Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

Many-Particle Systems

M.S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

Published Nov 5, 2020• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The postulates of quantum mechanics and their consequences, which have been developed to describe a single particle, are still valid when applied to a system of N particles. The system can be described by a wave function Ψ which depends on the time and on the 3 N coordinates of all the particles: 10.1 Ψ = Ψ ( r → 1 , … r → i , … r → N , t ) = Ψ ( x 1 , y 1 , z 1 , … , x i , y i , z i , … x N , y N , z N , t ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn10_1_B.tif"/>

DOI
10.1201/9781003078265-11

Related papers

Mathematical introduction

In-Gee Kim

The properties of a quantum mechanical system composed of many identical particles are most conveniently described in terms of the second‐quantized, Heisenberg representation, particle‐creation, and annihilation operators. The creation operator ψ ^ † ( r , t ) $ \hat{\psi }^{\dag } ({\mathbf{r}}, t) $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math2_1.tif"/> , when acting to the right on a state of the system, adds a particle to the state at the space‐time point r , $ {\mathbf{r}}, $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math2_2.tif"/> t ; the annihilation operator ψ ^ ( r , t ) $ \hat{\psi }({\mathbf{r}}, t) $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math2_3.tif"/> , the adjoint of the creation operator acting to the right, removes a particle from the state at the point r , t .

•Mar 14, 2018•1 citation

Methods in the Many-Body Problem

A. B. Migdal

The solution of Schrödinger’s equation for systems composed of a large number of strongly interacting particles is an unsolved problem. Indeed, even the classical three-body problem cannot be solved in general form. Fortunately, the problem of obtaining the Ψ-function of such a system is not only insoluble but unnecessary; such a detailed description of the many-body problem is not required by any experiment that is possible in real life. Any real experimental set-up contains a comparatively small number of particle indicators, and hence, in cases where a large number of particles take part in a given process, can give only their averaged characteristics. Any attempt to determine the coordinates of every particle of such a system would lead (because of the uncertainty relation) to a complicated excited state and would indeed change the properties of the system. Thus, the description of a macroscopic system by means of a wave function is an inadequate approach * : we need 262 instead methods of incomplete description, which determine only the relations between averaged quantities. An example of such a description is hydrodynamics, the equations of which determine only the average velocity of the particles at each point (i. e. the velocity field). A second example, closer to our problem, is the kinetic equation, which allows us to find the distribution of particles with respect to velocity and position. A knowledge of the one-particle distribution function f ( r ˜ , p ˜ , t ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1304.tif"/> , which depends on the coordinate r ˜ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1305.tif"/> and velocity p ˜ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1306.tif"/> of the particles, allows us to calculate the mean values of additive quantities such as the density n ( r ˜ ) = ∑ i δ ( r ˜ - r ˜ i ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1307.tif"/> or the momentum per unit volume j ˜ ( r ˜ ) = ∑ i p ˜ i δ ( r ˜ - r ˜ i ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1308.tif"/> . The two-particle distribution function f ( r ˜ 1 , r ˜ 2 ; p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 ; t ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1309.tif"/> allows us to find the correlations between the coordinates and the velocities of two particles and to determine the averages of quantities which depend on the coordinates of two particles, for instance the mean value of the pairwise interaction energy V = ∑ ik V ( r ˜ i - r ˜ k ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1310.tif"/> . The periodic or weakly damped solutions of the equation for the distribution function give the eigenfrequencies of the system.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

Time—Dependent Perturbation Theory

Şaki̇r Erkoç

Systems described by a time–independent potential energy function, V ( r , t ) = V ( r ), are the subject of quantum statics . Such systems may be studied by the time–dependent Schrödinger equation 16.1 H Ψ = i ℏ ∂ Ψ ∂ t https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429136528/397e01c1-e101-4a47-b552-a910642bbb8c/content/eqn16_1.tif"/>

CRC Press eBooks•Jul 28, 2006•0 citations

Angular Momentum

M.S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

The orbital angular momentum operator has been introduced by Postulate 2 as a vector operator L → ^ = r → × p → ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_1_B.tif"/> whose Cartesian components, Eq.(2.18) , correspond to those of the classical observable for a single particle. As a consequence of Postulate 4, the components L ^ x https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_2_B.tif"/> , L ^ y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_3_B.tif"/> and L ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_4_B.tif"/> do not commute with one another, Eq.(4.47) , and all commute with L ^ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_5_B.tif"/> , and this implies that the eigenstates of L → ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_6_B.tif"/> are simultaneous eigenfunctions of L ^ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_7_B.tif"/> and of one component L ^ i https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_8_B.tif"/> , at a time. Similar properties are exhibited by the angular momentum vector operator of a system of particles, which is defined as the vector sum over the individual particle operators: J → ^ = ∑ p L → ^ ( p ) , J ^ 2 = J ^ x 2 + J ^ y 2 + J ^ z 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_108_B.tif"/> such that, because the coordinate and momentum operator for two different particles are commuting operators, we have: 8.1 [ J ^ x , J ^ y ] = [ ∑ p L ^ x ( p ) , ∑ q L ^ y ( q ) ] = ∑ p ∑ q [ L ^ x ( p ) , L ^ y ( q ) ] = ∑ p [ L ^ x ( p ) , L ^ y ( q ) ] = i h ∑ p [ L ^ z ( p ) = i h J ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_1_B.tif"/> and similarly: 8.2 [ J ^ y , J ^ z ] = i h J ^ x , [ J ^ z , J ^ x ] = i h J ^ y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_2_B.tif"/>

