurements.

arXiv:quant-ph/0409107•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2004•2 citations

Experimental Hamiltonian identification for controlled two-level systems

S. G. Schirmer, Avinash Kolli, Daniel K. L. Oi

We present a strategy to empirically determine the internal and control Hamiltonians for an unknown two-level system (black box) subject to various (piecewise constant) control fields when direct readout by measurement is limited to a single, fixed observable.

arXiv:quant-ph/0311187•Physical Review A•May 19, 2004•64 citations
By considering the identification problem of unknown but fixed Hamiltonian H = S 0 σ 0 + Σ i = x, y, z S i σ i where σ i (i = x, y, z) are pauli matrices and σ 0 = I, we explore the feasibility and limitation of empirically determining the Hamiltonian parameters for quantum systems under experimental conditions imposed by projective measurements and initialization procedures. It may be unsurprising to physicists that one can not obtain the knowledge of So no matter what kind of projective measurements and initialization are permitted, but the observation draws our attention to the importance of the parameter identifiability under different experimental condition. It has also been revealed that one can obtain the knowledge of |S z | and S x 2 + S y 2 at most when only the projective measurement {|0⟩⟨0|, |1⟩⟨1|} is permitted to perform on and initialize the qubit. Further more, we demonstrated that it is feasible to distinguish |S x |, |S y |, and |S Z | even without any a priori information about Hamiltonian if at least two kinds of projective measurement or initialization procedures are permitted. It should be emphasized that both projective measurements and initialization procedures play an important role in quantum system identification.
This paper explores the experimental design and identifiability problems for both closed and open quantum systems. In general, the identifiability of quantum systems depends on both the choice of model sets and experimental design. The limits of identifiability in certain experimental settings and ways to improve the identifiability of model parameters by changing experimental conditions are investigated. Furthermore, it is exemplified that the experiment design in the domain of quantum system identification at least include the three following aspects: (1) initialization procedures, (2) measurement methods, and (3) the choice of coherent control.
Hamiltonian of finite-dimensional quantum closed systems can be classified by its degeneracy and corresponding parameter models for the systems can be given respectively. Based on this kind of classification, we explore the model type identification problem for four-level quantum closed systems when projective measurement is available. We show that to a certain context the model type identification problem can be reduced to a problem of spectrum analysis. However when only one kind of projective measurement is available, the model type of a four-level quantum closed system can not be completely discriminated just by spectrum analysis for most cases. Furthermore, we give an experimental design to the complete model type identification of a four-level quantum closed system with a special kind of Hamiltonian by spectrum analysis, when more than one kind of projective measurement is available.