Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

Angular Momentum

M.S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

Published Nov 5, 2020• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The orbital angular momentum operator has been introduced by Postulate 2 as a vector operator L → ^ = r → × p → ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_1_B.tif"/> whose Cartesian components, Eq.(2.18) , correspond to those of the classical observable for a single particle. As a consequence of Postulate 4, the components L ^ x https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_2_B.tif"/> , L ^ y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_3_B.tif"/> and L ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_4_B.tif"/> do not commute with one another, Eq.(4.47) , and all commute with L ^ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_5_B.tif"/> , and this implies that the eigenstates of L → ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_6_B.tif"/> are simultaneous eigenfunctions of L ^ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_7_B.tif"/> and of one component L ^ i https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_8_B.tif"/> , at a time. Similar properties are exhibited by the angular momentum vector operator of a system of particles, which is defined as the vector sum over the individual particle operators: J → ^ = ∑ p L → ^ ( p ) , J ^ 2 = J ^ x 2 + J ^ y 2 + J ^ z 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_108_B.tif"/> such that, because the coordinate and momentum operator for two different particles are commuting operators, we have: 8.1 [ J ^ x , J ^ y ] = [ ∑ p L ^ x ( p ) , ∑ q L ^ y ( q ) ] = ∑ p ∑ q [ L ^ x ( p ) , L ^ y ( q ) ] = ∑ p [ L ^ x ( p ) , L ^ y ( q ) ] = i h ∑ p [ L ^ z ( p ) = i h J ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_1_B.tif"/> and similarly: 8.2 [ J ^ y , J ^ z ] = i h J ^ x , [ J ^ z , J ^ x ] = i h J ^ y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_2_B.tif"/>

DOI
10.1201/9781003078265-9

Related papers

Rotations and Angular Momentum

Richard P. Feynman

In the last lecture we spoke about an apparatus that produced an object in condition a: https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429492501/e6a0c676-1f8d-4684-97a0-6bf3353f7ce0/content/pg11_1.tif"/>

CRC Press eBooks•Feb 19, 2018•0 citations

Total Angular Momentum

Lukong Cornelius Fai

The infinitesimal symmetry transformation generator, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> D ^ ϕ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math4_1.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> , is recognizable dynamical variable in a simple situation and so can be used to define a dynamical variable in a more complicated situation. We take an example of a particle possessing an internal degree of freedom related to an intrinsic angular momentum, the so-called spin (pseudo vector), described by the spin operator, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> S ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math4_2.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> . So, the total wave function, considering the definition in Equation 3.314 should be 4.1 https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> Ψ r → , σ = Ψ r → X σ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math4_3.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/>