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2020•0 citations

N–Particle Systems

Şaki̇r Erkoç

After knowing the single particle analysis, one can easily extend the similar discussions for many-particle systems. Consider an N –particle system. The N –particles are described by a wave function ψ ( x 1 ,…,x n ) that is normalized such that

CRC Press eBooks•Jul 28, 2006•0 citations

Systems of several particles

Keith Hannabuss

Abstract One often wants to study systems, such as the helium atom of Sections 12.3 and 14.2, that contain more than one particle. We describe two-particle systems by a wave function, ψ (r1, r2), where r1 is the position of the first particle, and r2 that of the second. If we interchange the two particles, then the wave function becomes ψ (r2, r1). (16.1)

•Mar 20, 1997•0 citations
The postulates of quantum mechanics and their consequences, which have been developed to describe a single particle, are still valid when applied to a system of N particles. The system can be described by a wave function Ψ which depends on the time and on the 3 N coordinates of all the particles: 10.1 Ψ = Ψ ( r → 1 , … r → i , … r → N , t ) = Ψ ( x 1 , y 1 , z 1 , … , x i , y i , z i , … x N , y N , z N , t ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn10_1_B.tif"/>
The properties of a quantum mechanical system composed of many identical particles are most conveniently described in terms of the second‐quantized, Heisenberg representation, particle‐creation, and annihilation operators. The creation operator ψ ^ † ( r , t ) $ \hat{\psi }^{\dag } ({\mathbf{r}}, t) $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math2_1.tif"/> , when acting to the right on a state of the system, adds a particle to the state at the space‐time point r , $ {\mathbf{r}}, $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math2_2.tif"/> t ; the annihilation operator ψ ^ ( r , t ) $ \hat{\psi }({\mathbf{r}}, t) $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math2_3.tif"/> , the adjoint of the creation operator acting to the right, removes a particle from the state at the point r , t .
The solution of Schrödinger’s equation for systems composed of a large number of strongly interacting particles is an unsolved problem. Indeed, even the classical three-body problem cannot be solved in general form. Fortunately, the problem of obtaining the Ψ-function of such a system is not only insoluble but unnecessary; such a detailed description of the many-body problem is not required by any experiment that is possible in real life. Any real experimental set-up contains a comparatively small number of particle indicators, and hence, in cases where a large number of particles take part in a given process, can give only their averaged characteristics. Any attempt to determine the coordinates of every particle of such a system would lead (because of the uncertainty relation) to a complicated excited state and would indeed change the properties of the system. Thus, the description of a macroscopic system by means of a wave function is an inadequate approach * : we need 262 instead methods of incomplete description, which determine only the relations between averaged quantities. An example of such a description is hydrodynamics, the equations of which determine only the average velocity of the particles at each point (i. e. the velocity field). A second example, closer to our problem, is the kinetic equation, which allows us to find the distribution of particles with respect to velocity and position. A knowledge of the one-particle distribution function f ( r ˜ , p ˜ , t ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1304.tif"/> , which depends on the coordinate r ˜ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1305.tif"/> and velocity p ˜ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1306.tif"/> of the particles, allows us to calculate the mean values of additive quantities such as the density n ( r ˜ ) = ∑ i δ ( r ˜ - r ˜ i ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1307.tif"/> or the momentum per unit volume j ˜ ( r ˜ ) = ∑ i p ˜ i δ ( r ˜ - r ˜ i ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1308.tif"/> . The two-particle distribution function f ( r ˜ 1 , r ˜ 2 ; p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 ; t ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1309.tif"/> allows us to find the correlations between the coordinates and the velocities of two particles and to determine the averages of quantities which depend on the coordinates of two particles, for instance the mean value of the pairwise interaction energy V = ∑ ik V ( r ˜ i - r ˜ k ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429497940/5adca591-a306-49c7-affc-2d249cfef85c/content/eq1310.tif"/> . The periodic or weakly damped solutions of the equation for the distribution function give the eigenfrequencies of the system.
The orbital angular momentum operator has been introduced by Postulate 2 as a vector operator L → ^ = r → × p → ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_1_B.tif"/> whose Cartesian components, Eq.(2.18) , correspond to those of the classical observable for a single particle. As a consequence of Postulate 4, the components L ^ x https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_2_B.tif"/> , L ^ y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_3_B.tif"/> and L ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_4_B.tif"/> do not commute with one another, Eq.(4.47) , and all commute with L ^ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_5_B.tif"/> , and this implies that the eigenstates of L → ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_6_B.tif"/> are simultaneous eigenfunctions of L ^ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_7_B.tif"/> and of one component L ^ i https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_8_B.tif"/> , at a time. Similar properties are exhibited by the angular momentum vector operator of a system of particles, which is defined as the vector sum over the individual particle operators: J → ^ = ∑ p L → ^ ( p ) , J ^ 2 = J ^ x 2 + J ^ y 2 + J ^ z 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_108_B.tif"/> such that, because the coordinate and momentum operator for two different particles are commuting operators, we have: 8.1 [ J ^ x , J ^ y ] = [ ∑ p L ^ x ( p ) , ∑ q L ^ y ( q ) ] = ∑ p ∑ q [ L ^ x ( p ) , L ^ y ( q ) ] = ∑ p [ L ^ x ( p ) , L ^ y ( q ) ] = i h ∑ p [ L ^ z ( p ) = i h J ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_1_B.tif"/> and similarly: 8.2 [ J ^ y , J ^ z ] = i h J ^ x , [ J ^ z , J ^ x ] = i h J ^ y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_2_B.tif"/>