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 19, 2022•0 citations

Electron Motion in the Atom

M.S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

Spherically symmetric systems, where the potential energy U(r) is independent of the direction of r → https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn7_1_B.tif"/> , are usually treated using spherical polar coordinates (r,θ,φ), related to the Cartesian coordinates as shown by Eqs.(2.20) and ( 2.21) . Therefore, in view of the appropriate form ( 2.36) of the Hamiltonian, the Schrodinger wave equation for Ψ (r.θ,φ) reads: 7.1 H ^ Ψ = − h 2 m [ 1 r 2 ∂ ∂ r ( r 2 ∂ Ψ ∂ r ) + 1 r 2 sin θ ∂ ∂ θ ( sin θ ∂ Ψ ∂ θ ) + 1 r 2 sin 2 θ ∂ 2 Ψ ∂ φ 2 ] + U ( r ) Ψ = E Ψ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_1_B.tif"/> In contrast to the motion of a particle whose potential energy depends on Cartesian coordinates, where the Schrödinger equation can be separated into three equations pertaining to motions along the axes x, y, z, which are independent of one another (see Problem 5.4.2 ), Eq.(7.1) also separates into equations pertaining to motions along the coordinates r, θ and φ, but the three types of motion are no longer independent. The separation of variables is made in two stages, first substituting into the energy eigenvalue equation the trial solution: 7.2 Ψ ( r , θ , φ ) = R ( r ) Y ( θ , φ ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_2_B.tif"/> This transforms Eq.(7.1) in the form: 7.3 h 2 2 m [ 1 r ∂ ∂ r ( r 2 ∂ R ∂ r ) ] + r 2 [ E − U ( r ) ] = − h 2 2 m 1 Y [ 1 sin θ ∂ ∂ θ ( sin θ ∂ Y ∂ θ ) + 1 sin 2 θ ∂ 2 Y ∂ φ 2 ] https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_3_B.tif"/> where one side is independent of θ and φ , and the other side is independent of r , so that they must be separately equal to some constant, which is conveniently chosen as L 2 / 2 m. In this way we separate the radial motion, described by an ordinary differential equation where ∂ /∂r is replaced by d/dr: 7.4 [ − h 2 2 m 1 r 2 d d r ( r 2 d d r ) + U ( r ) + L 2 2 m r 2 ] R ( r ) = E R ( r ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_4_B.tif"/> 243 from the rotational motion, described by the angular equation: 7.5 − h 2 [ 1 sin θ ∂ ∂ θ ( sin θ ∂ ∂ θ ) + 1 sin 2 θ ∂ 2 ∂ φ 2 ] Y= L 2 Y or L ^ 2 Y= L 2 Y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_5_B.tif"/> which is the eigenvalue problem for orbital angular momentum, represented by the operator ( 2.33) . This separation corresponds to the classical splitting of kinetic energy among the two types of motion. The second stage of the separation process assumes that: 7.6 Y( θ , φ )= P ( θ ) Φ ( φ ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_6_B.tif"/> such that Eq.(7.5) becomes: 7.7 h 2 [ sin θ P ( θ ) ∂ ∂ θ ( sin θ ∂ P ( θ ) ∂ θ ) + L 2 h 2 sin 2 θ ] = − h 2 1 Φ ( φ ) ∂ 2 Φ ( φ ) ∂ φ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_7_B.tif"/> Since one side is independent of φ , while the other is independent of θ , they must each be equal to a constant, which we call L z 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn7_2_B.tif"/> , and this yields two other ordinary differential equations: 7.8 − h 2 d 2 d φ 2 Φ ( φ ) = L z 2 Φ ( φ ) or L ^ z 2 Φ ( φ ) = L z 2 Φ ( φ ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_8_B.tif"/> where L ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn7_3_B.tif"/> is defined by Eq.(2.25) , and: 7.9 1 sin θ d d θ ( sin θ d P ( θ ) d θ ) ( L 2 h 2 − L z 2 h 2 sin 2 θ ) P ( θ ) = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_9_B.tif"/>

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2020•0 citations

ORBITAL ANGULAR MOMENTUM

Mircea S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

The operator is contained in the expression (31.1) of the central field Hamiltonian, and this can be shown using Eq.(31.6), where the component operators are replaced by their forms (29.16) written in Cartesian coordinates, and this gives ⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂−⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂−= z x x z z x x z y z z y y z z yL 222ˆ == ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂− x y y x x y y x2= It is a straightforward matter to show that this relation may also be written as ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂−= 2 2 yx z xz y zy xL = ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+ z z y y x x xz zx zy yz yx xy 222222 222 2= We now use the expansion ( )2 2ˆ ˆr p x y z x y zx y z x y z⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⋅ = − + + + +⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠G G = ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂−= z z y y x x xz zx zy yz yx xy z z y y x x so that the addition of the last two relations yields ( ) ( ) 2 2 222 2 2 2 2 22 2 2ˆ ˆLˆ r p x y z x y zx y zx y z⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ ⋅ = − + + + + + + +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂∂ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠G G = = ( )pripr ˆˆˆ 22 GG=G ⋅+= (31.10) It follows that the momentum can be expressed as ( ) ( ) ( ) rrr r r L r priprL r p ∂ ∂−⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ⋅−⋅+= 2 ˆ1ˆˆˆˆˆ1ˆ ==GG=GGG (31.11) where the radial part results from the substitution of Eq. (I.20), Appendix I, which gives 1 1ˆ sinr p i i e e e r r rθ ϕθ θ ϕ ⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂= − ∇ = − + +⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ G G G G= = and hence ˆ ˆr p i r r ∂⋅ = − ∂ G G = Therefore the Hamiltonian (31.1) becomes ( )rUL rrrr r rm H + ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ −∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−= 222 2 ˆ111 2 ˆ = = and reduces to the equivalent form ( )rUL rr r rrm H +⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ −⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ 2 ˆ11 2 ˆ = = (31.12) used for a particle bound by a central force field. 31.2. EIGENVALUE EQUATIONS IN A CENTRAL FIELD Spherically symmetric systems, where the potential energy ( )rU is independent of the direction of ,rG are usually treated using the spherical coordinates ( )ϕθ ,,r related to the Cartesian coordinates as referred to in Appendix I, Eq.(I.19). As the angle θ is defined by the inclination to the z-axis, it is mathematically convenient to take the direction of the component of ( zyx ,, ) L G that is compatible with (in the sense introduced in Chapter 34) to be the z-axis. Therefore we consider the eigenvalue equations of the operators and given by ˆ ˆ, zH L 2Lˆ ( ) ( )ˆ , , , ,H r rθ ϕ ε θ ϕΨ = Ψ ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ ,,,,ˆ rLrL zz Ψ=Ψ (31.13) ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ ,,,,ˆ 22 rLrL Ψ=Ψ The appropriate form of the Hamiltonian Hˆ is conveniently written using the standard expression (I.23) of the Laplace operator in spherical coordinates as 2∇ ( )rU rrr r rrm H +⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂−= 2 sin 1sin sin 11 2 ˆ ϕθθθθθ = (31.14) Using the transformation (I.19) from Cartesian to spherical coordinates and the chain rule for differentiation, we find sin sin sin cosx y z r r x y x y z x y y θ ϕ θ ϕϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂= + + = − + = −∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂x so that the operator takes the form zLˆ ϕ∂ ∂=⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂= ix y y x i Lz ==ˆ (31.15) Furthermore, from Eqs.(31.12) and (31.14) it follows that is in fact expressed by that part of Hamiltonian which operates on the angular variables 2Lˆ ,θ ϕ only, that is, ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂−= 2 sin 1sin sin 1ˆ ϕθθθθθ=L (31.16) The energy eigenfunctions in central field, which are simultaneously eigenfunctions of and are subjected, in addition to the usual bound state requirement (30.21), to the single-valueness condition zLˆ 2ˆ ,L ( ) ( )πϕθϕθ 2,,,, +Ψ=Ψ rr since the points ϕ and πϕ 2+ are in fact the same physical point. The solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation (31.13) in central field can be found by a process of separation of variables, yielding three ordinary differential equations in the variables ,r θ and ,ϕ respectively, to which a physical significance will be assigned. It is common practice to separate the variables in two stages, first substituting the trial solution ( ) ( ) ( ), , ,r R r Yθ ϕΨ = θ ϕ (31.17) into the energy eigenvalue equation. If the Hamiltonian is expanded in spherical coordinates, as given by Eq.(31.14), Eq.(31.13) becomes ( )2 22 2 2 21 1 1 sin2 2 sin sin 21R Y Yr U r r m R r r m Y ε θθ θ θ θ ϕ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎡ ⎤+ − = − +⎢ ⎥⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ = = (31.18) One side is independent of θ and ,ϕ and the other side is independent of r, so they must be separately equal to some constant, which is conveniently chosen to be equal to In this way we obtain a radial equation, given by .2/2 mL ( ) ( ) ( )rRrR mr LrU dr dr dr d rm ε=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛− 2 2 1 2 = (31.19) where was replaced by for obvious reasons, and an angular equation, having the so-called spherical harmonics r∂∂ / drd / ( ),Y θ ϕ as solutions, which reads 2 2 ˆor sin 1sin sin 1 ==⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂− ϕθθθθθ= (31.20) The form of the spherical harmonics is obtained as a result of the second stage of the separation process, where we assume that ( ) ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ Φ= PY , so that Eq.(31.20) becomes 2 2 1sinsinsin ϕθθθθ θ ∂ Φ∂ Φ−=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ +⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ === LP P (31.21) Since one side is independent of ϕ while the other is independent of ,θ they must each be equal to a constant, which we call We thus obtain the differential equations .2zL d L dϕ Φ 2− = Φ= (31.22) where again ϕ∂∂ / has been replaced by ϕdd / , and 0 sin sin sin 1 22 ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ −+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ PLL d dP d d z θθθθθ === (31.23) where θ∂∂ / has been replaced by θdd / . Therefore the energy equation (31.13) completely separates, in central field, into a radial equation (31.19) and two angular equations (31.22) and (31.23). The radial equation, giving the energy levels ε of the system, takes the form ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rRrR mr LrUrR dr d rdr d m ε=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ +− 2 2 2 2 = (31.24) which can be simplified by making the substitution ( ) ( )rrRr =ξ (31.25) and using the identity 2 1r dd d r dr r rdr dr ξ ξ⎛ ⎞+ =⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ r Thus Eq.(31.24) reduces to ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rr mr LrU dr rd m εξξξ =⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++− 2 22 = (31.26) which is formally identical to the time-independent Schrödinger equation in one dimension (30.17), provided the central force potential ( )rU is replaced by an effective potential energy of the form ( ) ( ) 2 2 2mr LrUrUeff += The repulsive potential, associated with the angular momentum, modifies the central potential as illustrated before, see Figure 3.3, for ( ) rCrU /−= . Further progress with the solution of the radial equation depends on the particular form of the potential function . We shall consider the significant example of one-electron atoms in the next chapter.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 8, 2014•1 citation

Eigenstates and the Third Postulate

M.S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

The representation of physical observables by Hermitian linear operators was postulated assuming that an expectation value, defined by Eqs.(2.11) and (2.12) , is associated with any observable A measured in a quantum state Ψ of a dynamical system. In view of measurement uncertainties, defined by the dispersion: ( Δ A ) 2 = 〈 A 2 〉 − 〈 A 〉 2 = 〈 ( A − 〈 A 〉 ) 2 〉 = 〈 ( δ A ) 2 〉 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_1_B.tif"/> the expectation value 〈 A 〉 is taken in a state Ψ if and only if (Δ Α ) 2 vanishes. It is convenient to introduce the deviation operator: 3.1 δ  =  − 〈 A 〉 Î https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_2_B.tif"/> such that the condition of a vanishing dispersion for the observable A in a given state Ψ reads: 〈 Ψ |( δ  ) 2 Ψ 〉 = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_3_B.tif"/> Because δ is a Hermitian operator, we can also write: 〈 δ Â Ψ | δ Â Ψ 〉 = | δ Â Ψ | 2 = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_4_B.tif"/> which means that the norm of δ Â Ψ is zero and this implies that we have a null function δ Â Ψ = 0. In other words: 3.2 Â Ψ = 〈 A 〉 Ψ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_5_B.tif"/> It follows that the state function Ψ where a definite expectation value 〈 A 〉 of the observable A is observed, should be a solution of Eq.(3.2) rather than an arbitrary 112 function. The action of the operator  on Ψ has to be simply that of rescaling. All the state functions which are solutions of Eq.(3.2) are called eigenfunctions of  , and the constant factor 〈 A 〉 is said to be the corresponding eigenvalue. Hence we have shown that if ((δ  ) 2 ) = 0, the state function should be an eigenfunction of  , which means that a physical observable only takes definite values in states represented by eigenfunctions of the associated quantum operator. Conversely, given a quantum operator  one can systematically determine all its eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, which are solutions of the so-called eigenvalue equation: 3.3 Â Ψ = λ Ψ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_6_B.tif"/> It is visible that the eigenvalue equation fixes the eigenfunctions only up to an overall scale factor, which may always be chosen such that the eigenfunctions be considered normalized. Then, in view of Eq.(2.11) , Eq.(3.3) gives: 〈  〉 = ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ * Â Ψ d x = λ ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ * Ψ d x = λ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_7_B.tif"/> If we further apply the operator  to Eq.(3.3) , we obtain  2 Ψ = λ 2 Ψ and this leads to: 〈  2 〉 = ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ *  2 Ψ d x = λ 2 ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ * Ψ d x = λ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_8_B.tif"/> It follows that: ( Δ A ) 2 = 〈  2 〉 − 〈  〉 2 = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_9_B.tif"/> and this shows that the dispersion vanishes if a physical observable is measured in states represented by eigenfunctions of the associated operator.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2020•0 citations

Chapter 11. Angular Momentum and the Position Operators

Dennis Morris

De Gruyter eBooks•May 27, 2016•0 citations
The orbital angular momentum operator has been introduced by Postulate 2 as a vector operator L → ^ = r → × p → ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_1_B.tif"/> whose Cartesian components, Eq.(2.18) , correspond to those of the classical observable for a single particle. As a consequence of Postulate 4, the components L ^ x https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_2_B.tif"/> , L ^ y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_3_B.tif"/> and L ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_4_B.tif"/> do not commute with one another, Eq.(4.47) , and all commute with L ^ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_5_B.tif"/> , and this implies that the eigenstates of L → ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_6_B.tif"/> are simultaneous eigenfunctions of L ^ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_7_B.tif"/> and of one component L ^ i https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_8_B.tif"/> , at a time. Similar properties are exhibited by the angular momentum vector operator of a system of particles, which is defined as the vector sum over the individual particle operators: J → ^ = ∑ p L → ^ ( p ) , J ^ 2 = J ^ x 2 + J ^ y 2 + J ^ z 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_108_B.tif"/> such that, because the coordinate and momentum operator for two different particles are commuting operators, we have: 8.1 [ J ^ x , J ^ y ] = [ ∑ p L ^ x ( p ) , ∑ q L ^ y ( q ) ] = ∑ p ∑ q [ L ^ x ( p ) , L ^ y ( q ) ] = ∑ p [ L ^ x ( p ) , L ^ y ( q ) ] = i h ∑ p [ L ^ z ( p ) = i h J ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_1_B.tif"/> and similarly: 8.2 [ J ^ y , J ^ z ] = i h J ^ x , [ J ^ z , J ^ x ] = i h J ^ y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_2_B.tif"/>
The infinitesimal symmetry transformation generator, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> D ^ ϕ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math4_1.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> , is recognizable dynamical variable in a simple situation and so can be used to define a dynamical variable in a more complicated situation. We take an example of a particle possessing an internal degree of freedom related to an intrinsic angular momentum, the so-called spin (pseudo vector), described by the spin operator, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> S ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math4_2.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> . So, the total wave function, considering the definition in Equation 3.314 should be 4.1 https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> Ψ r → , σ = Ψ r → X σ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math4_3.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/>
Spherically symmetric systems, where the potential energy U(r) is independent of the direction of r → https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn7_1_B.tif"/> , are usually treated using spherical polar coordinates (r,θ,φ), related to the Cartesian coordinates as shown by Eqs.(2.20) and ( 2.21) . Therefore, in view of the appropriate form ( 2.36) of the Hamiltonian, the Schrodinger wave equation for Ψ (r.θ,φ) reads: 7.1 H ^ Ψ = − h 2 m [ 1 r 2 ∂ ∂ r ( r 2 ∂ Ψ ∂ r ) + 1 r 2 sin θ ∂ ∂ θ ( sin θ ∂ Ψ ∂ θ ) + 1 r 2 sin 2 θ ∂ 2 Ψ ∂ φ 2 ] + U ( r ) Ψ = E Ψ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_1_B.tif"/> In contrast to the motion of a particle whose potential energy depends on Cartesian coordinates, where the Schrödinger equation can be separated into three equations pertaining to motions along the axes x, y, z, which are independent of one another (see Problem 5.4.2 ), Eq.(7.1) also separates into equations pertaining to motions along the coordinates r, θ and φ, but the three types of motion are no longer independent. The separation of variables is made in two stages, first substituting into the energy eigenvalue equation the trial solution: 7.2 Ψ ( r , θ , φ ) = R ( r ) Y ( θ , φ ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_2_B.tif"/> This transforms Eq.(7.1) in the form: 7.3 h 2 2 m [ 1 r ∂ ∂ r ( r 2 ∂ R ∂ r ) ] + r 2 [ E − U ( r ) ] = − h 2 2 m 1 Y [ 1 sin θ ∂ ∂ θ ( sin θ ∂ Y ∂ θ ) + 1 sin 2 θ ∂ 2 Y ∂ φ 2 ] https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_3_B.tif"/> where one side is independent of θ and φ , and the other side is independent of r , so that they must be separately equal to some constant, which is conveniently chosen as L 2 / 2 m. In this way we separate the radial motion, described by an ordinary differential equation where ∂ /∂r is replaced by d/dr: 7.4 [ − h 2 2 m 1 r 2 d d r ( r 2 d d r ) + U ( r ) + L 2 2 m r 2 ] R ( r ) = E R ( r ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_4_B.tif"/> 243 from the rotational motion, described by the angular equation: 7.5 − h 2 [ 1 sin θ ∂ ∂ θ ( sin θ ∂ ∂ θ ) + 1 sin 2 θ ∂ 2 ∂ φ 2 ] Y= L 2 Y or L ^ 2 Y= L 2 Y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_5_B.tif"/> which is the eigenvalue problem for orbital angular momentum, represented by the operator ( 2.33) . This separation corresponds to the classical splitting of kinetic energy among the two types of motion. The second stage of the separation process assumes that: 7.6 Y( θ , φ )= P ( θ ) Φ ( φ ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_6_B.tif"/> such that Eq.(7.5) becomes: 7.7 h 2 [ sin θ P ( θ ) ∂ ∂ θ ( sin θ ∂ P ( θ ) ∂ θ ) + L 2 h 2 sin 2 θ ] = − h 2 1 Φ ( φ ) ∂ 2 Φ ( φ ) ∂ φ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_7_B.tif"/> Since one side is independent of φ , while the other is independent of θ , they must each be equal to a constant, which we call L z 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn7_2_B.tif"/> , and this yields two other ordinary differential equations: 7.8 − h 2 d 2 d φ 2 Φ ( φ ) = L z 2 Φ ( φ ) or L ^ z 2 Φ ( φ ) = L z 2 Φ ( φ ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_8_B.tif"/> where L ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn7_3_B.tif"/> is defined by Eq.(2.25) , and: 7.9 1 sin θ d d θ ( sin θ d P ( θ ) d θ ) ( L 2 h 2 − L z 2 h 2 sin 2 θ ) P ( θ ) = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn7_9_B.tif"/>
The operator is contained in the expression (31.1) of the central field Hamiltonian, and this can be shown using Eq.(31.6), where the component operators are replaced by their forms (29.16) written in Cartesian coordinates, and this gives ⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂−⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂−= z x x z z x x z y z z y y z z yL 222ˆ == ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂− x y y x x y y x2= It is a straightforward matter to show that this relation may also be written as ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂−= 2 2 yx z xz y zy xL = ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+ z z y y x x xz zx zy yz yx xy 222222 222 2= We now use the expansion ( )2 2ˆ ˆr p x y z x y zx y z x y z⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⋅ = − + + + +⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠G G = ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂−= z z y y x x xz zx zy yz yx xy z z y y x x so that the addition of the last two relations yields ( ) ( ) 2 2 222 2 2 2 2 22 2 2ˆ ˆLˆ r p x y z x y zx y zx y z⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ ⋅ = − + + + + + + +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂∂ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠G G = = ( )pripr ˆˆˆ 22 GG=G ⋅+= (31.10) It follows that the momentum can be expressed as ( ) ( ) ( ) rrr r r L r priprL r p ∂ ∂−⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ⋅−⋅+= 2 ˆ1ˆˆˆˆˆ1ˆ ==GG=GGG (31.11) where the radial part results from the substitution of Eq. (I.20), Appendix I, which gives 1 1ˆ sinr p i i e e e r r rθ ϕθ θ ϕ ⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂= − ∇ = − + +⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ G G G G= = and hence ˆ ˆr p i r r ∂⋅ = − ∂ G G = Therefore the Hamiltonian (31.1) becomes ( )rUL rrrr r rm H + ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ −∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−= 222 2 ˆ111 2 ˆ = = and reduces to the equivalent form ( )rUL rr r rrm H +⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ −⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ 2 ˆ11 2 ˆ = = (31.12) used for a particle bound by a central force field. 31.2. EIGENVALUE EQUATIONS IN A CENTRAL FIELD Spherically symmetric systems, where the potential energy ( )rU is independent of the direction of ,rG are usually treated using the spherical coordinates ( )ϕθ ,,r related to the Cartesian coordinates as referred to in Appendix I, Eq.(I.19). As the angle θ is defined by the inclination to the z-axis, it is mathematically convenient to take the direction of the component of ( zyx ,, ) L G that is compatible with (in the sense introduced in Chapter 34) to be the z-axis. Therefore we consider the eigenvalue equations of the operators and given by ˆ ˆ, zH L 2Lˆ ( ) ( )ˆ , , , ,H r rθ ϕ ε θ ϕΨ = Ψ ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ ,,,,ˆ rLrL zz Ψ=Ψ (31.13) ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ ,,,,ˆ 22 rLrL Ψ=Ψ The appropriate form of the Hamiltonian Hˆ is conveniently written using the standard expression (I.23) of the Laplace operator in spherical coordinates as 2∇ ( )rU rrr r rrm H +⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂−= 2 sin 1sin sin 11 2 ˆ ϕθθθθθ = (31.14) Using the transformation (I.19) from Cartesian to spherical coordinates and the chain rule for differentiation, we find sin sin sin cosx y z r r x y x y z x y y θ ϕ θ ϕϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂= + + = − + = −∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂x so that the operator takes the form zLˆ ϕ∂ ∂=⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂= ix y y x i Lz ==ˆ (31.15) Furthermore, from Eqs.(31.12) and (31.14) it follows that is in fact expressed by that part of Hamiltonian which operates on the angular variables 2Lˆ ,θ ϕ only, that is, ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂−= 2 sin 1sin sin 1ˆ ϕθθθθθ=L (31.16) The energy eigenfunctions in central field, which are simultaneously eigenfunctions of and are subjected, in addition to the usual bound state requirement (30.21), to the single-valueness condition zLˆ 2ˆ ,L ( ) ( )πϕθϕθ 2,,,, +Ψ=Ψ rr since the points ϕ and πϕ 2+ are in fact the same physical point. The solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation (31.13) in central field can be found by a process of separation of variables, yielding three ordinary differential equations in the variables ,r θ and ,ϕ respectively, to which a physical significance will be assigned. It is common practice to separate the variables in two stages, first substituting the trial solution ( ) ( ) ( ), , ,r R r Yθ ϕΨ = θ ϕ (31.17) into the energy eigenvalue equation. If the Hamiltonian is expanded in spherical coordinates, as given by Eq.(31.14), Eq.(31.13) becomes ( )2 22 2 2 21 1 1 sin2 2 sin sin 21R Y Yr U r r m R r r m Y ε θθ θ θ θ ϕ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎡ ⎤+ − = − +⎢ ⎥⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ = = (31.18) One side is independent of θ and ,ϕ and the other side is independent of r, so they must be separately equal to some constant, which is conveniently chosen to be equal to In this way we obtain a radial equation, given by .2/2 mL ( ) ( ) ( )rRrR mr LrU dr dr dr d rm ε=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛− 2 2 1 2 = (31.19) where was replaced by for obvious reasons, and an angular equation, having the so-called spherical harmonics r∂∂ / drd / ( ),Y θ ϕ as solutions, which reads 2 2 ˆor sin 1sin sin 1 ==⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂− ϕθθθθθ= (31.20) The form of the spherical harmonics is obtained as a result of the second stage of the separation process, where we assume that ( ) ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ Φ= PY , so that Eq.(31.20) becomes 2 2 1sinsinsin ϕθθθθ θ ∂ Φ∂ Φ−=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ +⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ === LP P (31.21) Since one side is independent of ϕ while the other is independent of ,θ they must each be equal to a constant, which we call We thus obtain the differential equations .2zL d L dϕ Φ 2− = Φ= (31.22) where again ϕ∂∂ / has been replaced by ϕdd / , and 0 sin sin sin 1 22 ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ −+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ PLL d dP d d z θθθθθ === (31.23) where θ∂∂ / has been replaced by θdd / . Therefore the energy equation (31.13) completely separates, in central field, into a radial equation (31.19) and two angular equations (31.22) and (31.23). The radial equation, giving the energy levels ε of the system, takes the form ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rRrR mr LrUrR dr d rdr d m ε=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ +− 2 2 2 2 = (31.24) which can be simplified by making the substitution ( ) ( )rrRr =ξ (31.25) and using the identity 2 1r dd d r dr r rdr dr ξ ξ⎛ ⎞+ =⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ r Thus Eq.(31.24) reduces to ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rr mr LrU dr rd m εξξξ =⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++− 2 22 = (31.26) which is formally identical to the time-independent Schrödinger equation in one dimension (30.17), provided the central force potential ( )rU is replaced by an effective potential energy of the form ( ) ( ) 2 2 2mr LrUrUeff += The repulsive potential, associated with the angular momentum, modifies the central potential as illustrated before, see Figure 3.3, for ( ) rCrU /−= . Further progress with the solution of the radial equation depends on the particular form of the potential function . We shall consider the significant example of one-electron atoms in the next chapter.
The representation of physical observables by Hermitian linear operators was postulated assuming that an expectation value, defined by Eqs.(2.11) and (2.12) , is associated with any observable A measured in a quantum state Ψ of a dynamical system. In view of measurement uncertainties, defined by the dispersion: ( Δ A ) 2 = 〈 A 2 〉 − 〈 A 〉 2 = 〈 ( A − 〈 A 〉 ) 2 〉 = 〈 ( δ A ) 2 〉 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_1_B.tif"/> the expectation value 〈 A 〉 is taken in a state Ψ if and only if (Δ Α ) 2 vanishes. It is convenient to introduce the deviation operator: 3.1 δ  =  − 〈 A 〉 Î https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_2_B.tif"/> such that the condition of a vanishing dispersion for the observable A in a given state Ψ reads: 〈 Ψ |( δ  ) 2 Ψ 〉 = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_3_B.tif"/> Because δ is a Hermitian operator, we can also write: 〈 δ Â Ψ | δ Â Ψ 〉 = | δ Â Ψ | 2 = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_4_B.tif"/> which means that the norm of δ Â Ψ is zero and this implies that we have a null function δ Â Ψ = 0. In other words: 3.2 Â Ψ = 〈 A 〉 Ψ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_5_B.tif"/> It follows that the state function Ψ where a definite expectation value 〈 A 〉 of the observable A is observed, should be a solution of Eq.(3.2) rather than an arbitrary 112 function. The action of the operator  on Ψ has to be simply that of rescaling. All the state functions which are solutions of Eq.(3.2) are called eigenfunctions of  , and the constant factor 〈 A 〉 is said to be the corresponding eigenvalue. Hence we have shown that if ((δ  ) 2 ) = 0, the state function should be an eigenfunction of  , which means that a physical observable only takes definite values in states represented by eigenfunctions of the associated quantum operator. Conversely, given a quantum operator  one can systematically determine all its eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, which are solutions of the so-called eigenvalue equation: 3.3 Â Ψ = λ Ψ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_6_B.tif"/> It is visible that the eigenvalue equation fixes the eigenfunctions only up to an overall scale factor, which may always be chosen such that the eigenfunctions be considered normalized. Then, in view of Eq.(2.11) , Eq.(3.3) gives: 〈  〉 = ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ * Â Ψ d x = λ ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ * Ψ d x = λ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_7_B.tif"/> If we further apply the operator  to Eq.(3.3) , we obtain  2 Ψ = λ 2 Ψ and this leads to: 〈  2 〉 = ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ *  2 Ψ d x = λ 2 ∫ − ∞ ∞ Ψ * Ψ d x = λ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_8_B.tif"/> It follows that: ( Δ A ) 2 = 〈  2 〉 − 〈  〉 2 = 0 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn3_9_B.tif"/> and this shows that the dispersion vanishes if a physical observable is measured in states represented by eigenfunctions of the associated operator.